THE IMPORTANCE OF EXPERIENCE Dr Teresa Senserrick, PhD Learner - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the importance of experience
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

THE IMPORTANCE OF EXPERIENCE Dr Teresa Senserrick, PhD Learner - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE IMPORTANCE OF EXPERIENCE Dr Teresa Senserrick, PhD Learner Driver Mentor Program Seminar Sydney, 12 May 2009 Overview > Youth and road trauma in NSW > Crash risk from Ls to Ps > Age versus inexperience > Why 120 hours? >


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE IMPORTANCE OF EXPERIENCE

Dr Teresa Senserrick, PhD

Learner Driver Mentor Program Seminar Sydney, 12 May 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

> Youth and road trauma in NSW > Crash risk from Ls to Ps > Age versus inexperience > Why 120 hours? > Common learner requirements > Does it work? > Conclusions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Over-representation of NSW youth in road trauma

> #1 cause of death & acquired disability > Novice drivers aged ≤25 years

> 15% licensed driver population > 36% road fatalities

> Novice driver crashes 1993-2003

> Over 1,000 fatalities

> 17 year-old P1 drivers

> 4x more likely to be involved in fatal crash than driver >25

(RTA, 2008)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Young driver casualty crash risk – Victoria

(VicRoads, 2008)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Young driver casualty crash risk - Queensland

(Queensland Transport, 2009)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Young driver crash risk – Nova Scotia, Canada

(Mayhew et al, 2003)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Young driver crash risk - Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, United States

(McCarrt et al, 2003)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Young driver crash risk - Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, United States

(McCarrt et al, 2003)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Older age at provisional licensure reduces crash risk

Figure 2. Self-reported crashes per million kilometres by licensing and crash age in The Netherlands (Twisk, 2007)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why 120 hours?

In September 1993, Sweden increased learner period > From 6 to 24 months > Minimum age from 17½ to 16 years > Minimum ‘provisional’ licence age remained 18 years > Minimum learner period remained 6 months Significant reductions in crashes for those using 24 months

> 40% reduction to previous years > 24% reduction compared to 6 months

> 15% overall reduction in crashes

Those using full 24-month learner period averaged 120 hours supervised driving compared to 45 hours for those licensed 6 months

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Common supervisory driving requirements for learners

Australia 0, 25, 50, 100, 120 hours Austria 3,000 kms* Finland 1,000 kms France 3,000 kms* Great Britain 15 hours Northern Ireland 10 hours Norway 2,000 kms Sweden 80 hours / 4,000 kms* United States 0, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60 hours

* Optional

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Positive findings - Austria: 3,000 km reduced crash risk

KEY: SE = traditional L17 = 3,000 km supervised driving option

(Twisk, 2007)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Negative findings - France: 3,000 km no change in crash risk

(Page et al, 2000; Twisk, 2007)

> Higher success rate on driving tests > No change in casualty crashes 2 years after introduction > Insufficient experience in complex situations

> Mostly routine trips, e.g., to local shops

> Demanding situations taken over by supervisory driver

> No real transfer to more independent driving

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusions

> Requirements too new for conclusive findings > Unknown impact on actual skill development Likely benefits > Extension of learner licence duration

> Effective in reducing crashes (5-32%)

> Older age at provisional licensure > Private vs professional training increases exposure

> Times of day & weather conditions, particularly at night and in darkness > Speed zones, road types & trip durations

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

Likely disbenefits > Disproportionate impact on disadvantaged communities

> Lack of qualified supervisory drivers > Lack of access to vehicle for supervised practices

> Potential to increase unlicensed driving

NEED FOR LEARNER DRIVER MENTOR PROGRAMS!