TE TEMPTATI TION GOODS, HARM REDUCTI TION AN AND DUAL AL MAR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

te temptati tion goods harm reducti tion an and dual al
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TE TEMPTATI TION GOODS, HARM REDUCTI TION AN AND DUAL AL MAR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TE TEMPTATI TION GOODS, HARM REDUCTI TION AN AND DUAL AL MAR ARKETS Mark A.R. Kleiman Marron Institute New York University Te Temptation goods: no ordinary commodities Tendency to induce excessive consumption compared to the users


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TE TEMPTATI TION GOODS, HARM REDUCTI TION AN AND DUAL AL MAR ARKETS

Mark A.R. Kleiman Marron Institute New York University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Te Temptation goods: no ordinary commodities

Tendency to induce excessive consumption compared to the user’s own long-term desires or goals

“Continued use despite known adverse consequences” Time-inconsistent behavior Self-strategy (Schelling)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Te Temptation goods: examples

  • Alcohol
  • Nicotine
  • Cannabis
  • Opiates
  • Stimulants
  • Gambling
  • Sweet/salty/oily foods
  • Videogames
  • Pornography
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Te Temptation goods create “internalities”

Axioms of consumer choice fail to hold Paternalistic intervention may be warranted.

  • Taxation
  • Regulation
  • Prohibition

Those interventions always create adverse effects, including the risk of illicit markets

slide-5
SLIDE 5

No good is a temptation good for all consumers

* Typical case: minority of problem users, majority of contented users * Pareto’s Law: 80% of the activity concentrated in 20% of the users * Likely to overlap heavily with problem users *Certain to dominate the economics of the market, licit or illicit

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Th The “harm reduction” controversy

Tension between policies designed to reduce extent of use and policies designed to make use less harmful Harm reduction is three things

  • A utilitarian maxim
  • A set of techniques
  • An ideology
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ma MacCou Coun’s Eq Equation H H = h x u

H = total harm h = harmfulness or harm rate u = extent of use Reducing h or u reduces H as long as the other factor doesn’t increase more than proportionally.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Th The nicotine harm reduction controversy

Should less-harmful forms of nicotine be encouraged to reduce harmfulness

  • r discouraged to prevent an increase in use?

Either is a “public health” approach. The (rational) difference concerns harm ratios among products and theories of consumer behavior