1
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Carbon Capture and Storage Value Chain
Large Stationary Sources Capture and Compression Pipeline Transport Deep Subsurface Storage
Transport $2, 3% Capture $51, 73% Storage $9, 13% Compression $7, 11%
Carbon Capture and Storage Value Chain Capture and Compression - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Carbon Capture and Storage Value Chain Capture and Compression Large Stationary Sources Capture $51, 73% Storage $9, 13% Compression $7, 11% Pipeline Transport Deep Subsurface Storage Transport $2, 3% National Energy 1 Technology
1
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Large Stationary Sources Capture and Compression Pipeline Transport Deep Subsurface Storage
Transport $2, 3% Capture $51, 73% Storage $9, 13% Compression $7, 11%
2
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Ingredients for Success
Capture Technology Low Cost Sufficient and Secure Storage Formations Efficient Power Systems Integrated Demonstration Projects
3
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Advancing Technologies in Power Generation Utilizing Coal
* Data for active projects as of October 28, 2015
Office of Coal and Power R&D Office of Program Performance & Benefits Office of Major Demonstrations
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Today
2025 (commercial deployment) 2035
Today 2nd-Gen Transformational
~420 projects $11.3B Total ($3.3B DOE) * Relevance of R&D, Leverages, Promotes Commercialization
4
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Office of Coal and Power R&D
Advancing Technologies that Transform Power Generation
Advanced Energy Systems STEP CO2 Storage Program
Storage Infrastructure Geologic Storage Monitoring, Verification, Accounting & Assessment
CO2 Capture Program
Pre-combustion Post-Combustion
Enabling Technologies (Crosscutting) Program
Materials, Computational Tools, Intelligent Sensors and Controls Applied Research Demonstration Engineering Development Pre-commercial Testing
BIG SKY WESTCARB SWP PCOR MGSC SECARB MRCSPGasification Turbines Combustion Fuel Cells Coal & Coal-Biomass to Liquids
5
National Energy Technology Laboratory
FY15 ~ $400* Million, Active Projects ~ 410
Data as of September 2015
Advanced Energy Systems STEP CO2 Storage Program CO2 Capture Program Enabling Technologies (Crosscutting) Program
$49 Million, 115 Projects
Applied Research Demonstration Engineering Development Pre-commercial Testing
BIG SKY WESTCARB SWP PCOR MGSC SECARB MRCSP$113 Million** 136 Projects $88 Million 58 Projects $100 Million 100 Projects *Includes $15 M for Rare Earth Research and $35Million to NETL Office of Research and Development ** Includes AES and STEP (Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles)
6
National Energy Technology Laboratory
Bio-Gasification AUSC Steam Cycles Integrated Gasification Fuel Cells (IGFC) Direct Power Extraction Chemical Looping Supercritical CO2 Cycles Transformational CO2 Separation Transformational H2 Production Pressurized Oxy-combustion Pressure Gain Combustion 65% LHV Combustion Turbines Atmospheric Oxy-Combustion Radically Engineered Modular Systems (REMS) Warm Syngas Cleanup Oxygen Production Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture High-Pressure Dry Feed Combustion Turbine Components DG SOFC Aspects Also Applicable to Natural Gas
Gasification Combustion
Sensors & Controls Simulation-Based Engineering Water Management High Performance Materials Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Oxygen Production
Brian K. Robinson Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
November 17, 2015
Fossil
Sequestration Ready
Solar SunShot Power Cycle
7 1 2 3 5 6 8
Compressors Turbine HT Recup
4
Alternator Waste Heat Chiller LT Recup
CO2Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle
Space Solar Electric Propulsion Nuclear Geothermal
The long-term vision is widespread commercial deployment of a transformational technology
8
Comparison
Rankine efficiency is 33% Supercritical CO2 (sCO2 ) potential to surpass 50% efficiency Greatly reduced cost for sCO2 compared to the cost of conventional steam Rankine cycle sCO2 compact turbo machinery is easily scalable
1 meter sCO2 (300 MWe) (Brayton Cycle) 20 meter Steam Turbine (300 MWe)
(Rankine Cycle)
5-stage Dual Turbine Lo Hi
3-stage Single Turbine Hi Lo
Lo
Supercritical CO2: Transformational Energy Systems
9
Economic and environmental benefits of the technology include:
Public policy benefits include:
What is the appropriate Federal Role?
benefits are significant and aligned with policy goals
10
Nominal Application-Specific Conditions for sCO2 Turbo Machinery (Ref. sCO2 Power Cycle Technology Roadmapping Workshop, February 2013, SwRI San Antonio, TX) 11
Objective: Construct the 10 MWe scale Supercritical Transformational Electric Power (STEP) pilot scale facility and address technical issues, reduce risk, and mature sCO2 technology for demonstration. Activities:
design/code qualification (ongoing activity)
sharing of pre-commercial ideas and technology
recuperator development and fabrication (10MW, 700C)
broad-based applications. Examples of the latter include high-temperature recuperator design and build, materials corrosion testing, and compressor design and build to allow for more variable operating conditions
12
potential to increase the efficiency and decrease the cost of electricity generation compared to existing steam based power cycles.
solar, nuclear, fossil fuel, geothermal and waste heat recovery applications.
industry to go it alone. Some companies are prepositioning themselves as first movers which underscores the perceived potential of this technology
13
14
demonstration facility (‘09)
Energy (EERE) developed program specific R&D activities (‘10)
path forward
needed to confirm benefits of sCO2 technology
15
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. SAND2014-17447 PE
Commercializing the sCO2 Recompression Closed Brayton Cycle
Gary E. Rochau, (505) 845-7543, gerocha@sandia.gov Advanced Nuclear Concepts Nuclear Energy Systems Laboratory/Brayton Lab (Brayton.sandia.gov)
17
generated
generation
procedures TA Description: Heater – 750 kW, 550°C Load Bank – 0.75 MWe Max Pressure - 14 MPa Gas Compressor to scavenge TAC gas TACs – 2 ea, 125 kWe @ 75 kRPM, Inventory Control 2 power turbines, 2 compressors Turbine Bypass(Remote controlled) High Temp Recuperator - 2.3 MW duty ASME B31.1 Coded Pipe, 6 Kg/s flow rate Low Temp Recuperator – 1.7 MW duty Engineered Safety Controlling Hazards Gas Chiller – 0.6 MW duty Remotely Operated
18
19
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 30 35 40 45 50 55 Emissions Reduction from 33% Efficiency Value [%] Cycle Efficiency
Emissions Reduction vs. Cycle Efficiency
20
7 1 2 3 5 6 8
Compressors Turbine HT Recup
4
Alternator Waste Heat Chiller LT Recup
CO2Solar Fossil Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle DOE-NE Advanced Reactors Nuclear (Gas, Sodium, Water)
Sequestration Ready
SunShot Power Cycle ARRA Geothermal Military CONUS Marine Mobile? Gas Turbine Bottoming