the carbon footprint of suburbanization evidence from
play

The carbon footprint of suburbanization: Evidence from French - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions The carbon footprint of suburbanization: Evidence from French household data e 1 and Miren Lafourcade 2 Camille Blaudin de Th 1 Systra 2 University Paris-Sud


  1. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions The carbon footprint of suburbanization: Evidence from French household data e 1 and Miren Lafourcade 2 Camille Blaudin de Th´ 1 Systra 2 University Paris-Sud (RITM) / University Paris-Saclay & Paris School of Economics (PSE) November 30, 2016 PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  2. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Motivation Suburbanization is a long-standing trend (1950-...) ⇒ Accelerated growth in real per capita income since WWII ⇒ Decades of low energy prices, steep decline in transport costs ⇒ Preference for living in detached single-family homes... But urban sprawl has come at many costs (market failures) : ⇒ Consumption of undeveloped land & reduction of bio-diversity ⇒ Growth of GHG emissions due to commuting patterns... �→ Road transport : ∼ = 35% of anthropogenic CO 2 emissions �→ Personal driving : ∼ = 60% of road emissions in France �→ Rising share ( � = other sources), despite improved vehicle fleet ⇒ But strong resistance to carbon taxes related to the use of fuel... ⇒ Spatial policies as complements (substitutes ?) to other CO 2 mitigating macro-policies such as carbon taxes ? Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  3. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Motivation (cont’d) Vast body of literature since Newman & Kenworthy (1989) ⇒ Negative relation between density and transport-related energy ⇒ Key contributions include : Bento et al. (2005), Browstone & Golob (2009), Glaeser & Kahn (2010), Zheng et al. (2011)... ⇒ But causal impact of urban form or sorting / endogeneity issues ? �→ People who like driving sort into areas of particular density �→ Density correlated with unobserved variables affecting driving What this paper adds to the literature ⇒ First attempt to correct for both sorting and endogeneity issues �→ Not only density : job-housing distance, transport access... ⇒ Europe is seldom investigated, whereas sprawl increases rapidly �→ French MAs have expanded by 20% in the last decade... �→ SEEID studies (Lemaˆ ıtre and Kleinpeter or Perrissin, 2009...) ⇒ Policy prospects : is there an optimal or a sub-optimal city ? �→ Ranking of cities wrt CO 2 emissions of a “marginal” household �→ Relationship between MA-size and driving emissions : ∩ -curve Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  4. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Household data The fuel consumption associated with personal driving ⇒ French survey on “Family expenditures” (INSEE, 2006) : �→ 10,215 households (25,364 individuals), 7,800 urbanites ⇒ Exhaustive coverage of consumption expenditures : �→ 2 weeks purchases, 900 budgetary items �→ Gasoline, diesel and LPG expenditure... �→ Converted into volumes with related fuel prices in 2006 ⇒ Regular or extraordinary resources (gifts, lottery, inheritance,...) ⇒ Socioeconomic characteristics of all household members : �→ Nb of children, workers, job seekers, retired... �→ Age, gender, diploma, occupation (head of the household) ⇒ Dwelling characteristics : �→ Municipality code (statistical disclosure) Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  5. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Descriptive statistics Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  6. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Core-base geographical unit of observation ⇒ 352 French Metropolitan Areas (MAs) Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  7. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Urban form The metrics of urban sprawl : the three D’s ⇒ Density : Population increases faster at the urban fringe �→ Growth of city centers : +0,3%/year (1999-2006) �→ Growth of inner (+0,6%) & outer (+1,3%) suburbs �→ Density gradients fall with distance to city-centers... �→ Census data : number of inhabitants/jobs per km 2 ⇒ Design : The centrality of the urban space decreases as... �→ Workplaces and residence places develop further away �→ Commuting distances between residence and CBD increase... �→ “Great-circle” distance between the residence and the CBD ⇒ Diversity : Transport networks shape cities �→ Tentacular cities and “leap frog” sprawl �→ Possibly countered by transport networks �→ Public transit substitutes to personal driving �→ Public transport increases both local/global connectedness �→ GIS BD-TOPO (NGI) : all transports but buses Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  8. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Econometric specifications Fuel i ( k ) = α 0 + α 1 Paris k + α 2 IS k + α 3 OS k + α 4 M k + α 5 R k + X i θ + ǫ i ( k ) Fuel i ( k ) = α + β ln dens P k + δ ln dist CBD + γ ln dens T k + � x λ x ln TP k ( x )+ X i θ + ε i ( k ) k ⇒ Fuel i ( k ) : (Log)Fuel volume of household i living in municipality k ⇒ dens P k : population density in the municipality of residence k ⇒ dist CBD : distance between k and the CBD of the MA k ⇒ dens T k : density of train/metro stations in municipality k dens k ′ ( x ) ⇒ TP k ( x ) = � : connection of k within the MA dist kk ′ k ′ � = k , ∈ MA �→ Number of train/metro stations (as many as transit lines) �→ Length of the road network (weighted by traffic levels) ⇒ X i : Socioeconomic characteristics of household i : �→ Family composition : nb of (non-)working adults and children �→ Age, gender, diploma, occupation of the household-head ⇒ If distance to CBD doubles, fuel cons. varies by ln 2 × δ = 0 , 7 × δ Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  9. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar in log

  10. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Preliminary results : to sum up Fuel consumption and individual characteristics ⇒ Affluent households and (working) families consume more fuel... ⇒ The impact of a working-adult is 1.5-fold that of a non-working adult, and 15-fold that of an underage child ⇒ Households headed by elderly and women consume less fuel The impact of suburbanization on fuel consumption ⇒ Moving a household living in a non-Parisian city-center to : �→ The Parisian pole would save 60 gallons/year �→ Paris “intra-muros” would save 135 gallons/year �→ The inner suburb of Paris would save 40 gallons/year �→ The inner suburb of another city would add 40 gallons/year �→ An outer / multipolar suburb would add 90 gallons/year �→ A rural area would add 80 gallons/year ⇒ A household living at the fringe of a MA instead of a city-center would bear an extra-consumption of about 6 fuel tanks per year Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  11. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Sorting and endogeneity issues Econometric issues ⇒ Omitted variables (bus...) / Reverse causality (density...) ⇒ Instrumental Variables econometric techniques : �→ Length of the royal road departmental network in 1837 pro-rated on the basis of the surface area of each municipality (Source : Statistique g´ en´ erale de la France, Tome 2, 1837) �→ Lagged market potentials (pop. dens.) (Sources : INED, 1936) �→ Lagged density of deaths by municip. (Source : Census, 1962) ⇒ Sorting of (non-)motorized households ⇒ OLS / IV restricted to the sample of motorized households ⇒ Heckman two-step estimation : �→ 15% of households do not have a car... �→ Selection equation : probability to own (at least) a car = α + β log dens k + δ log dist CBD + γ log dens T � Car i ( k ) ≥ 1 � k + � x λ x log TP k ( x )+ Y i θ + µ i ( k ) P k �→ Outcome equation : Same as before - underage children + 1/Mill’s ratio Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

  12. French data Empirical strategy Preliminary results Main results CO2 predictions Miren Lafourcade (University Paris-Sud / Saclay & PSE) PSE-TSE-MEEM Seminar

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend