The Dollars and Sense of Bioenergy Presented by Dr. William Strauss - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the dollars and sense of bioenergy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Dollars and Sense of Bioenergy Presented by Dr. William Strauss - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Dollars and Sense of Bioenergy Presented by Dr. William Strauss President, FutureMetrics October 9, 2012 International Bioenergy Days, 2012 Who is FutureMetrics? We are Globally Respected Consultants in BioEnergy 8 Airport Road Bethel, ME


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Dollars and Sense of Bioenergy

Presented by Dr. William Strauss President, FutureMetrics October 9, 2012

International Bioenergy Days, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Who is FutureMetrics?

We are Globally Respected Consultants in BioEnergy

8 Airport Road Bethel, ME 04217, USA

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

FutureMetrics Services:

Research, analysis, and strategic guidance for the bioenergy sector. We combine data driven analysis with a depth of knowledge across the bioenergy sector to provide full spectrum reporting that enables our clients to make optimal decisions. ______________________________________________________

Selection of Clients

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Prefeasibility and feasibility studies Due diligence Financial modeling Risk analysis Economic impact analysis Expert advice

FutureMetrics LLC

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Recipient of the 2012 International Excellence in Bioenergy Award

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Does Bioenergy Make Sense?

It depends on the what you do with it…

If minimizing price of electricity is the objective, then green electricity in the current market is challenging.

Costs amortized over 25 years Natural Gas at at 6.00% $3.5 per MMBTU Construction Cost per kW Size (MW) Capacity Factor Install Cost Annual Capital Cost Amortization Annual Output (kWh) Fixed Capital Cost per kWh Fixed Maintenance and other per kWh Variable Cost per kWh Total Cost per kWh Hydro 2,180 $ 1000 90.0% 2,180,000,000 $ 170,534,246 $ 7,884,000,000 0.0216 $ 0.0140 $ 0.0010 $

0.0366 $

Natural Gas Combined Cycle 1,170 $ 200 90.0% 234,000,000 $ 18,305,052 $ 1,576,800,000 0.0116 $ 0.0160 $ 0.0210 $

0.0486 $

Coal 2,749 $ 500 85.0% 1,374,500,000 $ 107,522,624 $ 3,723,000,000 0.0289 $ 0.0180 $ 0.0270 $

0.0739 $

Landbased Wind 1,485 $ 50 23.0% 74,250,000 $ 5,808,334 $ 100,740,000 0.0577 $ 0.0340 $ 0.0100 $

0.1017 $

Nuclear 4,930 $ 1000 90.0% 4,930,000,000 $ 385,657,721 $ 7,884,000,000 0.0489 $ 0.0470 $ 0.0400 $

0.1359 $

Biomass (electricity only) 3,294 $ 200 85.0% 658,800,000 $ 51,535,762 $ 1,489,200,000 0.0346 $ 0.0710 $ 0.0450 $

0.1506 $

Offshore Wind 2,890 $ 50 34.0% 144,500,000 $ 11,303,761 $ 148,920,000 0.0759 $ 0.0770 $ 0.0100 $

0.1629 $

Solar PV 5,750 $ 100 30.0% 575,000,000 $ 44,980,363 $ 262,800,000 0.1712 $ 0.0150 $ 0.0050 $

0.1912 $

analysis by FutureMetrics

Price at the Generator

slide-7
SLIDE 7

If minimizing CO2 is the objective…

Thousands of Years Era of Combustion of Fossil Fuels 

Source: NOAA

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CCSR/NIES: Center for Climate System Research [1] & National Institute for Environmental Studies, [2], CCSR/NIES AGCM + CCSR OGCM Models 1890-2100 CCCma: Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis [3], CGCm2 Model 1900-2100 CSIRO: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [4], CSIRO- Mk2 model 1961-2100 Hadley Centre: Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research [5], HADCM3 model 1950-2099 GFDL: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory [6], R30 Model 1961-2100 MPI-M: Max Planck Institute für Meteorologie [7], ECHAM4/OPYC coupled model 1990-2100 NCAR PCM: National Center for Atmospheric Research [8], PCM model 1980-2099 NCAR CSM: National Center for Atmospheric Research [9], CSM Model 2000-2099

slide-9
SLIDE 9

How do we combine the economics of low cost energy with the environmental benefits carbon neutral or very low carbon energy? The focus has to be on Thermal applications not Electricity generation (more on transportation later).

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Let’s look at the US and Sweden’s aggregate numbers

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

R² = 0.7059

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6

GDP/Capita Competitiveness Index

GDP/Capita vs. Competitiveness

source: World Economic Forum, analysis by FutureMetrics

Sweden United States

slide-16
SLIDE 16

GDP/Capita Luxembourg 113,533 $ Qatar 98,329 $ Norway 97,255 $ Switzerland 81,161 $ United Arab Emirates 67,008 $ Australia 65,477 $ Denmark 59,928 $ Sweden 56,956 $ Canada 50,436 $ Netherlands 50,355 $ Austria 49,809 $ Finland 49,350 $ Singapore 49,271 $ United States 48,387 $

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The solution? The real “green” energy source: Biomass for Heat

(and combined heat and power)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

How can we generate heat reliably, cleanly, and sustainably with fuel from our forests. We follow in the footsteps of many European countries.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Biomass Thermal can be good for the suppliers, the users, and the economy if the right strategy is well executed. We think that the economic story is powerful enough. Carbon pricing is not necessary assuming a free market… But first, is it a free market?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Sources: Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Department of Energy (Energy Information Administration), Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, Office of Management and Budget, & U.S. Department of Agriculture, via Environmental Law Institute.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Source: “The Historical Role of Federal Subsidies in Shaping America’s Energy Future”, DBL Investors, Sept. 2011.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

What about Natural Gas?

We think low prices are very temporary.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

LNG export will open the US natural gas market to world prices.

$- $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00 $9.00 $10.00 $11.00 $12.00 $13.00 $14.00 $15.00 $16.00 $17.00 $18.00 $19.00 $20.00 Canada Russia United States New Zealand Romania Thailand United Kingdom Finland Belgium Bulgaria Spain Turkey Netherlands Estonia Ireland Luxembourg Poland Lithuania Italy France Greece Croatia Czech Republic Slovakia Portugal Slovenia Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) Korea Hungary Japan Switzerland Sweden Denmark

Natural Gas Price per MMBTU at Market Exchange Rates

(prices from data between 2010 to 2012 and may not be exactly correct for some countries today )

source: EIA, 2012, analysis by FutureMetrics

Median $11.46

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Current residential natural gas prices in the US are around to $10/MMBTU ($14 in Maine!) or the equivalent of about $1.20/gallon gasoline.

We expect that the demand for natural gas as a transportation fuel will push prices significantly higher.

We expect that by 2020, a significant proportion of the world’s rolling fleet will have converted to natural gas.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Okay, so what is the US Energy Policy and can Biomass play a role?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

We do not have a strategic vision at the Federal level. We do have Renewable Portfolio Standards at the State Level (more on this later)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Why does biomass thermal make sense?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Source: 2012 Maine Energy Profile, Governors Energy Office, analysis by FutureMetrics.

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Heat for homes and buildings is not made from electricity.

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

2,681,923 1,270,308 572,573 1,294,524 975,159 1,158,449

  • 500,000

1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 Illinois (35%) Indiana (33%) Iowa (22%) Michigan (32%) Minnesota (34%) Wisconsin (52%)

Number of Homes and Businesses NOT connected to Natural Gas

(proportion of total locations in parenthesis) source: US Energy Information Administration, US Census, 2012, analysis by FutureMetrics

Total NOT Connected = 7,952,935

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

899,640 520,320 1,248,990 400,800 3,558,339 2,390,090 206,550 210,840

  • 1,000,000

2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 Connecticut (68%) Maine (96%) Massachusetts (51%) New Hampshire (80%) New York (45%) Pennsylvania (49%) Rhode Island (51%) Vermont (84%)

Number of Homes and Businesses NOT connected to Natural Gas

(proportion of total locations in parenthesis)

source: US Energy Information Administration, US Census, 2012, analysis by FutureMetrics

Total NOT Connected = 9,435,569

17.6 million households in NE and MW with no natural gas.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Maine New Hampshire Vermont

Percent of Households using Heating Oil and Natural Gas

US ranking for heating oil and natural gas use in parenthesis Lower rank is more reliant, higher rank is less reliant Heating Oil Natural Gas source: EIA 2012, analysis by FutureMetrics - data excludes Alaska and Hawaii (1) (50) (2) (47) (4) (48)

The gap between high heating oil use and low natural gas availability makes Maine and the other NE states unique in the nation. But wherever there is no natural gas infrastructure AND is it cold AND there are forests that can sustainably supply wood…

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Residential pellet boilers can replace central heating systems and replace heating oil.

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Wood pellet fuel is common in Europe where more than a million homes have home heating systems automatically fueled with refined solid biofuel.

37

The owner never touches or sees the fuel. It is delivered in bulk by truck.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Source: Pellets@tlas.com

slide-39
SLIDE 39

120 425 1,746 3,874 7,234 12,272 16,764 21,957 28,034 36,908 47,375 61,635 74,804 83,250 91,391 100,753 119,253 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Pellet Boilers in Austria

source: the EU’s Intelligent Energy Program, 2012, Analysis and 2012 forecast by FutureMetrics 39

We are here in the US (15 years behind Sweden and Austria)!

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Modern Wood Pellet Boilers are CLEAN and completely automatic

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

To put this into perspective, compare using one cord of wood in a fireplace with one cord of wood’s worth of energy from wood pellets in a modern pellet boiler.

375 pounds

0.28 pound

Particulate emissions (SMOKE!)

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

20.1 million tons of green wood can make enough pellets for about 1.26 million homes and businesses.

Note that these numbers do not include an analysis of the potential for dedicated energy crops

42

State Wisconsin 4,964,000 Minnesota 2,494,000 Michigan 6,112,000 North Dakota 155,000 South Dakota 135,000 Iowa 1,195,000 Illinois 2,393,000 Indiana 2,675,000 Total 20,123,000

analysis by FutureMetrics

Estimated Annual Sustainable Production

  • f Bioenergy Feedstock in green tons

(50% of estimate of total sustainable wood harvest)

forestland (green tons). Merchantable biomass is the main stem of all species > 5” d.b.h. between a 1-foot stump height and a 4” top diameter (outside the bark), including rough and rotten culls.

from http://fiatools.fs.fed.us/Evalidator401/tm attribute.jsp

A very rough estimate of sustainable biomass available for energy based on Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) data.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

New England and PA also are markets.

The values for biomass below do not include current use by pulp and paper.

25.8 million tons of green wood can make enough pellets to heat about 1.8 million homes and businesses.

Forest Biomass Production per Year for BioEnergy Potential Crop Biomass Production per Year Total Biomass Production per Year (green tons) Connecticut 100,000 354,000 454,000 Maine 3,190,000 450,000 3,640,000 Massachusetts 110,000 498,000 608,000 New Hampshire 400,000 294,000 694,000 New York 3,330,000 8,766,000 12,096,000 Pennsylvania 2,800,000 3,894,000 6,694,000 Rhode Island 10,000 156,000 166,000 Vermont 300,000 1,134,000 1,434,000 TOTAL 10,240,000 15,546,000 25,786,000 analysis by FutureMetrics 43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

If we assume that each state provides biomass for its own needs, the table below shows the conversion rates. Wisconsin is highest proportionally with 10.12% of its homes and businesses converting. Michigan is highest in absolute numbers with 424,000 homes and businesses converting.

44

Occupied Households Equivalent Number of Businesses and Other Total Number

  • f Household

Equivalents Total Biomass for Pellets Production per Year (green tons) Wisconsin 2,624,358 782,846 3,407,204 4,964,000 10.12% 344,722 Minnesota 2,347,201 700,170 3,047,371 2,494,000 5.68% 173,194 Michigan 4,532,233 1,351,965 5,884,198 6,112,000 7.21% 424,444 North Dakota 317,498 94,710 412,208 155,000 2.61% 10,764 South Dakota 363,438 108,414 471,852 135,000 1.99% 9,375 Iowa 1,336,417 398,653 1,735,070 1,195,000 4.78% 82,986 Illinois 5,296,715 1,580,010 6,876,725 2,393,000 2.42% 166,181 Indiana 2,795,541 833,910 3,629,451 2,675,000 5.12% 185,764 TOTAL 19,613,401 5,850,678 25,464,079 20,123,000 1,397,431 analysis by FutureMetrics Total Number Converting in each State if the is NO Interstate Transport of Pellets (based on 8 tons per user per year average)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Maine and Vermont could convert almost half of their homes and small businesses from heating oil to pellet fuel with no significant impact on wood pricing to the traditional wood using industries.

45

Occupied Households Equivalent Number

  • f Businesses and

Other Total Number of Households and Businesses using Heating Oil Total Potential Wood Pellets Produced by each State Connecticut 1,323,000 394,651 872,567 252,222 3.61% 31,528 Maine 542,000 161,679 542,536 2,022,222 46.59% 252,778 Massachusetts 2,449,000 730,537 1,109,658 337,778 3.80% 42,222 New Hampshire 501,000 149,448 409,132 385,556 11.78% 48,194 New York 7,907,420 2,358,783 3,274,919 6,720,000 25.65% 840,000 Pennsylvania 4,877,735 1,455,028 1,836,501 3,718,889 25.31% 464,861 Rhode Island 405,000 120,812 208,221 92,222 5.54% 11,528 Vermont 251,000 74,873 200,738 796,667 49.61% 99,583 TOTAL 18,256,155 5,445,811 8,454,273 14,325,556 1,790,694 analysis by FutureMetrics Total Number Converting in each State if the is NO Interstate Transport of Pellets (based on 8 tons per user per year average)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Given these levels of penetration and assuming $20/ton profit for pellet manufacturing and $20/ton profit for pellet fuel delivery, the annual profit for pellet flow is more than $447 million. Installing 1.6 million pellet boilers with an assumed margin of $3500 per unit yields a total gross margin on boiler sales of about $4.9 billion.

46

Annual Profits from Pellet Sales Total Gross Margin on Boiler Sales Wisconsin $110,311,111 $1,206,527,778 Minnesota $55,422,222 $606,180,556 Michigan $135,822,222 $1,485,555,556 North Dakota $3,444,444 $37,673,611 South Dakota $3,000,000 $32,812,500 Iowa $26,555,556 $290,451,389 Illinois $53,177,778 $581,631,944 Indiana $59,444,444 $650,173,611 $447,177,778 $4,891,006,944 analysis by FutureMetrics

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Installing 1.8 million pellet boilers with an assumed margin of $3500 per unit yields a total gross margin on boiler sales of more than $6.2 billion across the northeastern states. Maine leads the nation in state of the art pellet boiler production. Modern pellet boilers are high tech clean and efficient fully automatic

  • systems. See www.MaineEnergySystems.com

47

Annual Profits from Pellet Sales Total Gross Margin on Boiler Sales Connecticut 3.61% 31,528 $20,177,778 $110,347,222 Maine 46.59% 252,778 $161,777,778 $884,722,222 Massachusetts 3.80% 42,222 $27,022,222 $147,777,778 New Hampshire 11.78% 48,194 $30,844,444 $168,680,556 New York 25.65% 840,000 $537,600,000 $2,940,000,000 Pennsylvania 25.31% 464,861 $297,511,111 $1,627,013,889 Rhode Island 5.54% 11,528 $7,377,778 $40,347,222 Vermont 49.61% 99,583 $63,733,333 $348,541,667 1,790,694

$1,146,044,444 $6,267,430,556

analysis by FutureMetrics Total Homes Converting in each State if the is NO Interstate Transport of Pellets (based on 8 tons per user per year average)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

At current heating oil prices, the Midwest states “export” more than 8 BILLION dollars per year*

*The US EIA data shows that 78% of every dollar spent on heating oil leaves the region and most of those dollars leave the country.

48

Number of Households that use Heating Oil or Propane Average Gallons Used per Year by all Users Average Total Expenditure Per Year (#2 at $3.80/gal) Amount that Does not Stay in the State (EXPORTED) Wisconsin 647,000 533,775,000 2,028,345,000 $ 1,582,109,000 $ Minnesota 488,000 402,600,000 1,529,880,000 $ 1,193,306,000 $ Michigan 765,000 631,125,000 2,398,275,000 $ 1,870,655,000 $ North Dakota 103,000 84,975,000 322,905,000 $ 251,866,000 $ South Dakota 137,000 113,025,000 429,495,000 $ 335,006,000 Iowa 312,000 257,400,000 978,120,000 $ 762,934,000 Illinois 413,000 340,725,000 1,294,755,000 $ 1,009,909,000 Indiana 436,000 359,700,000 1,366,860,000 $ 1,066,151,000 $ Total 3,301,000 2,723,325,000 10,348,635,000 $ 8,071,936,000 $ Source: US Energy Information Administration, 2012, US Census, analysis by FutureMetrics

slide-49
SLIDE 49

At current heating oil prices, about a half a million jobs are destroyed as money is drained from those states’ economies and sent to other places.

49

#2 Distillate Fuel and Propane use in Residential, Commercial, and Industrial (not Transportation) Average Gallons per Year Money Exported from Regional Economy at $3.80/gal Permanent Job Destruction Wisconsin 533,775,000 ($1,582,109,100)

  • 106,285

Minnesota 402,600,000 ($1,193,306,400)

  • 71,296

Michigan 631,125,000 ($1,870,654,500)

  • 114,132

North Dakota 84,975,000 ($251,865,900)

  • 16,142

South Dakota 113,025,000 ($335,006,100)

  • 21,551

Iowa 257,400,000 ($762,933,600)

  • 45,841

Illinois 340,725,000 ($1,009,908,900)

  • 54,736

Indiana 359,700,000 ($1,066,150,800)

  • 65,279

2,723,325,000 ($8,071,935,300)

  • 495,262

analysis by FutureMetrics

slide-50
SLIDE 50

At last winter’s heating oil prices, about ONE MILLION NE jobs were lost in the northeast!

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Pulpwood Demand is Declining The wood-to-energy business will keep the largest manufacturing sector in Maine, the forest products industry, alive!

52

6,000,000 6,500,000 7,000,000 7,500,000 8,000,000 8,500,000 9,000,000 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Maine Pulpwood Harvest (green tons) 1980 to 2011

source: Maine Forest Service, 2012, analysis by FutureMetrics Estimate

Ice Storm!

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Even the Pulp and Paper industry is leaving print behind!!

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Here is a pathway to incentivizing biomass thermal that does not require any participation by state government.

We need a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) that Awards both Electric and Thermal Renewable Energy Credits (RECs)

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Our states “export” billions of dollars a year to pay for heating oil.

Much of that money could be kept in the state economy if homes and businesses used regionally made biomass fuel. Thermal RECs would incentivize switching to lower cost regional biomass fuel and other renewable thermal technologies such as solar thermal and geothermal heat pumps.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

The mechanism is a “carve-out” to the current RPS utility obligation that could be implemented beginning in 2013. We are proposing in Maine that the 2.6% thermal carve-out could be implemented at a rate of 0.2% per year for 13 years. The legislation could set the alternative compliance payment (ACP) for renewable thermal energy at $28/MWh (which would be by far the lowest level

  • f any existing class).
slide-57
SLIDE 57

Heat generated from renewable biomass is produced at very high efficiency: 87% or more for residential pellet boiler systems and 65% or better for industrial boilers. Electricity from biomass is produced at low efficiencies

  • f 30% or less.

Because thermal biomass applications are up to three times more efficient than biomass power, the lower cost

  • f RPS compliance benefits homes and businesses by

saving them money for power and, if they use biomass fuel, heat.

slide-58
SLIDE 58
slide-59
SLIDE 59

The permanent jobs created per REC generated per year are many orders of magnitude higher for thermal RECs as compared to electric RECs from wind power.

Wind produces 0.066 jobs per 1000 RECs/year. Biomass thermal from pellet fuel produces 21.17 jobs per 1000 RECs/year.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Year 2013 2025 TOTALS Class I Thermal Carve Out % 0.20% 2.60% MWH of thermal energy1 42,000 546,001 Projected Cost @ $14/MWh2 $602,701 $10,280,345 $65,435,276 Worst Case Projected Cost with ACP @ $28/MWh $1,205,402 $15,288,022 $107,045,556 Reduced Heating Oil Equivlent (Gallons)3 1,038,436 13,499,672 94,497,703 Retention of Heating Oil Expenditures in Minnesota Economy4 $3,059,903 $61,257,990 $375,791,648 Direct Savings on Heating Bills to Minnesota Homes and Businesses5 $1,529,952 $30,628,995 $187,895,824 Net Savings to Minnesota (@$14/MWh) $3,987,154 $81,606,640 $498,252,196 Net Savings to Minnesota (@$28/MWh) $3,384,453 $76,598,962 $456,641,916 Number of Homes Converted from Oil to Pellet Fuel at 900 gallons per year per home 1,154 15,000 104,997 Percentage of Homes in Minnesota that use Heating Oil that are Converted 0.24% 3.07% 21.52% Jobs Created (for biomass supply and using IMPLAN multipiers for indirect and induced jobs) 408 8,316 Jobs not "Exported" + multiplers 326 4,241 Jobs from increased disposable income + multiplers 155 3,094 Net Jobs Created 889 15,650 Heating Oil Price (increasing at 3.5% per year) 3.85 $ 5.82 $ analysis by FutureMetrics

5Assumes that geothermal, solar thermal, and biomass thermal reduce the annual heating bill by

1/2

1Assumes carve out % of REC Qualified MN Load 2Since 2.6% is very small relative to the total heat used in MN, this assumes an oversupply of

thermal RECs and thus a REC value significantly below the ACP value

31 MWH = 3,412,000 btu, 1 gallon heating oil = 138,000 btu 4Using MN statewide average retail delivered price as of 9/20/2012 of $3.65/gallon; EIA estimates

$0.78 of every $1.00 in heating oil expenditure leaves the MN economy

slide-61
SLIDE 61

There is a place for biomass thermal energy from totally within the framework

  • f reducing the cost of energy.

It makes good dollars and sense! Heating our homes, schools, offices, etc. with sustainable regionally produced fuel makes good economic sense AND is a carbon neutral solution*.

*Biomass thermal is carbon neutral in combustion. The harvest and transportation and some of the pellet refining uses fossil fuel so in aggregate it is a low carbon solution.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

AND

With Thermal RECs everyone, is a winner. It is already law in New Hampshire. Your support for this here and in the other states along the northern tier would be welcomed.

slide-63
SLIDE 63

I would be happy to answer any questions…

Thanks. Bill Strauss President, FutureMetrics