Brent Warneke, Lindsey Thiessen, Tara Neill, Walt Mahaffee Grape - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

brent warneke lindsey thiessen tara neill walt mahaffee
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Brent Warneke, Lindsey Thiessen, Tara Neill, Walt Mahaffee Grape - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Brent Warneke, Lindsey Thiessen, Tara Neill, Walt Mahaffee Grape powdery mildew Life cycle Management Fungicide application timing Field mobility assessment Pinot Noir in the Willamette Valley, OR Primary y Infecti ction


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Brent Warneke, Lindsey Thiessen, Tara Neill, Walt Mahaffee

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Grape powdery mildew

  • Life cycle
  • Management

 Fungicide application timing  Field mobility assessment

Pinot Noir in the Willamette Valley, OR

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overwi rwinte nterin ing Primary y Infecti ction

  • n

Sexual xual reprodu duct ctio ion Asexual xual reprodu duct ctio ion

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Little natural resistance present in V. vinifera  Fungicides have been used successfully for 150 years  Typically applied on a calendar schedule Bordeaux mixture c. 1903 Sulfur dusting in Fresno, CA 1972

Gene Daniels, EPA Fr.wikipedia

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Primary ry Infect ction Secon econda dary ry Infect ction

Timing applications to critical fruit development stages increases disease control efficiency

Flowering and early cluster development

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 Motivations

  • We often find disease on inflorescences or clusters
  • Various products claim mobility to unprotected tissues

57 61 63 65 68 71 73 75 77

Graphics of the BBCH phenological scale (Lorenz et al., 1995)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Figur ure e 4. Air turbulence directing pollen into the cone between scale-bracts (A) and over the scale-bracts (B), and eddy formation redirecting airflow onto the leeward side of the cone. Image Credit: K. Niklas (27)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Determine the most effective fungicide application timing with relation to grape inflorescence phenological stage

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 3x5 factorial

  • 3 flowering stages
  • 5 fungicides

 Randomized complete block design  Weekly leaf incidence assessments  Berry incidence assessed prior to

veraison

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fungicide FRAC Group Activity Rate per acre Quinoxyfen 13 xylem mobility and volatilization 4 fl oz Tebuconazole 3 xylem mobile 4 oz Fluopyram 7 locally systemic 4 fl oz Trifloxystrobin 11 locally systemic 2 oz Sulfur M2 non-systemic, volatilization 3 lb

slide-12
SLIDE 12

57 61 63 65 68

Inflorescence elongation BBCH 55 50% Bloom BBCH 65 Berry set BBCH 69

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Experimental Treatments Disease assessments Cluster Collection Sulfur every 14 days Fungicide de applicati tion

  • ns

Data collecti ction

  • n

Sulfur every 14 days

April June May July August September

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

71 73 75 77 57 61 63 65 68

201 015 201 016

Fungicide de Stage Inflorescence elongation 50% Bloom Berry set

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Stage Inflorescence elongation 50% Bloom Berry set

2016 16 2015 15

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Bars are 95%

confidence intervals

  • Points are the

mean probability

  • f berry infection
slide-18
SLIDE 18

 The bold horizontal

line is at 1, indicating no difference between the two timings compared

 In general later

timings were more effective

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 40 clusters per treatment

were marked with ribbon

 During application clusters

were covered with plastic bags

 These clusters were

expected to have as much disease as the water control since they received no direct spray

Plastic bags covering clusters during an application

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 Difference in the

probability of infection between the water control and the bagged cluster

 Most of the

treatments showed some protective activity

  • Vapor movement

Fungicide

slide-21
SLIDE 21

 Fluopyram, quinoxyfen, and trifloxystrobin were most

efficacious when applied later in bloom

 All five fungicides tested appeared to be mobile in the field

  • Vapor movement

Applegate Valley Chardonnay, Southern Oregon

slide-22
SLIDE 22

 Using the concepts of fungicide mobility and

application timing to efficiently control powdery mildew on grape berries in a commercial setting

slide-23
SLIDE 23

 Foliar Pathology lab

  • Walt Mahaffee
  • Tara Neill
  • Lindsey Thiessen
  • Carly Allen
  • Bailey Williams
  • Katelynn Thrall
  • Chris Gorman
  • Andy Albrect

 OSU Botany farm

  • Steve Clusky
  • Collaborators
  • Jason Tosch, Stoller

Family Estate

  • Ashley Lindsay,

Willamette Valley Vineyard

  • Funding Source
  • Oregon Wine Board
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

 Lorenz, D. h., Eichhorn, K. w., Bleiholder, H., Klose, R., Meier,

U., & Weber, E. (1995). Growth Stages of the Grapevine: Phenological growth stages of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.

  • ssp. vinifera)—Codes and descriptions according to the

extended BBCH scale†. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 1(2), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755- 0238.1995.tb00085.x