temperature and precipitation data set for Norway Elin Lundstad - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

temperature and precipitation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

temperature and precipitation data set for Norway Elin Lundstad - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fil A daily homogenized temperature and precipitation data set for Norway Elin Lundstad & Ole Einar Tveito Norwegian Meteorological Institute 29.10.2015 Norwegian Meteorological Institute 2 Norwegian Meteorological Institute 3


slide-1
SLIDE 1

«Fil…»

A daily homogenized temperature and precipitation data set for Norway

Elin Lundstad & Ole Einar Tveito Norwegian Meteorological Institute

29.10.2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Objectives

  • Establish a quality assurance tools to identify and

adjust for homogeneity violation

  • Producing homogenized daily values of temperature

and precipitation for a number of long climate series.

  • Develop methodology to generate "homogenized"

daily values of precipitation and temperature for given locations / catchments based on gridded (1x1 km) map.

  • Facilitate homogenized daily values and analysis for

homogenization so that it is available to external users, such as Statkraft.

5

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Challenges with the methods

6

HOMER

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

What is new?

7

· Former homogenization of monthly values · Mostly temperature data of some stations · Now homogenization of daily data

  • and all the precipitation stations

· New methods and programs:

  • SNHT

HOMER, MASH, SPLIDHOM, RHtest

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Methods

8

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Locations/Network

Network Breaks Temperature · 7 stations @Tromsø 1 · 7 @ Trondheim 7 · 12 @ Bergen 3 · 10 @ Kristiansand 3 · 10 @ Oslo 3 or 4? Precipitation · 1 @ Bardufoss · Mo i Rana · Fokstua 8 · Takle 1 · Sauda

10

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Challenges

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Network

18700 04440 04780 04930 17150 17850 19400 19710 27450 27500 18700 1.000 0.991 0.993 0.987 0.988 0.899 0.996 0.994 0.988 0.879 04440 0.991 1.000 0.994 0.991 0.981 0.989 0.991 0.986 0.983 0.954 04780 0.993 0.994 1.000 0.993 0.984 0.991 0.991 0.989 0.985 0.960 04930 0.987 0.991 0.993 1.000 0.986 0.991 0.986 0.980 0.984 0.954 17150 0.988 0.981 0.984 0.986 1.000 0.995 0.986 0.983 0.994 0.977 17850 0.899 0.989 0.991 0.991 0.995 1.000 0.992 0.988 0.993 0.972 19400 0.996 0.991 0.991 0.986 0.986 0.992 1.000 0.991 0.986 0.967 19710 0.994 0.986 0.989 0.980 0.983 0.988 0.991 1.000 0.986 0.973 27450 0.988 0.983 0.985 0.984 0.994 0.993 0.986 0.986 1.000 0.976 27500 0.879 0.954 0.960 0.954 0.977 0.972 0.967 0.973 0.976 1.000

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

What causes the breaks?

13

1924 1950 1969 2011 1982

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

From manual to automatic WS

14

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

New buildings

16

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Vegetation grows

17

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results of the homogenization

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Code for intepretation of breaks - Metadata

A = Change from manuel to automatic station E = Environment H = Change of instrument height I = Inspection N = New instrument O = Shift of observer R = Relocation S = Change of screening ? = Not confirmed

19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 20

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 21

A = Change from manuel to automatic station E = Environment H = Change of instrument height I = Inspection N = New instrument O = Shift of observer R = Relocation S = Change of screening ? = Not confirmed

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

TRONDHEIM

22

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 23

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Bergen

24

FLORIDA

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 25

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 26

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Kristiansand

27

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 28

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 29

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 30

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

What happen in 1988?

31

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

What happen in 1988?

32

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 33

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 35

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

The adjustment

38

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Precipitation: RHtestsV4

40

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 41

Fokstua

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 42

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Takle

43

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

Experiences so far..

· For temperature, we follow the recommendations of COST HOME: · Homer for monthly temperature · Software: SPLIDHOM for daily temperature · Homogeneity Software precipitation is problematic: Seasonal challenges are not covered by "standard" applications. We use several Homer, MASH, .... One method of day P.T. (RHtests_dlyPrcp4 @ Wang) Have access to other methods (MASH, ACMANT, ...) for comparison (monthly data) Open source can be a challenge: · lack of standardization maintenance and repairs

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Norwegian Meteorological Institute 45

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

+47 22 96 31 69 elinl@met.no @nile_2011 T. E. Twitter.

Thanks for your attention!

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Norwegian Meteorological Institute