The World Banks Comparative Advantage Given its experience in all - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the world bank s comparative advantage
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The World Banks Comparative Advantage Given its experience in all - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Policy Research at the World Bank Jean-Jacques Dethier, Research Manager, Development Economics The World Bank National Science Foundation International Workshop in STEM Graduate Education to Develop a Research Agenda, Holiday Inn, Arlington


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Policy Research at the World Bank

Jean-Jacques Dethier, Research Manager, Development Economics The World Bank National Science Foundation

International Workshop in STEM Graduate Education to Develop a Research Agenda, Holiday Inn, Arlington VA, February 6-7, 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The World Bank’s Comparative Advantage

Given its experience in all developing countries (and access to

governments), the World Bank produces * knowledge in many areas of development policy such as macroeconomic policy; health; education; social policy; poverty alleviation; infrastructure; environment; etc * high quality, rigorous empirical research * development data * surveys and analytical tools The Bank also acts as a catalyst for new ideas, advocates certain ideas on development and influence development debates because of the quality, diversity and relevance of its knowledge.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Changing Landscape for Knowledge

  • In fiscal year 2010 the World Bank Group (IBRD, IDA, IFC and MIGA) had

lending commitments of $72 billion, and in 2009, 59 billion.

  • But decline in lending, especially in emerging economies like Brazil,

Southern cone of Latin Am, Eastern Europe and South East Asia

  • Increasingly our clients ask for (and sometimes pay for) knowledge or

what World Bank staff call “non-lending services”.

  • The changing nature of the market for development knowledge poses a

challenge if the World Bank wants to maintain its technical and competitive edge

  • Competitors: private sector (McKinsey); public sector (OECD);

NGOs (Oxfam); donors (Gates Foundation) and academia

  • General knowledge on global issues can be covered cheaply and

faster – i.e. internet, Google, etc

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

MAKE winners and the World Bank — Are we loosing our technical edge…..?

  • World Bank (6 times winner)
  • 2000, ranked 10th – first

public sector organization to win the award

  • 2001, ranked 4th
  • 2002 -8th
  • 2003, 9th
  • 2004, 19th
  • 2005, 42nd
  • Not on the list since…

Other Winners (frequency)

  • Accenture (13)
  • Apple (5)
  • Ernst & Young (13)
  • Fluor (5)
  • General Electric (11)
  • Google (6)
  • HP (10)
  • IBM (12)
  • Infosys Technologies (7)
  • McKinsey & Co. (10)
  • Microsoft (13)
  • MindTree (1)
  • PcW (9)
  • Royal Dutch Shell (9); Samsung (7)
  • Schlumberger (4)
  • Siemens (9)
  • Tata Group (4)
  • Telefonica (1)
  • Wipro Technologies (4)

MAKE stands for Most Admired Knowledge Enterprise 2010 data

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The World Bank spent US$ 614 million

  • n knowledge products in 2010
  • not including knowledge embedded in (or generated through) our lending.
  • Knowledge for clients gets the largest share of spending:
  • 70% of spending on economic reports, sector analyses, impact evaluations, etc for

client countries

  • 17% on internal knowledge products (conferences, etc) and
  • 13% on public goods (research, forecasts, global reports)
  • A greater share of core knowledge services goes to Africa (15%),

followed by East Asia (12%), and Europe/Central Asia (9%)

  • Policy Research (public goods)
  • DEC produces the greatest share of public goods (85% in FY10)
  • 4 Networks produce internal knowledge products (environment & sustainable

development; poverty reduction and economics; human development; finance & private sector development)

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Spending on knowledge products increased between 2008 and 2010

  • Spending on knowledge products increased 20% between

2008 and 2010

– Knowledge for clients increased 23% – Knowledge as public good increased 21% – Knowledge for internal use increased 8%

  • Regional spending on core knowledge products increased

most for East Asia (27%), South Asia (25%) and Africa (23%)

  • Spending on knowledge by “networks” increased most
  • for Human Development (26%),
  • for Environment and Sustainable Development (24%)
  • for Economic Policy (24%)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What our clients want from us

From client satisfaction surveys, we know that they want Dialogue on policy and institutional issues, based on informed experiences and best practices from across the world, led by seasoned professionals Just-in-time advice on policy reforms and their implementation ( how- to) customizing solutions to specific country / context Ready access to knowledge and sharing experiences on key topics under debate from across the globe Connections to policy reformers, development practitioners, and researchers with in-depth familiarity on the topic Operational advice by teams with continuous field presence on the implementation of agreed programs Economic or institutional analysis in various sectors Up-to-date cross-country data and policy briefings on global issues to inform their own policy debates

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Leader in research on development

  • Ranked as the leading institution on development

economics by SSRN (based on publications and citations)

  • Many individual researchers are stars in their field globally
  • Report on progress against poverty was most downloaded

article in 2009

  • Policy Research Working Papers viewed 80,000 times each

month

  • Development data now available on Google
  • 24 million registered users for World Development

Indicators Online, and 16 million for Global Development Finance Online

  • Our forecasts have readership of more than 700,000.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

External Evaluation of World Bank Research 1998-2005

Independent Evaluation by a Panel chaired by Angus Deaton, Chair (Princeton), Abhijit Banerjee (MIT) & Ken Rogoff (Harvard) Assisted by D. Acemoglu (MIT), F. Caselli (LSE), T. Besley (LSE), S. Edwards (UCLA), G. Hanson (UC San Diego), N. Pavcnik (Dartmouth),

  • E. Duflo (MIT), M. Leibbrandt (U of Cape Town), N. Birdsall (CGD), J.

Angrist (MIT), S. Galiani (San Andrés, Argentina), J. Morduch (NYU),

  • M. Bertrand (Chicago), Justin Lin (Beijing U.), C. Udry (Yale), M.

Fafchamps (Oxford), Ed Glaeser (Harvard), M. Kremer (Harvard), A. Foster (Brown U.), G. Heal (Columbia U.), P. Diamond (MIT), A. Schoar (MIT) and J. Svejnar (U. of Michigan). Evaluators read a random sample of 420 journal articles, reports, and books talked to senior managers inside the Bank, and to external policymakers and users of Bank research

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Strengths of World Bank research

a) World leader in a number of important areas. Bank is the leading intellectual institution in development b) First rate work includes : social service delivery, impact evaluation, measurement of development outcomes, debate

  • n aid effectiveness, on globalization, …

c) Data generation, from the Living Standard Measurement Surveys, to the Doing Business and Investment Climate surveys, to the International Price Comparison Project  Bank’s data provision is key to almost all academic and policy debate on development (the ‘knowledge Bank’)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Issues with World Bank research

a) Data collection and dissemination needs to be more systematic b) The borderline between advocacy and research needs to be more carefully respected

  • Examples: work on Pension reform, aid effectiveness

c) Inherent tension between policy relevance and academic distinction

  • Too much undistinguished "academic style" work
  • Better monitoring of ongoing research, more external advice,

more external evaluation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

World Bank is not an academic institution. Its research must ultimately be judged by its impact on development, including responding to new challenges

The relevance test: does research lead to better policies?

  • not every piece of research needs to pass the test of

immediate policy relevance (strategic “blue sky” research)

  • Recognizing context; diverse settings; "one size does not

fits all"

  • need to discuss policy implication based on country groups
  • strengthen partnership with research institutions in

developing countries since local economists know best what opportunities and constraints their country faces

  • World Bank should also use its convening power to

connect knowledge generated by different countries

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Research Partnerships

World Bank has a role as connector and disseminator of research produced in developing and developed countries The World Bank has a unique vantage point: with partners in government and civil society, it can

  • identify key gaps in knowledge,
  • generate awareness of emerging issues,
  • test new ideas and tools.

Outside experts and centers of excellence are also key. Their role has increased the diversity of sources or advice to which developing countries can turn.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Solid Basis for Continuing Collaboration

Many collaborations with developing country researchers

  • Global Development Network (GDN)
  • African Economic Research Consortium (AERC), the New Economic

School (NES) in Moscow, the Economic Research Forum (ERF) in Cairo

  • Important institutional partnership with the Consultative Group on

International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)

  • Collaboration at level of specific projects (in 70+ countries)

Bank researchers work with consultants from some 90 countries

During 1998-2005, outside researchers who co-authored Bank research came from 66 developing and 25 developed countries

Bank research supported by a number of development partners (major donors like DfID; Sweden, Canada, etc) — providing further

  • pportunities for intellectual exchange

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusion: We can and should do more

  • Bank’s Knowledge Strategy should focus more on high-quality

research relevant for policy

– only 1% of the administrative budget is devoted to the base budget of the Bank’s Research Group – less than 6% of spending on Knowledge Products is devoted to research

  • More interactions with developing country policymakers
  • View from the South: The Bank needs to give greater weight to the

views of its partners on priority areas for research

  • Collaboration with partners assessing what works and what doesn’t

– Expanding role in impact evaluations; – Emphasis on filling strategic knowledge gaps rather than methodological preferences (randomization is just one tool);

  • Exchanges with developing country researchers

– Visiting Research Fellow Program – Exchanges with developing country researchers

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ANNEXES

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

DEC FY07-FY11 allocated budget

($ million)

FY07 FY08 FY09 Est. FY10 Plan FY11

% change FY07-10

Allocated Bank Budget /1

49.3 50.4 50.2 50.1 50.1 in constant FY07$ 47.9 46.9 45.6 45.4 45.4

  • 5%

Allocation for Research (includes RSB)

23.5 23.8 22.8 22.3 22.3

  • 5%

in constant FY07$ 23.5 23.1 21.5 21.0 21.0

  • 11%

DEC's allocated budget as share of Bank /2

3% 2.9% 2.7% 2.6% 2.6% /1 Excludes cross support, externally-funded outputs (EFOs), reimbursables, and external funds; FY11 is in FY10$ /2 In constant FY07$

Source: CFR budget allocation tables.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Trust Funds help but they are not the solution

  • Declining base budget => greater reliance on Trust Funds
  • However, TFs are less predictable/sustainable and cannot be

used for hiring technical experts to work on long-term research programs

  • Limited substitution possibilities between BB and TF without

loss of quality

  • The availability of core research staff (financed by BB) is now

largely determining output response to demands for research and data (Gates example).

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Worrying loss of competitiveness

  • Bank’s salary and benefits are no longer competitive with the IMF

and top universities for recruiting top researchers

  • Example: We identified a perfect post-doctoral candidate in late

2010:

– Our offer: $85K net on 2-year contract. – The competition offers $145K, tenure-track + $180K guaranteed research support

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Main References

World Bank DEC staff, "Research for Development", Policy Research Working Paper 5437, October 2010 http://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/5437.html Robert Zoellick, “Democratizing Development Economics,” Speech at Georgetown University, October 20, 2010 http://go.worldbank.org/EY8V84BR10 Evaluation of World Bank research, 1998 – 2005 http://econ.worldbank.org

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Examples of research informing policy

(1) Structural Transformation

Client and problem Analysis and policy recommendations

 Client: Poor farmers receiving low prices for soybeans in India  Problem: Are farmers fairly compensated or do they pay low prices due to imperfect information, low quality or other reasons?  Analysis: Give farmers cell phones or install internet kiosks with price information.  Policy Recommendations: Provide farmers with knowledge of market prices (through internet kiosks provided by the private sector company that acts as a middleman)

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Examples of research informing policy

(2) Broadening Opportunities

Client and problem Analysis and policy recommendations

 Client: HIV/AIDS patients and their households in Kenya  Research problem: what are the best courses of action for AIDS treatment of individuals and their households?  Analysis: difference in differences  Policy Recommendations: antiretroviral therapy has a range of benefits beyond the medical effects on the person treated -- the patients get back to work quickly and their (uninfected) children show marked improvements in school attendance and nutrition

22

Client and problem Analysis and policy recommendations

 Client: informal firms and informal sector workers  Research Problem: Should employment be encouraged through additional support for formal sector expansion or through expanding credit to informal enterprises?  Analysis: Randomized trials in Sri Lanka and Mexico  Policy Recommendations: Micro-enterprises invest in viable projects and are capable of paying high interest rates. Barriers to growth in this sector should be reduced, credit extended, rather than solely focusing on creation of formal sector jobs.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Examples of research informing policy

(3) New Global Challenges

Client and problem Analysis and policy recommendations

 Client: Fragile States  Research Problem: What can be done to prevent recurrence of conflict?  Analysis: Research and Consultations launched with WDR 2011  Policy Recommendations: framework using expectations, stresses and capabilities that suggests building confidence and state legitimacy, through inter-related actions on security, economic development, governance, and the provision of justice.

23

Client and problem Analysis and policy recommendations

 Client: Middle Income Countries using carbon- intensive technologies to produce manufactured products  Research Problem: Should industrial countries tax the carbon-content of imports from developing countries based on the carbon content of imports or industrial country domestic production?  Analysis: Modeling that identifies impact on developed and developing country production and exports  Policy Recommendations: Carbon taxes on imports will lead to large reductions in developing country exports. Negative effects could be mitigated but not eliminated by basing taxes on carbon content of industrial country production.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Examples of research informing policy

(4) Aid Effectiveness

Client and problem Analysis and policy recommendations

 Client: Donors and Aid Recipients  Research Problem: Should countries diversity donor sources or is donor fragmentation likely to dampen aid effectiveness?  Analysis: Cross-country statistical exercise  Policy Recommendations: Too many donors and increasing aid fragmentation weaken aid effectiveness . A single donor with a large share

  • f aid projects has an interest in maintaining the

quality of government administration and is less likely to drain the few high-quality managers away from the public sector.

24