carbon capture technology carbon capture technology
play

Carbon Capture Technology Carbon Capture Technology Strategies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Carbon Capture Technology Carbon Capture Technology Strategies Strategies ARPA- -E Carbon Capture and Conversion E Carbon Capture and Conversion ARPA Workshop Workshop Howard Herzog Howard Herzog MIT MIT October 29, 2009 October 29,


  1. Carbon Capture Technology Carbon Capture Technology Strategies Strategies ARPA- -E Carbon Capture and Conversion E Carbon Capture and Conversion ARPA Workshop Workshop Howard Herzog Howard Herzog MIT MIT October 29, 2009 October 29, 2009 Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  2. Today’ ’s Technology s Technology Today • Amines, primarily Monoethanolamine (MEA) Amines, primarily Monoethanolamine (MEA) • • Invented in 1930 Invented in 1930 • • Hundreds of processes in operation Hundreds of processes in operation •  Most industrial gas clean  Most industrial gas clean- -up (natural gas, up (natural gas, hydrogen, etc.) hydrogen, etc.) • Experience on power plant exhaust about 20 Experience on power plant exhaust about 20 •  Largest size about 1,000 tonnes per day (tpd)  Largest size about 1,000 tonnes per day (tpd) » 1,000 tpd equivalent to 50 MW coal 1,000 tpd equivalent to 50 MW coal- -fired power plant fired power plant »  More experience on gas than coal  More experience on gas than coal Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  3. CO 2 Capture at a Power Plant Source: ABB Lummus Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative Poteau, OK – 200 tpd

  4. Challenges for Today’ ’s s Challenges for Today Technology Technology • Costs for GHG mitigation Costs for GHG mitigation •  Starts at $60  Starts at $60- -65 per tonne CO 65 per tonne CO 2 avoided (4¢ ¢/kWh) /kWh) 2 avoided (4 for coal for coal  Add first mover costs  Add first mover costs  Add premium for retrofits  Add premium for retrofits • Large contributor to cost is parasitic energy Large contributor to cost is parasitic energy • load load  ~25% loss of output for a power plant capturing  ~25% loss of output for a power plant capturing 90% of CO 2 in exhaust gas 90% of CO 2 in exhaust gas • Critical challenge for PCC Critical challenge for PCC – – reducing the reducing the • parasitic energy load parasitic energy load Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  5. Improving CO 2 Capture Improving CO 2 Capture Technology Technology • Two primary approaches Two primary approaches •  Improved PCC technology  Improved PCC technology » Improved solvents Improved solvents » » Improved process design Improved process design »  Change process to make capture easier  Change process to make capture easier » Oxy Oxy- -combustion combustion » » Pre Pre- -combustion combustion » Post-Combustion Capture is critical technology for: (1) Existing coal-fired power plants (2) Existing and new gas-fired power plants Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  6. Post- -Combustion Capture Combustion Capture Post Technology Options Technology Options • MEA • MEA • Improved Amines • Improved Amines  Mixed amines  Mixed amines  Hindered amines  Hindered amines  Additives (e.g., piperazine)  Additives (e.g., piperazine) • Other solvents (e.g., ammonia) • Other solvents (e.g., ammonia) • Adsorption or membranes • Adsorption or membranes • Other options • Other options  Biomimetric approaches (e.g., carbonic anhydrase)  Biomimetric approaches (e.g., carbonic anhydrase)  Microalgae  Microalgae  Cryogenics/ phase separation  Cryogenics/ phase separation • Structured and Responsive Materials • Structured and Responsive Materials Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  7. Structured and Responsive Materials Structured and Responsive Materials • Opportunities for advanced technologies Opportunities for advanced technologies •  Greater reliance on entropic rather than  Greater reliance on entropic rather than enthalpic interactions enthalpic interactions  Minimization of large thermal swings for  Minimization of large thermal swings for regeneration regeneration » Stimuli Stimuli- -responsive materials to modify separation responsive materials to modify separation » environment environment » Use of non Use of non- -thermal regeneration methods (e.g., thermal regeneration methods (e.g., » electric swing) electric swing) Courtesy Alan Hatton Courtesy Alan Hatton Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  8. Examples of Structured and Examples of Structured and Responsive Materials Responsive Materials • Adsorbents • Adsorbents  Metal  Metal- -Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Organic Frameworks (MOFs)  Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs)  Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks (ZIFs)  Functionalized Fibrous Matrices  Functionalized Fibrous Matrices  Poly(Ionic Liquids)  Poly(Ionic Liquids) • Absorbents • Absorbents  CO  CO 2 Hydrates 2 Hydrates  Ionic Liquids  Ionic Liquids  Liquid Crystals  Liquid Crystals Courtesy Alan Hatton Courtesy Alan Hatton Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  9. Vattenfall Schwarze Pumpe Plant Vattenfall Schwarze Pumpe Plant Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  10. Oxy- -combustion 30 MW combustion 30 MW th Pilot Plant Oxy th Pilot Plant Boiler Air Separation ESP Unit FGD FG- Condenser Switchgear Building CO2-Plant Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  11. Oxygen Production Oxygen Production • Today • Today  Cryogenic Air Separation Unit (ASU)  Cryogenic Air Separation Unit (ASU)  Largest size  Largest size – – 4,000 tpd 4,000 tpd • Improved ASUs • Improved ASUs  Oxygen purity (95  Oxygen purity (95- -97%) 97%)  Pressure (1.3  Pressure (1.3- -1.7 bar) 1.7 bar)  Low power  Low power  Large scale  Large scale • Ionic Transport Membranes • Ionic Transport Membranes  Current scale = 5 tpd  Current scale = 5 tpd  Stand  Stand- -alone (heat and temperature recovery) alone (heat and temperature recovery)  Integrate in process (reduce O  Integrate in process (reduce O 2 partial pressure on permeate side) 2 partial pressure on permeate side) Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  12. Oxy- -Boilers Boilers Oxy • Synthetic Air • Synthetic Air  Requires flue gas recycle  Requires flue gas recycle  First tested in mid  First tested in mid- -1980s 1980s  No changes to water/steam system  No changes to water/steam system  Minimum changes to boiler  Minimum changes to boiler  Air enleakage an issue for retrofits  Air enleakage an issue for retrofits • Oxy- -Burners Burners • Oxy  Used in glass, metals, cement, waste treatment  Used in glass, metals, cement, waste treatment • Oxy- -boilers boilers • Oxy  Eliminate external recycle  Eliminate external recycle  Higher efficiency  Higher efficiency  Pressurized operation?  Pressurized operation? Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  13. CO 2 Purification CO 2 Purification • Flue Gas • Flue Gas  60  60- -70% CO 70% CO 2 2 (Air enleakage biggest unknown) (Air enleakage biggest unknown)  Particulate matter must be removed  Particulate matter must be removed  Non  Non- -condensibles and water removed during compression condensibles and water removed during compression • Criteria pollutant control • Criteria pollutant control  Co  Co- -sequester sequester  Modify current equipment  Modify current equipment  Remove during compression as acids  Remove during compression as acids • High recovery, high purity systems • High recovery, high purity systems  Distillation  Distillation  Membranes  Membranes Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  14. RD&D Pipeline for a RD&D Pipeline for a 8- -10 Year RD&D PCC Program 10 Year RD&D PCC Program 8 50 50 Exploratory (~$1 MM each) Exploratory (~$1 MM each) 30 30 Proof of Concept (~$10 MM each) Proof of Concept (~$10 MM each) 15 Pilot Plants (~$50 MM each) 15 Pilot Plants (~$50 MM each) 5 5 Demonstrations (~$1,000 MM each) Demonstrations (~$1,000 MM each) Commercial Technologies Commercial Technologies Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  15. Closing Thoughts Closing Thoughts • Allow room for people to explore Allow room for people to explore • • Avoid stove Avoid stove- -piping piping • • Understand lifecycle considerations Understand lifecycle considerations • • Create a transition from ARPA Create a transition from ARPA- -E to other E to other • programs as technology advances programs as technology advances • Don Don’ ’t forget fundamental principals t forget fundamental principals • Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  16. Obama visit to MIT Obama visit to MIT October 23, 2009 October 23, 2009 Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

  17. Contact Information Contact Information Howard Herzog Howard Herzog Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Energy Initiative Energy Initiative Room E19- -370L 370L Room E19 Cambridge, MA 02139 Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617- -253 253- -0688 0688 Phone: 617 E- -mail: hjherzog@mit.edu mail: hjherzog@mit.edu E Web Site: sequestration.mit.edu Web Site: sequestration.mit.edu Howard Herzog / MIT Energy Initiative

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend