the kind 2 model checker
play

The Kind 2 Model Checker Adrien Champion Alain Mebsout Christoph - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Kind 2 Model Checker Adrien Champion Alain Mebsout Christoph Sticksel Cesare Tinelli Kind 2 is for safety analysis Reactive System Model Kind 2 (Lustre) State Transition System h s , I ( s ) , T ( s , s 0 ) i Safety Property


  1. The Kind 2 Model Checker Adrien Champion Alain Mebsout Christoph Sticksel Cesare Tinelli

  2. Kind 2 is for safety analysis Reactive System Model Kind 2 (Lustre) State Transition System h s , I ( s ) , T ( s , s 0 ) i Safety Property (Extension of Lustre) safe unsafe P Proof Counter- Certificate example

  3. Kind 2 has multiple inductive, cooperating engines Supervisor invariant BMC k -induction IC3 discovery SMT SMT SMT SMT

  4. Kind 2 exploits the modularity of the system node max (x:real) returns (m:real); let m = x -> if x > pre x then x else pre x; tel node avg (x,y:real) returns (a:real); Component-level (*@contract invariant discovery assume x <= y; guarantee x <= a and a <= y; *) let a = (x + y) / 2.0; tel Assume-guarantee node sav (x:real) returns (s:real); contracts (*@contract assume x > 0.0 and x > pre x; guarantee s <= max(x); *) let s = avg(x -> pre s, x); tel

  5. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time 3 Abstract behavior of components to their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  6. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  7. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  8. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  9. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  10. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  11. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  12. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  13. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  14. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time l Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  15. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time l Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  16. Kind 2 reasons compositionally and modularly about the system Bottom-up verification of contracts of 4 nodes one at a time l Abstract behavior of components to 3 their contract and refine with implementation only on failure. 1 2

  17. Kind 2 certifies its results with counterexamples and proofs LFSC script contains SMT SMT proofs proofs SMT • Proofs from CVC4 proofs Φ k ∧ T k | I ∧ T k | = Φ 0 = Φ • k-inductive argument Φ | = P ⇤ Φ Independently checkable ⇤ P

  18. We have just released Kind 2 v1.0.0 Download or try it out at http://kind.cs.uiowa.edu/ Ongoing and Future Work • Explicitly mode aware contracts • Test case generation from contracts • Compilation to Rust • Parameterized reasoning through arrays

  19. Kind 2 is competitive 10000 1000 Time in s 100 Kind 2 (866 solved) jKind (863 solved) 10 NuXmv (842 solved) PKind (780 solved) Zustre (845 solved) 1 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Number of benchmarks solved

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend