7/25/2017 1
The ABCs of Behavior Analysis
A REVIEW OF THE BASICS National Autism Conference Workshop The Pennsylvania State University August 2017
1 3
The ABCs of Behavior Analysis A REVIEW OF THE BASICS National - - PDF document
7/25/2017 The ABCs of Behavior Analysis A REVIEW OF THE BASICS National Autism Conference Workshop The Pennsylvania State University August 2017 1 3 1 7/25/2017 Topics Reinforcement, Extinction, and Their Side-Effects
7/25/2017 1
1 3
7/25/2017 2
4
5
7/25/2017 3
reinforcement and about getting rid of problem behavior
in intro psych courses taught by those without a background in behavior analysis
procedure of choice
6
misrepresentations
Reward mainly occur (if they occur at all) when reinforcers are delivered noncontingently
7
7/25/2017 4
responses or reinforcing organisms?
reinforcement?
8 9
7/25/2017 5
10
11
7/25/2017 6
12 13
7/25/2017 7
14
The distinction between contingencies and pairings
15
7/25/2017 8
and pairings
(NCR)
18 19
7/25/2017 9
20 21
7/25/2017 10
22 23
7/25/2017 11
EXT (a)
24 25
7/25/2017 12
26
EXT (b)
27
7/25/2017 13
28 29
7/25/2017 14
EXT / RT 20-s
30 31
7/25/2017 15
32
33
7/25/2017 16
34 35
7/25/2017 17
effects of subtle but pervasive contingencies
36 37
7/25/2017 18
effects of subtle but pervasive contingencies
infants
38 39
7/25/2017 19
40
41
7/25/2017 20
42 43
7/25/2017 21
44
46
7/25/2017 22
contingency continues vs effectiveness after the contingency ends
47 48
7/25/2017 23
49 50
7/25/2017 24
51
52
7/25/2017 25
Ontogeny
53
54
7/25/2017 26
55
White, K. G. (2002). Psychophysics of remembering: The discrimination hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 141-145.
56
7/25/2017 27
an art form
creation of operant classes
variants
57 59
7/25/2017 28
61
62
7/25/2017 29
63 64
7/25/2017 30
65 66
7/25/2017 31
class mattered
67
class mattered
stimulus classes and the reinforcer classes?
68
7/25/2017 32
69 70
7/25/2017 33
classes
71 72
7/25/2017 34
73 75
7/25/2017 35
77
78
7/25/2017 36
behavior?
79 80
7/25/2017 37
81
The Three-Term Contingency
In presence of S1, R1 may produce C1 In presence of S2, R2 may produce C2
S = Stimulus R = Response C= Consequence
When R1 in presence of S1 differs from R2 in presence of S2, we say that the individual discriminates S1 from S2.
82
7/25/2017 38
83 84
7/25/2017 39
85
The Feature-Positive vs Feature-Negative Experiment
86
7/25/2017 40
87 88
7/25/2017 41
89 90
7/25/2017 42
91 92
7/25/2017 43
93 94
7/25/2017 44
95 96
7/25/2017 45
97
98
7/25/2017 46
99
food
food but may change whether relevant stimuli are available on the schedule key
100
7/25/2017 47
101 102
7/25/2017 48
103 104
7/25/2017 49
errors
105
The relation between reinforcers and responses that precede them: at the top, only one response is followed by a reinforcer; at the bottom, many are followed, at different delays. Thus, the effect of the reinforcer is larger.
106
7/25/2017 50
112
113
7/25/2017 51
accounts of the causes of behavior
feelings
demonstration
115
sights and smells of food
placed by others occasioning echoic behavior; server as audience
116
7/25/2017 52
117 118
7/25/2017 53
ABOUT OPTIONAL TOPICS THAT PROBABLY WOULD NEED MORE TIME THAN AVAILABLE FOR THE MAIN WORKSHOP.
119
extended sequences of behavior
120
7/25/2017 54
121 122
7/25/2017 55
produces a discriminative stimulus that
are all chains or all chunks. Instead, given a behavior sequence, which kind is it? BEHAVIOR CHAINS VS EXTENDED BEHAVIOR SEQUENCES: CHAINS VS CHUNKS
123 124
7/25/2017 56
contingencies
125 126
7/25/2017 57
127 128
7/25/2017 58
contingencies
variations
129 130
7/25/2017 59
131 132
7/25/2017 60
152 158
7/25/2017 61
SCHEDULE COMBINATIONS
159 171
7/25/2017 62
172 173