The Appalachian stream syndrome: Diagnosing & managing impacts - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the appalachian stream syndrome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Appalachian stream syndrome: Diagnosing & managing impacts - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Appalachian stream syndrome: Diagnosing & managing impacts of multiple aquatic stressors APRIL 13, 2017 ERIC R. MERRIAM J. TODD PETTY Background & Objectives Background & Objectives Research objectives: 1. Characterize


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Appalachian stream syndrome: Diagnosing & managing impacts of multiple aquatic stressors

APRIL 13, 2017 ERIC R. MERRIAM

  • J. TODD PETTY
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background & Objectives

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background & Objectives

Research objectives:

  • 1. Characterize detailed patterns in chemical

degradation

  • 2. Test whether degraded neighborhood conditions

affect metacommunity structure (tolerance) and processes (dispersal)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methods: study area

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methods: in-stream data

July–Aug 2010, 11, or 12 Water quality

  • Low flow conditions

Physical habitat

  • Quality (RVHA) and complexity

Macroinvertebrates

  • Genus-level abundance data
  • Tolerance and dispersal traits
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methods: Landscape data

Land cover and use

  • 2011 (July) NAIP imagery
  • Feature extraction

Ancillary datasets

  • Deep mine permits
  • Structures
  • Roads
  • Coal geology

Temporal consistency between landscape and in-stream datasets

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results: water quality

PC 1 PC 2 PC 3

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results: water quality

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results: Neighborhood effects

  • Dev. Explained (72%)

CV Dev. (65%) Surface mining Forest

PC 3 (rWQ) PC 1 (mWQ)

Neighborhood condition index (NCI)

  • All streams in 5km buffer
  • Sum PCs, standardized by

length

NCI

  • Dev. Explained (55%)

CV Dev. (45%) Roads Grass/Pasture Structures

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results: neighborhood effects

Local

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results: neighborhood effects

2 4 6 20 40 60 80

cNCI Abundance

  • Mod. tolerance

Low dispersal Optimal local Average local Worst local

2 4 6 20 40 60 80 100

cNCI Predicted abun

High tolerance High dispersal

Abundance

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

Pervasive land use degrades streams via 2 distinct pathways:

1. Degradation of local habitat 2. Degradation of neighborhood condition

Patchwork of distinct chemical signatures resulting from multiple natural and anthropogenic factors Pervasive chemical degradation has regional biological implications

  • Isolation effect on moderately sensitive, low dispersing taxa
  • Increased mass effects associated with tolerant taxa
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Management implications

Need for multi-stressor chemical remediation efforts The capacity for restoration and preservation to maintain regional diversity is limited by neighborhood condition Need strategic management actions that preserve metacommunity processes in the face of uncertain futures

  • Preserve network of undisturbed headwater catchments
  • Restoration should maximize neighborhood improvement
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acknowledgements

  • Dr. Mike Strager

Aaron Maxwell Donna Hartman Eric Miller & Alison Anderson