Synchrotron Light Interferometer Project at Jefferson Lab Pavel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

synchrotron light interferometer project at jefferson lab
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Synchrotron Light Interferometer Project at Jefferson Lab Pavel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Synchrotron Light Interferometer Project at Jefferson Lab Pavel Chevtsov February 21, 2003 - Properties of Light - Synchrotron Radiation - Beam Diagnostics with Synchrotron Light - Synchrotron Light Interferometer at Jefferson Lab with some


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Synchrotron Light Interferometer Project at Jefferson Lab

Pavel Chevtsov

February 21, 2003

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Properties of Light
  • Synchrotron Radiation
  • Beam Diagnostics with Synchrotron Light
  • Synchrotron Light Interferometer at Jefferson Lab

with some Experimental Results

  • Conclusions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Properties of Light

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Diffraction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Diffraction describes how light interacts with its physical environment. Diffraction is the spreading of waves around obstacles.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

.

y L

a

S I(y) = I(0) sin( ) = kay/(2L) k = 2 /

[ ]

2

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Resolving power of image-forming systems Diffraction of light limits the resolution of optical systems. The images of two objects, which are very close to each

  • ther, overlap.

How close two points can be brought together before they can no longer be distinguished as separate ?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

L The Rayleigh criterion states that two similar diffraction patterns can just be resolved if the first zero of one pattern falls on the central peak of the other.

min =

a s R = ( )min R

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Interference

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Interference is the net effect of the combination of two or more wave trains. Interference results from the superposition

  • f electromagnetic waves. It is the mechanism

by which light interacts with light.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The intensity pattern is given by: y

a

D

L

.

S sin( )]

2

[ 1 + cos(kDy/L) ]

I 0 [

I(y) = = kay/(2L)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

If the light source is not “point-like”

.

.

S

slide-13
SLIDE 13

sin( )]

2

[ 1 + V cos(kDy/L + ) ] I0[ I(y) = = kay/(2L) V = Imax - Imin Imax + Imin visibility (fringe contrast) And the visibility and the “phase shift” are connected with the degree of coherence : V = | | , = f (arg )

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Theorem of van Cittert – Zernike

The degree of coherence is given by the Fourier transform

  • f the intensity distribution of the source object.

( ) = I( ) exp{ -i 2 } d

= D R

  • the visibility of the interference fringe picture from a point source is equal to 1
  • a small source object gives a good visibility (fringe contrast)
  • a large source object gives a poor visibility (fringe contrast)

( ) (0) =

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What is about the resolution of such a double slit assembly (interferometer) ? Following Rayleigh’s criterion,

min = 2D

s R = ( )min y

a

D

L The resolution can be made very high …

slide-16
SLIDE 16

… but only if

slide-17
SLIDE 17

.P1

.

P2 S P1 and P2 remain correlated: for all typical points S in the source | SP1 – SP2 | << 0

2/ 2/

is the coherence length for the bandwidth

slide-18
SLIDE 18

sin( )]

2

[ 1 + V cos(kDy/L + ) ]

[

I(y) = = kay/(2L) Behavior of the function:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

sin( )]

2

[ 1 + V cos(kDy/L + ) ]

[

I(y) = = kay/(2L)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

sin( )]

2

[ 1 + V cos(kDy/L + ) ]

[

I(y) = sin( )]

2

[ 1 ± V ]

[

Env1,2(y) =

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

sin( )]

2

[ 1 + V cos(kDy/L + ) ]

[

I(y) =

slide-23
SLIDE 23

sin( )]

2

[ 1 + V cos(kDy/L + ) ]

[

I(y) =

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Synchrotron Radiation

slide-25
SLIDE 25

History - 1940th Theory of radiation from relativistic particles Pomeranchuk, Ivanenko, Sokolov, Ternov (USSR) Schwinger (USA) Synchrotron ideas - 1945 Veksler (USSR), McMillan (USA)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The first visual observation of synchrotron radiation was in 1947 from the General Electric synchrotron in the USA.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Synchrotron radiation (SR) is emitted from relativistic charged particles when their paths are changed. By the magnetic field, for example. Everywhere further we will consider

  • nly the synchrotron radiation from

electrons generated in the bending magnets.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

~ 1/ (5 GeV electrons -> 10-4 )

Because of the relativistic effect, the synchrotron radiation is emitted in a narrow cone in the forward direction, at a tangent to the orbit

slide-29
SLIDE 29

~ 1/ (5 GeV electrons -> 10-4 ) 2 cm ? ~ 100 m !

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Synchrotron radiation

  • highly polarized (E and E )
  • has a wide energy spectrum (from infrared to -rays)
  • extremely intense and highly collimated
slide-31
SLIDE 31

A typical energy spectrum of synchrotron radiation The critical wavelength ’ (or c) divides the radiated power into two equal parts: one-half of the power is radiated above this wavelength and one-half below.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

c =

4 3 3 The critical wavelength [A. Hofmann] Example: 5 GeV electrons, = 40 m

c = 0.16 nm

slide-33
SLIDE 33

At low frequencies the properties of synchrotron radiation are independent of the particle energy and depend only

  • n the radius
  • f the curvature.

The rms opening angle for >>

c

  • rms = 0.41 ( / )1/3
  • rms = 0.55 ( / )1/3

Example: = 630 nm, = 40 m

  • rms = 10-3
slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • rms = 10-3

2 cm ? ~ 10 m

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Synchrotron Radiation Beam Diagnostics

slide-36
SLIDE 36

e¯ detector lens

Imaging of the beam cross section with synchrotron radiation - SLM

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The natural opening angle of the emitted light sets a limit to the resolution of the SLM

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The diffraction limited resolution of synchrotron light imaging systems in the visible part of the spectrum [A.Hofmann]:

S ≈ 0.3 (λ2ρ)1/3

Example: λ = 630 nm, ρ = 40 m

S ≈ 0.1 mm

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Can we build a synchrotron light interferometer and use its data to measure smaller beam sizes ?

slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • T. Mitsuhashi, Photon Factory, KEK, Japan
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Problems

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Synchrotron radiation is like a moving narrow searchlight in horizontal direction.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

We observe photons coming from different positions when the electron moves from point A to point B. We must sum these photons.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

A B S1 S2 When an electron is moving from point A to point B, the light is sweeping from slit S1 to slit S2.

  • The intensities of two modes of light illuminating

the slits are different.

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • T. Mitsuhashi has modified the van Cittert-Zernike

theorem and developed the method to calculate the beam size on the basis of the interference picture for the synchrotron light emitted by the beam. “Beam Profile and Size Measurement by the Use

  • f the Synchrotron Light Interferometer”
slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • OK. Now we build our interferometer.
slide-47
SLIDE 47

S Synchrotron Light Source Lens CCD

R L Synchrotron Radiation Interferometer

Image

Double slit assembly D a

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Problems

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Two polarized components

  • f the synchrotron light

(p and s) are “in anti-phase”. Their superposition will not give us the interference fringes at all.

  • > We get just a sort of a “SLM”.
slide-50
SLIDE 50

The synchrotron light is not monochromatic. range is the whole visible spectrum !

slide-51
SLIDE 51

S Synchrotron Light Source Lens CCD

R L

Synchrotron Radiation Interferometer

Image

Double slit assembly Polarization filter Band pass filter ( 0 ± )

slide-52
SLIDE 52
slide-53
SLIDE 53

Beam Size Calculation

slide-54
SLIDE 54

In case of a gaussian beam shape it is easy: sin( )]

2

[ 1 + V cos(kDy/L + ) ] I0[ = kay/2L I(y) = V = exp(- 2 2 D2

2 beam 2 R2

) =

V(D) ( ) = I( ) exp{ -i 2 } d

( ) (0) =

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Methods to calculate the beam size

slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • 1. We measure (experimentally) the contrast of the interferogram

as a function of the slit separation D. Then we define the RMS

  • f the visibility curve

V . beam =

R 2

V

D V ..

. . ...

V

slide-57
SLIDE 57
  • 2. We can also measure the RMS beam size from one data of

visibility which is measured at a fixed separation of a double slit assembly

beam =

R D √ 0.5 ln(1/V)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

V = 0.8

S = 0.12 mm

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Synchrotron Light Interferometer at Jefferson Lab Main Components

slide-60
SLIDE 60

S Synchrotron Light Source Lens CCD

R L

Synchrotron Radiation Interferometer at Jefferson Lab

Synchrotron Light Interference Picture

Double slit assembly Polarization filter Band pass filter ( 0 ± )

R = 9.18 m L = 1.12 m 0 = 630 nm = 40 m

slide-61
SLIDE 61

1C12

slide-62
SLIDE 62
slide-63
SLIDE 63
slide-64
SLIDE 64
slide-65
SLIDE 65
slide-66
SLIDE 66
slide-67
SLIDE 67

Resolution of our synchrotron light interferometer

slide-68
SLIDE 68
slide-69
SLIDE 69
slide-70
SLIDE 70
slide-71
SLIDE 71
slide-72
SLIDE 72

Our Synchrotron Light Interferometer Main Control Components

slide-73
SLIDE 73
slide-74
SLIDE 74
slide-75
SLIDE 75

Common Serial Driver Multiplexed Maxvideo Library Stepper-motor Control Software Video Camera Control Software EPICS Distributed Database Control Software Structure

slide-76
SLIDE 76
slide-77
SLIDE 77
slide-78
SLIDE 78
slide-79
SLIDE 79

Very First Experimental Results

slide-80
SLIDE 80

(exposure time = 2 sec)

slide-81
SLIDE 81

V = 0.8

S = 0.12 mm

slide-82
SLIDE 82

SLI Data After 2002 Summer Shutdown

slide-83
SLIDE 83

(exposure time = 50 sec)

slide-84
SLIDE 84
slide-85
SLIDE 85
slide-86
SLIDE 86

(exposure time = 10 sec)

slide-87
SLIDE 87
slide-88
SLIDE 88
slide-89
SLIDE 89

Recent Data

slide-90
SLIDE 90

(exposure time = 15 sec)

slide-91
SLIDE 91
slide-92
SLIDE 92
slide-93
SLIDE 93
slide-94
SLIDE 94

Very Last Data

slide-95
SLIDE 95
slide-96
SLIDE 96
slide-97
SLIDE 97
slide-98
SLIDE 98
slide-99
SLIDE 99
slide-100
SLIDE 100
slide-101
SLIDE 101

Summary

  • Jefferson Lab has a modern beam diagnostic device

based on non-invasive technology

  • Jefferson Lab has a great experience in design and

installation of such a device

  • The resolution of this device can be made less than 10 m
  • The device’s operational current range:

a few microamps –> milliamps

slide-102
SLIDE 102

SLI team:

  • P. Chevtsov, J.-C. Denard, R. Hicks, K. Capek, D. Hardy,
  • D. Wetherholt, Z. Kurzun

Many thanks to:

  • S. Suhring, M. Spata, O. Garza, all accelerator operators and

technicians. Special thanks to:

  • M. Tiefenback, G. Krafft, H. Areti, L. Merminga, J. Benesch,
  • A. Bogacz, A. Freyberger, Y. Derbenev, A. Hutton, K. White.
slide-103
SLIDE 103

E N D