Techniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived echniques and Results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

techniques and results of neutral long lived echniques
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Techniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived echniques and Results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Techniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived echniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived Particle Sear Particle Searches in A ches in ATLAS and CMS in LHC Run 2 TLAS and CMS in LHC Run 2 Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute of High Energy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Techniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived echniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived Particle Sear Particle Searches in A ches in ATLAS and CMS in LHC Run 2 TLAS and CMS in LHC Run 2

Rencontres de Moriond, Electroweak Session Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz

Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna For the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations La Thuile, 18 March 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. Wulz 2

Sour Sources of neutral long-l ces of neutral long-lived part ived particles icles

Standard model (SM): neutral B, D and K mesons, neutrons, neutrinos Beyond standard model (BSM): plethora of different models

  • R-parity violating SUSY
  • Gauge-mediated SUSY breaking scenarios
  • Anomaly mediated SUSY breaking scenarios
  • Split SUSY
  • Stealth SUSY
  • Hidden valley scenarios
  • Dark QED (particularly dark photons)
  • Dark QCD (particularly dark hadrons)
  • Dark matter models
  • Left-right symmetric models (particularly heavy neutrinos)
  • Axion-like particles (ALPS)
  • Approximate symmetries
  • ...

Conditions for models with long-lived particles (at least one)

  • Small phase space - nearly degenerate mass spectra
  • Small couplings
  • Highly virtual intermediate states

Green: covered in this talk

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 3

Mot Motivat ivation to sear ion to search for new long-l ch for new long-lived part ived particles icles

Searches for new long-lived particles (cτ > 1 mm) ongoing for several years

  • ATLAS/CMS a priori designed/optimized for prompt particles, not new

LLP‘s

  • Clever ideas for triggering / data acquisition / reconstruction / analysis

have been and are being developed, in parallel with theory developments … but no signal observed so far!

  • Preparations for Run 3 and detector upgrades for HL-LHC have strong

focus on new LLP‘s

Figure by Kathryn Zurek

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Signatur Signature-driven sear e-driven searches ches

C.-E. Wulz 4

dileptons ileptons, lepton-jets , lepton-jets mul multitrack itrack vert vertices ices mul multitrack itrack vert vertices ices in in muon muon system system trackless, trackless, low-EMF jets low-EMF jets emer emerging ging jets jets photons photons

Figure adapted from Heather Russell

Displaced decays

  • Displaced multitrack vertices
  • Displaced photons
  • Displaced jets
  • Emerging jets
  • Trackless jets, with low

electromagnetic energy fraction

  • Displaced dileptons and lepton-jets

Delayed decays and trapped stable particles

  • Particles stopped in detector
  • Particles trapped in detector,

e.g. magnetic monopoles

  • Out-of-time detection possible
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Chal Challenges lenges

Physics

  • Unusual fractions of electromagnetic / hadronic energies in calorimeters
  • Decays outside usual detectors, e.g. jets in muon system
  • Unusual, not yet known signatures

Trigger, reconstruction and data analysis

  • Inadequate triggers or triggers with low efficiency
  • Timing information not always available
  • Standard object reconstruction often inadequate
  • Secondary vertex finding algorithms not optimized
  • Interaction point constraint in triggering / reconstruction not usable
  • Systematic uncertainties need to be specially estimated
  • Simulation samples not readily available

Backgrounds

  • In-time and out-of-time pileup
  • Long-lived standard model hadrons (KL, b, …)
  • Cosmic rays
  • Accelerator-related backgrounds (beam halo, satellite bunches)
  • Electronic noise
  • Material interactions

C.-E. Wulz 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Specific techniques Specific techniques

C.-E. Wulz 6

Trigger and data acquisition

  • Simple requirements, without saturating bandwidth
  • Trigger on prompt particles in associated production
  • Trigger on subsequent bunch crossings, or during gaps in bunch trains
  • Scouting: store only reduced event information, but at high rate
  • Parking: store full raw data, without immediate processing
  • Non-standard information, such as timing, added to event record

Reconstruction

  • Avoid that events get rejected at early stages of reconstruction -> check

initial basic requirements

  • Track reconstruction optimized for prompt particles -> need dedicated

tracking algorithms

  • Secondary vertices: b tagging algorithms extended to work better at

distances beyond 1 cm

  • Particle flow reconstruction (CMS) needs to be adapted
  • Electrons and taus need further development
  • Spike cleaning in calorimeters must be checked and adapted
  • Instrumental and non-collision backgrounds from data
  • Pileup can be useful for low-pT displaced tracks, e.g. from sexaquarks
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Displaced jets Displaced jets

C.-E. Wulz 7

Signature

  • Jets with vertices displaced up to 55 cm from primary

vertex in transverse plane, reconstructed from energy deposits in calorimeter towers, with or without MET Dedicated displaced jet trigger

  • HT > 350 GeV
  • ≥ 2 jets with pT > 40 GeV, IηI < 2
  • ≤ 2 associated prompt tracks
  • ≥ 1 associated displaced track

Background suppression

  • QCD multijets
  • Likelihood discriminant from track, jet and vertex

information

Displaced Di-Jet

Benchmark models and interpretations

  • Jet-jet model: pp -> XX, X -> qq (X = neutral scalar)
  • SUSY models with LLP

, e.g. GMSB model with long- lived gluino, decaying to gluon and gravitino (g -> g G) arXiV 1811.07991 CMS-EXO-18-007 ~ ~

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Displaced jets Displaced jets

Gluino masses up to 2300 GeV excluded for proper decay lengths between 20 and 110 mm

C.-E. Wulz 8

1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

[mm] τ c

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

[fb] σ (13 TeV)

  • 1

35.9 fb CMS

95% CL upper limits

Jet-Jet model

Observed Median expected = 50 GeV

X

m = 100 GeV

X

m = 300 GeV

X

m = 1000 GeV

X

m

arXiV: 1811.07991, CMS-EXO-18-007

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Delayed jets Delayed jets

CMS-EXO-19-001

C.-E. Wulz 9

Jet timing in barrel ECAL

  • PbWO4 crystals with Si APDs
  • Time resolution ≈ 200 ps
  • Cells within ΔR < 0.4 of jet
  • tjet

jet defined by med

defined by median cel ian cell t l time ime Model assumption and dataset

  • GSMB SUSY model: g -> gG
  • Full Run 2 dataset: 137 fb-1

Trigger and signal selection

  • HLT trigger: MET > 120 GeV
  • MET + delayed calorimeter jet: 3 ns < tjet

jet < 20 ns

  • Particle flow not used for jet reconstruction due to non-standard tracker

component, calorimeter clustering only ~ ~

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

20 − 15 − 10 − 5 − 5 10 15 20

(ns)

jet

t

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

2016 (35.5/fb) 2017 (41.8/fb) 2018 (55.2/fb) 20 − 15 − 10 − 5 − 5 10 15 20

(ns)

jet

t

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

7

10

2016 (35.5/fb) 2017 (41.8/fb) 2018 (55.2/fb)

Delayed jets Delayed jets

C.-E. Wulz 10

Satellite bunches (example profile)

Backgrounds estimated from control regions with data

  • ECAL resolution tails
  • Direct APD hits
  • In-time and out-of-time pileup
  • Beam halo
  • Satellite bunches (2.5 ns steps)
  • Cosmic muon deposits in ECAL

Rejection of main backgrounds through jet cleaning

  • number of ECAL cells > 25
  • electromagnetic / total calorimeter energy fraction > 0.2
  • fraction of tracks associated to primary vertex < 1/12
  • RMS of tjet

Befor Before jet cleaning e jet cleaning After jet cleaning After jet cleaning

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Delayed jets Delayed jets

C.-E. Wulz 11

  • Significantly extended reach in cτ compared to tracker based searches
  • Gluino masses up to 2500 GeV (2150 GeV) excluded for cτ of 1m (30 m)

