the effect of diffusion on a line on fisher kpp
play

The effect of diffusion on a line on Fisher-KPP propagation In - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The effect of diffusion on a line on Fisher-KPP propagation In honor of Jean-Michel Coron Henri Berestycki EHESS, PSL Research University, Paris, ReaDi project - ERC IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 1/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on


  1. The effect of diffusion on a line on Fisher-KPP propagation In honor of Jean-Michel Coron Henri Berestycki EHESS, PSL Research University, Paris, ReaDi project - ERC IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 1/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 1 /

  2. Fisher - KPP equation Homogeneous reaction-diffusion equations x ∈ R N , t > 0 ∂ t v − d ∆ v = f ( v ) 2/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 2 /

  3. Fisher - KPP equation Fisher – KPP case � t > 0 , x ∈ R N ∂ t v = d ∆ v + f ( v ) x ∈ R N v | t =0 = v 0 with v 0 ≥ 0 , �≡ 0 fit . , " >p 3/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 3 /

  4. Fisher - KPP equation Homogeneous equation – Spreading properties in KPP case Invasion: v ( x , t ) → 1 as t → ∞ , locally uniformly in x as soon as v 0 �≡ 0. 4/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 4 /

  5. Fisher - KPP equation Homogeneous equation – Spreading properties in KPP case Invasion: v ( x , t ) → 1 as t → ∞ , locally uniformly in x as soon as v 0 �≡ 0. Asymptotic speed of propagation: ∃ w ∗ such that for any v 0 having compact support ∀ c > w ∗ sup v ( x , t ) → 0 as t → ∞ | x |≥ ct ∀ c < w ∗ sup | v ( x , t ) − 1 | → 0 as t → ∞ . | x |≤ ct 4/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 4 /

  6. Fisher - KPP equation Homogeneous equation – Spreading properties in KPP case Invasion: v ( x , t ) → 1 as t → ∞ , locally uniformly in x as soon as v 0 �≡ 0. Asymptotic speed of propagation: ∃ w ∗ such that for any v 0 having compact support ∀ c > w ∗ sup v ( x , t ) → 0 as t → ∞ | x |≥ ct ∀ c < w ∗ sup | v ( x , t ) − 1 | → 0 as t → ∞ . | x |≤ ct w ∗ = c K = 2 � d f ′ (0) Fisher - KPP case: 4/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 4 /

  7. Fisher - KPP equation Asymptotic position of level sets @ ÷ w*sc , a ) ocaci { ult .x1 x . : . . , 5/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 5 /

  8. Fisher - KPP equation The effect of a “road” with fast diffusion on Fisher-KPP propagation Joint work with Jean-Michel Roquejoffre and Luca Rossi J. Math. Biology (2013) Nonlinearity (2013) Comm. Math. Phys. (2016) Nonlinear Anal. (2016) 6/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 6 /

  9. motivation The system (B, Roquejoffre and Rossi) Ω: upper half-plane R × R + .  ∂ t u − D ∂ xx u = ν v | y =0 − µ u , x ∈ R , t ∈ R   ∂ t v − d ∆ v = f ( v ) , ( x , y ) ∈ Ω , t ∈ R  − d ∂ y v | y =0 = µ u − ν v | y =0 , x ∈ R , t ∈ R .  Note: v | y =0 := lim y ց 0 v . Birth/death rate: Logistic law (KPP type term) f : f ( v ) ≤ f ′ (0) v . f > 0 on (0 , 1) , f (0) = f (1) = 0 , 7/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 7 /

  10. motivation Basic properties Comparison principle If ( u 1 , v 1 ) and ( u 2 , v 2 ) are solutions of the Cauchy problem with u 1 ≤ u 2 and v 1 ≤ v 2 at t = 0, then u 1 ≤ u 2 and v 1 ≤ v 2 for all t ≥ 0. “Monotone system” (kind of) 8/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 8 /

  11. motivation Liouville-type result for stationary solutions Steady states  x ∈ R N − D ∆ x U = ν V | y =0 − µ U ,   − d ∆ V = f ( V ) , ( x , y ) ∈ Ω ,  x ∈ R N . − d ∂ y V | y =0 = µ U − ν V | y =0 ,  where Ω = { x = ( x 1 , . . . , x N , y ); y = x N +1 > 0 } . 9/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 9 /

