technical criteria clarification meeting wood poles cross
play

Technical Criteria Clarification Meeting Wood Poles & Cross - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Technical Criteria Clarification Meeting Wood Poles & Cross arms Date: 13/07/2018 Eskom Values (ZIISCE) VALUE MEANING ZERO HARM Eskom will strive to ensure that zero harm befalls its employees, contractors, the public and the


  1. Technical Criteria – Clarification Meeting Wood Poles & Cross arms Date: 13/07/2018

  2. Eskom Values (ZIISCE) VALUE MEANING ZERO HARM Eskom will strive to ensure that zero harm befalls its employees, contractors, the public and the natural environment. INTEGRITY Honesty of purpose, conduct and discipline in actions, and respect for people. INNOVATION Value-adding creativity and results oriented. Lead through excellence in innovation. SINOBUNTU Caring. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION A commitment to meet and strive to exceed the needs of the receivers of products and services. EXCELLENCE Acknowledged by all for exceptional standards, performance and professionalism. 2

  3. Scope of Work • Evaluate tender submissions for Manufacture, Supply and delivery of Creosote treated wood poles and cross arms for electrification projects in Gauteng Operating Unit. 3

  4. Technical Evaluation: Purpose • To determine, based on the technical evidence submitted by the Tender Responder: • if there is compliance with the technical criteria 240-84010203 of the tender. • If there is compliance with Eskom specification 240-77230460 & SANS 754:2015. 4

  5. Technical evaluation • The technical evaluation comprises of two phases i.e. desktop evaluation and Factory assessment.. • Desktop evaluation is meant to determine if all mandatory technical requirements are met. Mandatory technical returnables are assessed at this phase • Factory Assessment is done to assess the tenderer’s capability to enter into contract with Eskom for a particular product. Annex B of the technical evaluation criteria 240-84010203 is used to verify capability and readiness of the supplier. 5

  6. Mandatory technical returnables • SABS Certification: SABS for SANS 754:2015, valid & certified. If no certificate is available then supply a LETTER from SABS, indicating that the manufacturer(s) or supplier(s) is compliant and when the certificate will be available. • Boiler certificates: boilers registered with the department of labour under the OHS Act and certified by any accredited certification body. If no certificate is available then supply a LETTER indicating when it will be available. However, certificate(s) and boiler report(s) must be submitted before contract award stage. • Treatment plant data records: If no electronic data recording unit is available then supply a LETTER indicating when it will be available. However, the supplier must have an electronic data recording unit before contract award stage. 6

  7. Mandatory technical returnables • Cantilever test: the treatment plant must have a calibrated cantilever testing facility onsite. If no calibrated cantilever testing facility is available then supply a LETTER indicating when it will be available. However, the supplier must have calibrated cantilever testing facility on-site contract award stage. • Technical Schedule A B : there must be a valid entry in each field of column B • Inspection & Test Reports: test reports must be in English 7

  8. Desktop Evaluation SB3 • Mandatory Technical returnables must be submitted in a separate technical section in a file or in a separate technical file properly indexed. • Submissions that do not meet mandatory technical requirements will immediately be disqualified and not evaluated further. • Evidence not contained in the Technical File/technical section cannot be evaluated by the Technical evaluators and will not be considered • At this evaluation stage mandatory technical requirements(gate keepers) are assessed then a discretionary scoring/rating is used to assess the mandatory requirements out of 100 points. 8

  9. Slide 8 SB3 More details needed Shabnum Behari, 2016/05/03

  10. Desktop Evaluation • Only submissions that meet mandatory technical requirements will progress to scoring/rating verification. • A Tenderer must obtain a minimum score of 80% on scoring/rating to be deemed technically acceptable 9

  11. Factory Assessment • Only suppliers that score 80% and above on scoring/rating will be subjected to factory assessment. • It is performed to assess capability of the tenderer to enter into contract with Eskom and readiness of the supplier supply/manufacturing of wood poles and cross arms. • Assess compliance to the relevant equipment specification Eskom/SANS. • Verification of tender documents submitted at tendering stage. • Annex B is used as verification to for this phase of evaluation. 10

  12. Factory Assessment: checklist • The following will be evaluated during factory assessment: � Manufacturing Methods � Workshop Practices � Design Practices and Application � Testing Facility and Practices � Raw material Procurement, Storage and Sub-contractor practices � Site and Other Services � Factory Performance (factory failure rate) 11

  13. Factory Assessment • Deviations if any are listed and discussed at this stage between Eskom evaluation team and Supplier. • Factory assessment is scored out of 120, the qualifying score is 80% • Note! Results of this assessment is not confirmation or guarantee that any contract will be entered into by Eskom. 12

  14. Thank you

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend