the computational challenge of lattice chiral symmetry is
play

The computational challenge of lattice chiral symmetry - Is it worth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The computational challenge of lattice chiral symmetry - Is it worth the expense? Adam Virgili In collaboration with Waseem Kamleh & Derek Leinweber University of Adelaide 5 November 2019 + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 + ) Roper


  1. The computational challenge of lattice chiral symmetry - Is it worth the expense? Adam Virgili In collaboration with Waseem Kamleh & Derek Leinweber University of Adelaide 5 November 2019

  2. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2

  3. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Discovered in 1964 via partial wave analysis of pion-nucleon scattering data.

  4. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Discovered in 1964 via partial wave analysis of pion-nucleon scattering data. Has unusually large full width ≈ 350 MeV.

  5. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Discovered in 1964 via partial wave analysis of pion-nucleon scattering data. Has unusually large full width ≈ 350 MeV. Is the lowest lying resonance in the nucleon spectrum, sitting below the first − state. negative parity N(1535) 1 2

  6. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Discovered in 1964 via partial wave analysis of pion-nucleon scattering data. Has unusually large full width ≈ 350 MeV. Is the lowest lying resonance in the nucleon spectrum, sitting below the first − state. negative parity N(1535) 1 2 This is a reversal of ordering predicted by simple quark models.

  7. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Groups using correlation matrix anlyses in lattice QCD observe a large mass for the first positive parity excitation ∼ 2 GeV.

  8. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Groups using correlation matrix anlyses in lattice QCD observe a large mass for the first positive parity excitation ∼ 2 GeV. χ QCD collaboration have seen a low mass consistent with the Roper.

  9. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Groups using correlation matrix anlyses in lattice QCD observe a large mass for the first positive parity excitation ∼ 2 GeV. χ QCD collaboration have seen a low mass consistent with the Roper. They emphasise using a fermion action respecting chiral symmetry is key to obtaining a low mass result.

  10. + ) Roper Resonance (N(1440) 1 2 Groups using correlation matrix anlyses in lattice QCD observe a large mass for the first positive parity excitation ∼ 2 GeV. χ QCD collaboration have seen a low mass consistent with the Roper. They emphasise using a fermion action respecting chiral symmetry is key to obtaining a low mass result. We aim to carefully asses the role chiral symmetry plays in understanding the Roper in lattice QCD.

  11. Positive parity nucleon spectrum 2 . 5 2 . 0 1 . 5 E α (GeV) 1 . 0 CSSM 0 . 5 JLab Cyprus 0 . 0 0 . 00 0 . 05 0 . 10 0 . 15 0 . 20 0 . 25 0 . 30 0 . 35 0 . 40 m 2 π (GeV 2 )

  12. χ QCD results a -1 =1.73GeV, m l a=0.005 Nucleon (coulomb) 2.6 Roper(coulomb) Nucleon (JLab) 2.4 Roper (JLab) Nucleon (SEB) Roper (SEB) 2.2 CSSM exp. 2 M H (GeV) 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 2 (GeV 2 ) m �

  13. Summary of fermion actions

  14. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference

  15. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling

  16. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling

  17. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers.

  18. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers. Wilson-type fermions:

  19. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers. Wilson-type fermions: Wilson

  20. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers. Wilson-type fermions: Wilson Clover

  21. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers. Wilson-type fermions: Wilson Clover Twisted mass

  22. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers. Wilson-type fermions: Wilson Clover Twisted mass Wilson term violates chiral symmetry explicitly for massless fermions.

  23. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers. Wilson-type fermions: Wilson Clover Twisted mass Wilson term violates chiral symmetry explicitly for massless fermions. Why not just find an action which removes doublers and preserves chiral symmetry?

  24. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Introduce Wilson term to remove doublers. Wilson-type fermions: Wilson Clover Twisted mass Wilson term violates chiral symmetry explicitly for massless fermions. Why not just find an action which removes doublers and preserves chiral symmetry? Not straightforward...

  25. No-Go theorem

  26. No-Go theorem Theorem It is not possible to find a lattice Dirac operator D that simultaneously satisfies the following conditions:

  27. No-Go theorem Theorem It is not possible to find a lattice Dirac operator D that simultaneously satisfies the following conditions: 1. Correct continuum limit.

  28. No-Go theorem Theorem It is not possible to find a lattice Dirac operator D that simultaneously satisfies the following conditions: 1. Correct continuum limit. 2. No doublers.

  29. No-Go theorem Theorem It is not possible to find a lattice Dirac operator D that simultaneously satisfies the following conditions: 1. Correct continuum limit. 2. No doublers. 3. Locality.

  30. No-Go theorem Theorem It is not possible to find a lattice Dirac operator D that simultaneously satisfies the following conditions: 1. Correct continuum limit. 2. No doublers. 3. Locality. 4. Chiral symmetry.

  31. Ginsparg-Wilson Relation A Lattice deformed version of chiral symmetry: { D, γ 5 } = 2 aDγ 5 D

  32. Ginsparg-Wilson Relation A Lattice deformed version of chiral symmetry: { D, γ 5 } = 2 aDγ 5 D Formulated in 1982.

  33. Ginsparg-Wilson Relation A Lattice deformed version of chiral symmetry: { D, γ 5 } = 2 aDγ 5 D Formulated in 1982. Was considered to be inconsequential as there was no known solution.

  34. Ginsparg-Wilson Relation A Lattice deformed version of chiral symmetry: { D, γ 5 } = 2 aDγ 5 D Formulated in 1982. Was considered to be inconsequential as there was no known solution. Solution found in 90’s - the overlap fermion action.

  35. Overlap fermions D o = 1 2(1 + γ 5 ǫ ( H ))

  36. Overlap fermions D o = 1 2(1 + γ 5 ǫ ( H )) where: ǫ ( H ) is the matrix sign function applied to H

  37. Overlap fermions D o = 1 2(1 + γ 5 ǫ ( H )) where: ǫ ( H ) is the matrix sign function applied to H , and typically, H = γ 5 D w , the Hermitian form of the Wilson-Dirac operator.

  38. Overlap fermions D o = 1 2(1 + γ 5 ǫ ( H )) where: ǫ ( H ) is the matrix sign function applied to H , and typically, H = γ 5 D w , the Hermitian form of the Wilson-Dirac operator. − The matrix sign function is expensive to evaluate.

  39. Overlap fermions D o = 1 2(1 + γ 5 ǫ ( H )) where: ǫ ( H ) is the matrix sign function applied to H , and typically, H = γ 5 D w , the Hermitian form of the Wilson-Dirac operator. − The matrix sign function is expensive to evaluate. − D o ∼ O (100) times more expensive than Wilson-type fermions.

  40. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Wilson-type fermions: = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover Twisted mass

  41. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Wilson-type fermions: = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover Twisted mass Chiral fermions: Overlap

  42. Summary of fermion actions Naive finite difference = ⇒ fermion doubling Wilson-type fermions: = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover Twisted mass Chiral fermions: Overlap Domain wall

  43. χ QCD results a -1 =1.73GeV, m l a=0.005 Nucleon (coulomb) 2.6 Roper(coulomb) Nucleon (JLab) 2.4 Roper (JLab) Nucleon (SEB) Roper (SEB) 2.2 CSSM exp. 2 M H (GeV) 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 2 (GeV 2 ) m �

  44. Summary of fermion actions Wilson-type fermions = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover Twisted mass Chiral fermions Overlap Domain wall

  45. Summary of fermion actions Wilson-type fermions = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover Twisted mass Chiral fermions Overlap Domain wall

  46. Summary of fermion actions Wilson-type fermions = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover (NP-improved) Twisted mass Chiral fermions Overlap Domain wall

  47. Summary of fermion actions Wilson-type fermions = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover (NP-improved) Twisted mass Chiral fermions Overlap Domain wall

  48. Summary of fermion actions Wilson-type fermions = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover (NP-improved) Twisted mass Chiral fermions Overlap ( H = FLIC fermion matrix) Domain wall

  49. Summary of fermion actions Wilson-type fermions = ⇒ violate chiral symmetry explicitly, cheap Wilson Clover (NP-improved) Twisted mass Chiral fermions Overlap ( H = FLIC fermion matrix) Domain wall Does the Overlap action deliver a spectrum 300 MeV lower than the NP-improved Clover?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend