The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Robert Lubarsky Fred - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the weak fundamental theorem of algebra
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Robert Lubarsky Fred - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University July 27, 2009 Robert Lubarsky Fred


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University July 27, 2009

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Is it just true constructively?

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Is it just true constructively? No! Example: Sheaves over C. (Fourman-Hyland)

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Is it just true constructively? No! Example: Sheaves over C. (Fourman-Hyland) Is it ever true constructively?

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Is it just true constructively? No! Example: Sheaves over C. (Fourman-Hyland) Is it ever true constructively? – Over a discrete field. – Under Countable Choice. – When the coefficients are Cauchy reals. (Ruitenburg)

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

What’s the problem constructively?

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

What’s the problem constructively? – Roots that may or may not be repeated.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

What’s the problem constructively? – Roots that may or may not be repeated. How can you tell when a root is repeated?

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

What’s the problem constructively? – Roots that may or may not be repeated. How can you tell when a root is repeated? – Compare f and its derivative f ′.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

What’s the problem constructively? – Roots that may or may not be repeated. How can you tell when a root is repeated? – Compare f and its derivative f ′. How can you see if they have a common factor?

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

What’s the problem constructively? – Roots that may or may not be repeated. How can you tell when a root is repeated? – Compare f and its derivative f ′. How can you see if they have a common factor? – The Euclidean algorithm.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction. Else we have polynomials s and t with sf + tf ′ = 1.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction. Else we have polynomials s and t with sf + tf ′ = 1. Approximate f by g = Πi(x − qi); note f ′ is approximated by g′.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction. Else we have polynomials s and t with sf + tf ′ = 1. Approximate f by g = Πi(x − qi); note f ′ is approximated by g′. So f (q1) is close to 0,

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction. Else we have polynomials s and t with sf + tf ′ = 1. Approximate f by g = Πi(x − qi); note f ′ is approximated by g′. So f (q1) is close to 0, f ′(q1) is bounded away from 0,

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction. Else we have polynomials s and t with sf + tf ′ = 1. Approximate f by g = Πi(x − qi); note f ′ is approximated by g′. So f (q1) is close to 0, f ′(q1) is bounded away from 0, g′(q1) = Πi=1(q1 − qi),

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction. Else we have polynomials s and t with sf + tf ′ = 1. Approximate f by g = Πi(x − qi); note f ′ is approximated by g′. So f (q1) is close to 0, f ′(q1) is bounded away from 0, g′(q1) = Πi=1(q1 − qi), and q1 is bounded away from each

  • f the other qi’s.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

Theorem

Let f be a nonconstant monic polynomial over C. Then the assumption that f has no roots leads to a contradiction.

Proof.

Apply the Euclidean algorithm to f and f ′. If the GCD has degree > 1, you’re done by induction. Else we have polynomials s and t with sf + tf ′ = 1. Approximate f by g = Πi(x − qi); note f ′ is approximated by g′. So f (q1) is close to 0, f ′(q1) is bounded away from 0, g′(q1) = Πi=1(q1 − qi), and q1 is bounded away from each

  • f the other qi’s. So we have coherent approximations to the root

near q1.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

So the root set S of a polynomial may not be inhabited, but it can’t be empty.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

So the root set S of a polynomial may not be inhabited, but it can’t be empty. In fact,

◮ the distance d(z, S) = infx∈S d(z, x) may not be defined, but

the quasi-distance δ(z, S) = supx∈S d(z, x) is;

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

So the root set S of a polynomial may not be inhabited, but it can’t be empty. In fact,

◮ the distance d(z, S) = infx∈S d(z, x) may not be defined, but

the quasi-distance δ(z, S) = supx∈S d(z, x) is;

◮ S may not be finite, but it’s quasi-finite; and

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

So the root set S of a polynomial may not be inhabited, but it can’t be empty. In fact,

◮ the distance d(z, S) = infx∈S d(z, x) may not be defined, but

the quasi-distance δ(z, S) = supx∈S d(z, x) is;

◮ S may not be finite, but it’s quasi-finite; and ◮ there is a Riesz space of functions on S.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Definition

The resultant of polynomials a(x) and b(x), Res(a, b), is the determinant of the Sylvester matrix.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Definition

The resultant of polynomials a(x) and b(x), Res(a, b), is the determinant of the Sylvester matrix. Example: For a = Σiaixi and b = Σjbjxj, the Sylvester matrix is         a2 a1 a0 a2 a1 a0 a2 a1 a0 a2 a1 a0 b4 b3 b2 b1 b0 b4 b3 b2 b1 b0         .

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Definition

The resultant of polynomials a(x) and b(x), Res(a, b), is the determinant of the Sylvester matrix. Standard Facts If a = Π(x − qi) and b = Π(x − rj), then Res(a, b) = Π(qi − rj).

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Definition

The resultant of polynomials a(x) and b(x), Res(a, b), is the determinant of the Sylvester matrix. Standard Facts If a = Π(x − qi) and b = Π(x − rj), then Res(a, b) = Π(qi − rj). So over a discrete field, Res(a, b) = 0 iff a and b have a common non-trivial factor.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Definition

The resultant of polynomials a(x) and b(x), Res(a, b), is the determinant of the Sylvester matrix. Standard Facts If a = Π(x − qi) and b = Π(x − rj), then Res(a, b) = Π(qi − rj). So over a discrete field, Res(a, b) = 0 iff a and b have a common non-trivial factor. This doesn’t generalize well to arbitrary rings. Example: Over Z8, x2 + 4 and x2 + 4x have a resultant of 0 but no non-trivial common factors. Hence:

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Definition

The resultant of polynomials a(x) and b(x), Res(a, b), is the determinant of the Sylvester matrix. Standard Facts If a = Π(x − qi) and b = Π(x − rj), then Res(a, b) = Π(qi − rj). So over a discrete field, Res(a, b) = 0 iff a and b have a common non-trivial factor.

Theorem

For a and b monic, Res(a, b) is a unit iff a and b are comaximal.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

Comaximality

Definition

In a ring R, a and b are comaximal if the ideal (a, b) equals R; i.e. for some s, t ∈ R sa + tb = 1.

Definition

The resultant of polynomials a(x) and b(x), Res(a, b), is the determinant of the Sylvester matrix.

Theorem

For a and b monic, Res(a, b) is a unit iff a and b are comaximal.

Corollary

For a and b monic polynomials over C, Res(a, b) is a unit iff a and b are comaximal iff there is a positive distance between the roots

  • f a and b.

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Outline The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra Comaximality References

References

◮ Fourman/Hyland, Sheaf models for analysis, in M.P. Fourman,

C.J. Mulvey, and D.S. Scott (eds.), Applications of Sheaves, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 753, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1979, p. 280-301

◮ Lubarsky/Richman, Zero Sets of Univariate Polynomials,

TAMS, to appear

◮ Richman, The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra: a

Constructive Development without Choice, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, v. 196, 2000, p. 213-230

◮ Ruitenburg, Constructing roots of polynomials over the

complex numbers, Computational aspects of Lie group representations and related topics (Amsterdam 1996) 107–128, CWI Tract, 84, Math. Centrum, Centrum Wisk. Inform., Amsterdam 1991. MR 92g:03085

Robert Lubarsky Fred Richman Florida Atlantic University The Weak Fundamental Theorem of Algebra