Time Series Analysis using Hilbert-Huang Transform [HHT] is one of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

time series analysis using hilbert huang transform
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Time Series Analysis using Hilbert-Huang Transform [HHT] is one of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Time Series Analysis using Hilbert-Huang Transform [HHT] is one of the most important discoveries in the field of applied mathematics in NASA history. Presented by Nathan Taylor & Brent Davis Terminology Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Time Series Analysis using Hilbert-Huang Transform

‘[HHT] is one of the most important discoveries in the field of applied mathematics in NASA history.’ Presented by Nathan Taylor & Brent Davis

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Terminology

Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF) Empirical – Relying on derived from observation or experiment Mode – A particular form, variety, or manner Decomposition – The separation of a whole into basic parts Intrinsic – Belonging naturally

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Computing the high frequency IMF

Find all local maxima of TS Find all local minima of TS Fit a curve through maxima Fit a curve through minima Find the mean of these two curves

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sifting: Subtract mean from Original Time Series

Subtract the mean from original TS The goal is after a number of siftings, to minimize the mean

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Repeat this process of sifting

Three Notes: The mean will approach zero. The two envelopes are becoming more symmetric.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

After multiple siftings Q: What property does it have?

The mean is now minimized, so we would like to develop a stopping criterion a) b) The number of extrema and zero crossings are alternating.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

EPICA C Ice Core IMF 1

The first IMF should have the highest frequency component.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Decomposing TS after multiple siftings

Residual + IMF1 = Original TS, Residual = Original TS – IMF1 . . .

Trend = Original TS – (IMF1 + IMF2 + … + IMFN)

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

About the trend

An application

  • f EMD is to find

a empirical trend line. The trend shouldn't have periodic behavior Here's the last IMF and original TS

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

What is mode mixing?

Cubic spline are not perfect if envelopes are close together and at a height away from zero Each IMF should have a dominant signal. Rather than get clean IMF signals there are combinations of frequencies

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Explanation of EEMD

Ensemble - A unit or group of complementary parts that contribute to a single effect. Outline:

Add white noise to original TS Create a set of IMFs using EMD Do this N times Take the average of each individual IMF

Result: New set of IMFs with less mode mixing

slide-22
SLIDE 22

EMD

slide-23
SLIDE 23

EEMD with 500 iterations

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Nonlinear Nonstationary (mean, variance

are functions of time

Local (frequency is

a function t)

Adaptive

FFT Frequency Power Spectrum: Mathematical artifacts

  • ccur when you

assume linear, stationary, global, and/or nonadaptive

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Analysis of each IMF

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Mathematical Artifacts of Time Series Analysis using HHT

Spacing:

  • Even vs. Uneven
  • Length of spacing

Curve Fitting:

  • Cubic Spline vs. Linear Interpolation

Level of white noise added We'll use the Vostok & Epica C Ice Core Data for examples

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Uneven versus Even Spacing – IMF 8

Notice the EEMD on the evenly spaced data pulls out a more uniform signal

slide-29
SLIDE 29

EMD v. EEMD – Cubic Spline IMF 8

Notice the EEMD pulls out a more uniform signal

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Linear Interpolation v. Cubic Spline – IMF 6

The cubic spline and the linear interpolation return almost the exact same signal

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Choices in Length of Spacing – IMF 6

The difference in spacing has little effect on the signal pulled out.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Varying Levels of Noise

Notice the decompositions with higher levels of noise pull out a more uniform signal.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

An Application of EEMD to Paleoclimatology

Paleoclimatology is the study

  • f climate change on a long

time scale typically using a proxy measurement. We looked at two: EPICA C Ice Core Data Measures Deuterium Content

slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Noise of 0.5 Ensemble of 500 IMF 5 IMF 4 IMF 3

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Welch Power Spectrum and Mean Periods of IMFs

Notice there are three noticeable peaks in each

100,000 year cycle? 40,000 year cycle? 20,000 year cycle?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Milankovitch cycles:

The earth axis completes one full cycle of precession every 26,000 years. The angle between Earth's rotational axis and the normal to the plane of its orbit, its obliquity, completes a full cycle every 41,000 years. The eccentricity is a measure of the departure of this ellipse from circularity Which combines to an approximate 100,000 year full cycle.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

The angle between Earth's rotational axis and the normal to the plane of its orbit, its obliquity, completes a full cycle every 41,000 years.

slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Epica C Correlation Results for Obliquity & IMF 4

Lag results: 6,820 years ahead yields 0.6964 Choice: If the obliquity is a forcing function with which the earth responds, then the lag is 6,820 years ahead.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Correlation between IMF 4 and Obliquity

without lag: coefficient: 0.3444 significance: 0.6220 with lag: coefficient: 0.6954 significance: 1.0000

slide-43
SLIDE 43

The eccentricity is a measure of the departure of this ellipse from circularity which combines to an approximate 100,000 year full cycle.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Correlation between IMF 5 and Eccentricity

coefficient: 0.5992 significance: 0.9940

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The earth axis completes one full cycle of precession every 26,000 years.

slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Epica C Correlation Results for Climatic Precession & IMF 3

Lag results: 16,368 years ahead yields 0.4225 Choice: If the precession is a forcing function with which the earth responds, then the lag is 16,368 years ahead.

slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Correlation between IMF 3 and Climatic Precession

without lag: coefficient: -0.164 significance: 0.35 with lag: coefficient: 0.4225 significance: 0.9100