THE GANGA WAIT THE GANGA: WAIT TING FOR GODOT TING FOR GODOT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

THE GANGA WAIT THE GANGA: WAIT

Presentation by: Banjot Kaur, C

TING FOR GODOT TING FOR GODOT

Correspondent, Down To Earth

Holy River, U H y R , U

Ganga Action Plan I IN 1986 Ganga Action Plan I IN 1986 Ganga Action Plan II IN 1993 Closure of GAP I in 2000 (10 years delay Closure of GAP I in 2000 (10 years delay Yamuna Action Plan I in 2003 Yamuna Action Plan II in 2004 Y A P II NGBRA in 2004 Finance min announces Namami Gange in budget in g g Cabinet approval in May 2015, Rs 22000cr sanctio NMCG, formed in 2011, became authority via gaze O b October 2016 May 2018: Gadkari declared the Ganga would be c 80% by March 2019 y

Unholy attempts U y p

July 2014 y

• ned, decline 2019

etted notification in cleaned by 2020, 70-

CPCB

PROJECTS STATUS Till August 31, 2018)

236 sanctioned, 63 completed R d R Rs 22323.37 sanctioned, Rs 5291.78 spent 114 sewage projects sanctioned, 27 completed completed River front/ghats : 70 sanctioned, 27 completed Institutional devpt: Rs 1069.92cr sanctioned, Rs 37.06cr completed ff d Afforestation: Rs 236.56cr sanctioned, Rs 114 cr completed Source: NMCG Source: NMCG

)

UTTAR P UTTAR P

33 Sanctioned/ Sewer line: 110 Ghats/cremato l t d completed

RADESH RADESH

/8 completed 08 km laid/1643km

• ria: 81 sanctioned/7

Output of Kanpur tanneries

BIH BIH

Sewage: 21 san S l Sewer line: 172 sanctioned/38 /3 Ghats/cremato G / sanctioned/0 c

HAR HAR

l nctioned/0 completed k 22.36km 1.63km completed 3 p

• ria/riverfront: 5

/ 5

• mpleted

WEST B WEST B

16 sewage proje 16 sewage proje completed Sewer line: 627 i d sanctioned Gh t t Ghats.cremator sanctioned

BENGAL BENGAL

ects sanctioned/2 ects sanctioned/2 7km laid/1001.68km i 24 l t d/31 ria: 24 completed/31

JHARK JHARK

Sewage: 2 sanc S l Sewer line: 38.7 sanctioned Ghats/cremato G / completed/4 sa

KHAND KHAND

l ctioned/0 completed k l d k 78km laid/89km

• ria/riverfront: 0

/ anctioned

UTTARA UTTARA

32 sewage proje l d completed

AKHAND AKHAND

ects sanctioned, 15

LACK OF APPRO APPRO

IIT IIT report prep basin approach pp There are abou stem on the rive radar none inclu radar, none inclu the basin

F BASIN OACH OACH

d i R 6 f pared in Rs 16 crore for lies dumped p ut 90 cities all of main r which are on govt’s uded outside stem lying in uded outside stem lying in

E-FL E FL

Challenge is not to cle 59% baseflow amount r IIT Kharagpur’s Abhij IIT Kharagpur’s Abhij 14 ongoing and 14 pro g g p Bhagrirathi and Alakn G D A l G D Agarwal’s strugg Govt’s E flow notifica Govt s E-flow notifica

LOW LOW

an the river but save the river reduced from 1970s to 2016: ijeet Mukherjee ijeet Mukherjee

• posed projects on

p p j nanda basins: WWI report l gle ation: A bluff ation: A bluff

Twin pit toilets No though give a fad, but no solution en to sludge management

GOVER GLITC GLITC

GAP vs Namami Gange: Co- K ’ Vi d T b Kanpur’s Vinod Tare says bo No monitoring of MoUs with g PM-led National Ganga Cou Water Resources minister led 2017, supposed to meet once NMCG director post: musica N b tt h No bottom-up approach

NANCE CHES CHES

• ordination of departments, IIT-

th d th

• th are one and the same

10 ministries uncil has never met task force met only thrice since every three months al chairs: 7 people in six months

FINANC CLEA CLEA

More than Rs 986 II II IIT: 1 paise per litr IIT p s p Cost overruns mult deadlines Pl f f Planning of finance Sewer line cost in G than Rs 5k crore

CES OF AN UP AN-UP

6 crores spent in GAP I and re tiple times: Extended p UP SAAP es: UP SAAP, 2016— Ganga basin towns is more

WILL GANG CLE CLE

It will take 200 year considering your lin considering your lin 2014 Not a drop has bee It is an ever going p Tare T OR WILL IT KE GODOT?

A BE EVER EAN? EAN?

rs to clean the Ganga ne of action: SC to govt in ne of action: SC to govt in en cleaned: NGT in 2017 process: IIT-Kanpur’s Vinod EEP WAITING FOR

THANK THANK THANK THANK K YOU K YOU K YOU K YOU