math 12002 calculus i 4 4 fundamental theorem of calculus
play

MATH 12002 - CALCULUS I 4.4: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MATH 12002 - CALCULUS I 4.4: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Professor Donald L. White Department of Mathematical Sciences Kent State University D.L. White (Kent State University) 1 / 8 The Fundamental Theorem Fundamental Theorem of


  1. MATH 12002 - CALCULUS I § 4.4: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Professor Donald L. White Department of Mathematical Sciences Kent State University D.L. White (Kent State University) 1 / 8

  2. The Fundamental Theorem Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Let f be continuous on [ a , b ] . 1 If we define � x g ( x ) = f ( t ) dt , a then g ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) for all x in ( a , b ) . 2 If F is any antiderivative for f , then � b f ( x ) dx = F ( b ) − F ( a ) . a D.L. White (Kent State University) 2 / 8

  3. The Fundamental Theorem Notes: Part 1 says that the function g is an antiderivative of f . In particular, every continuous function has an antiderivative. � x Part 1 also says that if we integrate f (i.e., to get a f ( t ) dt ) and then differentiate, we get f back; that is, � x d f ( t ) dt = f ( x ) . dx a Part 2 says that if we differentiate F (i.e., to get f ) and then integrate, we get F back (except for a constant); that is, � x F ′ ( t ) dt = F ( x ) − F ( a ) . a Together, Parts 1 & 2 say that differentiation and integration are inverse processes. That Fundamental Theorem really ties the branches of calculus together, does it not? D.L. White (Kent State University) 3 / 8

  4. Proof of FTC � x Assume f is continuous on [ a , b ] and define g ( x ) = a f ( t ) dt . For Part(1), we need to show that g ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) for a < x < b ; that is, g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) lim = f ( x ). h h → 0 We first informally outline the idea of the proof of Part (1). � x + h � x Note that g ( x + h ) = f ( t ) dt and g ( x ) = a f ( t ) dt . a For a positive function f and positive h , we have the following picture: ✻ R x + h R x f ( x + h ) g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) = f ( t ) dt − a f ( t ) dt f q a = area under graph on [ x , x + h ] f ( x ) q ≈ area of rectangle f ( x ) ✲ h = h · f ( x ) a x x + h b Hence for small h , g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) ≈ f ( x ) and so f ( x ) = lim = g ′ ( x ). h h h → 0 D.L. White (Kent State University) 4 / 8

  5. Proof of FTC We now prove Part (1) more rigorously. By one of our properties of definite integrals, � x + h g ( x + h ) = f ( t ) dt a � x � x + h = a f ( t ) dt + f ( t ) dt x � x + h = g ( x ) + f ( t ) dt , x and so � x + h g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) = f ( t ) dt . x Therefore, � x + h g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) = 1 f ( t ) dt . h h x D.L. White (Kent State University) 5 / 8

  6. Proof of FTC Since f is continuous on the closed interval [ x , x + h ], it has an absolute maximum and an absolute minimum on the interval. Thus there is a number u , x � u � x + h , such that f ( u ) is the absolute minimum value of f on the interval, and there is a number v , x � v � x + h , such that f ( v ) is the absolute maximum value of f on the interval. Hence on the interval [ x , x + h ], we have f ( u ) � f ( t ) � f ( v ). By a comparison property of integrals, we have � x + h f ( u )(( x + h ) − x ) � f ( t ) dt � f ( v )(( x + h ) − x ); x that is, � x + h f ( u ) h � f ( t ) dt � f ( v ) h , x and finally � x + h f ( u ) � 1 f ( t ) dt � f ( v ). h x D.L. White (Kent State University) 6 / 8

  7. Proof of FTC Recalling that � x + h � x + h f ( t ) dt = g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) 1 and f ( u ) � 1 f ( t ) dt � f ( v ), h x h h x we now have f ( u ) � g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) � f ( v ). h Since x � u � x + h & x � v � x + h , we have u → x & v → x as h → 0. Since f is continuous, this implies h → 0 f ( u ) = lim lim u → x f ( u ) = f ( x ) and lim h → 0 f ( v ) = lim v → x f ( v ) = f ( x ). Therefore, g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) f ( x ) = lim h → 0 f ( u ) � lim � lim h → 0 f ( v ) = f ( x ), h h → 0 and so by the Squeeze Theorem g ( x + h ) − g ( x ) g ′ ( x ) = lim = f ( x ). h h → 0 D.L. White (Kent State University) 7 / 8

  8. Proof of FTC We now have that Part (1) of the Fundamental Theorem holds, � x and so g ( x ) = a f ( t ) dt is an antiderivative of f . If F is any antiderivative of f , then F ( x ) = g ( x ) + C for some constant C . In particular, � b F ( b ) = g ( b ) + C = f ( t ) dt + C , a � b and so a f ( t ) dt = F ( b ) − C . But also, � a F ( a ) = g ( a ) + C = f ( t ) dt + C = 0 + C = C , a and so C = F ( a ). Therefore � b f ( t ) dt = F ( b ) − F ( a ) a and Part (2) of the Fundamental Theorem holds. D.L. White (Kent State University) 8 / 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend