TECHNO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF SIMPLIFIED COOLING TIME ESTIMATION METHODS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

techno economic study of simplified cooling time
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TECHNO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF SIMPLIFIED COOLING TIME ESTIMATION METHODS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IIR Student Competition International Congress of Refrigeration ICR2015 ICR2015 Yokohama, Japan TECHNO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF SIMPLIFIED COOLING TIME ESTIMATION METHODS APPLIED ON TWO-PHASE YOGURT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY M. Okuli, M.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TECHNO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF SIMPLIFIED COOLING TIME ESTIMATION METHODS APPLIED ON TWO-PHASE YOGURT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY

  • M. Okulić, M. Ožegović and I. Zlatanović

University of Belgrade – Faculty of Agriculture ICR2015 Yokohama, Japan

IIR Student Competition – International Congress of Refrigeration ICR2015 ICR2015 Yokohama, Japan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

COOLING TIME ESTIMATION IMPORTANCE ?

 More efficient and economical operation of the

cooling system for specific technology requirements;

 Smaller capacity of refrigeration systems;  Energy savings;  Cost-effective production process.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

IMPORTANT PARAMETERS

 Thermo-physical properties of food

(heat conductivity, density and heat capacity)

 Packaging material (size and shape)

(plastic cup, carton box, cellophane, ...)

 Cooling medium

(water, air,...)

 Refrigerant propeties

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SIMPLIFIED COOLING TIME CALCULATION METHODS

1. Cooling time estimation method based on f and j factors 2. Cooling time estimation method based on „Equivalent Heat Transfer Dimensionality“ (EHTD)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cooling time estimation method based on f and j factors

f and j factors represent the slope and intercept, of the temperature history curve. Factor j is a measure of the lag between the onset of cooling and the exponential decrease in the temperature of the food. Factor f represents the time required to

  • btain a 90% reduction in the non-

dimensional temperature difference (Y).

10 20 30 40 50 60 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 f j

a i a

T T Y T T    , min.  Y

ln 2.303 f Y j   

     

  • Cooling time
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Calculation of f and j factors for irregulary shaped products

– shape factor – f factor – j factor

          

2 2 2 1 4 2

1 1 8 3 25 . A A L G 

   

2 1 2

303 . 2 M L f

2 1

0388 .

892 .

M

e j

 

 

H A1 A2 L

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cooling time estimation method based on „Equivalent Heat Transfer Dimensionality“ (EHTD)

Cooling time estimation method based on EHTD is based on the comparison of the total heat transfer to the heat transfer through the shortest dimension.

2 2

3 ln c L j E Y          

     

4 3 4 3

1.85 1.85 Bi E Bi E E

  

  • Cooling time
  • EHTD factor
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Typical diary supply chain scheme

Farm Transport Diary

(processing factory)

Transport Distribution depots Transport Consumer Cold chain Retail

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Two-phase yogurt manufacturing technology

Reception

  • f the raw milk

Filtration Separation Cream Skim milk Standardization

to acheive the desired % of fat content

Pasteurization

30 min at T=85oC 10 min at T=95oC

Homogenization

mixing at 15 Mpa and cooling to T=43oC

Starter culture insertion

at T=43oC

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Small blast freezers Storage cold room

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Yogurt palette packaging Small blast freezer interior

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CALCULATION RESULTS Estimation method based on f and j factors

Input data: Cooling time: 56.58 minutes

  • Dimension of yogurt cup (diameter 2∙L and height H)

Ø55 x 63 mm

  • Shortest distance between cup center and cup surface

L=0.0275 m

  • The minimum cross sectional area containing L

A1=0.02375 m2

  • The cross sectional area that is orthogonal to A1

A2=0.003465 m2

  • Biot number

Bi=1.368

  • The geometry index

G=0.801

  • The characteristic value

M1

2=1.48

  • Factor f

f=13169

  • Factor j

j=0.842

  • The fractional unaccomplished temperature difference

Y=0.465

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CALCULATION RESULTS Estimation method based on EHTD

Input data: Cooling time: 53.11 minutes

  • Yogurt cup radius

L=0.0275 m

  • Biot number

Bi=1.368

  • Value of ω

ω =1.776

  • Form factor for Bi=0

E0=2.74

  • Form factor for Bi→ ∞

E∞=2.04

  • (second shortest dimension of food item)/(shortest

dimension of food item) β1=1.15

  • (longest dimension of food item)/(shortest dimension of

food item) β2=1.15

  • Factor j

j=0.842

  • The fractional unaccomplished temperature difference

Y=0.465

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The yogurt cup radius variation impact on cooling time

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CONCLUSION

Simplified cooling time calculation methods represents very usefull and reliable tool for the refrigeration system dimensioning.

Dimension, shape and geometry of cooled product has great influence on cooling process.

The type and form of packaging must be considered during the product design phase, when the application of these methodes can be of importance.

This will bring financial savings in the production process due to the higher energy efficiency of the system.