Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan Overview Machine overview LOCO method and minimisation technique Minimisation results and Measurements Sextupole
Overview
- Machine overview
- LOCO method and minimisation technique
- Minimisation results and Measurements
- Sextupole alignment measurements
- Conclusion
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Australian Synchrotron Light Source Overview
- Storage Ring Parameters
Energy 3 GeV Circumference 216 m RF Frequency 499.654 MHz Peak RF Voltage 3.0 MV Current 200 mA Betatron Tune (h/v) 13.3/5.2 Momentum Compaction 0.002 εx (nominal) 10.4 nm∙rad
- Double bend lattice
- 14 fold symmetric
- Gradient dipoles
- Corrector and skew quad coils on sextupoles.
- Independent power supplies for all
multipoles.
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
LOCO method
- LOCO – Linear Optics from Closed Orbits.
- Adjusts the linear optics in the model to fit the real machine data
- Model response matrix – Machine response matrix = Error
- Minimise error by adjusting the model ‘fit parameters’
- Fit Parameters normally include:
– BPM/Corrector gains and coupling – Corrector gains and coupling – Quadrupole strengths – Skew Quadrupole strengths
- We fit skew quadrupole components in all multipole magnets in our model
lattice to represent rolls and misalignments.
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
LOCO Outputs
Outputs:
- BPM Gains + Couplings
- Skew components
- Quad Strengths
- Corrector gains/tilts
From these outputs we can calibrate the model and calculate skew corrections needed to adjust coupling Consistent BPM/corrector coupling results for differing machine coupling settings – LOCO is not attributing the machine coupling to BPM/corrector coupling
Fits to varying machine coupling states (0.01- 17% coupling) Fits to identical machine coupling (10 samples)
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Verified from attenuation measurements for the BPM.
Emittance Coupling minimisation
- Emittance coupling (εy/εx) calculated from LOCO Calibrated model.
- Minimisation algorithm used to adjust skew quads to desired emittance
coupling.
- Emittance coupling can be adjusted to arbitrary amounts with this
method.
Set Coupling LOCO Measured Coupling Calculated εy (pm) 0.0% 0.01% 1.0 0.1% 0.12% 12.2 0.2% 0.23% 23.5 0.3% 0.33% 33.7 0.4% 0.43% 43.9 0.5% 0.54% 55.1 0.6% 0.64% 65.3 0.7% 0.74% 75.5 0.8% 0.84% 85.7 0.9% 0.92% 93.8 1.0% 1.04% 106.1
- Phys. Rev. ST Accel Beams, 14, 012804 (2011)
Touschek Lifetime vs RF
- By taking single bunch lifetime over extended period the Touschek
component of the lifetime can be extracted.
du u e du u u e e D D c Nr
u u x x y x z e
) 2 ) ln( 3 ( 2 1 ) ln( 2 2 3 ) ( , , ) ( 8 1
max 3 max 2 2
) 1 ( ) (
1 1 2 a a
e a i b be i t i b i a i dt di
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Touschek Lifetime vs RF
- Touschek component will also change with RF voltage.
- 2.1% energy acceptance
(measured)
- Curve fit by varying εy/εx ,
- ther values fixed.
- Blue curve fit corresponds to
εy = 1.24 pm Set εy/εx (%) Fitted εy/εx (%) εy (pm)
0.01 0.012 ± 0.003 1.2 ± 0.3 0.06 0.043 ± 0.013 4.5 ± 1.3 0.10 0.093 ± 0.025 9.4 ± 2.6 ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Tune Crossing Results
LOCO Model εy (pm) ηy Component (pm) Betatron Coupling Component (pm) Total Measured εy (pm) Model – Measured (pm)
92.31 ± 2.77 2.24 ± 0.09 86.90 ± 2.65 89.55 ± 2.65 2.76 ± 3.83 76.30 ± 2.23 2.96 ± 0.12 76.50 ± 2.14 78.64 ± 2.14 2.34 ± 3.09 41.41 ± 1.24 1.73 ± 0.07 40.39 ± 1.84 42.23 ± 1.84 0.82 ± 2.22 22.75 ± 0.68 2.04 ± 0.08 19.69 ± 1.33 21.72 ± 1.33 1.03 ± 1.49 12.75 ± 0.38 2.14 ± 0.09 10.71± 1.02 12.85 ± 1.02 0.10 ± 1.09 7.55 ± 0.23 1.73 ± 0.07 5.41 ± 0.71 7.14 ± 0.71 0.41 ± 0.75 1.05 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.09 0.59 ± 0.30 1.32 ± 0.31 0.27 ± 0.31 ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
How to improve?
- With current correction scheme we are stuck at 1-2 pm.
- Instead of correcting for misalignments, lets eliminate
them.
- Recent ring alignments have made the coupling worse!
- Need to measure them independently – Beam based
method
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Sextupole offsets
- Shunt each sextupole
magnet family to different strengths and take a response matrix at each point
- Perform LOCO analysis
and fit skew quadrupole terms to each sextupole.
- Gradient of skew field vs
sextupole field gives vertical offset.
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Sextupole Offset Results
- Average offset:
70 microns
- Systematic
alignment effect?
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Cross Checks
Applied BPM Offset Measure Mean Beam Offset Difference from zero +125 234.6 ± 10.6 128.7 ± 18.8 +75 167.7 ± 16.5 61.8 ± 22.6 105.9 ± 15.5
- 75
33.1 ± 17.8
- 72.8 ± 23.6
- 125
- 16.1 ± 21.6
- 122 ± 26.6
Magnet Original Offset (μm) Applied Shim (μm) New Offset (μm) Delta offset (μm) Sector 9 SFB
- 108.4 ± 44.6
150
- 249.3 ± 7.2
140.9 ± 45.2 Sector 11 SFB
- 56.7 ± 10.0
100
- 120.4 ± 56.0
- 63.4 ± 57.4
Sector 9 SDA
- 14.6 ± 9.9
100
- 118.3 ± 8.3
- 103.7 ± 14.1
Cross checks show that amplitude of offset is correct and individual magnets can be adjusted accurately.
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Sextupole Realignment – latest results
Re-aligned section (girder #16-21) now has much lower offsets. Simulated minimal vertical emittance has reduced from 1pm to 0.7 pm.
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Conclusions
- εy of 1.3 pm.rad achieved through LOCO based minimisation.
- We have developed tools to accurately measure sextupole
misalignments and eliminate them.
- Aim to have all sextupoles realigned by end of year and expect to
reach < 1 pm emittance
- Also working on an inexpensive way to increase available skew
correctors
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011
Thank you
ICFA - Low Emittance Ring Workshop 3-5 October 2011