supervasion project
play

SUPERVASION PROJECT SUPERVISION BY OBSERVATION USING INDUCTIVE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SUPERVASION PROJECT SUPERVISION BY OBSERVATION USING INDUCTIVE PROGRAMMING DAVID NIEVES CORDONES daniecor@dsic.upv.es CARLOS MONSERRAT ARANDA cmonserr@dsic.upv.es JOS HERNNDEZ ORALLO jorallo@dsic.upv.es DAVID NIEVES CORDONES -


  1. SUPERVASION PROJECT SUPERVISION BY OBSERVATION USING INDUCTIVE PROGRAMMING DAVID NIEVES CORDONES daniecor@dsic.upv.es CARLOS MONSERRAT ARANDA cmonserr@dsic.upv.es JOSÉ HERNÁNDEZ ORALLO jorallo@dsic.upv.es DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  2. INTRODUCTION APPROACH INDEX RESULTS QUESTIONS 2

  3. INTRODUCTION SUPERVASION Project Automated assistants that after the observation of how an expert performs a task are able to supervise whether GOAL other humans are performing the task correctly , also by observation. Automated supervision by observation The system should be capable of learning from observations. The learning process should take from one/few HOW demonstrations. The acquired knowledge must be intelligible to humans. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) DOMAIN 3 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  4. INTRODUCTION Domain High-level description MIS resources for trainees Video exercise 4 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  5. APPROACH Elements of Event Calculus* - Events Starts or ends a fluent ( e.g., forceps has just crossed the 5 cm line ) - Low-level fluents A direct observable property that is true along a period of time ( e.g., forceps is inside the 5 cm zone ) - High-level fluents - Extracted from expert explanation (not directly observable) ( e.g., approach the forceps to the bin with the objects ) - Set true because other fluents (usually directly observable ones) are true. * Artikis, A., Sergot, M., & Paliouras, G. (2015). An event calculus for event recognition. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 27(4), 895-908. 5 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  6. APPROACH Elements of Event Calculus “System learns the rules that connect the low-level fluents with the high-level fluents.” Domain approach initiatesF(clip_object(i1,o1),T) :- holdsAt(open(i1),T), holdsAt(in5(i1,g1),T) 6 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  7. APPROACH Supervision by observation Phase 1: KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Phase 2: ONLINE SUPERVISION Event Event Builder Builder Narrative Acquired [Surgeon knowledge Event explanation] Knowledge detection Specific builder Acquired knowledge Knowledge [XHAIL] Detected [RTEC] General and fluents Specific [surgeon Knowledge narration] The system uses the acquired knowledge to The system learns from example supervise the training process of the novel performances and the narrative surgeons 7 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  8. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase Phase 1: KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Phase 2: ONLINE SUPERVISION Event Event Builder Builder Narrative Acquired [Surgeon knowledge Event explanation] Knowledge detection Specific builder Acquired knowledge Knowledge [XHAIL] Detected [RTEC] General and fluents Specific [surgeon Knowledge narration] 8 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  9. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase Phase 1: KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Phase 2: ONLINE SUPERVISION Event Event Builder Builder Narrative Acquired [Surgeon knowledge Event explanation] Knowledge detection Specific builder Acquired knowledge Knowledge [XHAIL] Detected [RTEC] General and fluents Specific [surgeon Knowledge narration] 9 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  10. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase Events detected Predicates in EC {E 1 , TF 1 } happensAt(E 1 , T 1 ). {E 2 , TF 2 } happensAt(E 2 , T 2 ). {E 3 , TF 3 } happensAt(E 3 , T 3 ). {E 4 , TF 4 } happensAt(E 4 , T 4 ). Event happensAt(E 5 , T 5 ). {E 5 , TF 5 } Builder … … . Event Builder (EB) Narrative [Surgeon - Events are extracted from video Knowledge explanation] recordings of experts performing Builder Acquired the training task. knowledge [XHAIL] General and - The EB detects and states the Specific Knowledge order in which events happen, thus generating the corresponding predicates in EC. 10 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  11. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase 11 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  12. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase Phase 1: KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Phase 2: ONLINE SUPERVISION Event Event Builder builder Narrative Acquired [Surgeon knowledge Event explanation] Knowledge detection Specific builder Acquired knowledge Knowledge [XHAIL] Detected [RTEC] General and fluents Specific [surgeon Knowledge narration] 12 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  13. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase Narrative [Surgeon explanation] Event - Extracted from the expert Builder high-level explanation and translated to a sequence of fluents in EC. Narrative [Surgeon Knowledge explanation] - Properties that hold or not at Builder Acquired any instant of time knowledge [XHAIL] General and Specific #example not holdsAt(F 1 , T 1 ). Knowledge #example not holdsAt(F 1 , T 2 ). #example holdsAt(F 1 , T 3 ). #example holdsAt(F 1 , T 4 ). #example not holdsAt(F 1 , T 5 ). #example not holdsAt(F 1 , T 6 ). … . 13 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  14. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase Phase 1: KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Phase 2: ONLINE SUPERVISION Event Event Builder Builder Narrative Acquired [Surgeon knowledge Event explanation] Knowledge detection Specific builder Acquired knowledge Knowledge [XHAIL] Detected General and [RTEC] fluents Specific [surgeon Knowledge narration] 14 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  15. APPROACH Knowledge acquisition phase Low-level fluents PREDICATES holdsAt(F, T) happensAt(E, T) Event initiates(E, F, T) terminates(E, F, T) initially(F) stoppedIn(T1, F, T2) Builder GENERAL AXIOMS holdsAt(F, T) :- initially(F), not stoppenIn(0, F, T) holdsAt(F, T) :- happensAt(E, T1), not stoppedIn(T1, F,T),T1<T Narrative stoppedIn(T1, F, T2) :- happensAt(E, T), T1<T, T<T2, [Surgeon terminates(E, F, T). Knowledge explanation] Builder Acquired knowledge High-level fluents [XHAIL] General and PREDICATES Specific holdsAtF(FF, T). Knowledge initiatesF(FF, T). terminatesF(FF, T) . GENERAL AXIOMS holdsAt(FF, T+1) :- not holdsAt(FF, T), initiatesF(FF, T). holdsAt(FF, T+1) :- holdsAt(FF, T), not terminatesF(FF, T). 15 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  16. APPROACH Online supervision phase Phase 1: KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Phase 2: ONLINE SUPERVISION Event Event Builder Builder Narrative Acquired [Surgeon knowledge Event explanation] Knowledge detection Specific builder Acquired knowledge Knowledge [XHAIL] Detected General and [RTEC] fluents Specific knowledge in [surgeon EC narration] 16 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  17. APPROACH Online supervision phase Phase 1: KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION Phase 2: ONLINE SUPERVISION Event Event Builder Builder Narrative Acquired [Surgeon knowledge Event explanation] Knowledge detection Specific builder Acquired knowledge Knowledge [XHAIL] Detected General and [RTEC] fluents Specific knowledge in [surgeon EC narration] 17 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  18. APPROACH Online supervision phase Detected fluents Event - The output of the Online Builder Supervision phase is the detection of when one high-level fluent starts and ends . Acquired knowledge Event - The success of the detection detection Specific process depends on whether the Knowledge initiatesF/2 and/or terminatesF/2 Detected [RTEC] of the new executions are inside fluents [surgeon the corresponding temporal narration] window. 18 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  19. RESULTS Example exercise We have analysed the ability of the system to learn and monitor Evaluation the MIS high-level fluent clipping . Starts just before one object o1 (contained in one bin g1) is clamped by an instrument i1. Exercise Finishes just when this object o1 is released (in a second bin g2). Scenarios Two performance examples: Scenario A & Scenario B 19 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  20. RESULTS Scenarios Scenario A Scenario B https://github.com/cmonserr/SUPERVASION More examples 20 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  21. RESULTS Rules Scenario A -> Scenario B Rules Scenario A initiatesF(clip_object(i1,o1),T) :- holdsAt(open(i1),T), holdsAt(in5(i1,g1),T) terminatesF(clip_object(i1,o1),T) :- holdsAt(waiting(i1),T), holdsAt(in5(i1,g2),T) 21 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  22. QUESTIONS Open research questions Any alternative to this approach? How can we automate the synchronisation / matching of the high-level fluents (narratives) from the high-level descriptions (natural language)? How can we generalise from multiple examples (different performances) of the same exercise? Is it possible to extract constraints between low-level events from a high-level description? 22 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  23. QUESTIONS Open research questions How can we identify whether all the low-level fluents are proper for this task? Is IP suitable for this task? ? 23 DAVID NIEVES CORDONES - daniecor@dsic.upv.es

  24. Thanks for your attention DAVID NIEVES CORDONES daniecor@dsic.upv.es CARLOS MONSERRAT ARANDA cmonserr@dsic.upv.es JOSÉ HERNÁNDEZ ORALLO jorallo@dsic.upv.es 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend