the influence of powdery
play

The Influence of Powdery S U Mildew on Pecan Nut Quality A g C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

L The Influence of Powdery S U Mildew on Pecan Nut Quality A g C Charles J. Graham e n Pecan Research/Extension Station t e r L S U A g C e n t e r Pecan Scab L S U A g C e n t e r Several diseases at same time.


  1. L The Influence of Powdery S U Mildew on Pecan Nut Quality A g C Charles J. Graham e n Pecan Research/Extension Station t e r

  2. L S U A g C e n t e r

  3. Pecan Scab L S U A g C e n t e r

  4. Several diseases at same time. L S U A g C e n t e r

  5. L S U A STUART g C PECAN e n t e r

  6. L POWDERY S U MILDEW A g C e n t e r

  7. Powdery Mildew L The fungus Microsphaera penicillata (Wallr.:Fr.) Lev S causes powdery mildew of pecan. U On pecan, powdery mildew primarily appears A g mid‐to‐late season and will generally only affect C fruit, but can be found on leaflets occasionally. e n Powdery mildew can occur sporadically and may t not be present each year . e r

  8. Powdery Mildew Gottwald et al. (1984) found that powdery L mildew had no effect on net photosynthesis or S dark respiration of nuts, but 50% coverage on U the shuck reduced kernel oil, protein, and free A fatty acids. g C e n t e r

  9. Powdery Mildew Brenneman and Bertrand (1989) reported that L disease levels were significantly negatively S correlated with kernel weight, but the percent U fill of nuts were not correlated with disease A severity. g C e n t e r

  10. Powdery Mildew Olsen et al. (2003) reported no significant L differences in nut weight, kernel weight, S percent fill, or kernel color ratings on infected U and non- infected ‘Wichita’ and ‘Western’ pecan A varieties. g C e n t e r

  11. Pecan Cultivars Susceptible to Powdery Mildew • Curtis L S • Desirable U • Farley • Moore A g • Pabst C • Wichita e • Western n t e r

  12. Initial infection L S U A g C e n t e r

  13. Advanced infection L S U A g C e n t e r

  14. L SHUCK S U DECLINE A g C e n t e r

  15. Shuck Decline Stem-end Shuck Dieback Blight L Tulip Disease S U A g C e n t e r

  16. Pecan Cultivars Most Susceptible to Shuck Decline • Success L S • Desirable U • Forkert • Choctaw A g • Pawnee C • Oconee e • Creek n t e r

  17. L TEST S U CONDITIONS A g C e n t e r

  18. Orchard Description  Orchard planted in 2005. L S U  Six cultivars: Caddo, Desirable, Elliott, Nacono, Oconee, Pawnee A g C  Only 4 fungicide applications: e n Prophyte, Elast, Super Tin, Agri-fos t e r

  19. L S U A g C e n t e r

  20. Data Collection  25 random nuts of uninfected, powdery mildew infected, and with L shuck decline symptoms collected S from each individual tree. U A  Four replicant trees for each cultivar. g C e n  Individual nut length, nut diameter, t nut weight, kernel weight, oil content. e r

  21. L S U RESULTS A g C e n t e r

  22. Desirable L S U A g C e n t e r

  23. L S U A g C e n t e r

  24. L S U A g C e n t e r

  25. ‘Desirable’ Pecan TRT Length Width L S U Control 44.27 a 24.22 a A g P. Mildew 42.92 b 23.84 a C e n Shuck Decline 42.95 b 23.91 a t e r

  26. ‘Desirable’ Pecan TRT Nut Kernel Percent Weight Weight Kernel L S Control 10.29 a 5.48 a 53.17 b U A P. Mildew 9.47 b 5.20 b 54.85 a g C Shuck Decline 9.67 b 5.26 ab 54.32 ab e n t e r

  27. ‘Desirable’ Pecan TRT Nuts/lb % Oil L S U Control 44 a 67 a A g P. Mildew 48 b 64 a C e n Shuck Decline 47 b 62 a t e r

  28. Oconee L S U A g C e n t e r

  29. L S U A g C e n t e r

  30. L S U A g C e n t e r

  31. L S U A g C e n t e r

  32. L S U A g C e n t e r

  33. ‘Oconee’ Pecan TRT Length Width L S U Control 48.74 a 22.54 a A g P. Mildew 48.08 a 22.21 b C e n Shuck Decline 47.20 a 22.09 b t e r

  34. ‘Oconee’ Pecan TRT Nut Kernel Percent Weight Weight Kernel L S Control 9.79 a 5.69 a 57.83 a U A P. Mildew 9.12 b 5.32 b 58.02 a g C Shuck Decline 8.67 b 4.98 b 57.23 a e n t e r

  35. ‘Oconee’ Pecan TRT Nuts/lb % Oil L S U Control 46 a 71 a A g P. Mildew 50 b 72 a C e n Shuck Decline 52 b 70 a t e r

  36. Pawnee L S U A g C e n t e r

  37. L S U A g C e n t e r

  38. L S U A g C e n t e r

  39. ‘Pawnee’ Pecan TRT Length Width L S U Control 47.22 a 23.90 a A g P. Mildew 45.44 a 23.43 a C e n Shuck Decline 46.15 a 23.60 a t e r

  40. ‘Pawnee’ Pecan TRT Nut Kernel Percent Weight Weight Kernel L S Control 9.29 a 5.50 a 59.29 a U A P. Mildew 8.76 a 5.32 a 60.84 a g C Shuck Dieback 9.03 a 5.40 a 59.74 a e n t e r

  41. ‘Pawnee’ Pecan TRT Nuts/lb % Oil L S U Control 49 a 74 a A g P. Mildew 52 a 74 a C e n Shuck Decline 50 a 74 a t e r

  42. L PECAN CULTIVAR S U SUSCEPTIBILTY A g C e n t e r

  43. Powdery Mildew T olerant Susceptible Highly L Susceptible S • Jackson • Caddo • Curtis U • Littlepage • Gloria Grande • Desirable • Maramec • Kiowa • Forkert A g • Pawnee • Moreland • Melrose C • P-Cou 2 • Nacono e • Sumner • Oconee n • Schley t e r

  44. Powdery Mildew Many growers regularly spraying for scab L are surprised to see powdery mildew S development on their nuts. U A Many of the fungicides that are effective g for scab are not effective in controlling C powdery mildew. e n t e r

  45. Fungicides Labeled L • Group 30, organotin S • Group 3, DMI’s U • Group M, guinidine acetate A • Group 11, strobilurin g • Group 1, thiophanate-methyl C • Group 33, phosphonates e • Group 6, G3 & G11 Mixtures n t e r

  46. Fungicides Labeled L • Agri-Tin, Super Tin 4L, Super Tin 80WP S U • Enable, Orbit, Propimax, Bumper • Elast 400F A • Abound, Sovran, Headline g • T Methyl 70 WSB, Topsin-M C • Agri-fos, Fosphite, ProPhyte, Rampart e • Stratego, Quilt n t e r

  47. Fungicides Labeled L • Agri-Tin, Super Tin 4L, Super Tin 80WP S U • Enable, Orbit, Propimax, Bumper • Elast 400F A • Abound, Sovran, Headline g • T Methyl 70 WSB, Topsin-M C • Agri-fos, Fosphite, ProPhyte, Rampart e • Stratego, Quilt n t e r

  48. L S U SUMMARY A g C e n t e r

  49. Powdery Mildew  Desirable Pecan – significantly reduced nut length, nut weight, kernel weight, nuts/lb, L and oil content. S U  Oconee Pecan – significantly reduced nut diameter, nut weight, kernel weight, and A nuts/lb. g C e  Pawnee Pecan – severe infection of n powdery mildew had no significant effect t on any of the measured quality e parameters. r

  50. Summary  Powdery Mildew infection is sporadic in L S occurrence and not considered a significant U economic problem, therefore specific fungicide application for powdery mildew A control is not recommended. g C e  Fungicide choice for pecan scab control will n impact powdery mildew infection. t e r

  51. L S U QUESTIONS?? A g C e n t e r

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend