T HE P OWER OF P ERFORMANCE 51 TH A NNUAL C ONFERENCE M AY 22-25, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

t he p ower of p erformance 51 th a nnual c onference m
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

T HE P OWER OF P ERFORMANCE 51 TH A NNUAL C ONFERENCE M AY 22-25, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

T HE P OWER OF P ERFORMANCE 51 TH A NNUAL C ONFERENCE M AY 22-25, 2018 O RLANDO , F LORIDA Automated Evaluation Matrix Debbie Storme and Kevin (SeYon) Hwang on behalf of Brenda J. Billingsley, Director of Purchasing E VALUATION C OMMITTEE E


slide-1
SLIDE 1

THE POWER OF PERFORMANCE

51TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 22-25, 2018 ORLANDO, FLORIDA

Automated Evaluation Matrix Debbie Storme and Kevin (SeYon) Hwang

  • n behalf of Brenda J. Billingsley, Director of Purchasing
slide-2
SLIDE 2

EVALUATION COMMITTEE EVALUATION MATRIX

  • Evaluation criteria developed by Project Managers,

Contract Administrators and Purchasing staff for each advertised Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation

  • Vendors submit voluminous responses to RFP

solicitations in BidSync

  • Project Managers and Contract Administrators review

Vendor qualifications

  • Qualifications are presented to Evaluation Committee

in Evaluation Matrix for ranking and selecting Vendors

slide-3
SLIDE 3

BUSINESS NEED

  • Extensive commitment of time for

Project Managers and Purchasing staff

  • Procurement Process sometimes extended or delayed
  • Manual nature of process leaves room for errors
  • r allows for speculative information as interpreted by

staff

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AUTOMATED PROCESS

  • Project Managers work with Purchasing Agents to develop evaluation

criteria and scoring prior to advertising

  • Purchasing Agent creates fillable PDF Evaluation Criteria Response

Form by copying and pasting evaluation criteria provided by Project Manager

  • Application automatically generates Evaluation Criteria Response Form
  • Vendors provide responses directly into PDF form via BidSync
  • Each criteria response allows for a maximum of 2100 text characters
  • Graphs, resumes, tables, org charts, etc. are submitted as

attachments

  • Purchasing Agent uploads into Automated application which creates

the final matrix of responses with all vendor information side by side.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

EFFICIENCIES OF AUTOMATION

Replaces intensive labor process with automated solution Reduces delays in procurement process Evaluation Matrix submitted to Evaluation Committee are consistent in formatting Vendors have control of information Evaluation Committee reviews Easily customized based on each solicitation Provides clear comparison of vendors qualifications helping Evaluation Committee rapidly select best choice for the organization

slide-6
SLIDE 6

APPLICATION LOGIN PAGE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WELCOME PAGE WILL OPEN

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MASTER VENDOR EVALUATION QUESTIONS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

VENDOR EVALUATION PAGE

slide-10
SLIDE 10

CREATE A NEW VENDOR EVALUATION

  • 1. SELECT CATEGORY TYPE 3. TYPE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
  • 2. TYPE A TITLE OF THE PROJECT 4. TYPE RFP NUMBER
slide-11
SLIDE 11

THE SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY GENERATES THE VENDOR EVALUATION

QUESTIONS FROM THE PROJECT MASTER TEMPLATE

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MODIFY VENDOR EVALUATION QUESTIONS

MULTI LINE, REQUIRED FIELD, READ ONLY, OR CHANGE ORDER OF

QUESTIONS

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ONCE COMPLETE, THE VENDOR EVALUATION QUESTIONS DOWNLOAD A FILLABLE FORM BY CLICKING “DOWNLOAD COMBINED FORM” BUTTON.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SAMPLE VENDOR EVALUATION CRITERIA

FILLABLE FORM

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PURCHASING AGENTS

DOWNLOAD

VENDOR

RESPONSES FROM

BIDSYNC AND

UPLOAD INTO THE APPLICATION BY DRAG AND DROP

slide-16
SLIDE 16

APPLICATION ALLOWS VENDOR’S RESPONSE SIZE TO BE

LIMITED SO MATRIX DISPLAYS ON ONE PAGE

slide-17
SLIDE 17

VENDOR EVALUATION MATRIX SAMPLE – LIMITED TO 4

RESPONSES ON ONE PAGE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

VENDOR EVALUATION MATRIX SAMPLE – LIMITED TO 4

RESPONSES ON ONE PAGE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

THE END

Deborah Storme dstorme@Broward.org Kevin (Se Yeon) Hwang syhwang@Broward.org