The California Economy Recession, Forecast, Budget, Issues City - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the california economy recession forecast budget issues
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The California Economy Recession, Forecast, Budget, Issues City - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The California Economy Recession, Forecast, Budget, Issues City National Bank Annual Economic Forecast Conference Stephen Levy, CCSCE February 2, 2010 California Economy and Budget Outlook and Issues Economy Bottom Linemodest


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The California Economy Recession, Forecast, Budget, Issues

City National Bank Annual Economic Forecast Conference Stephen Levy, CCSCE February 2, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

California ‐‐ Economy and Budget‐‐ Outlook and Issues

  • Economy Bottom Line—modest recovery,

substantial long‐term opportunities, MANY CHALLENGES

  • Budget Bottom Line—numbers don’t add,

lousy choices, bad feelings, BIG GRIDLOCK

  • The relationship of the budget, policy and the

California economy—getting beyond blame to create a great future for our children

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • The California economy closely tracks the

national economy. So the California forecast depends heavily on the national forecast.

  • California has become an average growth

state measured by jobs, income and population.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Annual Change in Total Jobs

‐5.0% ‐4.0% ‐3.0% ‐2.0% ‐1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 California United States

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Annual Change in Personal Income

‐4.0% ‐2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 California United States

slide-6
SLIDE 6

California as Share of U.S. Now an Average Growth State

10.0% 10.5% 11.0% 11.5% 12.0% 12.5% 13.0% 13.5% 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Population Jobs Personal Income

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A Deep Recession‐ A million Lost Jobs

  • In 2 years CA lost more than 6% of job base
  • The unemployment rate more than doubled
  • Construction led the recession falling by 60%
  • r $60 billion
  • As a result, California’s recession was deeper

than the nation’s

  • The recession hit businesses, consumers and

devastated government revenues

slide-8
SLIDE 8

California Loses A Million Jobs

‐140,000 ‐120,000 ‐100,000 ‐80,000 ‐60,000 ‐40,000 ‐20,000 20,000 40,000

Dec‐07 Apr‐08 Aug‐08 Dec‐08 Apr‐09 Aug‐09 Dec‐09

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Unemployment Rates Surge Wiping Out the Decade’s Job Gains

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% Dec‐07 Apr‐08 Aug‐08 Dec‐08 Apr‐09 Aug‐09 Dec‐09

California United States

slide-10
SLIDE 10

California Construction Spending

20 40 60 80 100 120

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 $Billions

Residential Non Residential Public Total Construction

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Residential Permits in California

50 100 150 200 250

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Thousands

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CA Job Losses Driven by Construction Decline

29.2% 9.2% 11.9% 6.9% 21.5% 6.7% 15.4% 5.1%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% Construction Finance Manufacturing Total Nonfarm

% Job Loss Dec 07‐Dec 09

California U.S.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The California Outlook

  • Broad consensus on slow recovery
  • Pace depends on the nation’s recovery
  • Positives for CA—1) world recovery, 2)

allocation of federal funds; 3) VC recovery

  • Negatives for CA—1) long delay for

construction as we work off the large stock of homes, office and retail space; 2) gridlock— are we still a welcoming state?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Let’s Get the Arithmetic Right First

  • Most forecasts for California show negative

job growth and slow income growth in 2010 compared to 2009

  • But that is on a year over year basis
  • The same forecasts show growth starting in

Q4‐2009—but slower than in previous cycles

  • California’s question is the nation’s question—

if we are done with the recession, how soon and strong will the recovery be?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Nonfarm Job Growth

‐0.3% ‐0.7% 1.5% 1.3% ‐1.0% ‐0.9% 1.8% 1.7%

‐1.5% ‐1.0% ‐0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% UCLA DOF UCLA DOF 2010 2011 California United States

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Job Growth in CA from Q4‐2009

98.5% 99.0% 99.5% 100.0% 100.5% 101.0% 101.5% 102.0% 102.5% 103.0% 103.5% Q4‐2009 Q1‐2010 Q2‐2010 Q3‐2010 Q4‐2010 Q1‐2011 Q2‐2011 Q3‐2011 Q4‐2011

UCLA DOF

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Income Growth From Q4‐2009

94.0% 96.0% 98.0% 100.0% 102.0% 104.0% 106.0% 108.0% 110.0%

Q4‐2009 Q1‐2010 Q2‐2010 Q3‐2010 Q4‐2010 Q1‐2011 Q2‐2011 Q3‐2011 Q4‐2011

UCLA DOF

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Positives in California

  • The world economy is recovering—that means

exports, tourism and investment dollars for CA

  • Domestic capital spending is recovering—we

sell technology embodied in capital goods

  • The federal agenda favors investment in

technology to address energy, health care and

  • ther issues. CA getting a high share of grants
  • VC funding should rise in response to these
  • pportunities
  • CA offers creative talent—always in demand
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Share of U.S. Venture Capital

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 CA % of US Bay Area % of US

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Negative Short Term Trends

  • The desire of consumers to rebuild balance

sheets—probably more to rebuild in CA

  • The need to work through the inventory of

distressed residential and commercial properties before new building can occur

  • The contraction in state and local government

employment

  • The CA budget and policy gridlock
slide-21
SLIDE 21

California Median Resale Home Price

$0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 Dec 89 Dec 93 Dec 97 Dec 01 Dec 05 Dec 09

slide-22
SLIDE 22

California Home Prices and Income

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50

1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 1989=1.0

Median Resale Price Median HH Income

slide-23
SLIDE 23

CA Budget and Economy

  • Two budget problems—structural deficit from

2000 and deep recession

  • In 2000 CA spent peak revenues on new

spending and tax cuts—huge majority votes

  • Unlike businesses, when government

revenues fall, the number of customers rises

  • We are in gridlock about how the budget

affects the economy and what choices to make

slide-24
SLIDE 24

General Fund Tax Revenue ($Billions)

$0.0 $20.0 $40.0 $60.0 $80.0 $100.0 $120.0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

slide-25
SLIDE 25

General Fund Shortfall ($Billions)

$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 2010‐11 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15

slide-26
SLIDE 26

General Fund Budget

  • K‐12 40%
  • Higher Ed 10%
  • Medi‐Cal 15%
  • Social Services 15%
  • Corrections 10%
  • Other 10%
  • Retirement and Debt Service included in

categories—approximately $5 billion each

slide-27
SLIDE 27

General Fund as % of Personal Income

0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0%

1979 1980 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Taxes as % of Income Spending as % of Income

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Budget Choices and Issues

  • The current revenue structure, even with

economic recovery, does not support historical spending choices

  • The situation will get tougher as rising

retirement and debt service levels kick in

  • Yet CA ranks 45th‐50th in the number of

teachers, librarians, and counselors in K‐12, is turning students away from colleges and plans large new infrastructure investments

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Thoughts to Ponder from Jan 27

  • Tom Friedman—Adults Only, Please “We badly

need leaders inspired by sustainable values, not situational ones. Without that we’ll just be digging our hole deeper and making the reckoning that much more ferocious”

  • Barack Obama—”As hard as it may be….it’s

time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth”

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Budget Choices and Issues

  • We give legislators a mixed message—don’t

cut spending, don’t raise taxes and then get mad at them when they say “Got it!!”.

  • So what kind of budget do we want for our

state, our economy and our children?

  • How do we connect to our future and resolve

gridlock?

  • The story of LA voters amidst recession—what

is the lesson?