the 2018 nssme
play

The 2018 NSSME+ FEBRUARY 7, 2019 Daniel Heck Kristen Malzahn - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The 2018 NSSME+ FEBRUARY 7, 2019 Daniel Heck Kristen Malzahn Courtney Plumley Nadine Bezuk, Discussant Session Overview About the 2018 NSSME+ Brief Overview of Current Status of Mathematics Instruction Resources for


  1. The 2018 NSSME+ FEBRUARY 7, 2019 Daniel Heck Kristen Malzahn Courtney Plumley Nadine Bezuk, Discussant

  2. Session Overview • About the 2018 NSSME+ • Brief Overview of Current Status of Mathematics Instruction • Resources for Instruction • The Mathematics Teaching Force • Professional Development Experiences • Implications for Teacher Preparation and Support

  3. About the 2018 NSSME+ • The 2018 NSSME+ is the sixth in a series of surveys dating back to 1977. • It is the only survey specific to STEM education that provides nationally representative results.

  4. The 2018 NSSME+, and this presentation, is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DGE-1642413. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

  5. Topics Addressed Six different survey instruments • Characteristics of the science/math/computer science teaching force: − demographics − preparation for teaching − beliefs about teaching and learning − perceptions of preparedness • Instructional practices • Factors that shape teachers’ decisions about content and pedagogy • Use of instructional materials • Opportunities teachers have for professional growth • How instructional resources are distributed

  6. Who’s In the Sample Two-stage random sample that targeted: • 2,000 schools (public and private) • Over 10,000 K–12 teachers Very good response rate: • 1,273 schools participated • 86 percent of program representatives • 78 percent of sampled teachers

  7. Endorsing Organizations • American Association of Chemistry • National Association of Biology Teachers Teachers • American Association of Physics • National Association of Elementary Teachers School Principals • American Federation of Teachers • National Association of Secondary • Association of Mathematics Teacher School Principals Educators National Council of Supervisors of • • American Society for Engineering Mathematics Education • National Council of Teachers of • Association of State Supervisors of Mathematics Mathematics • National Earth Science Teachers Association for Science Teacher Association • Education • National Education Association • Council of State Science Supervisors • National Science Education • Computer Science Teachers Leadership Association Association • National Science Teachers Association

  8. Interpreting Results After data collection, design weights were computed, adjusted for nonresponse, and applied to the data. Why should you care? The sampling and weighting processes mean that the results are national estimates of schools, teachers, and classes—not characteristics of the respondents.

  9. www.horizon-research.com/NSSME Current reports: • Technical report • Highlights report • Compendium of Tables Follow us on Twitter: @NSSMEatHRI #NSSME

  10. What mathematics instruction are students experiencing? * • Instructional time • Objectives • Math Practices

  11. Instructional Time: Elementary 100 89 82 80 Minutes Per Day 63 57 60 Reading/LA Mathematics Science 40 Social Studies 27 21 18 16 20 0 Grades K-3 Grades 4-6

  12. Objectives Receiving a Heavy Emphasis 67 Understand mathematical concepts 71 69 62 Learn how to do math 61 63 37 Develop student confidence 41 37 41 Increase student interest 34 26 36 Learn math vocabulary 27 29 33 Learn how to perform computations 20 21 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Percent of Classes Elementary Middle High

  13. Instructional Activities: Weekly 95 Teacher explains ideas 95 95 95 Whole-class discussion 91 84 88 Small-group work 77 71 78 Provide manipulatives 29 20 41 Write reflections 30 19 13 Use flipped instruction 10 11 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent of Classes Elementary Middle High

  14. Engagement in Standards for Mathematical Practice The 2018 NSSME+ included a series of items asking how often students were engaged in aspects of the mathematical practices: 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively 3. Construct viable arguments/critique reasoning of others 4. Model with mathematics 5. Use appropriate tools strategically 6. Attend to precision 7. Look for and make use of structure 8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

  15. Engagement in Standards for Mathematical Practice In the ideal, how often should students engage with these math practices? • Determine whether their answers make sense • Develop a mathematical model to solve a mathematics problem A. Daily B. Weekly C. Less often

  16. Standards for Mathematical Practice: Weekly 85 Determine if answer makes sense 85 84 85 Provide math reasoning 83 76 74 Work on challenging problems 75 71 75 Develop math models 70 64 59 Work on generating a rule or formula 70 61 65 Analyze math reasoning of others 61 53 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent of Classes Elementary Middle High

  17. Standards for Mathematical Practice: Daily 46 Determine if answer makes sense 44 39 44 Provide math reasoning 39 36 25 Work on challenging problems 22 24 36 Develop math models 26 23 20 Work on generating a rule or formula 22 20 23 Analyze math reasoning of others 21 15 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent of Classes Elementary Middle High

  18. Why Might Instruction Look This Way? • State, district, school policies • Availability of resources, including instructional materials

  19. State, District, and School Policies What percentage of elementary classes are required to take three or more state/district mathematics assessments in a year? A. 25% B. 50% C. 75% D. 100%

  20. Required External Mathematics Testing Percent of Classes Elementary Middle High Never 9 1 20 Once a year 9 12 25 Twice a year 9 11 22 Three or four times a year 48 43 24 Five or more times a year 25 33 10

  21. Instructional Materials For most classes, districts designate instructional materials to be used: 100 91 80 Percent of Classes 80 66 60 40 20 0 Elementary Middle High

  22. What Is Designated Percent of Classes Elementary Middle High Commercially published textbooks 89 88 91 State, county, or district-developed units or lessons 44 37 32 Lessons or resources from websites that are free 28 30 24 Lessons or resources from websites that have a subscription fee or cost 31 22 15 Self-paced online courses or units 33 33 13

  23. What Teachers Use (Weekly) Percent of Classes Elementary Middle High 76 65 61 Commercially published textbooks Teacher-developed units or lessons 44 65 78 Units or lessons from other sources (e.g., conferences, colleagues) 30 31 35 Lessons or resources from websites that 37 39 27 are free State, county, or district-developed units 41 26 23 or lessons Lessons or resources from websites that have a cost 54 34 19 Self - paced online courses or units 36 24 12

  24. Instruction Take-Aways Developing conceptual understanding and learning how to do math receive heavy emphases in most classes across grade bands Lecture, whole class discussion, and small group work are all common activities in most mathematics classes Most math classes engage with the Standards for Mathematical Practice on a weekly basis, but most do not engage with them daily Most math classes, particularly at the elementary and middle school level, have a lot of external assessments Teachers use a hodgepodge of instructional materials raising questions about quality and coherence

  25. The Mathematics Teaching Force The 2018 NSSME+ collected data about: • Demographics of teachers • Path to certification • College coursework • Beliefs about teaching and learning • Feelings of preparedness

  26. Teacher Experience True or False? The majority of teachers of mathematics have 11 or more years of teaching experience.

  27. Teaching Experience 100% 15 20 21 80% Percent of Teachers 35 >20 years 33 35 60% 11-20 years 6-10 years 40% 20 3-5 years 17 17 0-2 years 17 20% 17 19 13 12 10 0% Elementary Middle High

  28. Paths to Certification 100% 2 4 7 23 20 21 80% Not credentialed Percent of Teachers 10 14 16 60% Masters Post-baccalaureate 40% program 65 61 57 Undergraduate 20% program 0% Elementary Middle High

  29. College Degrees About what percentage of middle school mathematics teachers hold a degree in mathematics or mathematics education? A. 25% B. 50% C. 75% D. 100%

  30. Degree in Mathematics or Mathematics Education 100 79 80 Percent of Teachers 60 45 40 20 3 0 Elementary Middle High

  31. Teacher Beliefs What percentage of teachers believe they should ask students to justify their mathematical thinking? A. 25% B. 50% C. 75% D. 100%

  32. Teacher Beliefs 97 Teachers should ask students to justify their 99 math thinking 98 97 Students should learn math by doing math 97 96 96 Most class periods should have students share 95 their thinking and reasoning 94 97 Students learn best when instruction is 93 connected to their everyday lives 85 77 It is better for instruction to focus on ideas in 89 depth, even if it means covering fewer topics 83 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent of Teachers Elementary Middle High

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend