the changing state of the lower murray lakes
play

The changing state of the Lower Murray Lakes S uppo rte d by: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HEADLINE TO BE PLACED IN THIS SPACE CL L AMMe c o lo gy Re se arc h Cluste r partne rs: The changing state of the Lower Murray Lakes S uppo rte d by: With the c o llabo ratio n o f: Acknowledgements Authors Justin Brookes


  1. HEADLINE TO BE PLACED IN THIS SPACE CL L AMMe c o lo gy Re se arc h Cluste r partne rs: The changing state of the Lower Murray Lakes S uppo rte d by: With the c o llabo ratio n o f:

  2. Acknowledgements • Authors • Justin Brookes • Brian Deegan • Sebastien Lamontagne • Perran Cook • Ian Webster • Matt Hipsey • Andrew Bissett • DWLBC, MDBC,EPA, AWQC • ICE WaRM • International Liaison Programme • Travelled to Max Planck Institute, Bremen, Germany • Water Cluster of the University of Adelaide AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  3. The Lower Murray Lakes SA’s largest permanent lakes (306 and 106 km 2 ) • • Shallow - average depth approx 3.5 m, maximum depth 4.1 m (Geddes 1984) • Terminus of the River Murray, their principal source of water (Sims and Muller, 2004) • Local stream contribution significant during periods of low River Murray inputs (MDBC, 2007) • Estuarine prior to European settlement (Geddes 1984, Von Der Borch and Altman 1979), • Fresh more than 95% of the time (Sims and Muller, 2004) • Post European settlement • Water extractions • More frequent intrusions of salt water into the lakes (Sims and Muller, 2004) • Construction of five barrages between 1935 and 1940 • Lake Alexandrina discharges into the Murray Mouth and Coorong • Controlled by barrage operations AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  4. AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  5. Important for agriculture, fisheries, water supply, … AMM e c o lo gy CL L S.Wedderburn

  6. AMM e c o lo gy … recreation, residence, … L CL

  7. ... biota … • Along with Coorong and Murray Mouth are listed as a wetland of international significance (Ramsar agreement, 1984) S.Wedderburn AMM e c o lo gy CL L S.Wedderburn

  8. ... and a supply of resources to downstream ecosystems • Water, nutrients, organic material supplied to Coorong, Murray Mouth and near-shore environment C. Matthews AMM e c o lo gy CL L C. Matthews

  9. The Lower Murray Lakes • Eutrophic-hypereutrophic (Geddes 1984, 1988) • Marginal for phytoplankton growth? • A majority of the nutrients are in particulate forms • Dissolved nutrients not available for algal growth • Highly turbid environment - resuspension • Algal blooms common, particularly during periods of low flow (low turbidity) • First recorded toxic bloom of blue-green algae ( Nodularia spumigena ) in Australia (Francis 1878) • Pico-cyanobacterial blooms now occur annually • Blooms of Nodularia spumigena , Anabaena circinalis Aphanizomenon/Anabaena are common • First bloom of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii occurred in the lakes in 2006 • Impact fisheries, water supply and biotia • We know very little about the functioning of the Lower Murray Lakes AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  10. AMM e c o lo gy A turbid, eutrophic environment L CL

  11. Barrage operations • Barrages separate from the Coorong and the Murray Mouth to prevent saline intrusions • Operations • Maintain an average water level of 0.75 m Australian Height Datum (AHD) (MDBC, 2007) • As river flow increases, barrage gates are opened to maintain this level. • Surcharged to 0.85 m AHD at the beginning of Summer to ensure >0.60 m AHD in Autumn • Altered flow • Reduced size (magnitude and duration) of peak flow • Extends period of no outflow • Increase lake levels • Reduces water level fluctuations • Increase water residence times • ‘Environmental’ flow releases AMM e c o lo gy CL L M. Geddes

  12. Original project objectives • Examine the processing of resources (nutrients, organic matter) within the Lower Murray Lakes • Develop historical nutrient and ion budgets for the Lower Murray Lakes • Examine how resource delivery from the Lower Lakes could impact primary and secondary production in the Coorong and Murray Mouth region • Develop a model capable of predicting organic matter and nutrient delivery from the Lower Lakes to the Coorong and Murray Mouth under various flow regimes AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  13. The current situation – Murray inflows AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  14. The current situation – falling water levels AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  15. The current situation – falling water levels AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  16. The current situation – falling water levels AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  17. The current situation – some benefits? AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  18. AMM e c o lo gy The current and future situation L CL • Text (DWLBC, 2007)

  19. AMM e c o lo gy The current and future situation L CL • Text (DWLBC, 2007)

  20. The current and future situation Island??? Pomanda •Weir at

  21. Additional objectives • Monitoring salt intrusions • Impacts of drying-reflooding on nutrient release and bacterial activity • Impacts of salinity on phytoplankton communities AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  22. Steps involved • How have the Lower Murray Lakes functioned in the past? • Analysis of historical data • How are the Lower Murray Lakes currently functioning? • Monitoring and field/laboratory experiments • How will the Lower Murray Lakes function in the future? • 3D hydrodynamic-ecological model AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  23. How have the Lower Murray Lakes functioned in the past? • Nutrient and ion budget • Water quality data from AWQC, EPA and MDBC • HCO 3 , K, Mg, Na, SO 4 , Ca, Cl, NO 3 , pH, Si, TKN, FRP and TP • Only consistent parameters • Only 1979–1996 were considered, most comprehensive • Collection of flow data from BIGMOD (J. Davis, MDBC) • Inflow = Tailem Bend • Closest to the inflow • Outflow = Milang • Closest to barrages • Nutrient concentrations at Goolwa barrage not significantly different ( t -test, P>0.05) • Monthly loads were obtained at the inflow and outflow points • Average monthly concentrations x monthly flow AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  24. Annual inflow v nutrient & ion inputs AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  25. Retention in the Lower Murray Lakes AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  26. Retention in the Lower Murray Lakes AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  27. The nutrient budget 1979-1996 • Assimilation of inorganic nutrients • Conversion to organic forms (TKN (little NH 4 )) • Consistent with autotrophic system • Contrasts with Australian reservoirs • Increasing N:P • Exports will be N ‘rich’ • Flow provisions across the barrages are likely to provide environmental benefits • Estuarine and marine systems generally N limited • Initial response likely to be observed in zooplankton and bacterial communities Units = Kmol • Benefits cascade through the foodwebs AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  28. How are the Lower Murray Lakes currently functioning? • Field and laboratory experiments • Thermistor chains • Temp - 5 depths, 4 sites, every 15 min since December 2006 • Sediment character survey. At 40 sites: • Water column - chlorophyll, POM, PSD, light intensity profiles. • Sediment – nutrients, chlorophyll, POM, PSD • Wind-driven sediment resuspension – P release • Influence of drying-reflooding on sediment nutrient release • Routine monitoring. At 20 sites: • Nutrients, chlorophyll, POM, TSS, PSD • DO, temp, conductivity, turbidity, pH and light profiles • Algal counts at 12 sites in January 2007 • Phytoplankton activity with PhytoPAM AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  29. Drying-reflooding – nutrient release • Impacts of sediment exposure (drying) and reflooding on nutrient fluxes • Dessication – cell lysis and nutrient leaching • Incubation experiment • Permanently wet sediments vs. wet-dry-wet • Changes in water column nutrient concentrations through time • Microsensor profiles for DO, NO x , NH 4 • Flux rates given by rate of change through profiles • Injection of ‘labelled’ N for calculation of denitrification rates • Added to water column (NO x ) – sample from air (N 2 ) AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  30. AMM e c o lo gy Drying-reflooding – nutrient release L CL

  31. AMM e c o lo gy Drying-reflooding – nutrient release L CL

  32. AMM e c o lo gy L CL Routine monitoring

  33. Salinity Electrical conductivity (mS/cm) 40 River Murray Lake Alexandrina body Narrows 30 Lake Albert Lake Alexandrina arm Barrages 20 10 ANZECC, 2000 0 Jan Mar May Jul Oct Nov AMM e c o lo gy CL L

  34. Electrical conductivity (mS/cm) Salinity 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 Jan Water depth (m) 1 Mar 2 May Jul 3 Oct 4 Goolwa Nov 5 Electrical conductivity (uS/cm) 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 Point Sturt- Jan Water depth (m) 1 Mar Point McLeay 2 May Jul 3 Oct 4 Nov AMM e c o lo gy CL L 5

  35. 2.5 River Murray Lake Alexandrina body Nutrients Narrows 2 Lake Albert Total P (mg/L) Lake Alexandrina arm 1.5 Barrages 1 0.5 ANZECC, 2000 0 Jan Mar May Jul Oct Nov 25 River Murray Lake Alexandrina body Narrows 20 Lake Albert Lake Alexandrina arm DOC (mg/L) Barrages 15 10 5 0 AMM e c o lo gy CL L Jan Mar May Jul Oct Nov

  36. Nutrients 0.3 River Murray Lake Alexandrina body Narrows Lake Albert NH 4 -N (mg/L) 0.2 Lake Alexandrina arm Barrages 0.1 ANZECC, 2000 0 Jan Mar May Jul Oct Nov AMM e c o lo gy CL L

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend