Sustainability Myths By Richard Stratton Setting the Scene One - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sustainability myths
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sustainability Myths By Richard Stratton Setting the Scene One - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainability Myths By Richard Stratton Setting the Scene One Planet Company We try to practice what we preach Worlds first consultancy to be formally endorsed as a One Planet Company by sustainability charity BioRegional


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sustainability Myths

By Richard Stratton

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Setting the Scene

slide-3
SLIDE 3

One Planet Company

We try to practice what we preach

  • World’s first consultancy

to be formally endorsed as a One Planet Company by sustainability charity BioRegional

  • Applied the 10

One Planet Principles to guide our commitment, actions and services

  • Cundall Sustainability

Roadmap available on www.cundall.com

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Climate Change not Sustainability

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What’s really warming the world

Skeptics of manmade climate change offer various natural causes to explain why the Earth has warmed 1.4 degC since 1880. Can these account for the planet’s rising temperature?

Observed KEY Observed

This line shows the measured, or “observed,” land-ocean temperature

Source File : Bloomberg Business http://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2015-whats-warming-the-world/

based on findings from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Is it the Earth’s orbit?

Observed Orbital Changes KEY Observed Orbital Changes

The Earth wobbles on its axis, and its tilt orbit change over many thousands of years, pushing the climate into and out of ice ages. Influence of orbital changes has been negligible

95% Confidence

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Is it the sun?

Observed Solar KEY Observed Solar 95% Confidence

The sun’s temperature varies over decades and centuries. Sun’s change has had negligible effect.

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Is it volcanoes?

Human industry emits about 100 times more CO2 than volcanic activity, and eruptions release sulfate chemicals that can actually cool the atmosphere for a year or two.

Observed Volcanic KEY Observed Volcanic 95% Confidence

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Observed

Is it all three of these things combined?

Adding the natural factors together doesn’t add up.

Orbital Changes Volcanic Solar KEY Observed Orbital Changes Solar Volcanic Natural Factors 95% Confidence Natural Factors

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-10
SLIDE 10

So if it’s not nature, is it deforestation?

KEY Observed Land Use . 95% Confidence Observed Land Use

Humans have cut, plowed, and paved more than half the Earth’s land surface. Dark forests are yielding to lighter patches, which reflect more sunlight - and have a slight cooling effect.

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Or ozone pollution?

Natural ozone blocks harmful sunlight and cools slightly. Closer to Earth, pollution related ozone makes the climate a little hotter – but not much.

Observed KEY Observed Ozone 95% Confidence Ozone

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Or aerosol pollution?

Some pollutants cool the atmosphere, like sulfate aerosols from coal-burning. Offsets some of the warming – but causes acid rain

KEY Observed Aerosols 95% Confidence Aerosols Observed

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-13
SLIDE 13

No, it really is greenhouse gases

Observed

Atmospheric CO2 levels are 40% higher than they were in 1750.

KEY Observed Greenhouse Gases 95% Confidence Greenhouse gases

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-14
SLIDE 14

See for yourself

Together HUMAN FACTORS match the observed temperature change - particularly since 1950.

KEY Observed Land Use Ozone Aerosols Greenhouse Gases 95% Confidence Human factors Land Use Ozone Aerosols Greenhouse gases Observed Human Factors

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Compare and contrast

Combining natural and human causes of climate change demonstrates the dominance of greenhouse gases What are we going to do about it?

NATURAL FACTORS HUMAN FACTORS Volcanic Solar Orbital Changes Greenhouse gases Aerosols Ozone Land Use Observed All Factors 95% Confidence

Source File : Bloomberg Business

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Everything is okay – doesn't look like it

– Plan A because there is no Plan B (M&S) – ..cut CO2 by 20%, 30% etc… (of what???) – 20% Renewable Energy (of what???)

  • Is any of this enough – does anyone really know?

Industry perception

Myanmar July 2015

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Energy = no. of people x expectations consumption efficiency CO2 = energy x type of fuel

Energy & Carbon – buildings & globally

Sources: UN, The Economist

+33% against 2015 +53% against 2015

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The News

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The News

slide-20
SLIDE 20

IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

The IPCC is a scientific body under the auspices of the United Nations Currently 195 countries are members of the IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Rising Sea Levels

The rate at which the global oceans have risen in the past two decades is more significant than previously recognised, say US- based scientist. 200mm rise

Hurricane Sandy

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Increasing CO2 in the atmosphere

261 years 2100 Gt CO2 = average 8Gt per annum Last 41 years 1100 Gt CO2 = average 27Gt per annum Currently at 30 to 35 Gt per annum

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Rate of Increase CO2 in the atmosphere

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Total Carbon Budget in the atmosphere

New Budget Limit to avoid >2degC rise 820 Gt CO2 by 2011 already emitted 515Gt CO2 At current rates Budget Limit will be reached by 2021

Where we need to be Where we are heading

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Droughts & Floods

  • Food shortages
  • Rising prices
  • Reducing income
  • Population dislocation

& migration

  • Competition for

resources

  • Conflict

Dried up irrigation gully Current flooding in Gaza

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Meeting the rising energy demand

OECD/IEA World Energy Outlook 2011

Fossil Fuels

81% in 2000 75% in 2030

Renewables

13% in 2000 18% in 2030

17 12.6

34%

We are simply adding energy sources not displacing any

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Oil

valuable natural resource

Preservation of reserves

provide economic sustainability for future generations

Minimise local demand

through a combination of energy efficient design and use of renewable energy strategies

Meeting the rising energy demand

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Example

A development of the scale of King Abdullah City Considering 20% energy reduction and 10% renewable energy could save 34 million barrels of oil per year (0.8% of annual production) Prolongation of oil reserves for future generations Full market value available on preserved

  • il reserves.

Meeting the rising energy demand

slide-29
SLIDE 29

What about the trees?

Realistically? …

A Maple in 25 yrs absorbs 1/3 of a tonne of CO2 (0.013 T/annum) A Pine in 25 yrs absorbs 1.7 tonnes of CO2 (0.068 T/annum)

To offset current annual global CO2 emissions need 5,100,000,000,000 Pine Trees or 40,000,000 km2

(approx. 4 x China)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Will Renewables reverse this

Great, but can't be replicated and unpredictable

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Graphene

  • Photovoltaic Panels
  • Currently – 17% output
  • In the future?
  • The problem is time

…the new wonder material? … Discovered in the University of Manchester

slide-32
SLIDE 32

COP 21 - Dec 2015 Paris

December 2015, the world will gather in Paris to secure a legally binding, global climate change agreement with emission reduction commitments from all countries for the first time ever. The fall in the price of oil removes one big incentive for the developed world to invest in renewables and greater energy efficiency. Lima summit 2014

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Tonnes per capita 2015

US 17 Aus 16.7 China 6.7 HK 5.7 Singapore 4.3 Libya 6.4 Qatar 43.9 UAE 20.1 UK 8.3 Spain 7.1 Poland 8.3 Romania 3.9

Source – The World Bank

slide-34
SLIDE 34

40 year Challenge

What can I do (at home)? What can I do (at work) What can we (Cundall) do?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The Challenge

http://calculator.bioregional.com/step01.php

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Change behaviour…

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Visualise the Alternative

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Running cars on biofuels

Source: David MacKay, Without Hot Air

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Running cars on biofuels

Source: David MacKay, Without Hot Air

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Biofuel in buildings v vehicles

10 litres of recycled cooking oil CHP Truck

23kgCO2e CO2e saving 27kgCO2e 45% Extra fuel cost 0% Lots Capital cost Zero

Biofuel works better in transport Why waste it in buildings?

CHP in building connected to grid electricity and natural gas CHP efficiency Heat to power output ratio = 1.5 Efficiency = 75% No heat rejected Emission factors (kgCO2e/kWh) Recycled oil = 0.06 Diesel = 0.32 Grid electricity = 0.6 Natural gas = 0.2 Fuel Costs Biofuel & diesel = 70 p/litre (1 litre of fuel = 10 kWh)` Grid electricity = 10 p/kWh Nat gas =3.5 p/kWh

slide-42
SLIDE 42

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

Natural gas Diesel / petrol Biofuel Recycled cooking oil

kgCO2e / kWh

Not all biofuels are low carbon

Source: “Carbon and Sustainability Reporting Within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation: Technical Guidance Part Two - Carbon Reporting – Default Values and Fuel Chains” version 2.1 published in July 2010 by UK Renewable Fuel Agency.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

67% 9% 24%

Operating Embodied Transport

Operating: 150kgCO2e/m2/year Embodied (initial): 700kgCO2e/m2 Embodied (in-use): 550kgCO2e/m2 Commuting: 800kgCO2e/person/year 60 year period No energy supply decarbonisation included

Typical London air con office

Source: What Colour Is Your Building, David Clark, RIBA Publishing 2013

slide-44
SLIDE 44

14% 15% 71%

Operating: 20kgCO2e/m2/year Embodied (initial): 700kgCO2e/m2 Embodied (in-use): 550kgCO2e/m2 Commuting: 1500kgCO2e/person/year 60 year period No energy supply decarbonisation included

Nearly zero energy office – UK rural

Source: What Colour Is Your Building, David Clark, RIBA Publishing 201300

Operating Embodied Transport

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Operating: 185kgCO2e/m2/year Embodied (initial): 950kgCO2e/m2 Embodied (in-use): 675kgCO2e/m2 Commuting: 1,875kgCO2e/person/year 60 year period No energy supply decarbonisation included

Typical UAE air con office

Embodied (initial): Embodied (in

54% 8% 38%

Operating Embodied Transport

slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Water

Do we use too much? Do we have too little? Do we know how much we use?

1 2 3

slide-48
SLIDE 48

How much?

  • 200 years ago a bath a year
  • 30 years ago a bath a week
  • 2015 – 3 showers per day
  • What is the correct level of cleanliness

– too much washing = eczema

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Consumption is cheap 5 minute shower 50l < AED 1.0 Bath 180l = AED 2.0 Washing Teeth = 15 Fils Washing Machine < AED 2.0

But – desalination has a carbon penalty

  • New technology – 1.5 – 3 kg CO2 per m3
  • Old technology – 1.5 – 3 kg CO2 per m3

Consumption costs in Dubai almost the same as the UK

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Water scarcity in 2025 “There are only 2 to 5 days emergency water reserves for domestic use in the UAE and regions”

Gulfnews 21 September 2007 – study by Dr Mohammad Dawoud Manager, Water Resources Department Abu Dhabi Environment Agency

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Water sources

slide-52
SLIDE 52

100 200 300 400 500 600

Litres per person per day l/c/d

International Water Consumption 2007

Water use per capita

Future Benchmark??

65% Reduction

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Water use by sector – UAE

Residential 59% Government 11% Commercial 25% Industrial 5% Dubai Water Consumption 2006

Total=64,926 MIG

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Where is water used - commercial

Source: Water Efficiency in Offices, Australian Government

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Where is water used - residential

40% to 50% could be low grade non-potable 20% to 40% could be high grade non-potable

slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • Project water cycle analysis required. The system must be
  • balanced. Set design rules

Avoiding use of water (water demand)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Potable Water Cleaning/Maintenance AC Cooling Water Feature Makeup Swimming Pool Evap/Makeup Swimming Pool Backwash Irrigation

  • 200000

200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000 Litres/Day

Pot abl e W at er Cl eani ng/ M ai nt enanc e AC Cool i ng W at er Feat ur e M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Ev ap/ M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Bac k was h I r i gat i
  • n

Base Daily Water Demand

Waste Foul Water Use

Potable Water Cleaning/Maintenance AC Cooling Water Feature Makeup Swimming Pool Evap/Makeup Swimming Pool Backwash Irrigation

  • 50000

50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 m3/Year

Pot abl e W at er Cl eani ng/ M ai nt enanc e AC Cool i ng W at er Feat ur e M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Ev ap/ M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Bac k was h I r i gat i
  • n

Base Annual Water Demand

Waste Foul Water Use

Avoiding use of water (water demand)

  • Why??

Water Balance – Base Demand Luxury Residential with Lush Landscaping

Available waste water equates to only 12% of demand Available waste water equates to only 17% of demand

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Potable Water Cleaning/Maintenance AC Cooling Water Feature Makeup Swimming Pool Evap/Makeup Swimming Pool Backwash Irrigation

  • 200000
  • 100000

100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 Litres/Day

Pot abl e W at er Cl eani ng/ M ai nt enanc e AC Cool i ng W at er Feat ur e M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Ev ap/ M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Bac k was h I r r i gat i
  • n

Enhanced Daily Water Demand

Waste Foul Water Use

Potable Water Cleaning/Maintenance AC Cooling Water Feature Makeup Swimming Pool Evap/Makeup Swimming Pool Backwash Irrigation

  • 60000
  • 40000
  • 20000

20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 m3/Year

Pot abl e W at er Cl eani ng/ M ai nt enanc e AC Cool i ng W at er Feat ur e M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Ev ap/ M ak eup Swi m m i ng Pool Bac k was h I r i gat i
  • n

Enhanced Annual Water Demand

Waste Foul Water Use

Avoiding use of water (water demand)

  • Why??

Available waste water equates to only 21% of demand Available waste water equates to only 28% of demand

Water Balance – Enhanced Efficiency Residential with Lush Landscaping

slide-59
SLIDE 59
slide-60
SLIDE 60

Better U-Values?

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Carbon Content of an email

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Best Orientation?

330°

000/000/012/001/007

Incident wind velocity [m/s] 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 <10.0

000/000/023/001/007 000/000/021/001/007 000/000/022/001/007 000/000/020/001/007 000/000/015/001/007 000/000/014/001/007 000/000/016/001/007 000/000/013/001/007 000/000/019/001/007 000/000/018/001/007 000/000/017/001/007

000° 030° 090° 060° 300° 120° 180° 150° 210° 270° 240°

N

slide-63
SLIDE 63

External Shading- Horizontal or Vertical

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Orientation External Shading- Horizontal or Vertical

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Plants not Plant

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Photosynthesis

Known symbiotic relationship

slide-67
SLIDE 67

VOC removal Break down VOC into CO2 and H2O Microbes in soil

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Innovation- Plants and Air Quality

slide-69
SLIDE 69

The Experiment

David Brownstein

slide-70
SLIDE 70

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 Typical Office Living Wall kgCO2/m2

Annual CO2 Emission Rates

Internal Lighting Fans Pumps Heat rejection fans Condenser pumps Cooling - Air Cooling - Space Heating DHW

Implication of Living Wall

7.3% reduction in CO2

  • 10% less ventilation air / less cooling
  • 30% reduction in fan energy
slide-71
SLIDE 71

Conclusion- VOC

  • Removal is by microbes in the roots
  • Potted plants have poor exposure of the soil.
slide-72
SLIDE 72

Living Wall Biofilter

How do they perform?

The biowall can supply 100l/m2/sec? Equates to air for 10 people

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Application- Winter Garden = Plant Room

External Air PM10 PM 2.5 VOC & CO2 180m2 of Living Wall for South Building

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Hydroponic Wall

  • Improved Air Quality
  • Added Biodiversity
  • Passive Free Cooling
slide-75
SLIDE 75

Living Wall

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Daylight Factors Fixed overcast sky i.e. ignores the sun 2% minimum daylight factor Daylighting

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Climate Based Daylight Modelling (CBDM) An hourly calculation considering the sun and cloud Set minimum and maximum Daylighting

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Climate Based Daylight Modelling Two new metrics:

  • 1. Useful Daylight Index (UDI) - 80%
  • f the occupied hours, between

100-3000 lux.

  • 2. Daylight Autonomy (DA) –

typically 150 Lux for 50% of the space for the occupied hours.

Daylighting

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Key Features Light redirection

Daylighting

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Key Features Higher Ceilings Windows up to soffit

Daylighting

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Is energy too cheap to drive change?

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Is energy too cheap to drive change?

60% 64% 13% 19% 15% 10% 10% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% UK London Rent Rates Service Charge Energy Consumption Utilities / Standing Charges

Source: What Colour Is Your Building, David Clark, RIBA Publishing 2013

Energy costs 5 to 10% of office occupancy cost

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Tenants just aren’t interested in energy

“Between 2001 and 2011 not one prospective tenant enquired about the energy performance of a building before signing a lease, and only a handful asked about energy after the lease was signed.”

Head of lettings, de-brief pending his retirement from a major quoted property company (>1 million m2)

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Biggest cost is people

Source: What Colour Is Your Building, David Clark, RIBA Publishing 2013

£0 £1,000 £2,000 £3,000 £4,000 £5,000 £6,000

Employee Costs Rent Rates Service Charge Energy Consumption Utilities / Standing Charges

Annual cost per m2 of NLA Assumptions Average salary = £43,000 Employment cost (training, etc) = 30% Occupancy Density = 1 per 10m2 of NLA 7% 0.6% 2% 1% 89% < 0.5%

CUNDALL Dubai – Energy 0.53% CUNDALL Doha – Energy 0.58%

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Based on A/C only – no mixed mode (C rating with) H 176-200 I

201-225

J

226-250

K 251-275

269

Computer Model

C/D

Actual Energy

G ++

Considering Real Energy Consumption

slide-86
SLIDE 86

EPC v actual consumption

EPC Ratings Actual energy consumption

No correlation between EPC (design) and measured energy consumption (reality)

Source: A Tale of Two Buildings, JLL / BBP, 2012

slide-87
SLIDE 87

19.8% 17% 4.2% 10.6% 5 10 15 20 25 TAS IES IES SBEM ISBEM

TAS IES IES SBEM ISBEM

Energy Modelling

Approved Software comparison

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Energy Modelling

81% Refurb / Cat A fitout every 15 years, excludes Cat B fitout 77% Need to consider Actual energy not modelled energy – i.e. LEED could be 50% lower

slide-89
SLIDE 89

5,515m2 Campus Service Centre Constructed for <AED 4,000/m2 Solar Hot Water Heating - 5 Years payback Mini District Cooling System - 6 Years payback Sun Pipes - 10 Years payback Building Energy Performance ≈190kWh/m2/annum UK ECON 19 347 kWh/m2/annum 195kWh/m2/annum EGBC Green Building of Year 2015

30% Savings 30% Savings

5,515m2 Campus Service Centre Solar Hot Water Heating

American University of Sharjah

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Can I harness the power

  • f my dancing?
slide-91
SLIDE 91

Dancing energy

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Don’t get distracted by gimmicks

London Olympic games trial

  • ne million people

generated “72 million joules of energy” This equates to 20 kWh saving £2 in electricity

8.5 Ws per footfall

Example 1,000 people x 260 days = 0.61 kWh per year. 6p per year cost saving One 50W halogen lamp for 12 hours / year

Do the maths!

slide-93
SLIDE 93
slide-94
SLIDE 94

Local and Sustainable Food

Food Supplies

  • Over 7 billion people
  • 200 thousand born every day
  • Millions starve vs increasing
  • besity & diabetes.
slide-95
SLIDE 95

Local and Sustainable Food

27% attributed to food

Carbon Footprint

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Cheese v Chicken?

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Food Carbon Footprint Comparison

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Myth

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Fact

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Low carbon Hoofprint

Innovation required 30% reduction in carbon emission as a result of modified feed.

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Food seasonality and low carbon diet thoughts

SEASON OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES F R U I T WINTER SPRING SUMMER AUTUMN Dec. Jan. Feb. March Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Apples Apples (Bramley) Apples (cox) Rhubarb Blackcurrants Cherries Damson Pears Plums Quince Strawberries Raspberries Blackberries

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Food seasonality and low carbon diet thoughts

SEASON OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES V E G E T A B L E S WINTER SPRING SUMMER AUTUMN Dec. Jan. Feb. March Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Cabbage Asparagus Beetroot Brussels Sprouts Broccoli Carrots Cauliflower Celery Celeriac Leeks Marrow Potatoes (Maincrop) Lettuce Parsnip Peas Runner Beans Swede Sweetcorn

slide-103
SLIDE 103
slide-104
SLIDE 104

To Bee or not to bee

slide-105
SLIDE 105

To Bee or not to bee

Honey Eater Hoverfly Ant Butterflies Moths Beetles

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Effective Land Use

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Effective Land Use

Organic farming uses 20-25% more land for the same

  • utput as Conventional methods with no proven health
  • benefits. Could that land be better used?
slide-108
SLIDE 108

Effective Land Use

slide-109
SLIDE 109

Summary

slide-110
SLIDE 110

How many planets are you?

I am 3.6 Planets

Richard Stratton

slide-111
SLIDE 111

One Planet Living

What can I do? What can we do? We need a sense of urgency