TIP Selection 2016 Mountainland AOG Contacts Bob Allen | - - PDF document

TIP Selection 2016

Mountainland AOG

Contacts

Bob Allen | 801/229-3813 | rallen@mountainland.org Shawn Eliot | 801/229-3841 | seliot@mountainland.org www.mountainland.org/tipselection

 Project selection

• Every 2 years

 Project Selection

• Technical analysis of submitted proposals is

done by MPO staff and MPO TAC

• Final approval is recommended by MPO TAC

approved by MPO RPC  Application

• Municipalities, county, UDOT, UTA, and

government sponsored private groups can apply

• Starts with Project Idea Form and concludes

with a Concept Report

Mountainland AOG

General Info

TIP Selection 2016

 Projects, Programs, Studies

• Road widening, new roads, shoulders
• Traffic signal modernization (not new signals)
• Transportation, land use studies
• Safety projects, spot improvements
• Active Transportation (Bike/Trail)
• Bridge Projects
• ITS, Transit, Park and Ride Projects
• Air quality equipment/promotion

Mountainland AOG

Eligibility

TIP Selection 2016

 Concept Report Government Approval

• Local projects Concept Reports must be

approved by municipal/county leadership (mayor, council, manager, commission).

• Should be supported in General Plan and

have had the opportunity for public comment.

• UDOT, UTA and DAQ must be approved by

the regional director.

Mountainland AOG

Eligibility

TIP Selection 2016

Mountainland AOG

Functional Class Map

TIP Selection 2016

 Highway and active transportation projects (trails/bike lanes) associated with a road must be on the functional highway system

Mountainland AOG

TransPlan40

TIP Selection 2016

 Project must be in or supported by TransPlan40

• Collector roads on functional class map OK

Transit Highways Active Trans.

Funding

TIP Selection 2016

 MPO Programming

• MPO federal funds and Utah County

Transportation Sales Taxes

• Generally available for FY2019-2020
• About $30m to $40m available
• Project local match varies

 Current Projects

• Funded through 2018
• 43 projects totaling $184m

Mountainland AOG

Funding

TIP Selection 2016

 Applied vs. Awarded Applied for and awarded 2008-2018

8 30 13 9 8 11 7 2 15 10 3 26 2 4 10 1 1 4 1 9 1 5 21 8 6 5 7 5 2 10 3 15 2 2 6 3 4 10 20 30 40

Utah County UTA UDOT TOC UDOT Springville Spanish Fork Saratoga Springs Santaquin Provo Pleasant Grove Payson Orem Mapleton Lindon Lehi Highland Elk Ridge Eagle Mountain DAQ American Fork Alpine

Awarded Applied

Mountainland AOG

Funding

TIP Selection 2016

 Distribution Funding by Sponsor 2008-2018

Mountainland AOG

Utah County 21.3% Eagle Mountain 3.3% DAQ 0.1% American Fork 3.7% UTA 8.0% Springville 0.6% Spanish Fork 3.3% Saratoga Springs 3.6% UDOT 34.3% UDOT TOC 0.3% Santaquin 1.1% Provo 8.1% Pleasant Grove 1.7% Payson 1.5% Orem 3.5% Mapleton 1.1% Lindon 1.8% Lehi 4.1%

Total Funds $371.6m

Beginning

TIP Selection 2016

 Kick Off

• Held with MPO TAC and MPO RPC to

explain the process, policy, forms, and dates

Mountainland AOG

Project Ideas

TIP Selection 2016

 Project Idea Form

• One page form that includes
• Project description, type, phasing, ROW
• Draft cost estimate
• Local process info
• Maps, diagrams, charts, etc.
• MAG staff review draft form with sponsor,

gives suggestions for final submittal

• Sponsors present to MPO TAC
• TAC votes to move project forward to

Concept Report stage (non-binding)

Mountainland AOG

Concept Report

TIP Selection 2016

 Concept Report

• Requires more detailed cost estimating
• All non-road widening projects require

detailed air quality work

• Blank form can be obtained along with the

UDOT Cost Estimating Worksheet on the Mountainland webpage at www.mountainland.org/tipselection

• Not all projects will use the UDOT Estimating

Worksheet (transit, ITS)

• Concept Report and accompanying info

must be submitted in one PDF file

• MAG staff review draft report with sponsor,

gives suggestions for final submittal

Mountainland AOG

Staff Ranking

TIP Selection 2016

 MPO Staff Ranking

• MPO staff review each Concept Report
• Use ranking matrix based off identified

questions in the Concept Report

• Staff ranking is given to MPO TAC as

information, is non-binding

Mountainland AOG

Field Review

TIP Selection 2016

 Field Review

• Visit each project in the field that is viewable
• MPO TAC members are invited on the tour
• Sponsors present in the field what is being

proposed

• Typically weighs the most toward the final

ranking of projects

Mountainland AOG

Project Selection

TIP Selection 2016

 Create Project Ranking List

• MPO TAC creates Project Ranking List
• In ranking, committee members use their

knowledge of the Concept Reports, MPO Staff Ranking, and Field Review

• Available funding is not used in creating the

ranking list

• Each municipality, the county, UDOT, UTA,

and DAQ have one vote per project

• Voting is done with electronic tallying

software

Mountainland AOG

Project Funding

TIP Selection 2016

 Creating the Draft Funding List

• MPO staff use the Project Ranking List

created by MPO TAC to assign available funding

• Most flexible funding sources are assigned

to higher ranked projects

• Federal funds are first used for UDOT and

UTA projects

• When complete, the Draft Funding List is

returned to MPO TAC for review and recommendation to MPO RPC

Mountainland AOG

Final Approval

TIP Selection 2016

 Project and Funding Approval

• MPO RPC reviews the work done by MPO

TAC

• Final approval of the Project Ranking List

and Funding List is by MPO RPC

• Any projects not funded stay in ranking order

for additional funding if they come available

• Project Ranking List is valid for 2 years
• During this time, projects can be amended to

the list

Mountainland AOG