Technical Criteria Clarification Meeting Wood Poles & Cross - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
technical criteria clarification meeting wood poles cross
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Technical Criteria Clarification Meeting Wood Poles & Cross - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 12, 2024 245 likes •398 views

Technical Criteria Clarification Meeting Wood Poles & Cross arms Date: 13/07/2018 Eskom Values (ZIISCE) VALUE MEANING ZERO HARM Eskom will strive to ensure that zero harm befalls its employees, contractors, the public and the

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Technical Criteria – Clarification Meeting Wood Poles & Cross arms

Date: 13/07/2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Eskom Values (ZIISCE)

VALUE MEANING

ZERO HARM Eskom will strive to ensure that zero harm befalls its employees, contractors, the public and the natural environment. INTEGRITY Honesty of purpose, conduct and discipline in actions, and respect for people. INNOVATION Value-adding creativity and results oriented. Lead through excellence in innovation. SINOBUNTU Caring. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION A commitment to meet and strive to exceed the needs of the receivers of products and services. EXCELLENCE Acknowledged by all for exceptional standards, performance and professionalism.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Scope of Work

  • Evaluate tender submissions for Manufacture, Supply and delivery of

Creosote treated wood poles and cross arms for electrification projects in Gauteng Operating Unit.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Technical Evaluation: Purpose

  • To determine, based on the technical evidence submitted by the

Tender Responder:

  • if there is compliance with the technical criteria 240-84010203 of the

tender.

  • If there is compliance with Eskom specification 240-77230460 &

SANS 754:2015.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Technical evaluation

  • The technical evaluation comprises of two phases i.e. desktop

evaluation and Factory assessment..

  • Desktop evaluation is meant to determine if all mandatory technical

requirements are met. Mandatory technical returnables are assessed at this phase

  • Factory Assessment is done to assess the tenderer’s capability to

enter into contract with Eskom for a particular product. Annex B of the technical evaluation criteria 240-84010203 is used to verify capability and readiness of the supplier.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mandatory technical returnables

  • SABS Certification: SABS for SANS 754:2015, valid & certified. If no

certificate is available then supply a LETTER from SABS, indicating that the manufacturer(s) or supplier(s) is compliant and when the certificate will be available.

  • Boiler certificates: boilers registered with the department of labour

under the OHS Act and certified by any accredited certification body. If no certificate is available then supply a LETTER indicating when it will be available. However, certificate(s) and boiler report(s) must be submitted before contract award stage.

  • Treatment plant data records: If no electronic data recording unit is

available then supply a LETTER indicating when it will be available. However, the supplier must have an electronic data recording unit before contract award stage.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Mandatory technical returnables

  • Cantilever test: the treatment plant must have a calibrated cantilever

testing facility onsite. If no calibrated cantilever testing facility is available then supply a LETTER indicating when it will be available. However, the supplier must have calibrated cantilever testing facility

  • n-site contract award stage.
  • Technical Schedule A B: there must be a valid entry in each field of

column B

  • Inspection & Test Reports: test reports must be in English

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Mandatory Technical returnables must be submitted in a separate

technical section in a file or in a separate technical file properly indexed.

  • Submissions that do not meet mandatory technical requirements will

immediately be disqualified and not evaluated further.

  • Evidence not contained in the Technical File/technical section cannot

be evaluated by the Technical evaluators and will not be considered

  • At

this evaluation stage mandatory technical requirements(gate keepers) are assessed then a discretionary scoring/rating is used to assess the mandatory requirements out of 100 points.

8

Desktop Evaluation

SB3

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Slide 8 SB3 More details needed

Shabnum Behari, 2016/05/03

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Desktop Evaluation

  • Only submissions that meet mandatory technical requirements will

progress to scoring/rating verification.

  • A Tenderer must obtain a minimum score of 80% on scoring/rating to

be deemed technically acceptable

9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Factory Assessment

  • Only suppliers that score 80% and above on scoring/rating will be

subjected to factory assessment.

  • It is performed to assess capability of the tenderer to enter into

contract with Eskom and readiness of the supplier supply/manufacturing of wood poles and cross arms.

  • Assess compliance to the relevant equipment specification

Eskom/SANS.

  • Verification of tender documents submitted at tendering stage.
  • Annex B is used as verification to for this phase of evaluation.

10

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Factory Assessment: checklist

  • The following will be evaluated during factory assessment:

Manufacturing Methods Workshop Practices Design Practices and Application Testing Facility and Practices Raw material Procurement, Storage and Sub-contractor practices Site and Other Services Factory Performance (factory failure rate)

11

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Deviations if any are listed and discussed at this stage between

Eskom evaluation team and Supplier.

  • Factory assessment is scored out of 120, the qualifying score is 80%
  • Note! Results of this assessment is not confirmation or guarantee that

any contract will be entered into by Eskom.

12

Factory Assessment

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank you