The equality of the homogeneous and the Gabor wave front set Patrik - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the equality of the homogeneous and the gabor wave front
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The equality of the homogeneous and the Gabor wave front set Patrik - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The equality of the homogeneous and the Gabor wave front set Patrik Wahlberg Universit` a di Torino Joint work with Ren e Schulz, G ottingen XXXIII Convegno Nazionale di Analisi Armonica 1720 giugno 2013 Alba Plan of the talk P.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The equality of the homogeneous and the Gabor wave front set

Patrik Wahlberg

Universit` a di Torino Joint work with Ren´ e Schulz, G¨

  • ttingen

XXXIII Convegno Nazionale di Analisi Armonica 17–20 giugno 2013 Alba

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plan of the talk

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 2 / 18

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Plan of the talk

A brief reveiw of the C ∞ wave front set WF(u) of u ∈ D′(Rd)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 2 / 18

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Plan of the talk

A brief reveiw of the C ∞ wave front set WF(u) of u ∈ D′(Rd) The Gabor (global) wave front set WFG(u) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) (H¨

  • rmander 1991)
  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 2 / 18

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Plan of the talk

A brief reveiw of the C ∞ wave front set WF(u) of u ∈ D′(Rd) The Gabor (global) wave front set WFG(u) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) (H¨

  • rmander 1991)

The homogeneous wave front set HWF(u) (Nakamura 2005)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 2 / 18

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Plan of the talk

A brief reveiw of the C ∞ wave front set WF(u) of u ∈ D′(Rd) The Gabor (global) wave front set WFG(u) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) (H¨

  • rmander 1991)

The homogeneous wave front set HWF(u) (Nakamura 2005) Main result: WFG(u) = HWF(u) for u ∈ S ′(Rd)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 2 / 18

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Plan of the talk

A brief reveiw of the C ∞ wave front set WF(u) of u ∈ D′(Rd) The Gabor (global) wave front set WFG(u) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) (H¨

  • rmander 1991)

The homogeneous wave front set HWF(u) (Nakamura 2005) Main result: WFG(u) = HWF(u) for u ∈ S ′(Rd) A tool for the proof: global semiclassical pseudo-differential calculus

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 2 / 18

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The C ∞ wave front set

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 3 / 18

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The C ∞ wave front set

Precursor by M. Sato 1969 (hyperfunctions)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 3 / 18

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The C ∞ wave front set

Precursor by M. Sato 1969 (hyperfunctions) Introduced by H¨

  • rmander 1971 in “Fourier integral operators I”
  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 3 / 18

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The C ∞ wave front set

Precursor by M. Sato 1969 (hyperfunctions) Introduced by H¨

  • rmander 1971 in “Fourier integral operators I”

u ∈ D′(Rd), x0 ∈ Rd, ξ0 ∈ Rd \ {0}.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 3 / 18

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The C ∞ wave front set

Precursor by M. Sato 1969 (hyperfunctions) Introduced by H¨

  • rmander 1971 in “Fourier integral operators I”

u ∈ D′(Rd), x0 ∈ Rd, ξ0 ∈ Rd \ {0}. (x0, ξ0) / ∈ WF(u) if ∃ϕ ∈ C ∞

c (Rd), ∃Γ ⊆ Rd \ {0} conic, open, and

ξ0 ∈ Γ, such that ϕ(x0) = 0 and sup

ξ∈Γ

ξN|F(uϕ)(ξ)| < ∞ ∀N ≥ 0 where ξ = (1 + |ξ|2)1/2

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 3 / 18

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The C ∞ wave front set

Precursor by M. Sato 1969 (hyperfunctions) Introduced by H¨

  • rmander 1971 in “Fourier integral operators I”

u ∈ D′(Rd), x0 ∈ Rd, ξ0 ∈ Rd \ {0}. (x0, ξ0) / ∈ WF(u) if ∃ϕ ∈ C ∞

c (Rd), ∃Γ ⊆ Rd \ {0} conic, open, and

ξ0 ∈ Γ, such that ϕ(x0) = 0 and sup

ξ∈Γ

ξN|F(uϕ)(ξ)| < ∞ ∀N ≥ 0 where ξ = (1 + |ξ|2)1/2 x0 ξ0 Γ

Figure: x-space and the dual ξ-space

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 3 / 18

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 4 / 18

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

π(WF(u)) = sing supp(u), u ∈ D′(Rd), π(x, ξ) = x

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 4 / 18

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

π(WF(u)) = sing supp(u), u ∈ D′(Rd), π(x, ξ) = x WF(u) = ∅ ⇐ ⇒ u ∈ C ∞

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 4 / 18

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

π(WF(u)) = sing supp(u), u ∈ D′(Rd), π(x, ξ) = x WF(u) = ∅ ⇐ ⇒ u ∈ C ∞ H¨

  • rmander classes: m ∈ R, 0 ≤ δ < ρ ≤ 1

a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ

if |∂α

x ∂β ξ a(x, ξ)| ≤ Cα,βξm+δ|α|−ρ|β|,

x, ξ ∈ Rd

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 4 / 18

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

π(WF(u)) = sing supp(u), u ∈ D′(Rd), π(x, ξ) = x WF(u) = ∅ ⇐ ⇒ u ∈ C ∞ H¨

  • rmander classes: m ∈ R, 0 ≤ δ < ρ ≤ 1

a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ

if |∂α

x ∂β ξ a(x, ξ)| ≤ Cα,βξm+δ|α|−ρ|β|,

x, ξ ∈ Rd Characteristic set of a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ: (x0, ξ0) ∈ (Rd × (Rd \ 0)) \ char(a) if

|a(x, ξ)| ≥ εξm, (x, ξ) ∈ Γ, |ξ| ≥ A ≥ 0, ε > 0, where (x0, ξ0) ∈ Γ, and Γ is open and conic in ξ: (x, ξ) ∈ Γ, t > 0 ⇒ (x, tξ) ∈ Γ

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 4 / 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 5 / 18

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

Microsupport of a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ: (x0, ξ0) ∈ (Rd × (Rd \ 0)) \ µ supp(a) if

|∂α

x ∂β ξ a(x, ξ)| ≤ Cα,β,Mξ−M,

M ≥ 0, (x, ξ) ∈ Γ where Γ is open, conic in ξ, and (x0, ξ0) ∈ Γ.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 5 / 18

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

Microsupport of a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ: (x0, ξ0) ∈ (Rd × (Rd \ 0)) \ µ supp(a) if

|∂α

x ∂β ξ a(x, ξ)| ≤ Cα,β,Mξ−M,

M ≥ 0, (x, ξ) ∈ Γ where Γ is open, conic in ξ, and (x0, ξ0) ∈ Γ. Weyl quantization: a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ, f ∈ S (Rd)

aw(x, D)f (x) = (2π)−d

  • R2d eix−y,ξa

x + y 2 , ξ

  • f (y) dy dξ
  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 5 / 18

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

Microsupport of a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ: (x0, ξ0) ∈ (Rd × (Rd \ 0)) \ µ supp(a) if

|∂α

x ∂β ξ a(x, ξ)| ≤ Cα,β,Mξ−M,

M ≥ 0, (x, ξ) ∈ Γ where Γ is open, conic in ξ, and (x0, ξ0) ∈ Γ. Weyl quantization: a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ, f ∈ S (Rd)

aw(x, D)f (x) = (2π)−d

  • R2d eix−y,ξa

x + y 2 , ξ

  • f (y) dy dξ

Theorem 1 (Inclusions)

If a ∈ Sm

ρ,δ and u ∈ S ′(Rd) then

WF(aw(x, D)u) ⊆ WF(u) ∩ µ supp(a) WF(u) ⊆ WF(aw(x, D)u) ∪ char(a)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 5 / 18

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Basic properties of the C ∞ wave front set

Microlocal characterization: WF(u) =

  • a∈S0

1,0: aw(x,D)u∈C ∞

char(a)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 6 / 18

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The Gabor wave front set

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 7 / 18

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The Gabor wave front set

Introduced by H¨

  • rmander in Quadratic hyperbolic operators,

Microlocal Analysis and Applications, LNM vol. 1495, L. Cattabriga,

  • L. Rodino (Eds.), pp. 118–160, 1991
  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 7 / 18

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Gabor wave front set

Introduced by H¨

  • rmander in Quadratic hyperbolic operators,

Microlocal Analysis and Applications, LNM vol. 1495, L. Cattabriga,

  • L. Rodino (Eds.), pp. 118–160, 1991

Shubin symbol classes: m ∈ R, a ∈ G m if |∂α

x ∂β ξ a(x, ξ)| ≤ Cα,β(x, ξ)m−|α|−|β|,

(x, ξ) ∈ R2d

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 7 / 18

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The Gabor wave front set

Introduced by H¨

  • rmander in Quadratic hyperbolic operators,

Microlocal Analysis and Applications, LNM vol. 1495, L. Cattabriga,

  • L. Rodino (Eds.), pp. 118–160, 1991

Shubin symbol classes: m ∈ R, a ∈ G m if |∂α

x ∂β ξ a(x, ξ)| ≤ Cα,β(x, ξ)m−|α|−|β|,

(x, ξ) ∈ R2d A noncharacteristic point for a ∈ G m is a point in the phase space z0 = (x0, ξ0) ∈ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} such that |a(x, ξ)| ≥ ε(x, ξ)m, (x, ξ) ∈ Γ, |(x, ξ)| ≥ A where A, ε > 0 and Γ ⊆ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} is an open conic set such that z0 ∈ Γ

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 7 / 18

slide-28
SLIDE 28

z0 x ξ Γ

Figure: A cone in the phase space (x, ξ)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 8 / 18

slide-29
SLIDE 29

For a ∈ G m, char(a) ⊆ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} is the complement of the noncharacteristic points

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 9 / 18

slide-30
SLIDE 30

For a ∈ G m, char(a) ⊆ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} is the complement of the noncharacteristic points

Definition 2

The Gabor wave front set WFG(u) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) is the set of all phase space points (x, ξ) ∈ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} such that a ∈ G m, aw(x, D)u ∈ S ⇒ (x, ξ) ∈ char(a)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 9 / 18

slide-31
SLIDE 31

For a ∈ G m, char(a) ⊆ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} is the complement of the noncharacteristic points

Definition 2

The Gabor wave front set WFG(u) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) is the set of all phase space points (x, ξ) ∈ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} such that a ∈ G m, aw(x, D)u ∈ S ⇒ (x, ξ) ∈ char(a) WFG(u) =

  • a∈G ∞: aw(x,D)u∈S

char(a)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 9 / 18

slide-32
SLIDE 32

For a ∈ G m, char(a) ⊆ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} is the complement of the noncharacteristic points

Definition 2

The Gabor wave front set WFG(u) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) is the set of all phase space points (x, ξ) ∈ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} such that a ∈ G m, aw(x, D)u ∈ S ⇒ (x, ξ) ∈ char(a) WFG(u) =

  • a∈G ∞: aw(x,D)u∈S

char(a)

Theorem 3 (H¨

  • rmander 1991)

Let u ∈ S ′(Rd). Then WFG(u) = ∅ if and only if u ∈ S (Rd).

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 9 / 18

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Theorem 4 (H¨

  • rmander 1991)

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) and a ∈ G m then WFG(aw(x, D)u) ⊆ WFG(u)

  • conesupp(a)

WFG(u) ⊆ WFG(aw(x, D)u)

  • char(a)

The conic support conesupp(a) of a ∈ D′(Rd) is the set of all x ∈ Rd \ {0} such that any conic open set Γx containing x satisfies: supp(a) ∩ Γx is not compact in Rd.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 10 / 18

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Theorem 4 (H¨

  • rmander 1991)

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) and a ∈ G m then WFG(aw(x, D)u) ⊆ WFG(u)

  • conesupp(a)

WFG(u) ⊆ WFG(aw(x, D)u)

  • char(a)

The conic support conesupp(a) of a ∈ D′(Rd) is the set of all x ∈ Rd \ {0} such that any conic open set Γx containing x satisfies: supp(a) ∩ Γx is not compact in Rd. supp(a) conesupp(a)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 10 / 18

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Microlocal characterization

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 11 / 18

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Microlocal characterization

Translation Txf (y) = f (y − x), modulation Mξf (y) = eiy,ξf (y)

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 11 / 18

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Microlocal characterization

Translation Txf (y) = f (y − x), modulation Mξf (y) = eiy,ξf (y) ϕ ∈ S (Rd) \ {0} window function. The short-time Fourier transform (STFT) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) is Vϕu(x, ξ) = (u, MξTxϕ) = F(uTxϕ)(ξ), x, ξ ∈ Rd

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 11 / 18

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Microlocal characterization

Translation Txf (y) = f (y − x), modulation Mξf (y) = eiy,ξf (y) ϕ ∈ S (Rd) \ {0} window function. The short-time Fourier transform (STFT) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) is Vϕu(x, ξ) = (u, MξTxϕ) = F(uTxϕ)(ξ), x, ξ ∈ Rd

Definition 5 (rapid decay of the STFT in a cone)

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) and ϕ ∈ S (Rd) \ {0} then for z0 ∈ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} we say that z0 / ∈ WF ′(u) if there exists an open conic set Γz0 ⊆ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} containing z0 such that sup

z∈Γz0

zN|Vϕu(z)| < ∞ ∀N ≥ 0.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 11 / 18

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Microlocal characterization

Translation Txf (y) = f (y − x), modulation Mξf (y) = eiy,ξf (y) ϕ ∈ S (Rd) \ {0} window function. The short-time Fourier transform (STFT) of u ∈ S ′(Rd) is Vϕu(x, ξ) = (u, MξTxϕ) = F(uTxϕ)(ξ), x, ξ ∈ Rd

Definition 5 (rapid decay of the STFT in a cone)

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) and ϕ ∈ S (Rd) \ {0} then for z0 ∈ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} we say that z0 / ∈ WF ′(u) if there exists an open conic set Γz0 ⊆ T ∗(Rd) \ {(0, 0)} containing z0 such that sup

z∈Γz0

zN|Vϕu(z)| < ∞ ∀N ≥ 0.

Theorem 6 (microlocal characterization of WFG)

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) then WF ′(u) = WFG(u).

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 11 / 18

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The homogeneous wave front set

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 12 / 18

slide-41
SLIDE 41

The homogeneous wave front set

Dilation by a small parameter: ah(z) = a(hz), 0 < h ≤ 1, z ∈ R2d.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 12 / 18

slide-42
SLIDE 42

The homogeneous wave front set

Dilation by a small parameter: ah(z) = a(hz), 0 < h ≤ 1, z ∈ R2d.

Definition 7 (Nakamura 2005)

Let u ∈ S ′(Rd). A point (x, ξ) ∈ R2d \ {0} is not in the homogeneous wave front set HWF(u) if there exists a ∈ C ∞

c (R2d) with a(x, ξ) = 1

such that aw

h (x, D)uL2 = aw(hx, hD)uL2 = O(h∞) for h ∈ (0, 1].

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 12 / 18

slide-43
SLIDE 43

The homogeneous wave front set

Dilation by a small parameter: ah(z) = a(hz), 0 < h ≤ 1, z ∈ R2d.

Definition 7 (Nakamura 2005)

Let u ∈ S ′(Rd). A point (x, ξ) ∈ R2d \ {0} is not in the homogeneous wave front set HWF(u) if there exists a ∈ C ∞

c (R2d) with a(x, ξ) = 1

such that aw

h (x, D)uL2 = aw(hx, hD)uL2 = O(h∞) for h ∈ (0, 1].

Here O(h∞) means O(hN) for any integer N ≥ 0.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 12 / 18

slide-44
SLIDE 44

The homogeneous wave front set

Dilation by a small parameter: ah(z) = a(hz), 0 < h ≤ 1, z ∈ R2d.

Definition 7 (Nakamura 2005)

Let u ∈ S ′(Rd). A point (x, ξ) ∈ R2d \ {0} is not in the homogeneous wave front set HWF(u) if there exists a ∈ C ∞

c (R2d) with a(x, ξ) = 1

such that aw

h (x, D)uL2 = aw(hx, hD)uL2 = O(h∞) for h ∈ (0, 1].

Here O(h∞) means O(hN) for any integer N ≥ 0. Semiclassical analysis: ah(x, ξ) = a(x, hξ), x, ξ ∈ Rd, 0 < h ≤ 1.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 12 / 18

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The main result

Theorem 8 (Schulz, PW ’13)

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) then WFG(u) = HWF(u).

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 13 / 18

slide-46
SLIDE 46

The main tool: a global semiclassical calculus of ΨDOs

Definition 9

Let a = a(z; h) ∈ C ∞(R2d × (0, 1]). Then a is a h-Shubin symbol of

  • rder m ∈ R, denoted a ∈ G m

h , if for all α ∈ N2d there exists a constant

Cα > 0 such that |∂α

z a(z; h)| ≤ Cαh|α|hzm−|α|,

z ∈ R2d, h ∈ (0, 1].

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 14 / 18

slide-47
SLIDE 47

The main tool: a global semiclassical calculus of ΨDOs

Definition 9

Let a = a(z; h) ∈ C ∞(R2d × (0, 1]). Then a is a h-Shubin symbol of

  • rder m ∈ R, denoted a ∈ G m

h , if for all α ∈ N2d there exists a constant

Cα > 0 such that |∂α

z a(z; h)| ≤ Cαh|α|hzm−|α|,

z ∈ R2d, h ∈ (0, 1]. A typical case of an h-dependent symbol in G m

h is

ah(z) = a(hz), z ∈ R2d, h ∈ (0, 1], where a ∈ G m.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 14 / 18

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Definition 10

Let aj ∈ G mj

h , j = 0, 1, . . . , where mj → −∞ as j → +∞, let

a ∈ C ∞(R2d × (0, 1]) and h ∈ (0, 1]. Set mj = maxk≥j mk. We write a ∼

  • j=0

h

m0−mjaj

provided a −

N−1

  • j=0

h

m0−mjaj ∈ h m0− mNG mN h

, N ≥ 1, i.e. for any α ∈ N2d there exists CN,α > 0 such that

  • ∂α

z

 a(z; h) −

N−1

  • j=0

h

m0−mjaj(z; h)

 

  • ≤ CN,αh

m0− mN+|α|hz mN−|α|,

z ∈ R2d, h ∈ (0, 1].

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 15 / 18

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Lemma 11

Suppose aj ∈ G mj

h

for j = 0, 1, . . . , where mj → −∞ as j → ∞, and suppose there exists ε > 0 such that supp(aj(·/h; h)) ∩ Bε = ∅, h ∈ (0, 1], j = 0, 1, . . . . Then there exists a ∈ G

m0 h

such that a ∼ ∞

0 h m0−mjaj.

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 16 / 18

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Theorem 12

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) and a ∼ 0 then aw(x, D)uL2 = O(h∞).

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 17 / 18

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Theorem 12

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) and a ∼ 0 then aw(x, D)uL2 = O(h∞). The Weyl product: (a#b)w(x, D) = aw(x, D)bw(x, D).

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 17 / 18

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Theorem 12

If u ∈ S ′(Rd) and a ∼ 0 then aw(x, D)uL2 = O(h∞). The Weyl product: (a#b)w(x, D) = aw(x, D)bw(x, D).

Theorem 13

If a ∈ G m

h and b ∈ G n h then a#b ∈ G m+n h

and a#b(z) ∼

  • j=0

h2j (iσ(D)/2)j j! (a ⊗ b)h−1

  • h(z,z).
  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 17 / 18

slide-53
SLIDE 53

A consequence: an invariance result for the homogeneous wave front set

Theorem 14

Let u ∈ S ′(Rd) and suppose a ∈ C ∞

c (R2d), z0 ∈ R2d \ {0}, a(z0) = 1

and aw

h (x, D)uL2 = O(h∞),

h ∈ (0, 1]. Then there exists a relatively compact neighborhood U of z0, such that for any b ∈ C ∞

c (R2d) with supp(b) ⊆ U we have

bw

h (x, D)uL2 = O(h∞),

h ∈ (0, 1].

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 18 / 18

slide-54
SLIDE 54

A consequence: an invariance result for the homogeneous wave front set

Theorem 14

Let u ∈ S ′(Rd) and suppose a ∈ C ∞

c (R2d), z0 ∈ R2d \ {0}, a(z0) = 1

and aw

h (x, D)uL2 = O(h∞),

h ∈ (0, 1]. Then there exists a relatively compact neighborhood U of z0, such that for any b ∈ C ∞

c (R2d) with supp(b) ⊆ U we have

bw

h (x, D)uL2 = O(h∞),

h ∈ (0, 1].

– Thank you for your attention –

  • P. Wahlberg (Torino)

Homogeneous and Gabor wave front set XXXIII Conv. Naz. A.A. 18 / 18