the evaluation of american option prices under stochastic
play

The evaluation of American option prices under stochastic volatility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The evaluation of American option prices under stochastic volatility and jump-diffusion dynamics Carl Chiarella , Boda Kang , Gunter Meyer and Andrew Ziogas School of Finance and Economics, UTS School of Mathematics, Georgia


  1. The evaluation of American option prices under stochastic volatility and jump-diffusion dynamics Carl Chiarella ∗ , Boda Kang ∗ , Gunter Meyer † and Andrew Ziogas ‡ ∗ School of Finance and Economics, UTS † School of Mathematics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta ‡ Integral Energy, Australia Workshop on Mathematical Finance Wolfgang Runggaldier’s 65th Birthday Bressanone 16-20 July, 2007

  2. 1 Introduction • Implied volatilities found using traded option prices vary with respect to option moneyness; smiles and skews are observed . • Use alternative to the Black-Scholes asset return dynamics to capture the leptokurtosis found in financial time series data e.g. Merton’s (1976) jump-diffusion model, Heston’s (1993) stochastic volatility model, Scott’s (1997) SV + Jumps model, L´ evy processes - Cont & Tankov (2004). • Pricing European options under these alternative dynamics well-developed. American option prices are much harder to evaluate in these cases. 1 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  3. • Aims of this paper are: – to derive the integral equations for the price and early exercise boundary of an American call option under the combination of Heston’s (1993) square root and Merton’s (1976) jump diffusion processes; – to extend the Fourier transform method as reformulated by Jamshid- ian (1992) to this; and – to investigate numerical solution of the IPDE via the method of lines . 2 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  4. 2 Presentation Overview • Review of existing literature. • Problem definition. • The solution using the Fourier transform. • Structure of the solution. • Solving the IPDE directly via the method of lines. • Solving the IPDE via componentwise splitting. • Numerical results. • Conclusion. 3 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  5. 3 Literature Review: American Option • Kim (1990), Jacka (1991), Carr, Jarrow & Myneni (1992) : various derivation methods; decompose option price into European price plus an early premium term. • Jamshidian (1992) : transforms homogeneous FBVP to inhomogeneous unrestricted BVP. • Meyer and Van der Hoek (1997) : Method of Lines. • Various authors : Finite difference methods, finite element methods etc. 4 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  6. 4 Literature Review: Stochastic Volatility • Characteristic Functions (Heston, 1993): extended to American op- tions by Tzavalis & Wang (2003) . • Probability Methods (Jacka, 1991): extended to stochastic volatility for American options by Touzi (1999) . • Compound Option Approach (Kim, 1990; Geske & Johnson, 1984): extended by Zhylyevsky (2005) using Fast Fourier Transforms. • Incomplete Fourier Transform and modifications (McKean ,1965; Jamshidian, 1992): extended to stochastic volatility by Chiarella and Ziogas (2006) . 5 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  7. 5 Literature Review: Jump Diffusions • Merton (1976) : European call options under jump-diffusion. • Pham (1997) : American puts under jump-diffusion; behaviour of the price and free boundary using Ito calculus. • Gukhal (2001) : Kim’s method for American calls and puts under jump- diffusion. • Meyer (1998) : Method of lines. 6 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  8. 6 Literature Review: SV + JD • Bates (1996) : SV + JD model applied to Deutshe Mark options. • Scott (1997) : European options - Fourier transform approach. • Cont and Tankov (2004) : From the perspective of Levy processes. 7 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  9. 7 SV + JD Dynamics • SDE for S : dS = ( µ − λk ) Sdt + √ vSdZ 1 + ( Y − 1) Sd ¯ q, dv = κ v ( θ − v ) dt + σ √ vdZ 2 , dZ j ∼ N (0 , dt ) , E [ dZ 1 dZ 2 ] = ρdt, � ∞ k = E Q [( Y − 1)] = ( Y − 1) G ( Y ) dY. 0 8 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  10. 