Taking it seriously Scottish Regulatory Conference 5 November 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

taking it seriously scottish regulatory conference 5
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Taking it seriously Scottish Regulatory Conference 5 November 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Taking it seriously Scottish Regulatory Conference 5 November 2018 Guy Rubin General Dental Council www.gdc-uk.org Presentation Structure Shifting the balance and Policy Context GDC Evidence Strategy and Research Programme Public


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Taking it seriously Scottish Regulatory Conference 5 November 2018

Guy Rubin General Dental Council

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Structure

  • Shifting the balance and Policy Context
  • GDC Evidence Strategy and Research Programme
  • Public and Patient Survey GDC 2017
  • Literature review on seriousness
  • Cross – regulatory work

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-3
SLIDE 3

4 areas:

  • Promoting professionalism
  • Better handling of complaints/feedback by

the profession

  • Joining-up with partners
  • Refocusing fitness to practise
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Shifting the Balance

  • Current system “rules based”: can undermine
  • wnership and personal responsibility
  • Lack of engagement with standards
  • Insufficient confidence to apply common

sense/pragmatism

  • Does not set out the big picture: what is

professionalism for? Why does it matter?

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Shifting the Balance

  • Emerging alternatives:
  • Regulator brokers conversation between public &

profession about expectations, obligations & privileges

  • Reflects those in agreements that professions can
  • wn and promote
  • Underpins engagement, standards, education &

development etc

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Overall views

www.gdc-uk.org

  • Recognise the need for the debate at this time
  • Generally very supportive of the GDC’s premise and

involvement

  • Some strong views, but no firm definition or

description of professionalism – often default to GDC requirements

slide-7
SLIDE 7

GDC Research Plan

GDC Evidence Strategy and the Research Workplan

  • Evidence Strategy: Robust evidence and

actionable insight.

  • Research plan: Programme of work to gather

evidence from patients, registrants and future registrants aligned to the pillars of Shifting the Balance

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-8
SLIDE 8

GDC Research Plan Shifting the Balance: a better fairer system of dental regulation

Upstream Promoting professionalism Improving Resolution Accessibility of complaints processes, equality and diversity Refocusing Fitness to Practise/Right touch regulation Developing the concept of seriousness; cross regulatory research Organisational sustainability/development Impact of EU exit: Survey of European Qualified Dental Professionals

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.gdc-uk.org

www.gdc-uk.org

Research Digest

  • Share updates on research

findings in dentistry

  • Improve accessibility to research

findings and key reports for patients, the public, professionals and students

  • Increase information sharing

with external partners

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Aims and objectives

  • To develop a firm evidence base for policy

development in this area through a programme of research

  • To ensure that we take a proportionate approach to

enforcement action and focus on serious misconduct.

  • To develop a ‘hierarchy of risk 'for decision makers

supporting them to make proportionate decisions.

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

| Version 1 | Public |

We presented the public and registrants with a range of scenarios

A dentist/dental nurse posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page A dentist accidentally prescribes/a dental nurse accidentally gives the wrong medication to a patient, and there are serious side effects leading to the patient being admitted to hospital A dentist/dental nurse is charged for drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night

  • ut

A dentist removes the wrong tooth/a dental nurse reads notes out wrong, as a result, a dentist removes the wrong tooth A dentist/dental nurse gives a patient a rude response to a complaint the patient has made about them

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

| Version 1 | Public |

…and a range of sanctions

No action Reprimand – this is a statement of the General Dental Council’s disapproval, but the dental professional is still fit to practise with no restrictions Conditions – this is where restrictions are placed on the dental professional’s registration for a set amount of time, for example that they must take further training and provide evidence to prove that they are taking steps to improve Suspension – this means that the person cannot work as a dental professional for a set period of time, but may return to work after the suspension is completed Strike off register – this is the most serious sanction as it removes a dental professional’s name from the register. This means that they can no longer work in dentistry in the UK Don’t know

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

| Version 1 | Public |

Background to the research

Qualitative

  • Sixth survey of patients and public
  • Representative sample of 1,232 UK adults (from all 4 countries)
  • Fieldwork dates: 31st March – 9th April 2017
  • Includes tracker questions from previous waves and new topical and policy questions
  • 2 online discussion groups with the 9 members of the public following the quantitative survey
  • Provide a more in-depth understanding of some of the topics

Quantitative Qualitative

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

| Version 1 | Public |

People suggest different sanctions for different scenarios

Base: All respondents: (1,232)

3 4 3 5 13% 15% 42% 47% 7% 8% 8% 10% 14% 19% 26% 28% 26% 26% 52% 56% 23% 27% 31% 35% 12% 12% 10% 8% 21% 19% 42% 38% 36% 30% 28% 24% 13% 12% 14% 12% 21% 18% 13% 9% 19% 17% 6% 5 4 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2

No action Reprimand Conditions Suspension Strike off register Don't know

Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse

A dentist/dental nurse posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page A dentist accidentally prescribes/a dental nurse accidentally gives the wrong medication to a patient, and there are serious side effects leading to the patient being admitted to hospital A dentist/dental nurse is charged for drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night out A dentist removes the wrong tooth/a dental nurse reads notes

  • ut wrong, as a result, a dentist

removes the wrong tooth A dentist/dental nurse gives a patient a rude response to a complaint the patient has made about them

For each of these situations, please tell me what you think would be the most appropriate action, if any, for the dental regulator to take against the dentist/dental nurse? This action would be on top

  • f any action other organisations, such as the police, may have taken.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

| Version 1 | Public |

A dentist posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page A dentist accidentally prescribes the wrong medication to a patient, and there are serious side effects leading to the patient being admitted to hospital A dentist is charged for drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night out A dentist removes the wrong tooth A dentist gives a patient a rude response to a complaint the patient has made about them

The public expect more severe sanctions when wrongdoing

  • ccurs during treatment than during personal time

No action Strike off register

3% 21% 3% 13% 7% 4% 13% 19% 42% 6%

Professional time Personal time

Base: All respondents: (1,232)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

| Version 1 | Public |

…as the distinction between professional and

Their behaviour in their personal time has no bearing on their professional performance I would hope, and I would not really be likely to know what they get up to anyway.

(Male, 60-64, social grade C2)

I would prefer not to know what they do in their private lives as long as they do a good professional job in their work.

(Male, 60-64, social grade C2)

and public life is clear

Suspension for being convicted…the private behaviour reflects on their professional judgement. The GDC need to be aware of any issues that could directly affect the welfare of patients.”

(Female, 45-54, social grade C1)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

| Version 1 | Public |

A dentist posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page A dentist accidentally prescribes the wrong medication to a patient, and there are serious side effects leading to the patient being admitted to hospital A dentist is charged for drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night out A dentist removes the wrong tooth A dentist gives a patient a rude response to a complaint the patient has made about them

An exception is if a dental professional is racist

No action Strike off register

3% 21% 3% 13% 7% 4% 13% 19% 42% 6%

Professional time Personal time

Base: All respondents: (1,232)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

| Version 1 | Public |

18

Suspension, I am tough on this one. As a trusted professional you need to be unbiased and have all your patients’ best interests at heart. How can anyone of that race have any confidence in you to treat them to the best of your ability if you openly discriminate against them? The practice and profession will also be impacted by such behaviour.”

(Female, 25-34, social grade B)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

| Version 1 | Public |

People think slightly more lenient sanctions

A dentist has more responsibility than a nurse and is more likely to bring the practice into disrepute.

(Female, 65-74, social grade B)

The nurse would be under the dentist’s supervision so he should be the first to reprimand.

(Male, 60-64, social grade C2)

should be given to dental nurses than dentists

Hierarchy of accountability in practice

Dentists are perceived as:

more senior, with more responsibility

No, if the standard is set then it should be set across the board. Why give different levels per role? It would be more likely to be affected by the choice of comment, or method it’s given.

(Female, 25-34, social grade B)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

| Version 1 | Public |

Background and research aims

  • GDC’s Registrant Survey previously conducted annually between

2011 and 2013 - significant gap between this survey (2017) and the most recent wave (2013)

  • Provide statistically reliable data and qualitative evidence on

registrants’ views to inform future policy and performance

  • Provide benchmarking data and track views
  • Gain insight and understanding of current topics and issues
  • ‘Horizon scan’ and identify emerging policy issues with registrants
  • Full report will be published – this presentation focuses on two

specific areas – seriousness, misconduct and regulatory action and perceptions of fitness to practise

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

| Version 1 | Public |

Methodology

Quantitative

  • Online survey
  • Questionnaire

designed – repeated tracking questions and strategic/topical policy issue questions

  • Sent to a representative sample of 36,000 registrants
  • 1,489 responses received between 13 October and 13 November

2017 (17% response rate)

  • Results weighted to be representative of GDC registrant population

Qualitative

  • 4 focus groups
  • 26 in depth telephone interviews
  • Stratified to be broadly representative of GDC registrant population
  • Explore survey topics in greater depth
  • Tailored discussion guide

Mixed methodology - quantitative and qualitative

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

| Version 1 | Public |

Appropriate actions for the GDC to take

Possible actions the GDC can take:

Reprimand - This is a statement of the GDC's disapproval, but the dental professional is still fit to practise with no restrictions Conditions - This is where restrictions are placed on the dental professional's registration for a set amount of time, for example that they must take further training and provide evidence that they are taking steps to improve Suspension - This means that the person cannot work as a dental professional for a set period of time, but may return to work after the suspension is completed Strike off register - This is the most serious sanction as it removes a dental professional's name from the register. This means they can no longer work in dentistry in the UK No action

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

| Version 1 | Public |

Appropriate actions for the GDC to take

4% 5% 2% 4% 10% 13% 4% 14% 7% 7% 33% 37% 13% 12% 34% 37% 17% 23% 45% 46% 18% 18% 45% 39% 19% 20% 45% 38% 29% 27% 25% 22% 26% 23% 26% 21% 21% 16% 13% 14% 14% 14% 9% 13% 7% 6% 8% 3% 1% 2% 5% 5% 4% 8% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse No action Reprimand Conditions Suspension Strike off register Don't know A dentist/dental nurse posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page A dentist accidentally prescribes/a dental nurse accidentally gives the wrong medication to a patient, and there are serious side effects A dentist/dental nurse is charged for drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night out A dentist removes the wrong tooth/a dental nurse reads notes

  • ut wrong, as a result, a dentist

removes the wrong tooth A dentist/dental nurse gives a patient a rude response to a complaint a patient has made about them

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

| Version 1 | Public |

A dentist/dental nurse posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page

4% 5% 13% 15% 33% 37% 26% 28% 18% 18% 12% 12% 25% 22% 28% 24% 14% 14% 19% 17% 5% 5% 3% 3% Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse No action Reprimand Conditions Suspension Strike off register Don't know Registrants Patients/public I’d suggest

  • conditions. There

may be more training that’s needed. If that person’s judgement is affecting the way they are treating patients then that’s relevant to the GDC. It would depend on the level of the comment. If that person is exhibiting real, genuine hatred for a group of people then maybe it is a patient safety issue. If it’s an

  • ff-colour joke then it probably isn’t. So any of those

actions could be appropriate.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

| Version 1 | Public |

2% 4% 3% 4% 13% 12% 8% 10% 45% 39% 23% 27% 26% 23% 42% 38% 9% 13% 21% 18% 4% 8% 2% 2% Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse No action Reprimand Conditions Suspension Strike off register Don't know

A dentist accidentally prescribes/a dental nurse accidentally gives the wrong medication to a patient, and there are serious side effects

Registrants Patients/public

If it happened it would be a learning point to know that you can’t just rely on their medical history and you need to ask them every time. If it was a mistake then it should be a reprimand but maybe with some training. One in five thinks that if you make a mistake that’s it, your career is over…Do they think, in their jobs, that if they make

  • ne mistake they should be sacked?
slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

| Version 1 | Public |

A dentist/dental nurse is charged for drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night out

Registrants Patients/public

Unless they’re actually found guilty there should be no action. Since the GDC’s remit is to deal with patient safety, why would being drunk and disorderly affect a patient’s safety? Are they bringing the profession into disrepute?

10% 13% 42% 47% 34% 37% 26% 26% 19% 20% 10% 8% 26% 21% 13% 12% 7% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 2% 2% Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse No action Reprimand Conditions Suspension Strike off register Don't know

It may need to be investigated for alcohol abuse.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

| Version 1 | Public |

A dentist removes the wrong tooth/a dental nurse reads notes out wrong and, as a result, a dentist removes the wrong tooth

Registrants Patients/public

If it’s a consistent event then the dentist needs training It’s a training issue potentially I think conditions if it’s multiple.

4% 14% 3% 5% 17% 23% 14% 19% 45% 38% 31% 35% 21% 16% 36% 30% 8% 3% 13% 9% 5% 5% 2% 2% Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse No action Reprimand Conditions Suspension Strike off register Don't know

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

| Version 1 | Public |

A dentist/dental nurse gives a patient a rude response to a complaint a patient has made about them

Registrants Patients/public

Just a little bit of extra training would resolve that, wouldn’t it? I think it should be done in-house. It shouldn’t reach the GDC. A rude reply doesn’t necessarily affect the care of the patient.

7% 7% 7% 8% 45% 46% 52% 56% 29% 27% 21% 19% 13% 14% 14% 12% 1% 2% 4% 3% 5% 5% 2% 2% Dentist Dental nurse Dentist Dental nurse No action Reprimand Conditions Suspension Strike off register Don't know

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Registrant survey - attitudes to misconduct

www.gdc-uk.org

A dentist posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page No Action 4% Strike off register 14% A dentist is charged for drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night

  • ut

No action 10% Strike off register 7% A dental nurse posts racist comments on their personal Facebook page No action 5% Strike off register 14% A dental nurse is charged with drunk and disorderly behaviour on a night out No action 13% Strike off register 6%

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Literature Review

Literature review carried for the GDC by CAMERA/Plymouth University Schools of Medicine and Dentistry – Synthesises the relevant available evidence about how regulators use their Fitness to Practise powers and processes to sanction serious misconduct. – Includes published and grey literature that covers both health and other selected professions and covers literatures in the UK and professional regulation internationally.

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Literature Review

Emerging Findings

– Defining (serious) Misconduct – Nexus – Factors informing decision-making around serious misconduct – Aggravating and mitigating factors.

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Cross - regulatory work

– A cross-regulatory picture of how serious misconduct is dealt with. Is it proportionate? – Scoping and working with other regulators to develop a research project that will examine their approaches – Project aims and objectives include: Relative and absolute concept of seriousness Differences and similarities in approaches to seriousness Link between public confidence and enforcement action

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Next Steps

www.gdc-uk.org

slide-34
SLIDE 34

www.gdc-uk.org

End Guy Rubin grubin@gdc-uk.org 0207 167 6109