Surface Remediation Overview and Key Concerns Surface Remediation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

surface remediation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Surface Remediation Overview and Key Concerns Surface Remediation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Surface Remediation Overview and Key Concerns Surface Remediation Primary components Baker Creek Tailings and sludge ponds Pits Contaminated soil Buildings and roadways Others Site Overview Site Overview Site


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Surface Remediation

Overview and Key Concerns

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Surface Remediation

  • Primary components

– Baker Creek – Tailings and sludge ponds – Pits – Contaminated soil – Buildings and roadways – Others

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Site Overview

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Site Overview

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Site Overview

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Site Overview

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Site Boundary

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Baker Creek

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Baker Creek

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Baker Creek

  • Baker Creek flows through the site

– Enters above Baker Pond and exits into Back Bay

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Baker Creek

  • Both “natural” and “constructed” reaches
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Baker Creek

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Baker Creek

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Baker Creek

  • Reach 4 flowed over arsenic stopes

– Relocated and stabilized in 2006

4

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Baker Creek

  • Problem sections of Baker Creek in flood

– Narrow diversions above C1 pit and A2 pit

4 1 3

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Baker Creek

  • High value habitat

– Reach 4 – Grayling spawning – Reach 6 – Temperature and nutrients

4 1 3 6

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Baker Creek

  • Other fish habitat and uses

– Every reach is now known to support some fish uses

4 1 3 6 2 5

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Baker Creek

  • Arsenic in sediments – Reach 2, 5, 6

– But other reaches also have areas of contaminated sediments

4 1 3 6 2 5

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Baker Creek

  • Water quality

– Arsenic in Baker Creek comes from water treatment plant – And from upstream 220 kg/yr

4 1 3 6 2 5

300 kg/yr

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Baker Creek

  • Key Concerns

– Physically impacted in mine area – Water quality – Sediment quality – Concerns for fish, muskrat and humans? – Disturbance from sediment remediation?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Tailings

  • South, Central & North Ponds
  • Northwest Pond
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Tailings

  • Foreshore tailings
  • Offshore tailings
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Tailings

  • North, Central & South Ponds

– 7M tonnes tailings covering 51 ha – Sludge ponds

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tailings

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Tailings

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Tailings

  • Seven dams

around Original Impoundments

  • Up to 20 m high
  • Inspected

annually by geotechnical engineer

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Tailings

  • Northwest Pond

– 6.5M tonnes tailings covering 44 ha

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Tailings

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Tailings

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Tailings

  • Six dams around

Northwest Pond

  • 15-20 m high
  • Well engineered

and constructed

  • Inspected annually

by geotechnical engineer

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Tailings

  • Tailings are fine silty powder
  • About 2,000-4,000 mg/kg arsenic
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Tailings

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Sludge Ponds

  • Settling pond and polishing pond

– Water treatment residuals

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Tailings & Sludge Ponds

  • Key concerns

– Dust – Surface exposure of arsenic – Lack of vegetation – Seepage

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Pits

  • Five major pits
  • A2, A1, C1, B2, B1
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Pits

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Pits

  • Five large pits and three small pits

– Table of pits and volumes

Pit Existing Void Volume1 (m3) Pit Plan Area (m2) A1 757,000 48,000 A2 479,000 32,000 C1 372,000 31,000 B1 331,000 22,000 B2 203,000 20,000 B3 56,000 9,000 B4 10,000 4,000 Brock 10,000 2,000 TOTALS 2,218,000 158,000

1 Volume to spill point elevation

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Pits

  • Key concerns

– Safety

  • Steep pit walls are a potential hazard to people
  • Long-term stability of stopes directly below pits
  • Openings to surface

– If Baker Creek channel issues not addressed

  • Flooding could allow water into pits and underground
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Contaminated Soils

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Contaminated Soils

  • Key concerns

– Land use vs soil contamination levels – Soil quality

  • Human risk

– Inhalation / ingestion – Arsenic uptake by vegetation

  • Wildlife

– Disturbance related to soil remediation?

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Buildings

  • Buildings

– In general all buildings on the site will be cleaned and demolished – Five areas with different “issues”

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Buildings

  • Townsite Area

– City interested in four Townsite homes

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Buildings

  • Townsite and A-Shaft

– NWT Mine Heritage Society interested in Community Hall – A-Shaft is a safety hazard

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Buildings

  • Mill Area

– Significant arsenic and asbestos contamination – Requires careful sequence of hazardous material removal, demolition and disposal

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Buildings

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Buildings

  • Tailings Retreatment,

Effluent Treatment, and Akaitcho Shaft

– Some short-term uses – Then demolition and removal

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Buildings

  • Key concerns

– Many remaining buildings contain hazardous materials which could pose risks to workers and environment during demolition if not controlled – Decontamination will generate hazardous wastes requiring safe disposal (either on-site or special facility off-site) – Demolition will generate a large volume of non- hazardous waste requiring on-site disposal

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Roadways

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Roadways

  • Key concerns

– Some road sections contaminated

  • Mine waste rock containing arsenic

– Some roadways impede site drainage

  • Local flooding problems

– Many roadways not required for future uses

  • Occupied land can be rehabilitated
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Other

  • Remediation will create other surface

components

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Other

  • Arsenic trioxide management areas
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Other

  • Water management system
slide-53
SLIDE 53

Other

  • Soil borrow sources
slide-54
SLIDE 54

Other

  • Landfill ???
slide-55
SLIDE 55

Questions?