the design and evaluation of a task centered battery
play

The Design and Evaluation of a Task Centered Battery Interface - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Design and Evaluation of a Task Centered Battery Interface Task-Centered Battery Interface Presented by Kevin Lo Motivation Motivation Battery interfaces provide detailed information on how much usage time left. Default interface


  1. The Design and Evaluation of a Task Centered Battery Interface Task-Centered Battery Interface Presented by Kevin Lo

  2. Motivation Motivation • Battery interfaces provide detailed information on how much usage time left. • Default interface only gives a high level • Default interface only gives a high-level overview; not always reliable or accurate. • User needs to create her own mental model of how much longer she can use this application • Most interfaces only display time for 1 app. 2 2 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  3. Design of TCBI Design of TCBI • Existing indicators inadequate. Goal: “To provide users with an estimated amount of time remaining for applications running independently or in combination to eliminate guess work” in combination to eliminate guess work • Conducted a survey with 104 participants to understand users’ battery usage habits • 4-week user study to evaluate effectiveness of TCBI 3 3 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  4. Related Work Related Work • Various research on energy conservation – Power management – Energy efficient programs – Improving human-battery interaction (TCBI) I i h b tt i t ti (TCBI) • Commercial Applications: Commercial Applications: – EZ Battery Life – Battery Time y – Battery Magic 4 4 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  5. Battery Usage Survey Battery Usage Survey • Online survey consisted of 26 questions – demographics, different portable devices used, use of the battery interface and its perceived accuracy and usefulness etc and usefulness, etc. • 52 male and 52 female participants with diverse backgrounds through email mailing lists and online advertisements • Incentive: Chance to win 1 of 4 $25 GCs 5 5 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  6. Device Usage Device Usage • 95% own a smartphone/cellphone/PDA and 40% own 2 or more devices. • 93% own a laptop; 43% own 2 or more • 93% own a laptop; 43% own 2 or more. • 72% own an Internet tablet or media player; 72% own an Internet tablet or media player; 7% own something else (e.g. Amazon Kindle) • Average of 4.26 devices/person (SD: 2.22) 6 6 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  7. Device Usage (p2) Device Usage (p2) • Most use their devices on a daily basis; 6% smartphone & 8% laptop users on a weekly/monthly basis • Only 57% of Internet tablet/media player users use those devices on a daily basis use those devices on a daily basis 7 7 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  8. Battery Death Battery Death • Phones die more frequent while idle than other mobile devices • 21 participants’ phones die at least once a • 21 participants phones die at least once a week; 49 once or more per month • Less frequent battery deaths while in use: – 16 participants reported at least once per week; 29 – 16 participants reported at least once per week; 29 at least once per month 8 8 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  9. Low Battery Behavior Low Battery Behavior 9 9 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  10. Better Battery Interface Better Battery Interface 10 10 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  11. 11 11 Implementation Implementation • Prototype built on Nokia N810 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  12. Implementation (p2) Implementation (p2) • Python status bar applet • Obtains 2 piece of data when launched: – Battery’s current voltage reading Batter ’s c rrent oltage reading – List of active processes • Record time-stamped voltage readings every 10 sec while an application runs alone. 12 12 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  13. Implementation (p3) Implementation (p3) • 6 traces for each application; brightness and volume set to 50%, with brand new battery • For each set of application traces: • For each set of application traces: – Average the logged time remaining for each voltage capacity reading g p y g – Perform a smoothing function – Cross-validate each set of traces against their respective battery usage profile 13 13 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  14. Results – Single Application Results Single Application • Predicted battery time within an average of 738.37 sec (12.7%) of actual battery time 14 14 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  15. Results – Multiple Applications Results Multiple Applications • Predicted battery time within an average of 769.3 sec (17.1%) of actual battery time 15 15 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  16. Deployment Study Deployment Study • 2 phases, 1 interface (standard vs. TCBI) per phase 16 16 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  17. Deployment Study (p2) Deployment Study (p2) • Send emails on specific day with specific task • Participants answer set of 7 questions before & after task: – Current Time & Battery remaining – Prediction on whether the task could be completed; Likert scale used to rate predictions • Logging software used to track participation 17 17 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  18. Deployment Study (p3) Deployment Study (p3) • 8 final participants; $60 compensation for completing the study 18 18 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  19. Results Results • Definitely and Probably answers are considered correct for affirmative answers considered correct for affirmative answers • Definitely Not and Probably Not are considered correct for negative answers • Participants answered 94.8% of the questions P ti i t d 94 8% f th ti correctly using TCBI and 73.5% using the Nokia Interface Nokia Interface 19 19 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  20. Results (p2) Results (p2) 20 20 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  21. Results (p3) Results (p3) • Participants were asked to rate their confidence based on the interface they were using based on the interface they were using • Average ratings: 1.76 (TCBI) Average ratings: 1.76 (TCBI) 1.31 (Nokia) 1.31 (Nokia) 21 21 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  22. Possible Improvements Possible Improvements • Increase the font size on TCBI • Only 1 battery meter graphic needed • Make screen less cluttered • Ability to explore different application combinations (without actually opening them) • A more interactive desktop icon 22 22 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  23. Possible Improvements (p2) Possible Improvements (p2) • Display warning (in different color or style) when model is more prone to error 23 23 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

  24. Possible Improvements (p3) Possible Improvements (p3) • Use crowdsourcing to gather a large number of battery traces over a wide range of hardware settings • Per-device training for each application for a more accurate model for that device when more accurate model for that device when there are other background processes running • Generalizing TCBI to other platforms 24 24 Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend