Throckmorton Airfield Public Meeting 8 th Dec 2019 What are your - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

throckmorton airfield
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Throckmorton Airfield Public Meeting 8 th Dec 2019 What are your - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Throckmorton Airfield Public Meeting 8 th Dec 2019 What are your councils doing? PROFESSIONAL PLANNING CONSULTANT FOCUSING ON BIG CONCERNS Basis of site selection Suitability of site Contamination Distance from major


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Throckmorton “Airfield”

Public Meeting 8th Dec 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What are your councils doing?

PROFESSIONAL PLANNING CONSULTANT FOCUSING ON BIG CONCERNS

  • Basis of site selection
  • Suitability of site
  • Contamination
  • Distance from major employment sites + myth of non car transport
  • Green field
  • Impact on area
  • infrastructure
  • Congestion
  • Light pollution
  • Impact on quality of life and character of rural environment
  • Greater Pershore
  • Removal of villages
  • Removal of heritage, historical assets and rural environment
slide-3
SLIDE 3

What can the public do?

  • We believe the information presented is inadequate and

somewhat misleading ….. and some is not being made available at all

  • We also believe the communities have a right to have a

fuller picture

  • So we have tried to put together some of the biggest things

we feel are being “glossed over” by the SWDP plans.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Let’s start with the Map!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

…and then there’s the other Map!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Location

  • The Claim
  • SWDP – Throckmorton “airfield”
  • Brown Field Development
  • In Fact
  • Throckmorton “New Town”
  • Suitability of land means relatively little of the development will be on the

airfield itself, instead most will be Green field

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Scale : New Town

  • They talk about
  • 2000 homes (2031)
  • 4,600 people (2/3rds the size of Pershore 2018)
  • In Fact
  • Approval now will approve 6000 homes (beyond 2041)
  • 13,800 people (Nearly DOUBLE the size of Pershore 2018)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Suitability: Contamination

  • They talk about
  • Burial site “not really an issue”
  • “would just add a little to the cost”

(Comments of Planning officer at Throckmorton event)

  • In Fact
  • Burial sites are subject to significant on going scientific monitoring
  • They are to be monitored for 100 years due to the Bio Hazard they present
  • Scientific reports (latest 2017) recommend them not be disturbed – other

than for routine maintenance

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Suitability: Infrastructure

  • They talk about
  • 3 schools (2 primary one secondary)
  • Medical surgeries
  • Retail provisions
  • In Fact
  • Unclear when & how infrastructure investments will be triggered
  • The full provisions are unlikely to be much before the 6000
  • Meaning significant pressure on existing resources for up to 10 years
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Suitability: Transport links

  • They talk about
  • Sustainable transport – low emissions/ low carbon impact travel
  • Rail network
  • Foot and cycle distances to transport hubs and employment
  • In Fact
  • Inevitably major work centres will be Worcester & M5, Redditch & M42 and

Birmingham, Cheltenham and Stratford/Warwick …. ALL SIGNIFICANT COMMUTES from Throckmorton on already congested routes.

  • Rail line through Pershore is Single track – Massive investment … when?
  • Distances from the site are NOT realistic Foot or cycle commutes
  • Reality is that this location means THOUSANDS of additional significant daily

car commutes!

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Conclusion??

  • It might be easy to view this as untruthful …….
  • But ….. In Fact
  • We believe the planners are under huge pressure to deliver “target” numbers

with penalties for failure and this is driving desperate selection of land without availability and consideration of ALL relevant information

  • HOWEVER whatever the pressure …… selection of this site is BADLY FLAWED

and the site IS FUNDAMENTALLY UNSUITABLE and ……. if we stay silent it is the current and future communities which will suffer.

  • This may be the only chance we get to oppose the decision!
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Summary

  • Planning want the full proposal for the site agreed NOW and

without further consultation

  • Information and detail is very limited and this allows the problems

to be concealed

  • Accepting 2000 homes now … accepts the complete package
  • Whilst this is a consultation - it may be the planners are not keen

to listen…

  • The Parish Councils will respond Robustly and advisedly …. BUT
  • The Public voice needs to be raised in a protest –

TOO LOUD for the planners to ignore!

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Call to Action

  • Please add your own voice

by submitting your comments Before 5:00pm on Monday 16th December

  • Details on forms round the room and

www.BatPC.org.uk

  • … and encourage others
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Press Contacts

Jessica Charles (Largely Evesham Journal) Jessica.Charles@Newsquest.co.uk Christian Barnett (Evesham and Worcester) Christian.Barnett@Newsquest.co.uk Tom Banner (Broad area – politics focus) Tom.Banner@Newsquest.co.uk