Sustainable management of livestock waste for the removal/recovery of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sustainable management of livestock waste for the removal/recovery of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sustainable management of livestock waste for the removal/recovery of nutrients LIVEWASTE CYPRUS 2016: 4th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management Outline General information about the project Project objectives
Outline
- General information about the project
- Project objectives
- Project Actions
‐ Preparatory Actions ‐ Design of the integrated LIVEWASTE prototype ‐ Construction, installation and operation of the prototype system ‐ Performance of the prototype system ‐ Environmental assessment of proposed methodology ‐ Socioeconomic assessment of proposed methodology
- Project outputs
- Partner projects
Budget Ge ne r al Pr
- je c t Infor
mation
Total amount: 2,147,182 Euro % EC Co‐funding: 50%
Partners
Coordinating Beneficiary: Cyprus University of Technology
Duration
Start: 01/09/2013 ‐ End: 31/08/2016 Associated Beneficiary(ies): Animalia Genetics Ltd; Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources & Environment; National Technical University of Athens; University of Verona; University of Santiago de Compostela
Pr
- je c t L
- c ation
LP Premises
(Limassol‐Cyprus)
Pilot Unit
LIVEWASTE aims to:
- Develop and demonstrate an innovative system livestock waste treatment,
where livestock waste becomes a source
- f
energy, nutrients are removed/recovered from liquid part of digestate, compost is produced from the solid part of digestate and reusable treated effluent is delivered.
- Develop the baseline scenario on the existing livestock waste management in
Cyprus and in Europe
- Provide guidelines for the wider application of the integrated system
- Disseminate a strategic plan on sustainable decentralized livestock waste
management in line with the EU and National legislations
Pr
- je c t Obje c tive s
The project is consisted of five (5) action categories
- A. Preparatory actions
- B. Implementation actions
- C. Monitoring of the impact of the project actions
- D. Communication and dissemination actions
- E. Project management and monitoring of the project progress
Pr
- je c t Ac tions
Pr e par ator y Ac tions
Assessment of existing situation regarding the production and management of livestock waste in Cyprus and in the EU
Sub‐Activities: ‐ Sub‐Activity A1.1: Data collection concerning the existing situation of livestock waste production and management in Cyprus. ‐ Sub‐Activity A1.2: Critical evaluation of success stories and relevant legislative framework regarding livestock waste management in the EU.
Pr e par ator y Ac tions
Assessment of existing situation regarding the production and management of livestock waste in Cyprus and in the EU
Pr e par ator y Ac tions
Assessment of existing situation regarding the production and management of livestock waste in Cyprus and in the EU
Completed Deliverables:
- Report
- n
the production and management of livestock waste in Cyprus
- Report on success stories dealing
with the management of livestock waste in EU
- Report on the impact of legislative
framework on the management of livestock waste
Pr e par ator y Ac tions
Preliminary design of the prototype system for the treatment of livestock waste
Main Activities / Results ‐ Define the most significant aspects and characteristics of the pilot unit ‐ Ensure the use of environmentally friendly construction materials ‐ Foresee the application of methods, techniques and tools that minimize energy consumption ‐ Collect and analyze samples of livestock waste from the source
Pr e par ator y Ac tions
Preliminary design of the prototype system for the treatment of livestock waste
Completed Deliverables:
- Preliminary
drawings
- f
main components (basic drawings)
- Report on the preliminary design
(including calculations)
- f
the prototype, integrated system for the treatment of livestock waste)
- Report with the preliminary results
from the laboratory analyses
Pr e par ator y Ac tions
Preliminary design of the prototype system for the treatment of livestock waste
Pr e par ator y Ac tions
Preliminary design of the prototype system for the treatment of livestock waste
Basic Drawings of the Prototype
Final design of the integrated prototype system for the treatment
- f livestock waste.