  12. motivation Liouville-type result for stationary solutions Steady states  x ∈ R N − D ∆ x U = ν V | y =0 − µ U ,   − d ∆ V = f ( V ) , ( x , y ) ∈ Ω ,  x ∈ R N . − d ∂ y V | y =0 = µ U − ν V | y =0 ,  where Ω = { x = ( x 1 , . . . , x N , y ); y = x N +1 > 0 } . Theorem The only bounded steady states are ( U ≡ 0 , V ≡ 0) and ( U = ν/µ, V ≡ 1) . Proof rests on a sliding method (HB - L. Nirenberg) 9/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 9 /

  13. motivation Long time behaviour: invasion  ∂ t u − D ∂ xx u = ν v | y =0 − µ u , x ∈ R , t ∈ R   ∂ t v − d ∆ v = f ( v ) , ( x , y ) ∈ Ω , t ∈ R  − d ∂ y v | y =0 = µ u − ν v | y =0 , x ∈ R , t ∈ R .  10/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 10 /

  14. motivation Long time behaviour: invasion  ∂ t u − D ∂ xx u = ν v | y =0 − µ u , x ∈ R , t ∈ R   ∂ t v − d ∆ v = f ( v ) , ( x , y ) ∈ Ω , t ∈ R  − d ∂ y v | y =0 = µ u − ν v | y =0 , x ∈ R , t ∈ R .  Theorem Let ( u , v ) be a solution of the Cauchy problem with initial datum ( u 0 , v 0 ) �≡ (0 , 0) (nonnegative and bounded). Then, ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) → ( ν/µ, 1) , as t → ∞ , locally uniformly in ( x , y ) ∈ Ω . 10/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 10 /

  15. asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the line The effect of roads on propagation 11/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 11 /

  16. asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the line The effect of roads on propagation Theorem There exists an asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the x-axis, w ∗ = w ∗ ( µ, d , D ) > 0 . 11/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 11 /

  17. asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the line The effect of roads on propagation Theorem There exists an asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the x-axis, w ∗ = w ∗ ( µ, d , D ) > 0 . That is: let ( u 0 , v 0 ) be a compactly supported initial datum (nonnegative, nontrivial). Then, locally in y: ∀ c > w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) | → 0 as t → ∞ | x |≥ ct ∀ c < w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) − ( ν/µ, 1) | → 0 as | x |≤ ct , 0 ≤ y ≤ a t → ∞ . 11/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 11 /

  18. asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the line The effect of roads on propagation Theorem There exists an asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the x-axis, w ∗ = w ∗ ( µ, d , D ) > 0 . That is: let ( u 0 , v 0 ) be a compactly supported initial datum (nonnegative, nontrivial). Then, locally in y: ∀ c > w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) | → 0 as t → ∞ | x |≥ ct ∀ c < w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) − ( ν/µ, 1) | → 0 as | x |≤ ct , 0 ≤ y ≤ a t → ∞ . Theorem � d f ′ (0) be the (homogenous) KPP speed of propagation. Let c K := 2 11/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 11 /

  19. asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the line The effect of roads on propagation Theorem There exists an asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the x-axis, w ∗ = w ∗ ( µ, d , D ) > 0 . That is: let ( u 0 , v 0 ) be a compactly supported initial datum (nonnegative, nontrivial). Then, locally in y: ∀ c > w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) | → 0 as t → ∞ | x |≥ ct ∀ c < w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) − ( ν/µ, 1) | → 0 as | x |≤ ct , 0 ≤ y ≤ a t → ∞ . Theorem � d f ′ (0) be the (homogenous) KPP speed of propagation. Let c K := 2 If D ≤ 2 d then w ∗ ( µ, ν, d , D , f ′ (0))= c K . 11/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 11 /

  20. asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the line The effect of roads on propagation Theorem There exists an asymptotic speed of propagation in the direction of the x-axis, w ∗ = w ∗ ( µ, d , D ) > 0 . That is: let ( u 0 , v 0 ) be a compactly supported initial datum (nonnegative, nontrivial). Then, locally in y: ∀ c > w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) | → 0 as t → ∞ | x |≥ ct ∀ c < w ∗ , sup | ( u ( x , t ) , v ( x , y , t )) − ( ν/µ, 1) | → 0 as | x |≤ ct , 0 ≤ y ≤ a t → ∞ . Theorem � d f ′ (0) be the (homogenous) KPP speed of propagation. Let c K := 2 If D ≤ 2 d then w ∗ ( µ, ν, d , D , f ′ (0))= c K . If D > 2 d then w ∗ ( µ, d , D ) > c K . 11/56 Henri Berestycki (Paris) Effect of a line on F-KPP propagation IHP, Paris, 22 June 2016 11 /

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend