TMDL for Diazinon in TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tmdl for diazinon in tmdl for diazinon in chollas creek
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TMDL for Diazinon in TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TMDL for Diazinon in TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) 627-3932 Linda Pardy (858) 627-3932 <PARDL@RB9.SWRCB.CA.GOV> <PARDL@RB9.SWRCB.CA.GOV> and and Jimmy Smith (858)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TMDL for Diazinon in TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Chollas Creek Watershed

Linda Pardy (858) 627-3932 Linda Pardy (858) 627-3932

<PARDL@RB9.SWRCB.CA.GOV> <PARDL@RB9.SWRCB.CA.GOV>

and and Jimmy Smith (858) 467-2732 Jimmy Smith (858) 467-2732

<SMITJ@RB9.SWRCB.CA.GOV> <SMITJ@RB9.SWRCB.CA.GOV>

www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb9 www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb9

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Resolution No. R9-2002-0123 Resolution No. R9-2002-0123 Total Maximum Daily Load Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) (TMDL) for Diazinon in for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Chollas Creek Watershed San Diego County San Diego County

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Clean Water Act,

Section 303(d) list

  • Beneficial Uses:

WARM & WILD

Requirement for a TMDL Requirement for a TMDL

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Water flea
  • Freshwater minnow

Toxicity Testing Toxicity Testing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fathead Minnow acute chronic chronic 12 of 18 16 of 18 7 of 12 66% 89% 58%

  • C. dubia

acute 13 of 36 36% Toxicity Hits

  • C. dubia

Station SD8(1) Toxicity (1994 - 2002) Toxicity Hits North and South Fork Toxicity in 2000 - 2001

Toxicity Summary Toxicity Summary

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Toxicity Identity Evaluation Toxicity Identity Evaluation

  • TIE to determine primary

TIE to determine primary constituents causing toxicity constituents causing toxicity

Diazinon Diazinon? ? ? ? Copper? Lead? Copper? Lead? ? Zinc? ? Zinc? Chlorpyrifos Chlorpyrifos? ?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Watershed Location Watershed Location

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Jurisdiction in Jurisdiction in Chollas Chollas Creek Creek

Yellow = City of San Diego, 17,437 acres (84%) Tan = La Mesa, 1,613 acres (8%) Dark Brown = Lemon Grove, 1,646 acres (8%) Green = Unincorporated, 121 acres (<1%)

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Concentration-based TMDL
  • Numeric Targets =

California Department of Fish and Game Water Quality Criteria for protection of freshwater aquatic life from diazinon – Acute criterion = 0.08 ug/L – Chronic criterion = 0.05 ug/L

Numeric Targets Numeric Targets

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 10% Margin of Safety
  • Waste Load and Load Allocations are

applied equally to all discharges

– Allocations = 90% numeric targets – 0.072 ug/L acute exposure – 0.045 ug/L chronic exposure

Allocation Targets Allocation Targets

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Health & Safety Code Section 57004
  • All comments considered

Scientific Peer Review Scientific Peer Review

T M D L

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Major Components (1) USEPA diazinon phase-out (2) Modification of MS4 Permit (3) Reduce diazinon discharges

Implementation Plan Implementation Plan

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Major Components cont. (3) Reduce Diazinon discharges

  • Enforce existing local ordinances & adopt

new legal authority

  • Diazinon Toxicity Control Plan

(To include a focused public outreach/ education program on diazinon waste load reduction)

Implementation Plan Implementation Plan

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Minor Components

(1 & 2) Compliance w/ the MS4 permit & existing Basin Plan waste discharge prohibitions (3) Enforcement authority of Regional Bd (4) Modification of other existing WDRs (5) Adopt new WDRs or NPDES permits (6) Additional investigations & reports pursuant to Water Code Section 13267

Implementation Plan Implementation Plan

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Monitoring Plan – Assess effectiveness of TMDL – Assess implementation measures

  • Water Quality objectives
  • Beneficial uses

Implementation Plan Implementation Plan

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • No potential for adverse social
  • r environmental effects

Environmental Review Environmental Review

T M D L

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Cost/Benefit analysis not required
  • Estimate cost of a reasonably

foreseeable method of compliance

  • Interagency collaboration critical for

TMDL implementation plan success

Economic Considerations Economic Considerations

T M D L

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Public Workshops

– March 17, 1999 – August 3, 1999 – December 17, 1999 – May 17, 2002

Additional Meetings with Interested parties (May 24, June

4, 5 & 10)

Public Participation Public Participation

T M D L

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Next Steps for TMDL Next Steps for TMDL

  • State Water Resources Control Board

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) (SWRCB)

  • Office of Administrative Law (OAL)

Office of Administrative Law (OAL)

  • US Environmental Protection Agency

US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (USEPA)

What’s next? What’s next?

T M D L

Staff recommends adoption of Staff recommends adoption of tentative Resolution R9-2002-0123 tentative Resolution R9-2002-0123

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Aquatic Wildlife in Aquatic Wildlife in Chollas Chollas Creek Creek

California killifish collected at Chollas Creek Estuary July 2000