TIP Selection 2016 Mountainland AOG Contacts Bob Allen | - PDF document

TIP Selection 2016 Mountainland AOG Contacts Bob Allen | 801/229-3813 | rallen@mountainland.org Shawn Eliot | 801/229-3841 | seliot@mountainland.org www.mountainland.org/tipselection

General Info TIP Selection 2016  Project selection - Every 2 years  Project Selection - Technical analysis of submitted proposals is done by MPO staff and MPO TAC - Final approval is recommended by MPO TAC approved by MPO RPC  Application - Municipalities, county, UDOT, UTA, and government sponsored private groups can apply - Starts with Project Idea Form and concludes with a Concept Report Mountainland AOG

Eligibility TIP Selection 2016  Projects, Programs, Studies - Road widening, new roads, shoulders - Traffic signal modernization (not new signals) - Transportation, land use studies - Safety projects, spot improvements - Active Transportation (Bike/Trail) - Bridge Projects - ITS, Transit, Park and Ride Projects - Air quality equipment/promotion Mountainland AOG

Eligibility TIP Selection 2016  Concept Report Government Approval - Local projects Concept Reports must be approved by municipal/county leadership (mayor, council, manager, commission). - Should be supported in General Plan and have had the opportunity for public comment. - UDOT, UTA and DAQ must be approved by the regional director. Mountainland AOG

Functional Class Map TIP Selection 2016  Highway and active transportation projects (trails/bike lanes) associated with a road must be on the functional highway system Mountainland AOG

TransPlan40 TIP Selection 2016  Project must be in or supported by TransPlan40 - Collector roads on functional class map OK Highways Active Transit Trans. Mountainland AOG

Funding TIP Selection 2016  MPO Programming - MPO federal funds and Utah County Transportation Sales Taxes - Generally available for FY2019-2020 - About $30m to $40m available - Project local match varies  Current Projects - Funded through 2018 - 43 projects totaling $184m Mountainland AOG

Funding TIP Selection 2016  Applied vs. Awarded Applied for and awarded 2008-2018 Alpine 1 American Fork 4 9 Awarded 1 DAQ Applied 4 Eagle Mountain 3 Elk Ridge 1 1 Highland Lehi 6 10 2 4 Lindon Mapleton 2 2 15 26 Orem Payson 3 Pleasant Grove 3 10 10 15 Provo Santaquin 2 2 5 7 Saratoga Springs Spanish Fork 7 11 Springville 5 8 UDOT 6 9 UDOT TOC 8 13 21 30 UTA Utah County 5 8 0 10 20 30 40 Mountainland AOG

Funding TIP Selection 2016  Distribution Funding by Sponsor 2008-2018 Total Funds $371.6m Utah County 21.3% Eagle Lehi 4.1% Mountain 3.3% DAQ 0.1% Lindon 1.8% Mapleton 1.1% American Fork 3.7% Orem 3.5% Payson 1.5% UTA 8.0% Pleasant Springville Grove 1.7% 0.6% Provo 8.1% Spanish Fork 3.3% Santaquin 1.1% Saratoga Springs 3.6% UDOT TOC 0.3% UDOT 34.3% Mountainland AOG

Beginning TIP Selection 2016  Kick Off - Held with MPO TAC and MPO RPC to explain the process, policy, forms, and dates Mountainland AOG

Project Ideas TIP Selection 2016  Project Idea Form - One page form that includes - Project description, type, phasing, ROW - Draft cost estimate - Local process info - Maps, diagrams, charts, etc. - MAG staff review draft form with sponsor, gives suggestions for final submittal - Sponsors present to MPO TAC - TAC votes to move project forward to Concept Report stage (non-binding) Mountainland AOG

Concept Report TIP Selection 2016  Concept Report - Requires more detailed cost estimating - All non-road widening projects require detailed air quality work - Blank form can be obtained along with the UDOT Cost Estimating Worksheet on the Mountainland webpage at www.mountainland.org/tipselection - Not all projects will use the UDOT Estimating Worksheet (transit, ITS) - Concept Report and accompanying info must be submitted in one PDF file - MAG staff review draft report with sponsor, gives suggestions for final submittal Mountainland AOG

Staff Ranking TIP Selection 2016  MPO Staff Ranking - MPO staff review each Concept Report - Use ranking matrix based off identified questions in the Concept Report - Staff ranking is given to MPO TAC as information, is non-binding Mountainland AOG

Field Review TIP Selection 2016  Field Review - Visit each project in the field that is viewable - MPO TAC members are invited on the tour - Sponsors present in the field what is being proposed - Typically weighs the most toward the final ranking of projects Mountainland AOG

Project Selection TIP Selection 2016  Create Project Ranking List - MPO TAC creates Project Ranking List - In ranking, committee members use their knowledge of the Concept Reports, MPO Staff Ranking, and Field Review - Available funding is not used in creating the ranking list - Each municipality, the county, UDOT, UTA, and DAQ have one vote per project - Voting is done with electronic tallying software Mountainland AOG

Project Funding TIP Selection 2016  Creating the Draft Funding List - MPO staff use the Project Ranking List created by MPO TAC to assign available funding - Most flexible funding sources are assigned to higher ranked projects - Federal funds are first used for UDOT and UTA projects - When complete, the Draft Funding List is returned to MPO TAC for review and recommendation to MPO RPC Mountainland AOG

Final Approval TIP Selection 2016  Project and Funding Approval - MPO RPC reviews the work done by MPO TAC - Final approval of the Project Ranking List and Funding List is by MPO RPC - Any projects not funded stay in ranking order for additional funding if they come available - Project Ranking List is valid for 2 years - During this time, projects can be amended to the list Mountainland AOG