Main Outputs: Detailed drawings of: ‐ the anaerobic digester ‐ the composting unit ‐ the odour abatement system ‐ the SBR and the struvite crystallization unit ‐ the integrated prototype system
F inal Pr
- totype De sign
F inal Pr
- totype De sign: 3D De signs
F inal Pr
- totype De sign: PID
Pr
- totype Constr
uc tion
Construction and testing
- f
the prototype components – Installation and start – up of the integrated, prototype system for livestock waste treatment
Main Outputs: ‐ Construction and testing of the various components of the integrated, prototype system; ‐ Assembling, installation and start‐up of the integrated system treating livestock waste.
T he L IVE WAST E Pr
- totype
T he L IVE WAST E Pr
- totype
Overall System’s Performance
1 2 3 4 5 6 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
9 23 30 51 65 100 114 128 142 157 Biogas (m3 day‐1) COD (mg∙L‐1) Time (d) Total COD fed Total COD outlet Biogas production estimation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Solids Total Nitrogen Total Phosporus 92% 89% 89 %
Kg day‐1 Feeding Outlet
System performance:
The anaerobic digestion process removes more than 75% of Total COD. The biogas production is estimated in 1.6 m3
biogas per day.
Dewatering unit and ceramic membrane retain 92% of Total Solids. SBR is estimated to remove 89 % of N & P.
T he L IVE WAST E Pr
- totype
Overall System’s Performance: Compost Analysis
Water content: 45.7% Density: 645 g/l Water retention: 249 % C/N ratio: 18.0 Organic content: 86.0% Ash: 14.2% Total carbon: 49.8% Total Nitrogen: 2.8% (dry base) Nitrates‐N: less than 20% of TN Nitrites‐N: 0 mg/kg Sulfates: 0 mg/kg Total Phosphorous: 1780 mg/kg (dry base) pH: 7.8 Conductivity: 2200 mS/cm Maturity index: >50%
T he L IVE WAST E Pr
- totype : Monitor
ing
E nvir
- nme ntal Asse ssme nt
Evaluation of the environmental impacts resulting from livestock waste management in Cyprus before and after the project’s implementation
Climate change (CC), Ozone depletion (OD), Terrestrial acidification (TA), Freshwater eutrophication (FE), Marine eutrophication (ME), Photochemical oxidant formation (POF), Fossil depletion (FD) and Malodours air (MA).
‐100% ‐75% ‐50% ‐25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
CC OD TA FE ME POF FD MA
Relative contributions
Biomethane use Biogas upgrading Effluent reuse Compost application Chemicals consumption Electricity consumption Avoided natural gas use Avoided peat use Avoided mineral fertilization Avoided tap water Others
Environmental benefits from the production of valuable products are evaluated Main contributors to environmental impact (hotspots)
0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25 0,3 0,35 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5
Normalization results
E nvir
- nme ntal Asse ssme nt
L IVE WAST E
Soc ioe c onomic Asse ssme nt
Evaluation of the socioeconomic impacts resulting from livestock waste management in Cyprus before and after the project’s implementation
Soc ioe c onomic Asse ssme nt
Evaluation of the socioeconomic impacts resulting from livestock waste management in Cyprus before and after the project’s implementation
- Misunderstanding about risk perception: Erroneous risk perception is usually linked to NIMBY
syndrome
- People tend to overestimate risk regarding livestock operation
- Incomplete information: National/local administration needs to stress that any type of
livestock waste treatment system leads to better health condition or a minor environmental impact
- The main problem related to livestock operations is odor emission: Maximum effort has to
be addressed from R&D in the field of livestock waste management sector to reduce this problem
- Underestimation of socioeconomic impact of livestock waste management sector: Modern
livestock waste management systems could increase significantly the percentage of green energy and contribute to create new markets (e.g. fertilizer) that could help to stimulate economy
Policies Tackled:
- LIFE LIVE‐WASTE promotes the implementation of the Nitrates Directive (91/ 676/CEE)
and the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).
- The project provides an integrated, effective solution to the problem of biowaste
treatment, thus enhancing sustainable waste treatment practices and reducing non‐ sustainable ones, such as landfill disposal of livestock waste. This is in‐line with the targets of the Landfill Directive (1999/31/EC) for reducing the amount of organic waste disposed to landfills and of the Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC) for enhancing materials/energy recovery from waste.
- Furthermore, the eco‐design character of the prototype system and the resulting
energy recovery from waste will aid the implementation of the energy end‐use efficiency and energy services Directive (2006/32/EC).
- Finally, the project is in‐line with the concept of green growth, and the Kyoto Protocol
commitments, contributing to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the mitigation of climate change.
Pr
- je c t Obje c tive s
Disse mination
Website ‐ Social media
Facebook and Twitter Accounts
www.livewaste.org
Disse mination
Informative material ‐ Publications in press
Disse mination
Journal Publications
- L. Lijó, S. González‐García, J. Bacenetti, M. Fiala, G. Feijoo, J.M. Lema and M.T. Moreira (2014): Life Cycle
Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co‐digestion of pig slurry and energy
- crops. Renewable Energy 68: 625‐635
- L. Lijó, S. González‐García, J. Bacenetti, M. Fiala, G. Feijoo and M.T. Moreira (2014): Assuring the
sustainable production of biogas from anaerobic mono‐digestion. Journal of Cleaner Production. Doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.022
- L. Lijó, S. González‐García, J. Bacenetti, M. Negri, M. Fiala G. Feijoo and M.T. Moreira (2015). Environmental
assessment of farm‐scaled anaerobic codigestion for bioenergy production. Waste Management 41: 50‐59
- Barcón T., Hernández J., Gómez‐Cuervo S., Garrido J.M., Omil F. (2015)“Characterisation and biological
abatement of diffuse methane emissions and odour in an innovative wastewater treatment plant” Environmental Technology, 36 (13‐16) 2105‐2114.
- Hernández J., Gómez‐Cuervo S., Omil F. (2015). “EPS and SMP as stability indicators during the biofiltration
- f diffuse methane emissions” Water and Air Soil Pollution, 226 (10) 343.
- Gómez‐Cuervo S., Hernández J., Omil F. (2015)“Identifying the limitations of conventional biofiltration of
diffuse methane emissions at long‐term operation” Environmental Technology (in press)
Disse mination
Conference Publications – Seminars
1. Short Oral and Platform communications in ecoSTP 2014 Conference in June of 2014 in Verona (Italy). 2. Seminar: “Seminario técnico dirigido a empresas y centros tecnológicos Tecnologías Avanzadas para el Tratamiento y Valorización de Aguas Residuales”, Santiago de Compostela, 18‐20 June 2014 (Spain). 3. Keynote communication in 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management Athens, 12‐13 June 2014 (Greece). 4. Poster presentation at Open Week UNIVR, Student’s Day – Campus del talent, 9 July, Verona (Italy). 5. Poster presentation at VenetoNight: la notte europea dei ricercatori a Padova, Venezia e Verona. Friday 26 September 2014 (Italy). 6. Oral presentation at the Final LIFE‐DAIRIUS conference, June 24, 2015, Limassol (Cyprus). 7. Keynote communication in Biogas Science 2014 – Vienna, Austria – 26‐30 October 2014 8. Poster presentation at Biogas Science 2014 – Vienna, Austria – 26‐30 October 2 9. Oral presentation at Balkan Young Water Professionals 2015 – Thessaloniki, Greece – 10‐12 May 2015
- 10. Oral presentation at World Water Congress 2015 – Edinburgh, Scotland – 25‐29 May 2015
- 11. 5 Oral presentations at International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management 2015
- 12. Poster presentation at SETAC Meeting, Barcelona (Spain) – 3‐7 May 2015
- 13. Poster presentation at Life Cycle Management 2015 – Bourdeaux – 30 August – 2 September 2015
- 14. Oral presentation at International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology. 3‐5 September 2015.
Rhodes (Greece)
Par tne r Pr
- je c ts