The spatial sub-cellular proteome Methods and considerations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the spatial sub cellular proteome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The spatial sub-cellular proteome Methods and considerations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The spatial sub-cellular proteome Methods and considerations Kathryn Lilley Cambridge Centre for Proteomics Size matters Animal cell 10-30 m m Plant cell 10-100 m m Yeast cell 5 m m E. coli 2 m m Giraffe neck nerve 3m The crowded cell


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The spatial sub-cellular proteome

Methods and considerations

Kathryn Lilley Cambridge Centre for Proteomics

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Animal cell 10-30mm Plant cell 10-100mm Yeast cell – 5mm

  • E. coli – 2mm

Giraffe neck nerve 3m Size matters

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Courtesy of David S. Goodsell, The Scripps Research Institute

The crowded cell

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Subcellular spatial proteomics

Proteins reside within discreet subcellular niches where they carry out their function. Some proteins reside at multiple locations and fulfil different roles in a context specific manner. Differential subcellular distribution is controlled by: post transcriptional and post translational modification processing differential binding partners on location abundance changes Changes in subcellular dynamics are as important as changes in abundance, post translational status and interacting partners. Many proteomics protocols are not compatible with maintaining organelle integrity

We want to know….. Where a protein is localized If it is present in multiple locations Its interacting partners at these locations How this varies for different protein isoforms How this various for different cell types Dynamic changes in the above …and on a proteome-wide scale ……and on a cell wide-scale ……….and with sub-organelle resolution

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Different protein products that do the same job in more than one location

MDH

Proteins that are ‘inert’ in one location, but active in another

Transcription factors

Proteins that have different jobs in different locations

Beta catenin, LDH

Proteins as double agents

Proteins that do the same job in more than one location

Importins/exportins

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Where is a protein located?

Fluorescence microscopy

Proteinatlas.org

Challenges:

Automated assignment to subcellular niches Link-out to databases GO Cellular Compartment Antibodies Fusion protein without perturbation

CyTof-Imaging Giesen, 2014

slide-7
SLIDE 7

B

H R P

+ fluorescein/biotin- conjugated arylazide/H2O2

H R P H R P H R P

+ biotin- tyramide/H2O2

BirA *

+ biotin

A

bait

Biotin ligase biotinoyl-5’AMP (Lysine) Footprint – 10nm – tethered, more for freely diffusing baits (10 um) or half a cell Conjugated horse radish peroxidase Exposed tyrosine Footprint - 40-200nm (shorter half lives than above)

Rees et al Mol. Cell Prot. (2015 – in revision)

Proximity labelling scale per experiment:

  • Protein complexes
  • Membrane environments
  • Organelle contents

What proteins are nearby? (complexes, lipid rafts, sub organelle etc….)

Challenges:

Correct for contamination Fusions protein perturbation Reproducibility Link-out to databases Interaction networks GO CC

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Organelle catalogues

Proteinatlas.org

Purification of subcellular niche Challenges:

Experimental design sympathetic of contamination – quantitation No or limited steady state information Link-out to databases GO CC

D

  • uter

membrane mitochondrial matrix inter membrane space (IMS)

APEX APEX APEX APEX APEX APEX

+ biotin- phenol/H2O2

inter membrane space (IMS) mitochondrial matrix inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM)

Ascorbate peroxidase Smaller than BirA* Fusion protein directed to subcellular niche

APEX

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Correlation of protein distributions

Whole cell maps per experiment?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

HyperLOPIT

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Christoforou – in revision

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

LDH HXK1 HXK2 PFK PFK PFK ALDOA TPIS GAPDH PGK PGM ENO PKM

HyperLOPIT – Glycolysis (mouse Embryonic stem cells E14TGA)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Challenges:

Fractionation Mappability to

  • ther datasets

Data visualization Pattern recognition and classification Deconvolution of mixed location Interpretation of dynamic data Link-out to databases Interaction networks GO CC

As a scaffold for other spatial datasets

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

pRolocGUI

https://lgatto.shinyapps.io/christoforou2014/

slide-18
SLIDE 18

SOX2 Interacting partners

Sox2 SSBP DLGP5 ATX2 USP9X GNA1 IMB1 SYEP SYDC XPO1 XPO4 IF2B1 XRCC5 RAGP1 TYDP1 RFA2 RFA3RFA1 WDR18 NOL9 PK1IP TEX10 LYAR RBBP7

Black circles correspond to proteins listed as Sox2 interactors by Z. Gao et al (doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.320143)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Sox2, Oct4 and Nanog and their common binding partners CHD4,MTA2,SALL4,SALL1,ERR2,P66B,MTA1

Oct4 Sox2 Nanog

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Transfer learning algorithm which allows integration of heterogeneous data types

Spatial proteomics HPA GO CC Output of 3rd party software , e.g. Yloc Etc…… Primary and auxillary data Data improvement Have to combine data without compromising biological relevance of the primary data

Data Fusion

Breckels – in prep.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Common challenges within spatial ‘omics

Inter-relationship - improving metabolic models and vice versa Linking the biological scales

  • rganism-tissue-cell type –single cell-subcellular compartments

Are the current repositories fit for purpose? Single cell (or on cell –wide scale) Scale of validation – lack of facile validation Sampling, fractionation, Sensitivity, coverage Experimental design – can informatics help?