The aggregation of marginal gains: Analgesia for Rectal Cancer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the aggregation of marginal gains
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The aggregation of marginal gains: Analgesia for Rectal Cancer - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The aggregation of marginal gains: Analgesia for Rectal Cancer Resections Dr Cat Williams Dr Vinay Ratnaliker Professor Umesh Khot Morriston Hospital, Swansea Rectal Cancer Colorectal cancer = 4th commonest 40,000 new cases per year


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The aggregation of marginal gains:

Analgesia for Rectal Cancer Resections

Dr Cat Williams Dr Vinay Ratnaliker Professor Umesh Khot

Morriston Hospital, Swansea

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Rectal Cancer

  • Colorectal cancer = 4th commonest
  • 40,000 new cases per year
  • 14,000 = rectal cancer

Cancer research UK

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The problem

  • Older patients
  • Multiple co-morbidities
  • Burden of surgery is

considerable

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Perioperative Mortality

  • 30-day post-op

mortality 6.7%

  • Significant

increase with age

National Cancer Intelligence Network

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Perioperative Morbidity

  • Substantial morbidity following major abdominal

surgery

  • 78% at day 5
  • 50% at day 8
  • Negative impact on patient and service provider

Ann Surg 2011;254(6):907-913

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ERAS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Aggregation of marginal gains

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Audit

  • Retrospective audit
  • Rectal cancer resections with intrathecal

diamorphine

  • Jan 2012 - Dec 2016
slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Does the dose of intrathecal diamorphine make a

difference to:

  • Post-operative pain scores
  • Incidence of nausea and vomiting
  • PCA usage post-operatively
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Data collected

  • Dose of intrathecal diamorphine
  • Pain scores on rest and with moving for 3 days

post-op

  • Pain scores: 0,1,2,3
  • Total PCA dose used
  • Presence of nausea & vomiting or respiratory

depression

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results

Final number of patients = 103

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Analysis

  • Divided into laparoscopic and open cases
  • Intrathecal dose of <1.5mg/>1.5mg
  • Chi2 test/Fisher’s exact test
slide-13
SLIDE 13

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Laparoscopic Open Laparoscopic Open <1.5mg ≥1.5mg

ITO dose & Sex Distribution

Male Female

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pain Scores

  • No significant difference between pain scores at

rest or on moving for open or laparoscopic procedures regardless of ITO dose

  • EXCEPT………
slide-15
SLIDE 15

5 10 15 20 25 30

<1.5mg ≥1.5mg <1.5mg ≥1.5mg Day 1 Rest Day 1 Moving

Laparoscopic Procedure - Day 1 Pain Scores

1 2 3

p=0.0117

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Nausea & Vomiting/Resp Depression

  • Total 7 patients recorded as having N&V (6.8%)
  • No patients had respiratory depression
slide-17
SLIDE 17

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 All Patients Laparoscopic Open Open & Block

PCA Doses (Fentanyl mcg)

<1.5mg ≥1.5mg ITO & Block

slide-18
SLIDE 18

DREAMing

  • Lower pain scores on

day 1 moving in laparoscopic procedures in >1.5mg group

Anaesthesia 2016;71(9):1008-1012

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Limitations

  • Retrospective audit
  • Pain scores not VAS
  • Small sample size
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Recommendations

  • Higher dose opioids:
  • Appears to improve pain score on moving for

laparoscopic procedures

  • Do not have increased N&V or resp depression
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Recommendations

  • Optimise pain management protocols by

examining procedure-specific data?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Recommendations

  • Further studies needed looking at the relationship of

intrathecal opioid dose and pain scores

slide-23
SLIDE 23

We acknowledge the work done by the acute pain team in collecting the patient data Questions?