TCEQ Update: North Texas Clean Air Steering Committee Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tceq update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TCEQ Update: North Texas Clean Air Steering Committee Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TCEQ Update: North Texas Clean Air Steering Committee Meeting Brian Foster June 30, 2005 Air Modeling Section Air Quality Planning and Implementation Division TCEQ Update Modeling Update Controls Already in Place 2010 Emissions


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Brian Foster Air Modeling Section Air Quality Planning and Implementation Division June 30, 2005

TCEQ Update:

North Texas Clean Air Steering Committee Meeting

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 2

  • Modeling Update
  • Controls Already in Place
  • 2010 Emissions Inventory
  • Control Strategy Development
  • Examples of Lifestyle Changes
  • SIP Time Line
  • Cement Kiln Study Update

TCEQ Update

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 3

Modeling Update

  • Background

– The 9-county DFW area is classified as Moderate for 8- hour ozone and has an attainment date of June 15, 2010. The attainment demonstration must be based on the 2009 future year. – Modeling tests were performed using a 2010 future year to estimate the amount of NOx and VOC reductions needed for the DFW area to reach attainment. A 2009 future inventory is currently being developed. – Analyses for both the original 1999 modeling episode (August 15-22) and a corroborative episode (August 23- September 1, 1999) are being conducted.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 4

Modeling Update (cont.)

  • Methodology

– Starting with the 2010 projected emissions, a series of across the board reductions were applied to anthropogenic emissions of VOC, NOx, and both in the 9-county DFW area. – Model-predicted future 8-hour design values were plotted against the percent reduction to estimate the level of reduction required to demonstrate attainment.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 5

Modeling Update (cont.)

  • Results

– Both original and corroborative episodes show a limited response to reductions of VOC. – Both episodes show responsiveness to reductions of NOx and the model predicts that approximately 45% of NOx reductions are needed for the area to demonstrate attainment. – A combined 40% NOx and 50% VOC reduction would also show attainment in 2010.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 6

Design Value-Scaled 2010 DFW 8-Hour Ozone VOC Reductions. Aug 13-22, 1999 Core Period.

50 60 70 80 90 100

25 50 75 VOC Reduction [%] Ozone (ppb)

Frisco C31 Dallas C60 Dallas C63 Dallas C402 Denton C56 Midlothian C94 Arlington C57 Fort Worth C13 Fort Worth C17 85 ppb

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 7

Design Value Scaled 2010 DFW 8-Hour Ozone NOx Reductions. Aug 13-22, 1999 Core Period.

50 60 70 80 90 100

20 40 60 NOx Reduction [%] Ozone (ppb)

Frisco C31 Dallas C60 Dallas C63 Dallas C402 Denton C56 Midlothian C94 Arlington C57 Fort Worth C13 Fort Worth C17 85ppb

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 8

Design Value-Scaled 2010 DFW 8-Hour Ozone

NOx and VOC Reductions. Aug 13-22, 1999 Core Period.

50 60 70 80 90 100 20 40 60

Frisco C31 Dallas C60 Dallas C63 Dallas C402 Denton C56 Midlothian C94 Arlington C57 Fort Worth C13 Fort Worth C17 85 ppb

0 25 50

NOx Reduction [%] VOC Reduction [%]

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 9

Controls Already in Place

Vehicle Inspection/Maintenance Texas Emissions Reduction Plan Clean Diesel Cement Kiln Emission Limits Clean Gasoline Gas-fired Water Heaters, Small Boilers, and Process Heaters California Spark-Ignition Engines Voluntary Mobile Emissions Reduction Program (VMEP) Transportation Control Measures Speed Limit Reduction Portable Fuel Containers Energy Efficiency Alcoa Reductions Stage I Vapor Recovery Surface Coating Rules Lean-burn and Rich-burn Engines Utility/Industrial NOx Airport Ground Equipment Texas Clean Fuel Fleet Regional Utility NOx Low Reid Vapor Pressure Gas Tier II Vehicle Standards Federal Low Sulfur Gas National Low Emission Vehicles Locomotive Engines Diesel Engines Spark Ignition Standards Recreational Marine Standards Windshield Washer Fluid Stage II Vapor Recovery Bakeries Municipal Landfills Consumer/Commercial Products

Gasoline Terminals Fugitive Emissions Wood Furniture Manufacture Architectural/Industrial Coatings Traffic Markings High Performance Maintenance Coatings Special Purpose Coatings Aircraft Stage III Industrial Boilers Utility Boilers UST Remediation Signal Improvements Carswell Air Force Base Fire Training Pit Closure

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 10

Dallas - Fort Worth One-Hour Ozone Design Value Trends by Site

75 100 125 150 175 200 225 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 3-Year Period Ending at End of Year Shown Design Value (ppb) Dallas N C05/63 Colony Hinton C401 Keller C17 Denton C33/56 Arlington C57 Redbird C402 Meacham C13 Frisco C31 Each Design Value Covers a 3-Year Period Ending with the Year Indicated

Compliance Level

Controls in Place have helped Reduce Ozone in DFW Area

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 11

Dallas - Fort Worth Eight-Hour Ozone Design Value Trends by Site

70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 3-Year Period Ending at End of Year Shown Design Value (ppb) Dallas N C05/63 Colony Hinton C401 Keller C17 Denton C33/56 Redbird C402 Meacham C13 Frisco C31 Each Design Value Covers a 3-Year Period Ending with the Year Indicated

Compliance Level

Controls in Place have Reduced 8 Hour Ozone Levels, but the Area does not Meet the Standard

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 12

45%

N O x R e d u c t i

  • n

D/FW NOx Reductions Needed

183 tpd

2010 Emissions Inventory

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 13

Non-Road Mobile

132 tpd (32%)

On-Road Mobile

154 tpd (38%)

Point Source

86 tpd (21%)

Area Source

35 tpd (9%)

Dallas/Fort Worth NOx

2010 Emissions Inventory

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 14

Non-Road Mobile On-Road Mobile Point Source

Area Source

Sources Directly Regulated by TCEQ

2010 Emissions Inventory

120.2 tpd (30%)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 15

2010 Emissions Inventory

Examples of NOx Emissions Sources

Point Sources On-Road Mobile Sources Non-Road Mobile Sources Area Sources

Electric Utilities Industrial Utilities Cement Kilns Cars Trucks Locomotives Aircraft Construction Equipment Industrial Equipment Oil and Gas Production

Residential Natural Gas

Commercial/Industrial Natural Gas

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 16

Non-Road Mobile

132 tpd (32%)

On-Road Mobile

154 tpd (38%) Point Source

86 tpd (21%)

Area Source

35 tpd (9%)

Dallas/Fort Worth Point Source

2010 Emissions Inventory

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 17

Point Source Emissions from Ellis County

47%

Non-Road Mobile

On-Road Mobile

Area Source

2010 Emissions Inventory

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 18

Potential Control Strategy Studies Recommended to Texas Environmental Research Consortium

– Types of NOx Sources

Gas fired engines Pipeline engines Process heaters and gas turbines Back-up Diesel Generators Electric Utilities Test Cell and Test Stand emission control technology

Control Strategy Development

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 19

Potential Control Strategy Studies Recommended to Texas Environmental Research Consortium – Types of VOC Sources

Coal Tar Pavement / Sealers Coatings and Solvent Mobile Refueling Loading and Unloading Operations (railcars)

Control Strategy Development

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 20

  • Control Measure Catalog

– TCEQ developing a list of potential control strategies for DFW – Living document – Draft scheduled for review in August – DFW and Houston work groups combined when possible

  • Working with NCTCOG to obtain best

information available

Control Strategy Development

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 21

  • Free/Low Cost Transit (esp. on ozone action days) -

Costly.

  • Parking Restrictions - A program to limit vehicle use in

downtown areas or other areas of emission concentration could include: preferential parking for HOV users, public sector pricing, and/or control of parking supply.

  • Drive Thru Windows at Banks, Restaurants and Dry

Cleaners - Ban use during ozone season.

Examples of Lifestyle Changes

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 22

  • Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicle I/M – will require new

testing equipment. Not a large number of vehicles.

  • Automobile Operation Controls - Reduce air

pollution at airports from motor vehicles by restricting idling and controlling access to terminal areas.

  • Truck Traffic - Divert thru-trucks out of non-

attainment area

  • Refueling Ban - Ban fueling operations between

6 a.m. and 12 p.m.

Examples of Lifestyle Changes

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 23

  • Require large commercial fleets, including taxis, to be

hybrid, if possible

  • College/university VMT Reductions – Eliminate

internal streets. Only allow service vehicle traffic within campus.

  • More stringent graphic arts requirements
  • Change airport operations to reduce idling on runways

– priority given to order planes to leave the gate

  • California Consumer Product Rule – more stringent

then EPA rules phased in by 2005 with a three-year sell-through date.

Examples of Lifestyle Changes

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 24

  • Delayed start of Six Flags, Water Parks, Ranger

Games

  • Major road construction projects in non-ozone season
  • r at night
  • Open most retail operations later (exempt grocery

stores, pharmacies)

Examples of Lifestyle Changes

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 25

DFW SIP Revision Time Line

2009 Future Inventory

Task Start Date End Date Base Case Modeling Fri 03/04/05 Fri 05/06/05 2009 Future Case Emissions Inventory Development, Including Mobile Source Emissions Mon 03/14/05 Fri 09/30/05 2009 Future Base Case Modeling Mon 10/03/05 Fri 10/07/05 Control Strategy Development Mon 03/14/05 Fri 02/03/06 Rule Development Mon 06/06/05 Fri 02/17/06 Commissioner Backup Materials, Including Publishing on Agency Web Site Fri 04/28/06 SIP Proposal Wed 05/17/06 SIP Adoption Wed 11/15/06 Submit SIP to EPA Fri 12/15/06 Note: Dates are estimates and are subject to revision. Any revisions will be provided to affected parties.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Technical Analysis Division • NTCASC Meeting • June 30, 2005 • Page 26

Cement Kiln Study

  • Purpose of Study: to determine if additional controls

are feasible

  • Work order with ERG
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

STATUS OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION

North Texas Clean Air Steering Committee June 30, 2005 North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

slide-29
SLIDE 29

1-HOUR OZONE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Control Strategy Status Report

* Replaced by TERP

Source Control Strategy Complete/ On-Going In-Progress Delayed/ Repealed

Area Building Efficiency and Codes 2005 Gas-Fired Water Heaters, Small Boilers, and Process Heaters 2006 Non-road Accelerated Purchase of Tier II Locomotive Engines X * Airport Ground Support Equipment (GSE) Electrification X Compression Ignition Standards X Heavy-Duty Diesel Ozone Season Operating Restrictions X * Lawn and Garden Equipment - Phase II X Purchase of Tier III Diesel Engines X * Recreational Marine Standards 2008 Spark Ignition Standards X Texas Emissions Reduction Program (TERP) X X On-road Alternative Fuels Program - Clean Vehicle Program X Bicycle/Pedestrian Projects X X Ozone Season Fare Reduction / Public Education Campaign X Employee Trip Reduction (ETR) X Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) - 9 Counties X Federal Phase II Reformulated Gasoline (RFG)/Low Sulfur/Lower Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) X Grade Separations X X Heavy-Duty Diesel Standards X High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes X X Intersection Improvements X X National Low Emission Vehicle (LEV ) / Tier II Vehicle Emission Standards X Park and Ride Lots X X Rail Projects X X Speed Limit Reduction X Sustainable Development X X Texas Low-Emission Diesel (TxLED) 2006 Traffic Signal Improvements X X Vanpools X X Vehicle Retirement Program/Vehicle Maintenance (AirCheck Texas) X Point Cement Kilns X Dallas / Fort Worth Electric Generating Utilities X Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Small Emitters X Regional Electric Generating Utilities X

Source: North Central Texas Council of Governments & Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

slide-30
SLIDE 30

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS NONATTAINMENT AREA

Other Control Strategies

Source Control Strategy Complete / On-Going In-Progress Future

Area Local Energy Efficiency Policies X Non-road Aftermarket Technology and Fuel Additive Research Program X Enhanced Texas Emission Reduction Program (TERP) X Government Construction Incentives X On-road Air Quality Public Outreach X Bottleneck Removal X Clean Cities Technical Coalition X Clean Vehicle Loaner Program X Clean Vehicle Program X X Clean Vehicle Taxi Cab Program X Cleaner Fleet Vehicles Procurement Policy X Diesel Freight Vehicle Idling Reduction Program X Enhanced Employee Trip Reduction (ETR) X Exclude Sales Tax on Hybrid and Other Vehicles X Extend/Expand Diesel Engine Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) X Fleet Review, Procurement and Operations Policies X Goods Movement Program X Impound Lot/Auction Lot Vehicle Program X Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) / Freeway Incident Management X Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signals Replacement Program X Low Emitting Vehicle (LEV) HOV Eligibility X Ozone Season Fare Reduction / Public Education Campaign X Parking Cash-Out Pilot Program X Pay-As-You-Drive Auto Insurance Pilot Program X Seamless Public Transit X Smoking Vehicle Hotline X Stage I & II Gasoline Vapor Recovery X X Sustainable Development X Thoroughfare Assessment Program (Signal Progression) X Transportation Control Measure (TCM) Review X

Source: North Central Texas Council of Governments & Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 3

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Programs Carryover Funds Arterial Street Program

2

12.7% $44.86 12.7% + 7.34 7.34 Freeway Interchange and Bottleneck Program (1/3 federal, 1/3 State, 1/3 local) 24.72 7% 24.72 7% Arterial Intersection/Bottleneck Program

4

7.06 2% 36.38 10.3% 43.44 12.3% High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes 7.06 2% 7.06 2% Intelligent Transportation Systems

5

21.19 6% 21.19 6% Transit (Partnership Program 2) 109.49 31% 109.49 31% + 3.61 + 5.21 8.82 Cost Overrun/Emergency/New Projects 7.06 2% 24.72 7% 3.53 1% 35.32 10% $83.70 23.7% $198.84 56.3% $70.64 20% $353.20 100% $16.16 Notes: 1 All funds are reflected in millions of dollars. 2 Includes addition of lanes projects and new roadway projects. 5 Includes mobility assistance crews. STP-MM CMAQ RTC/Local Subtotal 3 Includes new 8-hour improvements, alternative fuel vehicle technology, bicycle/pedestrian regional connections, special studies/other, traffic signal improvements, travel demand management/park-and-ride, intermodal/freight projects, and local 4 Includes safety projects, grade separations, intersection improvements, and bottleneck removals. Sustainable Development Projects/Programs Local Air Quality Program

3

10% 10% 35.32 9% 9% 35.32 31.79 31.79

DISTRIBUTION OF FEDERAL REAUTHORIZATION FUNDS BY PROGRAM AREA1

FY 2005-2009

Revised Total $44.86 24.72 43.44 7.06 21.19 109.49 35.32 $369.36 40.61 42.66 match for other federal projects.

4

slide-32
SLIDE 32

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS NONATTAINMENT AREA

Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Emission Sources

Area 6% Point 13% Onroad 58% Nonroad 23%

2002 NOx Emissions 2007 NOx Emissions

Area 9% Point 19% Onroad 45% Nonroad 27%

Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 5% IOP SIP, Dallas-Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area 8-Hour Ozone Standard, April 2005 5

slide-33
SLIDE 33

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS NONATTAINMENT AREA

Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emission Sources

2002 VOC Emissions 2007 VOC Emissions

Area 45% Point 6% Onroad 34% Nonroad 15% Area 53% Point 8% Onroad 26% Nonroad 13%

Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 5% IOP SIP, Dallas-Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area 8-Hour Ozone Standard, April 2005 6

slide-34
SLIDE 34

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS NONATTAINMENT AREA

Area & Nonroad Emission Source Focus

NOx Contribution VOC Contribution 2002 Inventory 29% 60% 2007 Inventory 36% 66% 2009 Preliminary Estimates 48% 70% Statewide Controls Already Applied to Major Point Sources Onroad Mobile Source Controls Out of State’s Jurisdiction Previous Implementation of Point and Onroad Mobile Source Controls Historically, Fewer Controls on Area/Nonroad Sources

7

slide-35
SLIDE 35

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS NONATTAINMENT AREA

Nonroad Emission Source Categories

Nonroad Sources Construction * Locomotives Aircraft Industrial Commercial * Agriculture Ground Support Equipment Oil & Gas Commercial Lawn & Garden * Residential Lawn & Garden * Recreational Boating * Recreational Equipment * Railroad Maintenance Logging NOx Contribution in 2009 Higher Lower

8

*Also a large VOC contributor

slide-36
SLIDE 36

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS NONATTAINMENT AREA

Area Emission Source Categories

Area Sources Surface Coating Solvent Use Architectural Coating Petro Transport & Refueling Waste Treatment Oil & Gas Production * Asphalt Paving Drycleaning Leaking Underground Tanks Auto Refinishing Open Burning Surface Cleaning Graphic Arts Bakeries & Breweries Industrial Fuel Use * Traffic Marking Residential Fuel Use Pesticide Use VOC Contribution in 2009 Higher Lower

*Also a large NOx contributor

9

slide-37
SLIDE 37

8-HOUR OZONE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Development Schedule

DFW Designated Nonattainment for 8-Hour Ozone Standard – Area Expanded to Include 9 Counties June 15, 2004 Photochemical Modeling (TCEQ) In Progress Control Strategy Review and Modeling In Progress SIP Proposal (TCEQ Proposal) May 2006 SIP Adoption (TCEQ Proposal) November 2006 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Year 2009 5% Increment of Progress (IOP) SIP Submitted to EPA Jan 15, 2005 SIP Submission Due to EPA June 15, 2007 8-Hour Ozone Attainment Date for Moderate Areas June 15, 2010

10

slide-38
SLIDE 38

www.dfwcleanair.com/trans/sip.html Chris Klaus: cklaus@nctcog.org (817) 695-9286 Carrie Reese: creese@nctcog.org (817) 608-2353 Amanda Brimmer: abrimmer@nctcog.org (817) 608-2354

11

AIR QUALITY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR THE 8-HOUR OZONE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Contacts

slide-39
SLIDE 39

RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF AN EARLY SUBMITTAL OF AN 8-HOUR STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN THAT, TO THE LARGEST EXTENT POSSIBLE, RELIES ON REASONABLY AVAILABLE AND PRACTICABLY ENFORCEABLE LOCAL AND REGIONAL EMISSION REDUCTIONS TO EXPEDITIOUSLY MEET AIR QUALITY STANDARDS WHEREAS, exposure to ozone pollution above the current federal standard has been identified as a serious public health threat in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Region, resulting in premature deaths, respiratory illness, heart disease and other injurious medical conditions among residents in the region; and, WHEREAS, the public health harms associated with increased exposure to ozone pollution have been tied to increased medical costs for individuals, government and businesses, lost school days for students and lost productivity for employers; and, WHEREAS, DFW’s status as a nonattainment area for ozone pollution has the potential to hinder recruitment of desirable businesses; and, WHEREAS, it is the stated goal of local governments to be in compliance with the Clean Air Act and to become an attainment area for ozone pollution in an expeditious manner; and, WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the DFW Blue Skies Alliance, Downwinders At Risk, Public Citizen-TX and the Sierra Club (“the groups”) have concluded a lawsuit in federal court amicably with an historic consent decree on air quality, and parallel good faith agreements between the groups, EPA, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), and Collin and Tarrant Counties; and, WHEREAS, the primary goal of each of these negotiated documents is to submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone to EPA before the June 15, 2007 deadline that meets the 8-hour ozone standard as expeditiously as practicable, including the goal to achieve attainment in advance of the statutory deadline of June 2010, if possible; and, WHEREAS, the specific agreement signed by the groups and TCEQ’s commissioners recognizes “the advantages of maintaining focus, effort, and direction towards promptly developing, adopting, and implementing a SIP revision that addresses the 8-hour ozone standard;” and, WHEREAS, the specific agreement between the groups and TCEQ states that “The Executive Director will consider implementing control measures for the DFW 8-hour nonattainment area prior to the statutory, or any other agreed-upon earlier deadline for the submittal of an 8-hour attainment demonstration SIP, if those measures are clearly identified as being reasonably available, practically enforceable, and needed to contribute to the emission reductions necessary to achieve timely attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard in the DFW 8-hour nonattainment area;” and,

slide-40
SLIDE 40

WHEREAS, the U.S. House of Representatives has amended to the current Energy Policy Act of 2005 a provision, entitled, “SEC. 1443. ATTAINMENT DATES FOR DOWNWIND OZONE NONATTAINMENT AREAS” that would amend Section 181 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. §7511), to allow extension of attainment dates for what the provision defines as “downwind areas” to correspond with attainment deadlines for any other nonattainment areas or an area in any state found to be “significantly contributing” to the downwind area’s ozone problem, which are defined as “upwind areas;” and, WHEREAS, §1443 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 does not quantitatively define the term “significantly contributing,” leaving it to the discretion of the EPA Administrator to make that determination for a “downwind area” and allowing a state to apply for this extension in place of more effective air pollution control measures; and, WHEREAS, national ozone precursor transport concerns are now being addressed through the EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT KNOWN THAT THE NORTH TEXAS CLEAN AIR STEERING COMMITTEE: Section 1. Supports the air quality agreements signed between the groups and local, state and federal government, and endorses their goal of submitting a SIP for DFW before the June 15, 2007, deadline and achieving healthful air quality for DFW residents as expeditiously as practicable. Section 2. Requests that TCEQ focus its efforts on developing and submitting an adequate SIP for the 8-hour ozone standard that relies to the highest extent possible on local and regional emission reductions that can reasonably be expected to achieve attainment in the DFW area on or prior to June 2010. Section 3. Desires for TCEQ to use items 1 and 2 as its guiding principles and to

  • nly consider invoking §1443 of the Energy Policy Act, should it become

law, after it has included every reasonably available and practically enforceable local and regional control measure in its new 8-Hour Ozone SIP and has required these control measures to be implemented as rapidly as possible.