the rigour of proof
play

The Rigour of Proof SIGMAA, on the philosophy of mathematics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Rigour of Proof SIGMAA, on the philosophy of mathematics Baltimore, January 2019 Michle Friend, Department of Philosophy George Washington University 0 Table of contents for talk: The Rigour of Proof Position Characterisation Proof


  1. The Rigour of Proof SIGMAA, on the philosophy of mathematics Baltimore, January 2019 Michèle Friend, Department of Philosophy George Washington University 0

  2. Table of contents for talk: The Rigour of Proof Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Constructivism Pluralism 1

  3. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent conception of truth and objects Constructivism Pluralism 2

  4. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth conception of truth and objects Constructivism Pluralism 3

  5. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth Guarantee the conception of truth and preservation of truth objects Constructivism Pluralism 4

  6. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth Guarantee the conception of truth and preservation of truth objects Constructivism Objects and truth in mathematics are constructed from the human mind Pluralism 5

  7. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth Guarantee the conception of truth and preservation of truth objects Constructivism Objects and truth in Preservation of mathematics are knowledge constructed from the human mind Pluralism 6

  8. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth Guarantee the conception of truth and preservation of truth objects Constructivism Objects and truth in Preservation of Ensure the preservation mathematics are knowledge of knowledge constructed from the human mind Pluralism 7

  9. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth Guarantee the conception of truth and preservation of truth objects Constructivism Objects and truth in Preservation of Ensure the preservation mathematics are knowledge of knowledge constructed from the human mind Pluralism Mathematics consists in a plurality of foundations, methodologies, theories, applications and background philosophies 8

  10. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth Guarantee the conception of truth and preservation of truth objects Constructivism Objects and truth in Preservation of Ensure the preservation mathematics are knowledge of knowledge constructed from the human mind Pluralism Mathematics consists in a Proofs serve several plurality of foundations, purposes methodologies, theories, applications and background philosophies 9

  11. For the pluralist, proofs serve several purposes Proofs guarantee truth within a theory. Proofs guarantee truth of a theory from the perspective of a meta- theory. Proofs guarantee the preservation knowledge, given what is thought to be already known, or is taken to be known. 10

  12. For the pluralist, proofs serve several purposes Proofs guarantee truth within a theory. Proofs guarantee truth of a theory from the perspective of a meta- theory. Proofs guarantee the preservation knowledge, given what is thought to be already known, or is taken to be known. But now consider: for some theorems there are several non-equivalent proofs – equivalent in the result, but not in the methodology/ approach . 11

  13. For the pluralist, proofs serve several purposes Proofs guarantee truth within a theory. Proofs guarantee truth of a theory from the perspective of a meta- theory. Proofs guarantee the preservation knowledge, given what is thought to be already known, or is taken to be known. But now consider: for some theorems there are several non-equivalent proofs – equivalent in the result, but not in the methodology/ approach . The pluralist accounts for this by saying that proofs also help us to understand mathematics through the careful work of proving. 12

  14. Now what of the rigour of proof for the pluralist? Definition: A rigorous proof is one in which every step of the proof is accounted for in the right way. 13

  15. Now what of the rigour of proof for the pluralist? Definition: A rigorous proof is one in which every step of the proof is accounted for in the right way. Accounting: every step is either a definition, an axiom, a theorem; a premise – borrowed lemma, theorem from another (rigorous) proof – or follows from the above by reference to a rule of inference. 14

  16. Now what of the rigour of proof for the pluralist? Definition: A rigorous proof is one in which every step of the proof is accounted for in the right way. Accounting: every step is either a definition, an axiom, a theorem; a premise – borrowed lemma, theorem from another (rigorous) proof – or follows from the above by reference to a rule of inference. What is common to the above is that they are all self-justifying or can be traced to something that is self-justifying. Self-justification is justification in terms of meaning. 15

  17. Justification in terms of meaning There are (at least) three different ideas of what ‘meaning’ means– the realist idea, the constructivist idea and the pluralist. 16

  18. Justification in terms of meaning There are (at least) three different ideas of what ‘meaning’ means– the realist idea, the constructivist idea and the pluralist. The realist thinks of ‘meaning’ as something that we (happen to) grasp. It is independent of our language, symbols or mind. 17

  19. Justification in terms of meaning There are (at least) three different ideas of what ‘meaning’ means– the realist idea, the constructivist idea and the pluralist. The realist thinks of ‘meaning’ as something that we (happen to) grasp. It is independent of our language, symbols or mind. The constructivist thinks of meaning as a construction, but the construction has to start somewhere. A self-justifying axiom (etc…) is one that takes no further justification. 18

  20. Justification in terms of meaning There are (at least) three different ideas of what ‘meaning’ means– the realist idea, the constructivist idea and the pluralist. The realist thinks of ‘meaning’ as something that we (happen to) grasp. It is independent of our language, symbols or mind. The constructivist thinks of meaning as a construction, but the construction has to start somewhere. A self-justifying axiom (etc…) is one that takes no further justification. The pluralist thinks of meaning as relative to a formal context and language. It is ordinal not cardinal. No further justification is forthcoming. It has reached a temporary stability that contributes to understanding. It follows that meaning changes over time and people. 19

  21. Table of contents Position Characterisation Proof Rigour in Proof Realism Mind independent Preservation of truth Guarantee the conception of truth and preservation of truth objects Constructivism Objects and truth in Preservation of Ensure the preservation mathematics are knowledge of knowledge constructed from the human mind Pluralism Mathematics consists in a Proofs serve several Rigour comes in degrees plurality of foundations, purposes and can be appropriate or methodologies, theories, inappropriate, applications and ‘appropriateness’ is a background philosophies normative judgement 20

  22. Thank-you for your attention. michele@gwu.edu 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend