Techniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived echniques and Results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Techniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived echniques and Results - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Techniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived echniques and Results of Neutral Long-Lived Particle Sear Particle Searches in A ches in ATLAS and CMS in LHC Run 2 TLAS and CMS in LHC Run 2 Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Institute of High Energy
Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. Wulz 2
Sour Sources of neutral long-l ces of neutral long-lived part ived particles icles
Standard model (SM): neutral B, D and K mesons, neutrons, neutrinos Beyond standard model (BSM): plethora of different models
- R-parity violating SUSY
- Gauge-mediated SUSY breaking scenarios
- Anomaly mediated SUSY breaking scenarios
- Split SUSY
- Stealth SUSY
- Hidden valley scenarios
- Dark QED (particularly dark photons)
- Dark QCD (particularly dark hadrons)
- Dark matter models
- Left-right symmetric models (particularly heavy neutrinos)
- Axion-like particles (ALPS)
- Approximate symmetries
- ...
Conditions for models with long-lived particles (at least one)
- Small phase space - nearly degenerate mass spectra
- Small couplings
- Highly virtual intermediate states
Green: covered in this talk
Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 3
Mot Motivat ivation to sear ion to search for new long-l ch for new long-lived part ived particles icles
Searches for new long-lived particles (cτ > 1 mm) ongoing for several years
- ATLAS/CMS a priori designed/optimized for prompt particles, not new
LLP‘s
- Clever ideas for triggering / data acquisition / reconstruction / analysis
have been and are being developed, in parallel with theory developments … but no signal observed so far!
- Preparations for Run 3 and detector upgrades for HL-LHC have strong
focus on new LLP‘s
Figure by Kathryn Zurek
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Signatur Signature-driven sear e-driven searches ches
C.-E. Wulz 4
dileptons ileptons, lepton-jets , lepton-jets mul multitrack itrack vert vertices ices mul multitrack itrack vert vertices ices in in muon muon system system trackless, trackless, low-EMF jets low-EMF jets emer emerging ging jets jets photons photons
Figure adapted from Heather Russell
Displaced decays
- Displaced multitrack vertices
- Displaced photons
- Displaced jets
- Emerging jets
- Trackless jets, with low
electromagnetic energy fraction
- Displaced dileptons and lepton-jets
Delayed decays and trapped stable particles
- Particles stopped in detector
- Particles trapped in detector,
e.g. magnetic monopoles
- Out-of-time detection possible
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Chal Challenges lenges
Physics
- Unusual fractions of electromagnetic / hadronic energies in calorimeters
- Decays outside usual detectors, e.g. jets in muon system
- Unusual, not yet known signatures
Trigger, reconstruction and data analysis
- Inadequate triggers or triggers with low efficiency
- Timing information not always available
- Standard object reconstruction often inadequate
- Secondary vertex finding algorithms not optimized
- Interaction point constraint in triggering / reconstruction not usable
- Systematic uncertainties need to be specially estimated
- Simulation samples not readily available
Backgrounds
- In-time and out-of-time pileup
- Long-lived standard model hadrons (KL, b, …)
- Cosmic rays
- Accelerator-related backgrounds (beam halo, satellite bunches)
- Electronic noise
- Material interactions
C.-E. Wulz 5
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Specific techniques Specific techniques
C.-E. Wulz 6
Trigger and data acquisition
- Simple requirements, without saturating bandwidth
- Trigger on prompt particles in associated production
- Trigger on subsequent bunch crossings, or during gaps in bunch trains
- Scouting: store only reduced event information, but at high rate
- Parking: store full raw data, without immediate processing
- Non-standard information, such as timing, added to event record
Reconstruction
- Avoid that events get rejected at early stages of reconstruction -> check
initial basic requirements
- Track reconstruction optimized for prompt particles -> need dedicated
tracking algorithms
- Secondary vertices: b tagging algorithms extended to work better at
distances beyond 1 cm
- Particle flow reconstruction (CMS) needs to be adapted
- Electrons and taus need further development
- Spike cleaning in calorimeters must be checked and adapted
- Instrumental and non-collision backgrounds from data
- Pileup can be useful for low-pT displaced tracks, e.g. from sexaquarks
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Displaced jets Displaced jets
C.-E. Wulz 7
Signature
- Jets with vertices displaced up to 55 cm from primary
vertex in transverse plane, reconstructed from energy deposits in calorimeter towers, with or without MET Dedicated displaced jet trigger
- HT > 350 GeV
- ≥ 2 jets with pT > 40 GeV, IηI < 2
- ≤ 2 associated prompt tracks
- ≥ 1 associated displaced track
Background suppression
- QCD multijets
- Likelihood discriminant from track, jet and vertex
information
Displaced Di-Jet
Benchmark models and interpretations
- Jet-jet model: pp -> XX, X -> qq (X = neutral scalar)
- SUSY models with LLP
, e.g. GMSB model with long- lived gluino, decaying to gluon and gravitino (g -> g G) arXiV 1811.07991 CMS-EXO-18-007 ~ ~
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Displaced jets Displaced jets
Gluino masses up to 2300 GeV excluded for proper decay lengths between 20 and 110 mm
C.-E. Wulz 8
1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
[mm] τ c
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
[fb] σ (13 TeV)
- 1
35.9 fb CMS
95% CL upper limits
Jet-Jet model
Observed Median expected = 50 GeV
X
m = 100 GeV
X
m = 300 GeV
X
m = 1000 GeV
X
m
arXiV: 1811.07991, CMS-EXO-18-007
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Delayed jets Delayed jets
CMS-EXO-19-001
C.-E. Wulz 9
Jet timing in barrel ECAL
- PbWO4 crystals with Si APDs
- Time resolution ≈ 200 ps
- Cells within ΔR < 0.4 of jet
- tjet
jet defined by med
defined by median cel ian cell t l time ime Model assumption and dataset
- GSMB SUSY model: g -> gG
- Full Run 2 dataset: 137 fb-1
Trigger and signal selection
- HLT trigger: MET > 120 GeV
- MET + delayed calorimeter jet: 3 ns < tjet
jet < 20 ns
- Particle flow not used for jet reconstruction due to non-standard tracker
component, calorimeter clustering only ~ ~
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
20 − 15 − 10 − 5 − 5 10 15 20
(ns)
jet
t
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
2016 (35.5/fb) 2017 (41.8/fb) 2018 (55.2/fb) 20 − 15 − 10 − 5 − 5 10 15 20
(ns)
jet
t
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
7
10
2016 (35.5/fb) 2017 (41.8/fb) 2018 (55.2/fb)
Delayed jets Delayed jets
C.-E. Wulz 10
Satellite bunches (example profile)
Backgrounds estimated from control regions with data
- ECAL resolution tails
- Direct APD hits
- In-time and out-of-time pileup
- Beam halo
- Satellite bunches (2.5 ns steps)
- Cosmic muon deposits in ECAL
Rejection of main backgrounds through jet cleaning
- number of ECAL cells > 25
- electromagnetic / total calorimeter energy fraction > 0.2
- fraction of tracks associated to primary vertex < 1/12
- RMS of tjet
Befor Before jet cleaning e jet cleaning After jet cleaning After jet cleaning
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Delayed jets Delayed jets
C.-E. Wulz 11
- Significantly extended reach in cτ compared to tracker based searches
- Gluino masses up to 2500 GeV (2150 GeV) excluded for cτ of 1m (30 m)
2 4 6 8 10 12
(ns)
jet
t
5 −
10
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
Events/0.5 ns
Beam halo background Core and satellite backgrounds Cosmic background Observation = 1 m τ = 2400 GeV, c
g ~
GMSB m = 10 m τ = 2400 GeV, c
g ~
GMSB m = 30 m τ = 2400 GeV, c
g ~
GMSB m
CMS Preliminary = 13 TeV s
- 1
= 137 fb
int
L
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
/mm) τ (c
10
log
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
(GeV)
g ~
m
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
(fb) σ 95% CL upper limit on
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
(fb) σ 95% CL upper limit on
CMS Preliminary = 13 TeV s
- 1
= 137 fb
int
L
GMSB NLO+NLL exclusion G ~ g + → g ~ , g ~ g ~ → pp
95% CL observed σ 1 ± 95% CL expected median
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
(jet, tracks)
min
R ∆
1 2 3 4 5
per-event BDT
T
High-E
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001 0.0012 0.0014 0.0016 0.0018 0.002
∑
Selection
T
High-E )=(600,150) GeV
s
, m
Φ
(m
A B C D
ATLAS Simulation
=13 TeV s
Trackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters rackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters
EXOT-2017-025, arXiV 1902.03094 Models and dataset
- Hidden-sector models
- 10.8 fb-1 and 33.0 fb-1 at √s = 13 TeV
- cτ range few cm to tens of m
Signature and trigger
- Displaced jets in HCAL or outer edge
- f ECAL
- At least 2 trackless and low-EMF jets -
CalRatio (CR) jets
- dedicated low- and high-ET triggers
Analysis strategy and background
- Machine learning techniques (neural
network to determine jet origin, BDT classifier for jets)
- Backgrounds: mainly multijet and
beam-induced, estimated with ABCD method
arXiV: 1810.12602
C.-E. Wulz 12
A: signal region
mΦ = 600 GeV, ms = 150 GeV
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
s proper decay length [m]
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
ss → Φ
B 95% CL Upper Limit on
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10 ATLAS
= 13 TeV s = 25 GeV
s
= 125 GeV, m
Φ
m ]
- 1
CR limit [10.8 fb ]
- 1
MS1+MS2 limit [36.1 fb CR+(MS1+MS2) limit Obs. σ 1 ± Exp.
ss → H
B 100%
ss → H
B 10%
ss → H
B 1%
Trackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters rackless jets - scalars decaying in calorimeters
13
95% CL limits set on σ(ϕ) x B(ϕ→ss)
Mediator ϕ with mϕ = 125 GeV: ms between 5 and 55 GeV excluded for cτ between 5 cm and 5m, for B(ϕ→ss) = ) = 10% For mϕ = 400 GeV, mϕ = 600 GeV, and mϕ = 1000 GeV, σ(ϕ) × B(ϕ→ss) values > 0.1 pb excluded between 12 cm and 9 m, 7 cm and 20 m, and 4 cm and 35 m respectively, depending on ms
1 −
10 1 10 s proper decay length [m]
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
7
10
8
10 [pb]
ss → Φ
B × σ 95% CL Upper Limit on
- 1
= 13 TeV 33.0 fb s
- bs. limit
- exp. limit
σ 1 ± exp. σ 2 ± exp. = 150 GeV
s
= 600 GeV, m
Φ
Scaled Run 1 limit (8TeV) m
ATLAS
selection
T
= 150 GeV, high-E
s
= 600 GeV, m
Φ
m
Run I (scaled) mΦ = 600 GeV, ms = 150 GeV
C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz
Combination with displaced jet analysis in muon system
arXiV 1811.07370
Related analysis with CR jet and Z: arXiV 1811.02542
Φ/H Z Zd p p l+ l− q ¯ q
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Emer Emerging jets ging jets
CMS-EXO-18-001, arXiV: 1810.0169 Dark QCD model arXiV:1502.05409
- Mediator XDK , dark fermions Qd
- Hadronization of QDK to e.g. dark pions (πDK)
- Displaced decays of πDK back to SM particles
- Exponential decay of πDK
14
Emerging Jet
Background
- data-driven estimate from 4-jet sample without
emergent jets
- misidentification probability of regular jet as
emerging jet modelled, depending on parton flavour and jet multiplicity
Track multiplicity 10 20 30 40 Misidentification probability
5 −
10
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1
EMJ-1 b jet Light-flavor jet (13 TeV)
- 1
16.1 fb
CMS
C.-E. Wulz
Trigger and signature
- HT > 900 GeV
- 2 calorimeter jets with displaced tracks and many
different vertices within the jet cone
- 2 regular jets
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Emer Emerging jets ging jets
C.-E. Wulz 15
[GeV]
DK
X
m
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
[mm]
DK
π
τ c
95% CL upper limit on cross section [fb]
1 10
2
10
3
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
Observed limit Expected limit σ 1 ± Expected limit
= 5 GeV
DK
π
m
CMS
(13 TeV)
- 1
16.1 fb
3D
α
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Fraction of Jets / 0.05
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
QCD light jets = 1 mm
DKπ
τ c = 5 mm
DKπ
τ c = 25 mm
DKπ
τ c = 60 mm
DKπ
τ c = 100 mm
DKπ
τ c = 300 mm
DKπ
τ c
(13 TeV)
CMS
Simulation
m(πD) = 5 GeV
Mediator masses excluded between 400 and 1250 GeV for decay lengths 5 to 225 mm
C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz
Fraction of jet pT associated with prompt tracks
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
400 − 300 − 200 − 100 − 100 200 300 400 [cm]
vtx
Signed r
1 −
10 1 10
2
10 Vertices / 10 cm ATLAS Simulation = 13 TeV s
- 1
32.9 fb
high
SR
= 1 m τ = 300 GeV, c
1χ ∼
m = 1 m τ = 700 GeV, c
1χ ∼
m = 1 m τ = 1000 GeV, c
1χ ∼
m
400 − 300 − 200 − 100 − 100 200 300 400 [cm]
vtx
Signed r 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
7
10 Vertices / 10 cm ATLAS = 13 TeV s
- 1
32.9 fb
−
µ
+
µ
Drell-Yan t t Single top quark Data
Displaced Displaced dimuons imuons
arXiV: 1808.03057, PRD 99 (2019) 012001 Model assumptions and search strategy
- Long-lived neutralinos in GMSB scenario
- Long-lived dark photons ZD from Higgs decay
- High-mass (Z → μ+μ-) and low-mass (ZD → μ+μ-)
- m(χ1
0) = 300-1100 GeV, m(ZD) = 20-60 GeV
Signature and trigger
- 2 opposite-sign μ in muon system with vertex up to 4 m from interaction point
- 1μ trigger efficiency 70% at IP
, 10% at 4m → MET trigger compensates
C.-E. Wulz 16 ˜ g ˜ g ˜ χ0
1
Z ˜ χ0
1
Z p p q q ˜ G µ µ q q ˜ G f f H ZD p p ZD µ µ ⇣ ✏ Signal type Trigger Description Thresholds High mass Emiss
T
missing transverse momentum Emiss
T
> 110 GeV single muon single muon restricted to the barrel region muon |η| < 1.05 and pT > 60 GeV Low mass collimated dimuon two muons with small angular separation pT of muons > 15 and 20 GeV and ∆Rµµ < 0.5 trimuon three muons pT > 6 GeV for all three muons
~
Multijet bkg not included Signal (simulation)
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 [GeV]
µ µ
m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Vertices / 5 GeV ATLAS
- 1
32.9 fb = 13 TeV s
low
data, SR
high
data, SR
300 − 200 − 100 − 100 200 300 [cm]
vtx
Signed r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Vertices / 10 cm ATLAS
- 1
32.9 fb = 13 TeV s
low
data, SR
high
data, SR
Displaced Displaced dimuons imuons
C.-E. Wulz 17
Z cosmic
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
7
10 [cm] τ c
4 −
10
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10 [pb] B x σ 95% CL upper limit
(1100 GeV) = 0.163 pb
g ~
σ ) = 1 G ~ Z →
1
χ ∼ ( B = 1000 GeV
1χ ∼
m Observed Expected σ 1 ± σ 2 ±
ATLAS = 13 TeV s
- 1
32.9 fb
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
7
10 [cm] τ c
3 −
10
2 −
10
1 −
10 1 10
2
10
3
10 [pb] B x σ 95% CL upper limit
) = 0.1
D
Z
D
Z → (H B ) = 0.01
D
Z
D
Z → (H B ) = 0.107 µ µ →
D
(Z B = 60 GeV
DZ
m Observed Expected σ 1 ± σ 2 ±
ATLAS = 13 TeV s
- 1
32.9 fb
No significant excess in number of vertices above background -> lower and upper lifetime limits from 0.3 to 2400 cm, depending on model parameters
GMSB model Dark photon model
Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 18 18
ATLAS LLP sear TLAS LLP searches ches – 95% CL exclusion 95% CL exclusion
Model Signature
- L dt [fb−1]
Lifetime limit Reference
SUSY Higgs BR = 10% Scalar Other
RPV χ0
1 → eeν/eµν/µµν
displaced lepton pair 20.3 1504.05162 7-740 mm χ0
1 lifetime
m(˜ g)= 1.3 TeV, m(χ0
1)= 1.0 TeVGGM χ0
1 → Z ˜
G displaced vtx + jets 20.3 1504.05162 6-480 mm χ0
1 lifetime
m(˜ g)= 1.1 TeV, m(χ0
1)= 1.0 TeVGGM χ0
1 → Z ˜
G displaced dimuon 32.9 1808.03057 0.029-18.0 m χ0
1 lifetime
m(˜ g)= 1.1 TeV, m(χ0
1)= 1.0 TeVGMSB non-pointing or delayed γ 20.3 1409.5542 0.08-5.4 m χ0
1 lifetime SPS8 with Λ= 200 TeV
AMSB pp → χ±
1χ0 1, χ+ 1 χ− 1
disappearing track 20.3 1310.3675 0.22-3.0 m χ±
1 lifetime
m(χ±
1)= 450 GeVAMSB pp → χ±
1χ0 1, χ+ 1 χ− 1
disappearing track 36.1 1712.02118 0.057-1.53 m χ±
1 lifetime
m(χ±
1)= 450 GeVAMSB pp → χ±
1χ0 1, χ+ 1 χ− 1
large pixel dE/dx 18.4 1506.05332 1.31-9.0 m χ±
1 lifetime
m(χ±
1)= 450 GeVStealth SUSY 2 ID/MS vertices 19.5 1504.03634 0.12-90.6 m ˜ S lifetime m(˜ g)= 500 GeV Split SUSY large pixel dE/dx 36.1 1808.04095 > 0.9 m ˜ g lifetime m(˜ g)= 1.8 TeV, m(χ0
1)= 100 GeVSplit SUSY displaced vtx + E miss
T
32.8 1710.04901 0.03-13.2 m ˜ g lifetime m(˜ g)= 1.8 TeV, m(χ0
1)= 100 GeVSplit SUSY 0 ℓ, 2 − 6 jets +E miss
T
36.1 ATLAS-CONF-2018-003 0.0-2.1 m ˜ g lifetime m(˜ g)= 1.8 TeV, m(χ0
1)= 100 GeVH → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.18-120.0 m s lifetime
m(s)= 25 GeV FRVZ H → 2γd + X 2 e−, µ−jets 20.3 1511.05542 0-3 mm
γd lifetime
m(γd)= 400 MeV FRVZ H → 2γd + X 2 e−, µ−, π−jets 3.4 ATLAS-CONF-2016-042 0.022-1.113 m
γd lifetime
m(γd)= 400 MeV FRVZ H → 4γd + X 2 e−, µ−, π−jets 3.4 ATLAS-CONF-2016-042 0.038-1.63 m
γd lifetime
m(γd)= 400 MeV
H → ZdZd displaced dimuon 32.9 1808.03057 0.009-24.0 m Zd lifetime
m(Zd)= 40 GeV
H → ZZd 2 e, µ + low-EMF trackless jet 36.1 1811.02542 0.22-5.3 m Zd lifetime
m(Zd)= 10 GeV
VH with H → ss → bbbb 1 − 2ℓ + multi-b-jets 36.1 1806.07355 0-3 mm s lifetime
B(H → ss)= 1, m(s)= 60 GeV
Φ(200 GeV) → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.41-51.5 m s lifetime
σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV
Φ(600 GeV) → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.04-21.5 m s lifetime
σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV
Φ(1 TeV) → s s low-EMF trk-less jets, MS vtx 36.1 1902.03094 0.06-52.4 m s lifetime
σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 150 GeV HV Z ′(1 TeV) → qvqv 2 ID/MS vertices 20.3 1504.03634 0.1-4.9 m
s lifetime
σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV HV Z ′(2 TeV) → qvqv 2 ID/MS vertices 20.3 1504.03634 0.1-10.1 m
s lifetime
σ × B= 1 pb, m(s)= 50 GeV
cτ [m] τ [ns]
0.01 0.01 0.1 0.1 1 1 10 10 100 100
√s = 8 TeV √s = 13 TeV
ATLAS Long-lived Particle Searches* - 95% CL Exclusion
Status: March 2019
ATLAS Preliminary
- L dt = (3.4 – 36.1) fb−1 √s = 8, 13 TeV
*Only a selection of the available lifetime limits is shown.
March 2019
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Bibl Bibliography iography
ATLAS
ht https:// tps://twiki.cer twiki.cern.ch n.ch/twiki twiki/bin/view/ /bin/view/At AtlasPubl lasPublic ic/Exot ExoticsPubl icsPublicResul icResults ts
- Displaced hadronic jets in calorimeter: arXiv 1902.03094, EXOT-2017-025
- Displaced hadronic jets in muon spectrometer: arXiv 1811.07370, hepdata 1704138,
EXOT-2017-025
- LLP decaying in calorimeter in association with Z boson: arXiv 1811.02542, hepdata
1702261, EXOT-2017-024
- Displaced dimuon vertices: PRD 99 (2019) 012001, arXiv 1808.03057, EXOT-2017-024
ht https:// tps://twiki.cer twiki.cern.ch n.ch/twiki twiki/bin/view/ /bin/view/At AtlasPubl lasPublic ic/SupersymmetryPubl SupersymmetryPublicResul icResults ts
- Displaced vertices plus MET: PRD 97 (2018) 052012, arXiv 1710.04901, hepdata 78697,
SUS-2016-08
- Variable RPV coupling strength and LL R-hadrons: ATLAS-CONF-2018-003
CMS
ht https:// tps://cms-r cms-resul esults.web.cer ts.web.cern.ch n.ch/cms cms-r
- resul
esults/publ ts/public-r ic-resul esults/publ ts/publicat ications ions
- Delayed jets: EXO-19-001
- Displaced vertices in multijet events: PRD 98 (2018) 092011, arXiV 1808.03078, hepdata
1685992, EXO-17-018
- Emerging jets: JHEP 02 (2019) 179, arXiV 1810.10069, hepdata 1700173, EXO-18-001
- Displaced jets: PRD 99 (2019) 032011, arXiV 1811.07991, EXO-18-007
C.-E. Wulz 19
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Conclusions Conclusions
C.-E. Wulz 20
- Searches for long-lived particles are underway
- Full Run 2 analyses will be published soon
- Non-standard trigger, data acquisition and analysis
strategies and techniques are being further developed
- Detector hardware and trigger upgrades will come to
play in the HL-LHC phase I always believed in leaving no stone unturned Arnold Schwarzenegger
Mar March 2019 ch 2019 C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 21 21
BACKUP BACKUP
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
[m] τ c
- 4
10
- 2
10 1
2
10
4
10
6
10
8
10
10
10
12
10
) = 200 GeV
1 ±
χ ∼ > 0, m( µ ) = 5, β , tan(
1 ±
χ ∼ AMSB (tracker + TOF)
- 1
8 TeV, 18.8 fb ) = 800 GeV
1 ±
χ ∼ > 0, m( µ ) = 5, β , tan(
1 ±
χ ∼ AMSB (tracker + TOF)
- 1
8 TeV, 18.8 fb ) = 1000 GeV g ~ cloud model R-hadron, m( (stopped particle)
- 1
8 TeV, 18.6 fb ) = 200 GeV
1 ±
χ ∼ , m(
±
π +
1
χ ∼ →
1 ±
χ ∼ ,
1 ±
χ ∼ AMSB (disappearing tracks)
- 1
8 TeV, 19.5 fb ) = 500 GeV
1
χ ∼ ) = 1000 GeV, m( q ~ RPV SUSY, m( (displaced dijets)
- 1
8 TeV, 18.5 fb ) = 150 GeV
1
χ ∼ ) = 1000 GeV, m( q ~ RPV SUSY, m( (displaced dijets)
- 1
8 TeV, 18.5 fb ) = 250 GeV
1
χ ∼ , m( γ G ~ →
1
χ ∼ GMSB SPS8, (disp. photon timing)
- 1
8 TeV, 19.1 fb ) = 250 GeV
1
χ ∼ , m( γ G ~ →
1
χ ∼ GMSB SPS8, (disp. photon conv.)
- 1
8 TeV, 19.7 fb , m(H) = 125 GeV, m(X) = 20 GeV µ µ → XX (10%), X → H (displaced leptons)
- 1
8 TeV, 20.5 fb ee, m(H) = 125 GeV, m(X) = 20 GeV → XX (10%), X → H (displaced leptons)
- 1
8 TeV, 19.6 fb ) = 420 GeV t ~ bl, m( → t ~ RPV SUSY, (displaced leptons)
- 1
8 TeV, 19.7 fb
CMS long-lived particle searches, lifetime exclusions at 95% CL
C.-E. W C.-E. Wulz ulz 22 22
CMS LLP sear CMS LLP searches ches – 95% CL exclusion 95% CL exclusion
August 2016
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Emer Emerging jet event in CMS ging jet event in CMS
C.-E. Wulz 23
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Emer Emerging jet event in CMS ging jet event in CMS
C.-E. Wulz 24
Mar March 2019 ch 2019
Emer Emerging jet event in CMS ging jet event in CMS
C.-E. Wulz 25
Search for LLP with displaced vertices in multijet events
˜ χ0, ˜ g ˜ χ0, ˜ g ˜ t ˜ t p p ¯ t ¯ b ¯ s ¯ s ¯ b ¯ t ˜ t∗ ˜ t p p d d ¯ d ¯ d
(GeV)
g ~ / χ ∼
m
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
(mm) τ c
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
(fb)
2
Β σ 95% CL upper limit on
1 10 1
tbs → g ~ Observed Expected
CMS (13 TeV)
- 1
38.5 fb (GeV)
t ~
m
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
(mm) τ c
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
(fb)
2
Β σ 95% CL upper limit on
1 10 1
d d → t ~ Observed Expected
CMS (13 TeV)
- 1
38.5 fb (GeV)
g ~ / χ ∼
m
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
(mm) τ c
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
(fb)
2
Β σ 95% CL upper limit on
1 10
2
10
tbs → g ~ Observed Expected
CMS (13 TeV)
- 1
38.5 fb (GeV)
t ~
m
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
(mm) τ c
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
(fb)
2
Β σ 95% CL upper limit on
1 10
2
10
d d → t ~ Observed Expected
CMS (13 TeV)
- 1
38.5 fb
(mm)
VV
d
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Events/0.1 mm
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Background template = 1 fb: σ m = 800 GeV, Multijet signals, = 0.3 mm τ c = 1.0 mm τ c = 10 mm τ c
CMS (13 TeV)
- 1
38.5 fb
18.2
Background estimation:
- Construct shape of background dVV distribution
from ≥5-track one-vertex events in data.
- Validate construction method using events with
3-track and 4-track vertices.
CMS-EXO-17-018, arXiv:1808.03078, PRD 98, 092011 (2018) Signal model:
- Pair production of LLP decaying to multiple jets.
- Focus on intermediate signal lifetimes
(0.1 ≤ cτ ≤ 100 mm).
Search strategy:
- Custom vertex reconstruction algorithm
identifies displaced vertices from tracks.
- Signal region: ≥5-track two-vertex events.
- Search variable: distance between vertices dVV.