2 4 6 8 10 12

(ns)

jet

t

5 −

10

4 −

10

3 −

10

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

Events/0.5 ns

Beam halo background Core and satellite backgrounds Cosmic background Observation = 1 m τ = 2400 GeV, c

g ~

GMSB m = 10 m τ = 2400 GeV, c

g ~

GMSB m = 30 m τ = 2400 GeV, c

g ~

GMSB m

CMS Preliminary = 13 TeV s

  • 1

= 137 fb

int

L

2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

/mm) τ (c

10

log

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

(GeV)

g ~

m

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

(fb) σ 95% CL upper limit on

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

(fb) σ 95% CL upper limit on

CMS Preliminary = 13 TeV s

  • 1

= 137 fb

int

L

GMSB NLO+NLL exclusion G ~ g + → g ~ , g ~ g ~ → pp

95% CL observed σ 1 ± 95% CL expected median

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

(jet, tracks)

min

R ∆

1 2 3 4 5

per-event BDT

T

High-E

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001 0.0012 0.0014 0.0016 0.0018 0.002

Selection

T

High-E )=(600,150) GeV

s

, m

Φ

(m

A B C D

ATLAS Simulation

=13 TeV s

Trackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters rackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters

EXOT-2017-025, arXiV 1902.03094 Models and dataset

  • Hidden-sector models
  • 10.8 fb-1 and 33.0 fb-1 at √s = 13 TeV
  • cτ range few cm to tens of m

Signature and trigger

  • Displaced jets in HCAL or outer edge
  • f ECAL
  • At least 2 trackless and low-EMF jets -

CalRatio (CR) jets

  • dedicated low- and high-ET triggers

Analysis strategy and background

  • Machine learning techniques (neural

network to determine jet origin, BDT classifier for jets)

  • Backgrounds: mainly multijet and

beam-induced, estimated with ABCD method

arXiV: 1810.12602

C.-E. Wulz 12

A: signal region

mΦ = 600 GeV, ms = 150 GeV

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

s proper decay length [m]

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

ss → Φ

B 95% CL Upper Limit on

4 −

10

3 −

10

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10 ATLAS

= 13 TeV s = 25 GeV

s

= 125 GeV, m

Φ

m ]

  • 1

CR limit [10.8 fb ]

  • 1

MS1+MS2 limit [36.1 fb CR+(MS1+MS2) limit Obs. σ 1 ± Exp.

ss → H

B 100%

ss → H

B 10%

ss → H

B 1%

Trackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters rackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters

13

95% CL limits set on σ(ϕ) x B(ϕ→ss)

Mediator ϕ with mϕ = 125 GeV: ms between 5 and 55 GeV excluded for cτ between 5 cm and 5m, for B(ϕ→ss) = ) = 10% For mϕ = 400 GeV, mϕ = 600 GeV, and mϕ = 1000 GeV, σ(ϕ) × B(ϕ→ss) values > 0.1 pb excluded between 12 cm and 9 m, 7 cm and 20 m, and 4 cm and 35 m respectively, depending on ms

1 −

10 1 10 s proper decay length [m]

3 −

10

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

7

10

8

10 [pb]

ss → Φ

B × σ 95% CL Upper Limit on

  • 1

= 13 TeV 33.0 fb s

  • bs. limit
  • exp. limit

σ 1 ± exp. σ 2 ± exp. = 150 GeV

s

= 600 GeV, m

Φ

Scaled Run 1 limit (8TeV) m

ATLAS

selection

T

= 150 GeV, high-E

s

= 600 GeV, m

Φ

m

Run I (scaled) mΦ = 600 GeV, ms = 150 GeV

C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz

Combination with displaced jet analysis in muon system

arXiV 1811.07370

Related analysis with CR jet and Z: arXiV 1811.02542

Φ/H Z Zd p p l+ l− q ¯ q

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Emer Emerging jets ging jets

CMS-EXO-18-001, arXiV: 1810.0169 Dark QCD model arXiV:1502.05409

  • Mediator XDK , dark fermions Qd
  • Hadronization of QDK to e.g. dark pions (πDK)
  • Displaced decays of πDK back to SM particles
  • Exponential decay of πDK

14

Emerging Jet

Background

  • data-driven estimate from 4-jet sample without

emergent jets

  • misidentification probability of regular jet as

emerging jet modelled, depending on parton flavour and jet multiplicity

Track multiplicity 10 20 30 40 Misidentification probability

5 −

10

4 −

10

3 −

10

2 −

10

1 −

10 1

EMJ-1 b jet Light-flavor jet (13 TeV)

  • 1

16.1 fb

CMS

C.-E. Wulz

Trigger and signature

  • HT > 900 GeV
  • 2 calorimeter jets with displaced tracks and many

different vertices within the jet cone

  • 2 regular jets
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Emer Emerging jets ging jets

C.-E. Wulz 15

[GeV]

DK

X

m

400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

[mm]

DK

π

τ c

95% CL upper limit on cross section [fb]

1 10

2

10

3

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

Observed limit Expected limit σ 1 ± Expected limit

= 5 GeV

DK

π

m

CMS

(13 TeV)

  • 1

16.1 fb

3D

α

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Fraction of Jets / 0.05

3 −

10

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

QCD light jets = 1 mm

DK

π

τ c = 5 mm

DK

π

τ c = 25 mm

DK

π

τ c = 60 mm

DK

π

τ c = 100 mm

DK

π

τ c = 300 mm

DK

π

τ c

(13 TeV)

CMS

Simulation

m(πD) = 5 GeV

Mediator masses excluded between 400 and 1250 GeV for decay lengths 5 to 225 mm

C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz

Fraction of jet pT associated with prompt tracks

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

400 − 300 − 200 − 100 − 100 200 300 400 [cm]

vtx

Signed r

1 −

10 1 10

2

10 Vertices / 10 cm ATLAS Simulation = 13 TeV s

  • 1

32.9 fb

high

SR

= 1 m τ = 300 GeV, c

1

χ ∼

m = 1 m τ = 700 GeV, c

1

χ ∼

m = 1 m τ = 1000 GeV, c

1

χ ∼

m

400 − 300 − 200 − 100 − 100 200 300 400 [cm]

vtx

Signed r 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

7

10 Vertices / 10 cm ATLAS = 13 TeV s

  • 1

32.9 fb

µ

+

µ

Drell-Yan t t Single top quark Data

Displaced Displaced dimuons imuons

arXiV: 1808.03057, PRD 99 (2019) 012001 Model assumptions and search strategy

  • Long-lived neutralinos in GMSB scenario
  • Long-lived dark photons ZD from Higgs decay
  • High-mass (Z → μ+μ-) and low-mass (ZD → μ+μ-)
  • m(χ1

0) = 300-1100 GeV, m(ZD) = 20-60 GeV

Signature and trigger

  • 2 opposite-sign μ in muon system with vertex up to 4 m from interaction point
  • 1μ trigger efficiency 70% at IP

, 10% at 4m → MET trigger compensates

C.-E. Wulz 16 ˜ g ˜ g ˜ χ0

1

Z ˜ χ0

1

Z p p q q ˜ G µ µ q q ˜ G f f H ZD p p ZD µ µ ⇣ ✏ Signal type Trigger Description Thresholds High mass Emiss

T

missing transverse momentum Emiss

T

> 110 GeV single muon single muon restricted to the barrel region muon |η| < 1.05 and pT > 60 GeV Low mass collimated dimuon two muons with small angular separation pT of muons > 15 and 20 GeV and ∆Rµµ < 0.5 trimuon three muons pT > 6 GeV for all three muons

~

Multijet bkg not included Signal (simulation)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 [GeV]

µ µ

m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vertices / 5 GeV ATLAS

  • 1

32.9 fb = 13 TeV s

low

data, SR

high

data, SR

300 − 200 − 100 − 100 200 300 [cm]

vtx

Signed r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Vertices / 10 cm ATLAS

  • 1

32.9 fb = 13 TeV s

low

data, SR

high

data, SR

Displaced Displaced dimuons imuons

C.-E. Wulz 17

Z cosmic

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

7

10 [cm] τ c

4 −

10

3 −

10

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

2

10 [pb] B x σ 95% CL upper limit

(1100 GeV) = 0.163 pb

g ~

σ ) = 1 G ~ Z →

1

χ ∼ ( B = 1000 GeV

1

χ ∼

m Observed Expected σ 1 ± σ 2 ±

ATLAS = 13 TeV s

  • 1

32.9 fb

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

7

10 [cm] τ c

3 −

10

2 −

10

1 −

10 1 10

2

10

3

10 [pb] B x σ 95% CL upper limit

) = 0.1

D

Z

D

Z → (H B ) = 0.01

D

Z

D

Z → (H B ) = 0.107 µ µ →

D

(Z B = 60 GeV

D

Z

m Observed Expected σ 1 ± σ 2 ±

ATLAS = 13 TeV s

  • 1

32.9 fb

No significant excess in number of vertices above background -> lower and upper lifetime limits from 0.3 to 2400 cm, depending on model parameters

GMSB model Dark photon model

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 18 18

ATLAS LLP sear TLAS LLP searches ches – 95% CL exclusion 95% CL exclusion

Model Signature

  • L dt [fb−1]

Lifetime limit Reference

SUSY Higgs BR = 10% Scalar Other

RPV χ0

1 → eeν/eµν/µµν

displaced lepton pair 20.3 1504.05162 7-740 mm χ0

1 lifetime

m(˜ g)= 1.3 TeV, m(χ0

1)= 1.0 TeV

GGM χ0

1 → Z ˜

G displaced vtx + jets 20.3 1504.05162 6-480 mm χ0

1 lifetime

m(˜ g)= 1.1 TeV, m(χ0

1)= 1.0 TeV

GGM χ0

1 → Z ˜

G displaced dimuon 32.9 1808.03057 0.029-18.0 m χ0

1 lifetime

m(˜ g)= 1.1 TeV, m(χ0

1)= 1.0 TeV

GMSB non-pointing or delayed γ 20.3 1409.5542 0.08-5.4 m χ0

1 lifetime SPS8 with Λ= 200 TeV

AMSB pp → χ±

1χ0 1, χ+ 1 χ− 1

disappearing track 20.3 1310.3675 0.22-3.0 m χ±

1 lifetime

m(χ±

1)= 450 GeV

AMSB pp → χ±

1χ0 1, χ+ 1 χ− 1

disappearing track 36.1 1712.02118 0.057-1.53 m χ±

1 lifetime

m(χ±

1)= 450 GeV

AMSB pp → χ±

1χ0 1, χ+ 1 χ− 1

large pixel dE/dx 18.4 1506.05332 1.31-9.0 m χ±

1 lifetime

m(χ±

1)= 450 GeV

Stealth SUSY 2 ID/MS vertices 19.5 1504.03634 0.12-90.6 m ˜ S lifetime m(˜ g)= 500 GeV Split SUSY large pixel dE/dx 36.1 1808.04095 > 0.9 m ˜ g lifetime m(˜ g)= 1.8 TeV, m(χ0

1)= 100 GeV

Split SUSY displaced vtx + E miss

T

32.8 1710.04901 0.03-13.2 m ˜ g lifetime m(˜ g)= 1.8 TeV, m(χ0

1)= 100 GeV

Split SUSY 0 ℓ, 2 − 6 jets +E miss

T

36.1 ATLAS-CONF-2018-003 0.0-2.1 m ˜ g lifetime m(˜ g)= 1.8 TeV, m(χ0

1)= 100 GeV

H → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.18-120.0 m s lifetime

m(s)= 25 GeV FRVZ H → 2γd + X 2 e−, µ−jets 20.3 1511.05542 0-3 mm

γd lifetime

m(γd)= 400 MeV FRVZ H → 2γd + X 2 e−, µ−, π−jets 3.4 ATLAS-CONF-2016-042 0.022-1.113 m

γd lifetime

m(γd)= 400 MeV FRVZ H → 4γd + X 2 e−, µ−, π−jets 3.4 ATLAS-CONF-2016-042 0.038-1.63 m

γd lifetime

m(γd)= 400 MeV

H → ZdZd displaced dimuon 32.9 1808.03057 0.009-24.0 m Zd lifetime

m(Zd)= 40 GeV

H → ZZd 2 e, µ + low-EMF trackless jet 36.1 1811.02542 0.22-5.3 m Zd lifetime

m(Zd)= 10 GeV

VH with H → ss → bbbb 1 − 2ℓ + multi-b-jets 36.1 1806.07355 0-3 mm s lifetime

B(H → ss)= 1, m(s)= 60 GeV

Φ(200 GeV) → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.41-51.5 m s lifetime

σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV

Φ(600 GeV) → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.04-21.5 m s lifetime

σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV

Φ(1 TeV) → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.06-52.4 m s lifetime

σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 150 GeV HV Z ′(1 TeV) → qvqv 2 ID/MS vertices 20.3 1504.03634 0.1-4.9 m

s lifetime

σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV HV Z ′(2 TeV) → qvqv 2 ID/MS vertices 20.3 1504.03634 0.1-10.1 m

s lifetime

σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV

cτ [m] τ [ns]

0.01 0.01 0.1 0.1 1 1 10 10 100 100

√s = 8 TeV √s = 13 TeV

ATLAS Long-lived Particle Searches* - 95% CL Exclusion

Status: March 2019

ATLAS Preliminary

  • L dt = (3.4 – 36.1) fb−1 √s = 8, 13 TeV

*Only a selection of the available lifetime limits is shown.

March 2019

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Bibl Bibliography iography

ATLAS

ht https:// tps://twiki.cer twiki.cern.ch n.ch/twiki twiki/bin/view/ /bin/view/At AtlasPubl lasPublic ic/Exot ExoticsPubl icsPublicResul icResults ts

  • Displaced hadronic jets in calorimeter: arXiv 1902.03094, EXOT-2017-025
  • Displaced hadronic jets in muon spectrometer: arXiv 1811.07370, hepdata 1704138,

EXOT-2017-025

  • LLP decaying in calorimeter in association with Z boson: arXiv 1811.02542, hepdata

1702261, EXOT-2017-024

  • Displaced dimuon vertices: PRD 99 (2019) 012001, arXiv 1808.03057, EXOT-2017-024

ht https:// tps://twiki.cer twiki.cern.ch n.ch/twiki twiki/bin/view/ /bin/view/At AtlasPubl lasPublic ic/SupersymmetryPubl SupersymmetryPublicResul icResults ts

  • Displaced vertices plus MET: PRD 97 (2018) 052012, arXiv 1710.04901, hepdata 78697,

SUS-2016-08

  • Variable RPV coupling strength and LL R-hadrons: ATLAS-CONF-2018-003

CMS

ht https:// tps://cms-r cms-resul esults.web.cer ts.web.cern.ch n.ch/cms cms-r

  • resul

esults/publ ts/public-r ic-resul esults/publ ts/publicat ications ions

  • Delayed jets: EXO-19-001
  • Displaced vertices in multijet events: PRD 98 (2018) 092011, arXiV 1808.03078, hepdata

1685992, EXO-17-018

  • Emerging jets: JHEP 02 (2019) 179, arXiV 1810.10069, hepdata 1700173, EXO-18-001
  • Displaced jets: PRD 99 (2019) 032011, arXiV 1811.07991, EXO-18-007

C.-E. Wulz 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Conclusions Conclusions

C.-E. Wulz 20

  • Searches for long-lived particles are underway
  • Full Run 2 analyses will be published soon
  • Non-standard trigger, data acquisition and analysis

strategies and techniques are being further developed

  • Detector hardware and trigger upgrades will come to

play in the HL-LHC phase I always believed in leaving no stone unturned Arnold Schwarzenegger

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 21 21

BACKUP BACKUP

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

[m] τ c

  • 4

10

  • 2

10 1

2

10

4

10

6

10

8

10

10

10

12

10

) = 200 GeV

1 ±

χ ∼ > 0, m( µ ) = 5, β , tan(

1 ±

χ ∼ AMSB (tracker + TOF)

  • 1

8 TeV, 18.8 fb ) = 800 GeV

1 ±

χ ∼ > 0, m( µ ) = 5, β , tan(

1 ±

χ ∼ AMSB (tracker + TOF)

  • 1

8 TeV, 18.8 fb ) = 1000 GeV g ~ cloud model R-hadron, m( (stopped particle)

  • 1

8 TeV, 18.6 fb ) = 200 GeV

1 ±

χ ∼ , m(

±

π +

1

χ ∼ →

1 ±

χ ∼ ,

1 ±

χ ∼ AMSB (disappearing tracks)

  • 1

8 TeV, 19.5 fb ) = 500 GeV

1

χ ∼ ) = 1000 GeV, m( q ~ RPV SUSY, m( (displaced dijets)

  • 1

8 TeV, 18.5 fb ) = 150 GeV

1

χ ∼ ) = 1000 GeV, m( q ~ RPV SUSY, m( (displaced dijets)

  • 1

8 TeV, 18.5 fb ) = 250 GeV

1

χ ∼ , m( γ G ~ →

1

χ ∼ GMSB SPS8, (disp. photon timing)

  • 1

8 TeV, 19.1 fb ) = 250 GeV

1

χ ∼ , m( γ G ~ →

1

χ ∼ GMSB SPS8, (disp. photon conv.)

  • 1

8 TeV, 19.7 fb , m(H) = 125 GeV, m(X) = 20 GeV µ µ → XX (10%), X → H (displaced leptons)

  • 1

8 TeV, 20.5 fb ee, m(H) = 125 GeV, m(X) = 20 GeV → XX (10%), X → H (displaced leptons)

  • 1

8 TeV, 19.6 fb ) = 420 GeV t ~ bl, m( → t ~ RPV SUSY, (displaced leptons)

  • 1

8 TeV, 19.7 fb

CMS long-lived particle searches, lifetime exclusions at 95% CL

C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 22 22

CMS LLP sear CMS LLP searches ches – 95% CL exclusion 95% CL exclusion

August 2016

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Emer Emerging jet event in CMS ging jet event in CMS

C.-E. Wulz 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Emer Emerging jet event in CMS ging jet event in CMS

C.-E. Wulz 24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Mar March 2019 ch 2019

Emer Emerging jet event in CMS ging jet event in CMS

C.-E. Wulz 25

Search for LLP with displaced vertices in multijet events

˜ χ0, ˜ g ˜ χ0, ˜ g ˜ t ˜ t p p ¯ t ¯ b ¯ s ¯ s ¯ b ¯ t ˜ t∗ ˜ t p p d d ¯ d ¯ d

(GeV)

g ~ / χ ∼

m

500 1000 1500 2000 2500

(mm) τ c

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

(fb)

2

Β σ 95% CL upper limit on

1 10 1

tbs → g ~ Observed Expected

CMS (13 TeV)

  • 1

38.5 fb (GeV)

t ~

m

500 1000 1500 2000 2500

(mm) τ c

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

(fb)

2

Β σ 95% CL upper limit on

1 10 1

d d → t ~ Observed Expected

CMS (13 TeV)

  • 1

38.5 fb (GeV)

g ~ / χ ∼

m

500 1000 1500 2000 2500

(mm) τ c

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

(fb)

2

Β σ 95% CL upper limit on

1 10

2

10

tbs → g ~ Observed Expected

CMS (13 TeV)

  • 1

38.5 fb (GeV)

t ~

m

500 1000 1500 2000 2500

(mm) τ c

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

(fb)

2

Β σ 95% CL upper limit on

1 10

2

10

d d → t ~ Observed Expected

CMS (13 TeV)

  • 1

38.5 fb

(mm)

VV

d

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

Events/0.1 mm

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Background template = 1 fb: σ m = 800 GeV, Multijet signals, = 0.3 mm τ c = 1.0 mm τ c = 10 mm τ c

CMS (13 TeV)

  • 1

38.5 fb

18.2

Background estimation:

  • Construct shape of background dVV distribution

from ≥5-track one-vertex events in data.

  • Validate construction method using events with

3-track and 4-track vertices.

CMS-EXO-17-018, arXiv:1808.03078, PRD 98, 092011 (2018) Signal model:

  • Pair production of LLP decaying to multiple jets.
  • Focus on intermediate signal lifetimes

(0.1 ≤ cτ ≤ 100 mm).

Search strategy:

  • Custom vertex reconstruction algorithm

identifies displaced vertices from tracks.

  • Signal region: ≥5-track two-vertex events.
  • Search variable: distance between vertices dVV.