8 American Call: Free Boundary Value Problem � � Z ∞ • IPDE for C ( S, v, τ ) : ∂τ = vS 2 ∂ 2 C ∂S 2 + ρσvS ∂ 2 C ∂S∂v + σ 2 v ∂ 2 C ∂C ∂v 2 2 2 Z ∞ S ∂C + (1 − λ J ( Y ))( Y − 1) G ( Y ) dY r − q − λ ∂S 0 + ( κ v [ θ − v ] − λ v v ) ∂C ∂v − rC + λ (1 − λ J ( Y ))[ C ( SY, v, τ ) − C ( S, v, τ )] G ( Y ) dY, 0 • λ J ( Y ) - the MPR associated with a jump in S with magnitude Y . • Assume the market price of volatility risk is of the form √ v . λ ( v ) = λ v 9 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  11. • Solved in the region 0 ≤ τ ≤ T , 0 < S ≤ b ( v, τ ) . • Subject to BCs C ( S, v, 0) = max( S − K, 0) , C ( b ( v, τ ) , v, τ ) = b ( v, τ ) − K, ∂C ∂C lim ∂S = 1 , lim ∂v = 0 . S → b ( v,τ ) S → b ( v,τ ) 10 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  12. • In the volatility domain the boundary conditions are ∂C ( S, 0 , τ ) = ∂τ � ∞ � � S ∂C ( S, 0 , τ ) r − q − λ (1 − λ J ( Y ))( Y − 1) G ( Y ) dY ∂S 0 + κ v θ∂C ( S, 0 , τ ) − rC ( S, 0 , τ ) ∂v � ∞ + λ (1 − λ J ( Y ))[ C ( SY, 0 , τ ) − C ( S, 0 , τ )] G ( Y ) dY, 0 v →∞ C ( S, v, τ ) = S. lim 11 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  13. 9 The Different Approaches to American Option Pricing M C Kean:- Domain Charge Jamshidiam:- Kim:- ✛ ✲ Homogeneous PDE Inhomogeneous PDE Compound Option 0 < S < a ( τ ) 0 < S < ∞ R τ R τ � � � � Incomplete Fourier Induction Fourier Transform Limit R τ Transform R τ ❄ ❄ ❄ � � � � C Am ( S,τ )= F M 0 G M ( a ( ξ ) , a ′ ( ξ ) ,S,ξ ) dξ ✛ ✲ C Am ( S,τ )= F K 0 G K ( a ( ξ ) ,S,ξ ) dξ Integration a ( τ )= F a 0 G a a ( τ )= F a 0 G a M ( a ( ξ ) , a ′ ( ξ ) ,a ( τ ) ,ξ ) dξ by Parts K ( a ( ξ ) ,a ( τ ) ,ξ ) dξ M K 12 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  14. C ( S, v, τ ) � C ( S − , v, τ ) • C ( S + , v, τ ) • • • K b ( v, τ ) S − S Cost S + = Y S − Cost incurred by the investor from downward jumps in S . 16 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  15. 13 General Form of the Solution • The Jamshidiam approach gives the solution of the form � τ C ( S, v, τ ) = Ω C ( S, v, τ ) + Ψ C [ b ( ξ ) , ξ, τ, S, v ; C ( · , ξ )] dξ, 0 � τ b ( v, τ ) = Ω a ( b ( τ ) , v, τ ) + Ψ a [ b ( ξ ) , ξ, τ, b ( τ ) , v ; C ( · , ξ )] dξ, 0 31 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  16. 14 Numerical Solution Using the Method of Lines • The method of lines has several strengths when dealing with American options: – The price , free boundary , delta and gamma are all found as part of the computation. – The method discretises the IPDE in an intuitive manner, and is read- ily adapted to be second order accurate in time . • The key idea behind the method of lines is to replace an IPDE with an equivalent system of one-dimensional integro-differential equations (IDEs). • The system of IDEs is developed by discretising the time derivative and the derivative terms involving the volatility, v . • We must provide a means of dealing with the integral term. 32 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  17. • The IPDE to be solved is ∂τ = vS 2 ∂ 2 C ∂S 2 + ρσvS ∂ 2 C ∂S∂v + σ 2 v ∂ 2 C ∂C ∂v 2 2 2 + ( r − q − λ ∗ k ∗ ) S ∂C ∂S + ( α − βv ) ∂C ∂v � ∞ − ( r + λ ∗ ) C + λ ∗ C ( SY, v, τ ) G ∗ ( Y ) dY, 0 where α ≡ κ v θ and β ≡ κ v + λ v . • The domain for the problem is 0 ≤ τ ≤ T , 0 ≤ S ≤ b ( v, τ ) and 0 ≤ v < ∞ . 33 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  18. • We discretise according to τ n = n ∆ τ and v m = m ∆ v . • C ( S, v m , τ n ) = C n m ( S ) , V ( S, v m , τ n ) ≡ ∂C ( S, v m , τ n ) = V n m ( S ) . ∂S • We use the standard central difference scheme ∂ 2 C ∂v 2 = C n m +1 − 2 C n m + C n m − 1 , (∆ v ) 2 ∂S∂v = V n ∂ 2 C m +1 − V n m − 1 . 2∆ v • We use an upwinding finite difference scheme for the first order deriv- ative term  C n m +1 − C n v ≤ α m β , if ∂C  ∆ v ∂v = C n m − C n v > α m − 1 β . if  ∆ v 34 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

  19. • Integral term at each grid point estimated via num. integration. • We assume that the jump sizes are log-normally distributed. • Applying the Hermite Gauss-quadrature scheme, we have J √ 1 � � �� � ( γ − δ 2 / 2) + W n w H j C n 2 δX H m = S exp , √ π m j j =0 • We interpolate for the required values of C n m using cubic splines fitted in S along each line in v . • A second order approximation for the time derivative , m − C n − 1 C n − 1 − C n − 2 C n ∂C ∂τ = 3 + 1 m m m . 2 ∆ τ 2 ∆ τ 35 Chiarella, Kang, Meyer and Ziogas American Options – Stochastic Volatility + Jumps

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend