Systematics of quark/gluon tagging Deepak Kar (for the q/g team in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

systematics of quark gluon tagging
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Systematics of quark/gluon tagging Deepak Kar (for the q/g team in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Systematics of quark/gluon tagging Deepak Kar (for the q/g team in Les Houches 2015) Based on: arXiv:1605.04692 and work-in-progress MPI@LHC, Chiapas, Mexico 27th November - 2nd December, 2016 Discriminate between From Quantum Diaries 2


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Systematics of quark/gluon tagging

Deepak Kar (for the q/g team in Les Houches 2015) Based on: arXiv:1605.04692 and work-in-progress MPI@LHC, Chiapas, Mexico 27th November - 2nd December, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Discriminate between…

2

From Quantum Diaries

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quark/gluon discrimination

  • Ideally: identify quark-initiated or

gluon initiated jets.

  • Is that well defined?

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The study

  • In leading order:

quark radiation ∝ CF, gluon radiation ∝ CA

  • Affected strongly by subleading (perturbative and

non-perturbative) effects

  • Modelled in MC generators, but needs constraining

by data

  • Highlights modelling deficiencies

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Variable

6

Generalised angularities:

IRC Safe Used

Define: For hadron colliders:

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ATLAS Result(s)

7

  • Eur. Phys. J. C (2014) 74: 3023

ATLAS-CONF-2016-034

Data-MC difference (but very optimistic!) Discriminant composed

  • f different observables
slide-8
SLIDE 8

CMS Result

8

CERN-CMS-DP-2016-070

Need MC reweighting to match (data) efficiencies

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Discriminant

9

Discriminator:

Gluon rejection for a given quark efficiency Quark rejection for a given gluon efficiency

pq (pg) is the probability distribution for the quark jet (gluon jet) sample as a function

  • f the classifier λ

Δ → 0: no discrimination Δ → 1: perfect discrimination

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Idealised ep collider

  • Useful to understand final state evolution

(ignoring initial state complications)

  • Vary collisions energy (Q), jet radius (R)
  • Look at both hadron and parton level

10

Quark: Gluon:

Suppress wide angle radiation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hadron Level λLHA

11

Good agreement LEP data available Larger spread No data available

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Seperation

12

Pythia8 more optimistic, Herwig++ more pessimistic

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Non-Perturbative Effects

13

Large effect of hadronisation More difference among MC models as well

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Overall Separation

14

Large spread in discrimination power (even more at hadron level)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dependance on R

15

Separation increases with R (more phase space?)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Dependance on Q

16

Separation increases with Q at parton level (more phase space?)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Dependance on ⍺S

17

No clear trend at parton level, except Herwig++, rest decreases at hadron level

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Proton-proton Results

  • Very preliminary
  • Z+jets (quark

enriched), dijets (gluon enriched)

  • Shown standard jets,

but mMDT /Soft drop effects also looked at

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Hadron Level λLHA

19

Decent agreement Larger Difference

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Separation

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Separation

21

Pythia more optimistic Opposite trend

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Summary

  • Important physics applications
  • Large effect for generator setting, non-

perturbative/shower effects

  • Need (unfolded) measurements,

specially for gluon processes

22