The Global Forest and Agricultural The Global Forest and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the global forest and agricultural the global forest and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Global Forest and Agricultural The Global Forest and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Global Forest and Agricultural The Global Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model Sector Optimization Model Uwe A. Schneider A. Schneider Uwe Christine Schleupner Schleupner Christine Kerstin Jantke Jantke Kerstin Erwin


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Global Forest and Agricultural The Global Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model Sector Optimization Model

Uwe Uwe A. Schneider

  • A. Schneider

Christine Christine Schleupner Schleupner Kerstin Kerstin Jantke Jantke Erwin Erwin Schmid Schmid Michael Michael Obersteiner Obersteiner

Energy Modeling Forum 22: Climate Policy Scenarios for Stabiliza Energy Modeling Forum 22: Climate Policy Scenarios for Stabilization tion and in Transition, Tsukuba, Japan, December 12 and in Transition, Tsukuba, Japan, December 12-

  • 14, 2006

14, 2006

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why Global FASOM? Why Global FASOM?

Global Trade Global Trade Pollution Leakage Pollution Leakage Global Externalities Global Externalities Heterogeneity Heterogeneity

– – Soils Soils – – Land management Land management

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Methodological Developments Methodological Developments

1.

  • 1. Regional Expansion (Global FASOM)

Regional Expansion (Global FASOM)

2.

  • 2. Soil State Dynamics

Soil State Dynamics

3.

  • 3. Biodiversity

Biodiversity

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 1. Regional Expansion
  • 1. Regional Expansion

Global FASOM Global FASOM

slide-5
SLIDE 5

FASOM History FASOM History

US (1993 US (1993-

  • )

) EU (2004 EU (2004-

  • )

) Global (2006 Global (2006-

  • )

)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

US/EU Regions US/EU Regions

Resources Land Use Technologies Processing Technologies Products Markets Inputs Limits Supply Functions Trade Demand Capacities Environmental Impacts

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Non Non-

  • US/EU Regions

US/EU Regions

Resources Land Use Technologies Processing Technologies Products Markets Inputs Limits Supply Functions Trade Demand Capacities Environmental Impacts

Supply

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tasks Tasks

US + EU FASOM + others US + EU FASOM + others Balance Regional Resolution Balance Regional Resolution Land use in non Land use in non-

  • US / non

US / non-

  • EU

EU – – Microeconomics (Data) Microeconomics (Data) – – Environmental impacts (Simulation) Environmental impacts (Simulation)

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 2. Soil State Dynamics
  • 2. Soil State Dynamics
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why Soil State Dynamics? Why Soil State Dynamics?

Vulnerability (Humus, Salt) Vulnerability (Humus, Salt) Climate Mitigation Climate Mitigation Productivity Productivity Desertification, Desertification, Salinization Salinization

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Soil Carbon Determinants Soil Carbon Determinants

Crop Choice Crop Choice Tillage Tillage Irrigation Irrigation Fertilization Fertilization Residue Mgt Residue Mgt Soil Carbon Soil Carbon Soil Soil Carbon Carbon Change Change

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 10 20 30 40 50 percentage change years

Cereal Straw Removal Cereal Straw Removal

Soil Organic Carbon Yields

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Soil Organic Carbon (tC/ha/20cm) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 10 20 30 40 50 Time (years) Wheat-Lucerne 3/3 Wheat-Lucerne 6/3 No-till wheat-fallow Tilled wheat-fallow

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Previous Previous

Curse of Dimensionality Curse of Dimensionality Use of constant emission/sequestration Use of constant emission/sequestration coefficients coefficients

New Development New Development

Markov chain using soil organic carbon as Markov chain using soil organic carbon as state variable (Schneider, 2007) state variable (Schneider, 2007)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Soil Carbon Transition Probabilities Soil Carbon Transition Probabilities

SOC1 SOC2 SOC3 SOC4 SOC5 SOC6 SOC7 SOC8 SOC1 0.81 0.19 SOC2 1 SOC3 0.09 0.91 SOC4 0.31 0.69 SOC5 0.5 0.5 SOC6 0.74 0.26 SOC7 1 SOC8 0.04 0.96 No-till wheat-Fallow

slide-16
SLIDE 16

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 10 20 30 40 50 Time (years) Wheat-Lucerne 3/3 Wheat-Lucerne 6/3 No-till wheat-fallow Tilled wheat-fallow Soil Organic Carbon (tC/ha/20cm)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Extensions Extensions

Soil Carbon Types Soil Carbon Types Salt Salt

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 3. Biodiversity
  • 3. Biodiversity
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Previous Treatment Previous Treatment

So far biodiversity is ignored in FASOM So far biodiversity is ignored in FASOM Comparable models use biodiversity scores Comparable models use biodiversity scores

New Development New Development

Species or habitat requirements Species or habitat requirements Habitat supply Habitat supply Currently limited to wetlands Currently limited to wetlands

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Vertebrate species as surrogates for Vertebrate species as surrogates for biodiversity biodiversity

– – 16 amphibians 16 amphibians – – 4 reptiles 4 reptiles – – 9 mammals 9 mammals – – 43 birds 43 birds

Habitat Requirements Habitat Requirements

72 wetland species of European conservation concern

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Multiple species may require the same Multiple species may require the same habitat habitat Eligible habitats must be of minimum size Eligible habitats must be of minimum size

Habitat Requirements Habitat Requirements

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Habitat Supply Habitat Supply

Ecosystem Type Ecosystem Type

– –

  • 1. Mires (Bogs, Fens)
  • 1. Mires (Bogs, Fens)

– –

  • 2. Wet forests (Alluvial Forests, Swamp Forests)
  • 2. Wet forests (Alluvial Forests, Swamp Forests)

– –

  • 3. Natural Grasslands
  • 3. Natural Grasslands

– –

  • 4. Open waters (Running Waters, Standing Waters)
  • 4. Open waters (Running Waters, Standing Waters)

Ecosystem Quality Ecosystem Quality

1. 1. Existing, Inhabited Existing, Inhabited 2. 2. Existing, Not inhabited Existing, Not inhabited 3. 3. Potential Potential

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Peatland (Fens, Bogs) Wetforests Marshes, Reeds, Sedges Open Waters

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Peatland (Fens, Bogs) Wetforests Marshes, Reeds, Sedges Open Waters

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Existing Wetlands Potential Wetlands Open Waters

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Existing Wetlands Potential Wetlands Open Waters

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conclusions Conclusions

Land use (change) may play an important Land use (change) may play an important new role via climate change mitigation new role via climate change mitigation However, land use impacts are complex However, land use impacts are complex and affect multiple non and affect multiple non-

  • market goods

market goods We should not solve today We should not solve today’ ’s problem by s problem by creating another one tomorrow creating another one tomorrow Land use under multiple environmental Land use under multiple environmental

  • bjectives may be much different than
  • bjectives may be much different than

under single (climate) objectives under single (climate) objectives

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Global Environmental Treaties Global Environmental Treaties

Framework Convention on Climate Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1992) Change (UNFCCC, 1992) Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, 1992) 1992) Convention to Combat Desertification Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD, 1996) (UNCCD, 1996)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

References References

Schneider, U. A. (2007). Schneider, U. A. (2007). Soil organic carbon Soil organic carbon changes in dynamic land use decision changes in dynamic land use decision models models. . Agriculture, Ecosystems and Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

  • Environment. In print.

. In print.