The e Mar aryl yland and Pu Public ic He Heal alth th La - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The e Mar aryl yland and Pu Public ic He Heal alth th La Labor orat atorie ories Baltimore, MD Penn State Architectural Engineering Capstone Project Greg Tinkoff | Construction Management Option | Advisor: Dr. Robert Leicht

Outl Ou tlin ine Buil Bu ildi ding ng Ov Over ervie iew Pr Proj oject ect Par arti tici cipan ants ts I. I. Intr troduct oduction ion Building: lding: The Maryland Public Health Laboratories Develop De loper: er: Forest City-New East Baltimore Partnership II. II. Projec ject t Ov Overvie iew Bui uilding lding Location: ion: Lot-4 on the Science + Technology Park at Johns Owner: er: Maryland Economic Development Corporation I. I. Bui uilding ding Overvie iew Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Occupants: ants: The Maryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene II. II. Projec ject t Par Participa pant nts Building lding Size: e: 234,046 Gross S.F. Building lding Design gner: er: HDR, Inc. III. Bui III. uilding ding Locati tion on Number er of Stories: ries: 6 Stories + 2 Story Mechanical Penthouse IV. IV. Constr nstruc ucti tion on Site Plan Proje oject ct Managemen ement: t: Jacobs Engineering III. An III. Analys ysis s #1: Precast st Concre rete e Struc uctu tura ral l System em Occupan ancy/F cy/Fun unctio tion n Type: Offices & Medical Research Laboratories Genera eral l Contract tractor: or: Turner Construction Co. IV. IV. An Analys ysis s #2: Virtual l Mock-ups s for Bui uilding ing Façade de System em Proje oject ct Cost: t: $111,400,000 V. An V. Analys ysis #3: Imp mple lemen entati tation on of Al Alterna nate Dewateri ering ng Syst stem em Dates es of Const struction ruction: : December 19, 2011- April 19, 2014 VI. An VI. Analys ysis s #4: Value ue En Enginee eering ring Stormwater Harvesti ting ng System em Proje oject ct Deliver ery Met ethod od: : Design Build VII. Conc VII. nclusi sion on & Recom omme mendati ndation ons Cont ntrac act t Type: Lump Sun CMc VI VIII. II.Ackn knowled wledgeme gements nts IX. IX. Que uest stions ions

Outl Ou tlin ine Bu Buil ildi ding ng Lo Loca cati tion on Con onstr structi uction on Sit ite Pl e Plan an I. I. Intr troduct oduction ion II. II. Projec ject t Ov Overvie iew I. I. Bui uilding ding Overvie iew II. II. Projec ject t Par Participa pant nts III. Bui III. uilding ding Locati tion on IV. IV. Constr nstruc ucti tion on Site Plan III. III. An Analys ysis s #1: Precast st Concre rete e Struc uctu tura ral l System em 1710 Ashland nd Avenue ue, Baltimore, more, Maryland, d, Un United d States es IV. IV. An Analys ysis s #2: Virtual l Mock-ups s for Bui uilding ing Façade de System em V. V. An Analys ysis #3: Imp mple lemen entati tation on of Al Alterna nate Dewateri ering ng Syst stem em VI. An VI. Analys ysis s #4: Value ue En Enginee eering ring Stormwater Harvesti ting ng System em VII. VII. Conc nclusi sion on & Recom omme mendati ndation ons VI VIII. II.Ackn knowled wledgeme gements nts IX. IX. Que uest stions ions

An Analys lysis is #1: : Pre recas cast t Con oncr crete e Str tructural uctural Sys ystem em

Outl Ou tlin ine Pr Prec ecas ast t Con oncr crete e Sys ystem em Ov Over ervie iew Str truc uctural tural Sys ystem em Br Brea eakdo down wn I. I. Introducti oduction • 8 ” Hollo lowcore ore Plank Slab System with 2” topping • Building Slab sectioned into plank dimensions 4’x32’ & 4’x36’ II. Project ct Overview • 2 hour fire rating - IBC 2009 & NFPA Standard No. 1 • Cutting the slab necessary to meet irregular building perimeter. III. Analysis ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m • Preca ecast st Concrete e Struct uctur ural l Beams ms I. I. Precast ast Concr cret ete e System m Overvie iew • Original steel reinforcement layout. (1- 1/2”) • Beams produced to match the beam schedule provided. • Long beams were divided into parts II. Structura ctural System m Breakdo down wn • Preca ecast st Concrete e Columns mns III. III. Sequen encin cing • Original steel reinforcement layout (Depends on concrete • Columns produced combining multiple columns within column column) schedule IV. Schedul dule Imp mpact acts • 54’ in height max. V. V. Cost st of System (necessary for delivery VI. Cost st Analysis sis and erection) IV. Analysis ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System • Splicing occurs at slab V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion on of Alternat ate e Dewaterin ering g System connections. VI. Analysis ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System VII. Conclu clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations VIII. Ac Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts IX. X. Question stions

Outl Ou tlin ine Seq eque uenc ncin ing Sch ched edule ule Im Impac act I. I. Introducti oduction PR PRECAS CAST STRUC UCTUR URAL AL SYSTEM PR PRODU DUCTION TION DUR URATION ION PRECAS PR CAST STRUC UCTUR URAL AL SYSTEM ERECTION ION DUR URATION ON II. Project ct Overview Structura ctural Member er Quant ntit ity Producti ction on Rate Producti ction on Duration on Structural Member # of Members Erection Rate Erection Duration III. Analysis ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m Hollow Core Planks 665 3/days 222 days Beams/Columns 665 30 min./member 41.6 days I. I. Precast ast Concr cret ete e System m Overvie iew Beams/Columns 1833 50/day 36.75 days Hollow Core Planks 1833 10 min./member 38.2 days II. Structura ctural System m Breakdo down wn • Beams/columns and hollow core planks produced simultaneously. III. Sequen III. encin cing TOTAL DURATION 79.8 ~ 80 days • Total Production Duration: 222 days IV. Schedul dule Imp mpact acts • 75% of production complete before installation. (Begin June 25, 2011) Structural Members grouted and connected between picks. • V. V. Cost st of System • Hoist block remains the same, do not need to account for additional time. VI. Cost st Analysis sis Con onstru truct ctio ion Orig igin inal Basel elin ine S e Sched edule le: : 97 work rk da days IV. Analysis ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System • Columns erected by column lines from west to east and from north to south. V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion on of Alternat ate e Dewaterin ering g System Poten enti tial l Sched edule le Savin ings gs: 17 da days (3.4 wee eeks) • Beam erection VI. Analysis ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System • Connect to beams by grouting them to hunches. VII. Conclu clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations • Hollow core plank installation VIII. Ac Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts • Place shoring during lifts. IX. X. Question stions

Ou Outl tlin ine Cos ost t of of Sys ystem em Cos ost t An Anal alys ysis is I. I. Introducti oduction • Cost for the Precast System were estimated by Nitterhouse TOTAL SYSTEM COSTS (based ed on so source ce) II. Project ct Overview Concrete Products pricings and RSMeans Assemblies Cost Origi Or ginal nal Design gn – Cast t in Place Data. III. Analysis ysis #1: Precast st Concr cret ete e Structu tural al System m Jacobs Cost Estimate $7,168,807 • Vendor ors Pricing: ing: I. I. Precast ast Concr cret ete e System m Overvie iew • Hollow core planks - $8.00/ S.F. Turner Pay Application $6,835,598 II. Structura ctural System m Breakdo down wn • Columns - $140/ L.F. III. III. Sequen encin cing Propo Pr posed ed Design gn – Pr Precas ast t Concre rete • Beams - $155/ L.F. IV. Schedul dule Imp mpact act Precast System Cost $6,300,000 PRECAS CAST SYSTEM COST ESTIMATES ES V. V. Cost st of System VI. Cost st Analysis sis Vendor Cost Estimate $5,425,087 IV. Analysis ysis #2: Virtual Mock-ups ups for Buildin ing g Façade de System Cost t Savin ings gs: $53 535,598 5,598 RSMeans Estimate $7,793,203 V. V. Analysis ysis #3: Imp mplemen ementa tati tion on of Alternat ate e Dewaterin ering g System Adjusted Estimate $6,300,000 VI. Analysis ysis #4: Value Engineerin eering g Stormwat ater er Harvestin sting g System VII. Conclu clusio sion n & Recommen mmendations dations *Adjusted estimate accounts for lack of specifications in RSMeans and lack of VIII. Ac Ackno nowle wledg dgemen ements ts materials in lump sum vendor price. Also takes into account crane sizing upgrade. IX. X. Question stions