[PPT] - The e Mar aryl yland and Pu Public ic He Heal alth th La PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

The e Mar aryl yland and Pu Public ic He Heal alth th La Labor

rat

atorie

ries

Baltimore, MD

Penn State Architectural Engineering Capstone Project Greg Tinkoff | Construction Management Option | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht

SLIDE 2

Bu Buil ildi ding ng Ov Over ervie iew Ou Outl tlin ine Pr Proj

ject

ect Par arti tici cipan ants ts

Building: lding: The Maryland Public Health Laboratories Bui uilding lding Location: ion: Lot-4 on the Science + Technology Park at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Building lding Size: e: 234,046 Gross S.F. Number er of Stories: ries: 6 Stories + 2 Story Mechanical Penthouse Occupan ancy/F cy/Fun unctio tion n Type: Offices & Medical Research Laboratories Proje

ject

ct Cost: t: $111,400,000 Dates es of Const struction ruction: : December 19, 2011- April 19, 2014 Proje

ject

ct Deliver ery Met ethod

d:

: Design Build Cont ntrac act t Type: Lump Sun CMc De Develop loper: er: Forest City-New East Baltimore Partnership Owner: er: Maryland Economic Development Corporation Occupants: ants: The Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene Building lding Design gner: er: HDR, Inc. Proje

ject

ct Managemen ement: t: Jacobs Engineering Genera eral l Contract tractor:

r: Turner Construction Co.

I. I. Intr troduct

duction

ion II. II. Projec ject t Ov Overvie iew I. I. Bui uilding ding Overvie iew II. II. Projec ject t Par Participa pant nts III.

III. Bui

uilding ding Locati tion

n

IV.

IV. Constr

nstruc ucti tion

n Site Plan

III.

III. An

Analys ysis s #1: Precast st Concre rete e Struc uctu tura ral l System em IV.

IV. An

Analys ysis s #2: Virtual l Mock-ups s for Bui uilding ing Façade de System em V.

V. An

Analys ysis #3: Imp mple lemen entati tation

n of Al

Alterna nate Dewateri ering ng Syst stem em VI.

VI. An

Analys ysis s #4: Value ue En Enginee eering ring Stormwater Harvesti ting ng System em VII.

VII. Conc

nclusi sion

n & Recom
mme

mendati ndation

ns

VI VIII. II.Ackn knowled wledgeme gements nts IX.

IX. Que

uest stions ions

SLIDE 3

Bu Buil ildi ding ng Lo Loca cati tion

n

Ou Outl tlin ine Con

nstr

structi uction

n Sit

ite Pl e Plan an

I. I. Intr troduct

duction

ion II. II. Projec ject t Ov Overvie iew I. I. Bui uilding ding Overvie iew II. II. Projec ject t Par Participa pant nts III.

III. Bui

uilding ding Locati tion

n

IV.

IV. Constr

nstruc ucti tion

n Site Plan

III.

III. An

Analys ysis s #1: Precast st Concre rete e Struc uctu tura ral l System em IV.

IV. An

Analys ysis s #2: Virtual l Mock-ups s for Bui uilding ing Façade de System em V.

V. An

Analys ysis #3: Imp mple lemen entati tation

n of Al

Alterna nate Dewateri ering ng Syst stem em VI.

VI. An

Analys ysis s #4: Value ue En Enginee eering ring Stormwater Harvesti ting ng System em VII.

VII. Conc

nclusi sion

n & Recom
mme

mendati ndation

ns

VI VIII. II.Ackn knowled wledgeme gements nts IX.

IX. Que

uest stions ions

1710 Ashland nd Avenue ue, Baltimore, more, Maryland, d, Un United d States es

SLIDE 4

An Analys lysis is #1: : Pre recas cast t Con

ncr

crete e Str tructural uctural Sys ystem em

SLIDE 5

Pr Prec ecas ast t Con

ncr

crete e Sys ystem em Ov Over ervie iew Ou Outl tlin ine Str truc uctural tural Sys ystem em Br Brea eakdo down wn

8” Hollo

lowcore

re Plank Slab System with 2” topping
2 hour fire rating - IBC 2009 & NFPA Standard No. 1
Preca

ecast st Concrete e Struct uctur ural l Beams ms

Original steel reinforcement layout. (1-1/2”)
Preca

ecast st Concrete e Columns mns

Original steel reinforcement layout (Depends on concrete

column)

Building Slab sectioned into plank dimensions 4’x32’ & 4’x36’
Cutting the slab necessary to meet irregular building

perimeter.

Beams produced to match the beam schedule provided.
Long beams were divided into parts
Columns produced combining multiple columns within column

schedule

54’ in height max.

(necessary for delivery and erection)

Splicing occurs at slab

connections.

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m I. I. Precast ast Concr cret ete e System m Overvie iew II. Structura ctural System m Breakdo down wn III.

III. Sequen

encin cing

IV. Schedul

dule Imp mpact acts V. V. Cost st of System

VI. Cost

st Analysis sis

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

SLIDE 6

Seq eque uenc ncin ing Ou Outl tlin ine Sch ched edule ule Im Impac act

Beams/columns and hollow core planks produced simultaneously.
Total Production Duration: 222 days
75% of production complete before installation. (Begin June 25, 2011)

Con

nstru

truct ctio ion

Columns erected by column lines from west to east and from north to

south.

Beam erection
Connect to beams by grouting them to hunches.
Hollow core plank installation
Place shoring during lifts.

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m I. I. Precast ast Concr cret ete e System m Overvie iew II. Structura ctural System m Breakdo down wn III.

III. Sequen

encin cing

IV. Schedul

dule Imp mpact acts V. V. Cost st of System

VI. Cost

st Analysis sis

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

PR PRECAS CAST STRUC UCTUR URAL AL SYSTEM ERECTION ION DUR URATION ON

Structural Member # of Members Erection Rate Erection Duration Beams/Columns 665 30 min./member 41.6 days Hollow Core Planks 1833 10 min./member 38.2 days TOTAL DURATION 79.8 ~ 80 days

Structural Members grouted and connected between picks.
Hoist block remains the same, do not need to account for additional time.

Orig igin inal Basel elin ine S e Sched edule le: : 97 work rk da days Poten enti tial l Sched edule le Savin ings gs: 17 da days (3.4 wee eeks) PR PRECAS CAST STRUC UCTUR URAL AL SYSTEM PR PRODU DUCTION TION DUR URATION ION

Structura ctural Member er Quant ntit ity Producti ction

n Rate

Producti ction

n Duration
n

Hollow Core Planks 665 3/days 222 days Beams/Columns 1833 50/day 36.75 days

SLIDE 7

Cos

st

t of

f Sys

ystem em Ou Outl tlin ine Cos

st

t An Anal alys ysis is

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m I. I. Precast ast Concr cret ete e System m Overvie iew II. Structura ctural System m Breakdo down wn III.

III. Sequen

encin cing

IV. Schedul

dule Imp mpact act V. V. Cost st of System

VI. Cost

st Analysis sis

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

TOTAL SYSTEM COSTS (based ed on so source ce)

Or Origi ginal nal Design gn – Cast t in Place Jacobs Cost Estimate $7,168,807 Turner Pay Application $6,835,598 Pr Propo posed ed Design gn – Pr Precas ast t Concre rete Precast System Cost $6,300,000

Cost t Savin ings gs: $53 535,598 5,598

Cost for the Precast System were estimated by Nitterhouse

Concrete Products pricings and RSMeans Assemblies Cost Data.

Vendor
rs Pricing:

ing:

Hollow core planks - $8.00/ S.F.
Columns - $140/ L.F.
Beams - $155/ L.F.

PRECAS CAST SYSTEM COST ESTIMATES ES

Vendor Cost Estimate $5,425,087 RSMeans Estimate $7,793,203 Adjusted Estimate $6,300,000

*Adjusted estimate accounts for lack of specifications in RSMeans and lack of materials in lump sum vendor price. Also takes into account crane sizing upgrade.

SLIDE 8

Str truc uctural tural An Anal alys ysis is Ou Outl tlin ine

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m I. I. Structura ctural Breadth th Analysi sis s – Punching ing Shear and Slab Strength th

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplem emen enta tati tion

n of Altern

rnate e Dewatering ering System

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

Interio ior r Col

lumn

mn Punchin ing Shear

Precast System eliminates drop panels at columns.
Stronger concrete used in precast system (6000 psi)

Calculat ulated ed Sh Shear Load at Co t Column: n: 984 psf Calculat ulated ed Sh Shear Str Strength: gth: 1416 psf

Vc ≥ Vu , therefor adequate design

Hol

llo

low Cor

re Sla

lab S b Str trength th

Criteria for allowable superimposed load and plank span (feet).
HDR, Inc. calculated live load of typical floor = 125 psf
Increased Schedule because of reduced span.
Additional approximated 6 days added to erection.
No Additional Costs because cost based on square footage.

SLIDE 9

An Analys lysis is #2: : Virtual tual Mo Mock ck-ups ups for

r Building

lding Façad çade e Sys ystem em

SLIDE 10

Vir irtua tual l Moc

ck-Up

p Ov Over ervie iew Ou Outl tlin ine Qu Qual alit ity y & S & Saf afety ty Im Improvem ements ents

Quality significantly increases when performing the tasks.
Subcontractors can easily understand the work to be performed

and how to effectively complete the work.

Better understanding how to complete the task effectively reduces

risks and potential safety hazards.

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System I. I. Virtual al Mock-Up p Overview II. II. Qualit ity y & Safet ety Imp mprovem emen ents ts

III. Schedul

dule Imp mpact act

IV. Cost

st Analysis sis V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

Create Virtual Mock-ups

for building envelop.

Detail connections to

superstructure and to

ther façade systems.
Façade systems

includes:

Curtain wall
Metal Panels
Brick Veneer
Shop Window

SLIDE 11

Sch ched edule ule Im Impac act Ou Outl tlin ine Cos

st

t An Anal alys ysis is

Cost

t to crea eate e mock ck-ups ups: $3,000 - $9,840

$3,000 - $4,000 provided by Mortenson Construction
$3,280 – $9,840 based on $82 an hour working on

models.

Associa
ciated

ed Cost Savin ings gs: approx. $94,710

Reduction of system change orders by 50%
Efficiency savings of 0.3%. (based off 17% of project)
PROJEC

JECT T COST SAVINGS: GS: $84,870 - $91,710

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System I. I. Virtual al Mock-up up Overvie iew II. II. Qualit ity y & Safet ety Imp mprovem emen ents ts

III. Schedul

dule Imp mpact act

IV. Cost

st Analysis sis V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

Tim

ime to c

create mo

mock-ups: s: 2-3 weeks

The time creating the mock-ups should occur around
Dec. 8, 2011.
Tim

ime e Savin ings gs: 2-4 days

Based on Greenfield Hospital Case Study. (2.5 weeks)
35% of building schedule

SLIDE 12

An Analys lysis is #3: : Impl Implementation ementation of

f

Al Alter ernat nate e De Dewat atering ering Sys ystem em

SLIDE 13

Sys ystem em Sel elec ecti tion

n

Ou Outl tlin ine Sys ystem em Siz izin ing

Geotechnical Report Indicates clay and sandy soils.
Groundwater table apparent at 18’ depth from surface.
Confined project boundaries.
Existing Utilities
Deep Wells
Useful for depth greater

15’.

Used in confined areas
Adequate effectiveness

with low permeable soils

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System I. I. System em Selecti tion II. System em Sizing

III. System

em Mapping

IV. Insta

stallat ation

n & Schedulin

uling g Duration ions V. V. System em Cost

VI. Cost

st Analysis sis

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

Siz ize de depends ds on

n th

these ma majo jor aspect: ct:

Site Excavation Dimensions (308’x 96’)
Groundwater Table Depth (approx. 18’)
Impervious Layer Depth (approx. 70’)

Fl Flow w Rate Calculati ulation

ns and Sy

System Si Sizes Total Necessary Flow – 0.1793 m3/s Number of Wells – 7 deep wells Well Casings/Screens Sizing – 12” diameter Pump Size- 6”

SLIDE 14

Sys ystem em Map appin ing Ou Outl tlin ine In Insta stallati ation

n & S

& Sch ched edul uling ing Du Durat atio ions ns

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System I. I. System em Selecti tion II. System em Sizing

III. System

em Mapping

IV. Insta

stallat ation

n & Schedulin

uling g Duration ions V. V. System em Cost

VI. Cost

st Analysis sis

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

DEEP EP WELL INSTALLA ALLATION TION DURATION TION

Drilling Deep Wells 7 wells 2 well/day 3.5 days Pump Equipment Installation 7 wells 15 min/ well 1 hr. 45 min. Discharge Pipe Installation 612 ft. 400 ft./day 1.53 days TOTAL AL DEW EWATERI ERING NG INSTALL LLATION TION DURATION ION 5.25 days

Installation occurs as excavation begins, Feb. 27, 2012.
The system will run until all tasks below ground water table are

complete (expected 143 days)

System demobilization takes 2-3 days.
Total system duration is 150 days.
Dewatering system doesn’t installation doesn’t affect critical

path, but will save the lost 2 months due to flooding.

SLIDE 15

Sys ystem em Cos

st

Ou Outl tlin ine Cos

st

t An Anal alys ysis is

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System I. I. System em Selecti tion II. System em Sizing

III. System

em Mapping

IV. Insta

stallat ation

n & Schedulin

uling g Duration ions V. V. System em Cost

VI. Cost

st Analysis sis

VI. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

DEEP P WE WELL SYSTEM COST

Equipment $52,262 Materials $3,665 Rental/Operational Rates $53,700 Dewatering Cost $8,400 Labor $247,988 Overhead $2,400 TOTAL AL COST $390,596

Total Cost of Dee eep W p Wel ell System em: $390,596 Cost t of Orig igin inal Dewater erin ing g System em: : $185,000 Total Dewater erin ing g Cost wit ith Change ge Orde ders: $770,381 Tur urne ners s Pr Proje ject cted ed Pr Producti ductivit vity y Loss: $1.8 million Total Cost Savin ings gs of System em: $1.4 million

SLIDE 16

An Analys lysis is #4: : Valu lue e En Engi gineering eering Storm

rmwat

ater er Ha Harvesting esting Sys ystem em

SLIDE 17

Sys ystem em Ov Over ervie iew Ou Outl tlin ine Pr Prop

posed
sed In

Insta stallat ation ion Ar Area ea

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System VI.

I. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Enginee eerin ring g Storm rmwater er Ha Harvestin sting g System I. I. System em Overview II. Proposed sed Instal stallat ation ion Area

III. Cost

st Savings ngs

IV. Cost

st of Insta tallat ation

n

V. V. Cost st Analysis sis

VI. Susta

taina nabilit ity Evalua uati tion

n
VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

5 Underground Metal

Cisterns that will hold roughly 250,000 gallons of stormwater runoff.

8’ diameter cisterns.
Will store potential grey

water, roof run-off water and hardscape run-off water.

Prefiltration and pump

manhole placed within excavated installation area. Excavation Dimensions: 160’ x 85’

SLIDE 18

Cos

st

t Savin ings Ou Outl tlin ine Cos

st

t of

f In

Insta stallat ation ion

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System VI.

I. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Enginee eerin ring g Storm rmwater er Ha Harvestin sting g System I. I. System em Overview II. Proposed sed Instal stallat ation ion Area

III. Cost

st Savings ngs

IV. Cost

st of Insta tallat ation

n

V. V. Cost st Analysis sis

VI. Susta

taina nabilit ity Evalua uati tion

n
VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

STORMW MWATER ER HARVES ESTING TING SYSTEM INSTALLATI TION ON COST

Demolition $22,238 Earthwork $210,416 System Installation Fee $113,000 Stormwater Harvesting Equipment $500,725 Site Improvement $176,500 TOTAL STORMWATER HARVESTING COST $1,999,379

SLIDE 19

Cos

st

t An Anal alys ysis is Ou Outl tlin ine

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System VI.

I. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Enginee eerin ring g Storm rmwater er Ha Harvestin sting g System I. I. System em Overview II. Proposed sed Instal stallat ation ion Area

III. Cost

st Savings ngs

IV. Cost

st of Insta tallat ation

n

V. V. Cost st Analysis sis

VI. Susta

taina nabilit ity Evalua uati tion

n
VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

Wat ater r Ef Efficienc ciency

Inno novativ ative e Wastewater er Technologi nologies es (0 out t of 2 p points ts) 1.) Reduce potable water for sewage by 50%. UNA NATTAIN AINABLE ABLE 2.) Treat 50% of wastewater onsite. UNATTAIN AINABLE ABLE Water Use Reducti uction

n (2 out

t of 4 points) ts) 1.) Reduce water consumption to 40%. UNATTAINA INABLE BLE Wast ster er Reducti tion

n Percen

enta tage: ge: 2.23% (Total of 33.23%)

Sust ustai aina nabil bilit ity y Ev Eval aluation uation

Poten enti tial l Cost Savin ings gs: Ann nnua ual Savin ings gs wit ith Typi pical al Rai ainfal nfall: $455,360 Annual Savin ings gs wit ith Max. Rain infall: : $459,335 21 Yea ear Total Cost Savin ings gs: $9,562,568 Total Cost of Stormwater er Harves estin ing g System em: approx. $2 million Pa Pay off Per erio iod: 4.5 Years

SLIDE 20

Con

ncl

clusio usion n & R & Rec ecom

mme

mend ndat atio ions ns Ou Outl tlin ine

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System VI.

I. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Enginee eerin ring g Storm rmwater er Ha Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

An Analysis alysis #1: : Pr Prec ecast ast Concre ncrete e Str truct ctur ural al System em

COST T SAVINGS GS: : $535,598 SCHE CHEDU DULE LE SAVINGS GS: : 2 weeks INCREASE REASED SAFET ETY

An Analysis alysis #2: : Vi Virtu tual al Mo Mock ck-ups ups for Bu Build lding ing Faç açade ade Syst stems ems

COST T SAVINGS GS: : $84,870 - $91,710 SCHE CHEDU DULE LE SAVINGS GS: : 2-4 days INCREASE REASED PRODU DUCT CT QUALIT ITY SAFTE TEY Y SAFET ETY

SLIDE 21

Con

ncl

clusio usion n & R & Rec ecom

mme

mend ndat atio ions ns Ou Outl tlin ine

I. I. Introducti

duction

II. Project ct Overview

III. Analysis

ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m

IV. Analysis

ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion

n of Alternat

ate e Dewaterin ering g System VI.

I. Analysis

ysis #4: Value Enginee eerin ring g Storm rmwater er Ha Harvestin sting g System

VII. Conclu

clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations

VIII. Ac

Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX.

X. Question

stions

An Analysis alysis #3: : Implementation lementation of Al Alter ernat nate e Dewat aterin ering g System em

COST T SAVINGS GS: : $1,400,000 SCHE CHEDU DULE LE SAVINGS GS: : 2 months NO MATERIAL IAL AND PROPER PERTY DAMAGE GE

An Analysis alysis #4 Val alue e En Enginee neering ing Stormwat ater er Har arvestin esting g System em

COST T OF INSTALLA ALLATION TION: : $2,000,000 ANNUAL L COST T SAVING NGS: S: $455,000 PAY OFF PERIOD IOD: : 4.5 years ADDITIO ITIONA NAL L WORK DURATION: TION: 1.5 months NO LEED D POINTS TS ABLE TO BE ACQUIRED IRED

SLIDE 22

Academic Acknowledgments

Penn State Architectural Engineering Faculty

Dr. Robert Leicht – CM Thesis Advisor

Industry Acknowledgments

Jacobs Engineering Turner Construction Company HDR, Inc.

Special Thanks

Ahmad Hamid – Jacobs Engineering Brian Temme – Jacobs Engineering Thomas Stevenson – Jacobs Engineering Grace Wang – Jacobs Engineering Dana Rumpulla – Turner Construction Co. Corretta Bennett – Turner Construction Co. Justin Beaver – Griffin Dewatering Co. Andreas Phelps – Balfour Beatty Mitch Cormelius – Mortenson Construction Co. Reno Russell – Bigge Crane and Rigging Co. Joe Hockberger – Mersino Dewatering Jordan Kahlenberg – Contech Engineering Solutions Ken Dombroski – Contech Engineering Solutions

SLIDE 23