The Evolution of Nuclear Security: From Sites to Summitry 23rd WiN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the evolution of nuclear security from sites to summitry
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Evolution of Nuclear Security: From Sites to Summitry 23rd WiN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Evolution of Nuclear Security: From Sites to Summitry 23rd WiN Global Annual Conference: Women in Nuclear Meet Atoms for Peace Ms. Corey Hinderstein Senior Coordinator for the Nuclear Security Summit and Nonproliferation Policy Affairs


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Evolution of Nuclear Security: From Sites to Summitry

23rd WiN Global Annual Conference: Women in Nuclear Meet Atoms for Peace

  • Ms. Corey Hinderstein

Senior Coordinator for the Nuclear Security Summit and Nonproliferation Policy Affairs August 25, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mandatory Disclaimer

  • Views are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the

National Nuclear Security Administration or the Department of Energy

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A Trip in the Way Back Machine

  • Old-Fashioned views about nuclear security
  • Backseat to safety by operators and regulators
  • Little attention of senior management or Boards of Directors
  • Different from plant/critical infrastructure/industrial security
  • Domain of the “wave techs”
  • Engineers vs. Law Enforcement/Military attitudes
  • Resource burden placed by regulators, if even that
  • Undermining of productivity, operational efficiency and profits
  • Security department was the place to put the person with a bad

back, a bad attitude, or both.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Not so long ago…

  • Conventional wisdom about nuclear terrorism
  • Mass casualties are counter to political goals of

terrorist groups

  • A terrorist group could never build a nuclear weapon
  • Material is self protecting
  • What changed?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nuclear Security Summits

“So today I am announcing a new international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years...And we should start by having a Global Summit on Nuclear Security that the United States will host within the next year.” 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

2010 Washington Nuclear Security Summit

  • 50 world leaders, 3 international organizations
  • “House gifts” and other national commitments – over 90%

completed by 2012 Summit

  • Outcomes -- material removed or eliminated, treaties ratified and

implemented (CPPNM/A), reactors converted, regulations strengthened, “Centers of Excellence” launched

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit

  • 53 Countries and 3 IOs
  • More than 100 national

commitments

  • 13 “gift baskets” pushing beyond the

consensus boundaries of the Communique

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

2014 Hague Nuclear Security Summit

  • 53 countries, 4 IOs
  • Tangible Outcomes:
  • Announced removals of HEU and Pu
  • Security at sites and on borders is increasing
  • The global nuclear security architecture continues to be strengthened
  • Radioactive source security enhanced
  • 35 countries pledged to implement stronger nuclear security practices
  • Baby steps on military materials and non-accumulation of separated plutonium.
  • Radiological terrorism exercise
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Looking Ahead to 2016

9

  • March 30-April 1 in

Washington, DC

  • Focus on sustainability

through the global nuclear security architecture.

  • IAEA, UN, INTERPOL,

GICNT and GP

  • Communique
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Since 2010…so far

  • > 2.5 metric tons of vulnerable HEU and plutonium

material have been removed or disposed of

  • Seven countries – Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary,

Mexico, Serbia, Ukraine, and Vietnam – have become HEU-free*

  • Physical security upgrades have been completed at

32 buildings storing weapons-usable fissile materials

  • Radiation detection equipment has been installed at

250 international border crossings, airports, and seaports to combat illicit trafficking in nuclear materials

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Back Where We Started – Security Begins at the Site

  • No matter what the Presidents and Prime

Ministers say at a the NSS, the material is in the custody of facilities, in the control of individuals

  • “Security Culture” is vital for implementation

and sustainability

  • Demonstrable competence should be a

principle at all levels of security management

  • Everyone has a role to play, no matter where

you sit

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

THANK YOU

Comments or Questions? Corey.Hinderstein@nnsa.doe.gov

12