The DESC Observing Strategy Task Force Response to the Project White - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the desc observing strategy task force response to the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The DESC Observing Strategy Task Force Response to the Project White - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The DESC Observing Strategy Task Force Response to the Project White Paper Call by Dan Scolnic and Michelle Lochner on behalf of LSST DESC ObsStrat Task Force What is our plan for the response? ObsStrat Task Force Formed with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The DESC Observing Strategy Task Force Response to the Project White Paper Call

by Dan Scolnic and Michelle Lochner on behalf of LSST DESC ObsStrat Task Force

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is our plan for the response?

  • ObsStrat Task Force Formed with

representatives from each WG

  • Plan on ObsStrat GitHub
  • Two ‘brief’ white papers following Project

Latex template - one WFD, one DDF and mini-surveys

  • Two journal-ready papers for detail
  • Small projects written as stand-alone

papers

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What is our plan for the response?

  • Project want reproducible metrics
  • Our top goal to ~reproduce SRD FoM

assessment for multiple strategies

  • Need quantitative and qualitative

priorities

  • August 10, First assessment of subset of

WFD and mini-survey strategies, with

  • metrics. Slides from each WG.
  • September 15, Full assessment of

strategies and metrics due for task force

  • October 25, Revised white papers sent
  • ut to DESC.
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 10 New Strategies and Counting (now ~16)

What is given in the white paper call?

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • OpSim: Picked best possible observation from list of
  • bservations for 10 years.
  • Feature-Based: No set lists of observations, pick where

to observe based on number of features including what is behind, filter change time..

  • Alt-Sched [Rothchild/Stubbs]: Follows preprogrammed

path: no merit function,parameters give explicit control

  • ver global schedule properties.
  • Rolling versions of each of these.

What additional surveys can we analyze?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How much does this matter? A lot. See N. Regnault’s talk.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

How much does this matter? A lot.

From Husni Almoubayyed showing bias on the cosmic shear induced by typical PSF modeling errors (and

  • ther weak lensing systematics with similar profiles), as a function of angular separation.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

How much does this matter? A lot. The precision of time delays from strong lens systems. From S. Suyu, S. Huber

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What would we like to add?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What would we like to add? See H. Awan’s talk

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Where should the extra DDF be? Answer: We want to match where fields of other surveys are Takeaway is overlap with WFIRST/Euclid

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Where should the extra DDF be?

Plot from D. Rubin

Thinking here-ish

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Where should the extra DDF be?

Plot from D. Rubin

Thinking here-ish

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Where should the extra DDF(s) be?

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Join #desc-obs-strat for discussion
  • Branches for each issue on github.com/LSSTDESC/ObsStrat/

— monitor here for write-ups - it is public

  • Have already seen huge range of impact from 10 different

survey strategies

  • So far, Weak Lensing, SNe, Strong Lensing very excited about

increasing number of visits for WFD

Final Notes