THE (NEAR) FUTURE OF MOBILITY Choice as the paradigm of innovative - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE (NEAR) FUTURE OF MOBILITY “Choice” as the paradigm of innovative mobility, Integration between static volumes and dynamic fmows

Repubblica di San Marino Smart Mobility Forum 2017

• Arch. Federico Cassani

A B O U T U S

MIC | Mobility in Chain is a company founded in 2009 by Davide Boazzi, Federico Cassani and Federico Parolotto. The founders decided to open a new fjrm after 10 ears ina well- known transport planning fjrm where they were directors. MIC was founded on the belief that mobility infmuences the way we live and the quality of our lives. Also, MIC was created with the ambition of improving the quality of our lives through a profound understanding of how we move about. In line with their previous professional experience, MIC team is strongly focused on international work providing transport consultancy to developers, masterplanners and public bodies all over the world. MIC embraces an innovative and sustainable vision for mobility based on the following principles. The belief that town planning process should not be subject to the single minded pursuit of traffjc-driven approaches, and The new urbanism, which enhances compact, dense, mixed- use neighbourhoods that in addition set the right premises to enforce the original form of transport, walking, followed closely by cycling and public transport, as most favoured mode

• f movement.

MIC peculiarity lies in the combination of the principles above with the understanding of the needs of the client and with the requirements of the public bodies dealing with every kind

• f transport issue ranging from traffjc-impact studies to civil

engineering.

www.michain.com

Chongming, Shanghai, Accessibility Study 2017

MOBILITY PATTERNS ARE MULTIPLYING

MOBILITY: THE IMPORTANCE IN URBAN PLANNING

P R I V A T E T R A N S P O R T P U B L I C T R A N S P O R T

PUBLIC vs PRIVATE TRANSPORT

PUBLIC vs PRIVATE TRANSPORT

VS

PRO:

DEMOCRATIC SUSTAINABLE LESS CONGESTION

CONS:

NO FLEXIBILITY NO FREEDOM EXPENSIVE INFRASTRUCTURES

PRO:

FLEXIBILITY FREEDOM

CONS:

CONGESTION MANY INFRASTRUCTURES POLLUTION UNEFFICIENCY

PROS

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

CONS

DEMOCRATIC LESS POLLUTION

= 2€

NO CONGESTION Pounds of CO2 (or equivalents) per passenger-mile Underground cost - millions€/Km

0.5 1 1.5 2

SUV (solo driver) Car (solo driver) Transit bus (1/4 full) Carpool (3 occupants) Transit bus (3/4 full) Rail transit Intercity bus Walk/Bike

passengers vehicles space (m2) fuel (lit)

5 25 100 175 2000 400 100 50 24000 8800 3400 2800 250 120 50 3

Demand/capacity transport 10’000 persons for 1km NO FLEXIBILITY HIGH COSTS OF INFRASTRUCTURES A B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

PROS CONS

PRIVATE TRANSPORT

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

CO NOx PM10 NMVOC NH3 IPA SOx

Impact of road transport on the total emissions CONGESTION POLLUTION FLEXIBILITY FREEDOM A C B

FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY TO TEMPORARY OWNERSHIP

BENEFITS OF PRIVATE TRANSPORT WITHOUT OWNERSHIP ISSUES

MULTI MODAL SHARING

P U B L I C T R A N S P O R T P R I V A T E T R A N S P O R T

DIGITAL MOBILITY

In futuro il proces s o dive r rà s e mpre più imme diato e f a c i l m e nte l e g ato a l l ’ u ti l i z zo d e g l i s m ar t pho ne / In th e fut ure t he proce s s w il l be come more i m m e d i ate a n d e a si l y l i n ke d to th e u se

• f sm a r tp h o n e s

O g g i lo sce nario di poss ibilità pe r s ce gl ie r s i come s pos t a r s i è va r i e g ato m a co m p l e sso / Tod ay the scen ario of poss ibil it ie s to choos e how to ge t a ro u n d i s d i ve r se b u t co m p l ex

Mass Sharing System

PUBLIC PRIVATE

car sharing car sharing bike sharing

GPS navigation system

public transport

parking system

PUBLIC

car sharing

PRIVATE

DIGITAL MOBILITY

ENERGY GRIDS

URBAN PLANNING

DENSITY &INTENSITY

URBAN PLANNING

THE FUTURE OF PLANNING

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

Audi Urban Future Initiative 2015 Union Square

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

FLOW DESIGN

IED Milano November 2015

FLOW DESIGN

Può San Marino diventare un modello internazionale per l’accessibilità e la mobilità sostenibile? SAN MARINO AS AN INTERNATIONAL CHAMPION OF SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY?