supernova triggering part i needs and questions
play

Supernova Triggering Part I: Needs and Questions Amanda Weinstein - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Supernova Triggering Part I: Needs and Questions Amanda Weinstein Iowa State University Hierarchy of Needs Most critical to least critical Caveat: This is my (which does not imply items approximation and should at top not important)


  1. Supernova Triggering Part I: Needs and Questions Amanda Weinstein Iowa State University

  2. Hierarchy of Needs • Most critical to least critical Caveat: This is my (which does not imply items approximation and should at top not important) not be taken as “blessed” • Ideally, automatically enable by the SNB group items at top when designing Externally trigger (e.g. for the items on the bottom. SNEWS) a SNB at d < • We need a similar pyramid 15 kpc and record for DAQ requirements physics data Self-trigger a SNB at d > 15 kpc Externally trigger (e.g. SNEWS) a SNB at d < 15 kpc and record physics data Self-trigger a SNB at d < 15 kpc and record physics data 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

  3. Supernova Flowchart End-of-life mass > 1.4 Binary No White companion M ◉ ? (Birth ? mass > 8 M ◉ ) dwarf End-of-life mass Yes > 1.4 M ◉ ? (Birth Yes mass > 8 M ◉ ) Possible thermo- nuclear supernova Explosion Core mass succeeds > 3 M ◉ ? ? We want these CC SNe, neutron star Black hole

  4. What physics do we want to capture? Potentially Potentially detect Si- useful burning information phase at later before times (up to explosion in ~30s) neutrinos Intertwined info about shock development and neutrino physics

  5. Spectral Features • Different oscillation physics in neutrino’s journey from proto- neutron star to us - MSW effects (r > 200 km) - “Collective oscillations:” (r < 200 km) - Vacuum oscillations (once away from star) • Flavor-specific burst evolution carries information about mass ordering and SN processes • Key requirements: - Energy resolution <10% (in our Dasgupta, Dighe, Raffelt and Smirnov control) - Energy threshold ~ 5 MeV (mostly - Well-determined light curves in our control) - Statistics (only partly in our - Time-integrated and time- control) resolved energy spectra

  6. What physics do we want to capture? • We want self-triggering and whatever pointing we can get (alerts to other experiments) - Recall that in early period EM radiation does not escape, but neutrinos do - Neutrinos crucial with weak or dust- obscured SNe - “Failed” SNe: have a distinct neutrino signature (e.g. continuously hardening spectrum, abrupt cutoff) • Pointing information: allows optical, infrared telescopes to be ready and on target - Elastic scattering events are best for this but we don’t get many

  7. Factors controlling statistics Distance (inverse square law) Failure to trigger/record Does the 90% • Energy resolution degradation events near threshold(can number Detector inefficiencies • ameliorate by dumping include both • Not having prompt light (worse t0) raw data in long window) of these? • Other losses (e.g. neutrons) 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

  8. SNB Trigger • What can this mean? • External burst trigger :a vetted alert we send to other experiments • Internal burst trigger: triggering on the supernova as a whole, i.e on a multi-event signature that occurs over a period of time - Pros: could be as simple as looking for characteristic rate changes • Increases robustness against “wiggles” of radiological and other backgrounds • - Cons/challenges: potential for severe model-dependence • Triggering at the event level, i.e. reacting to the present a cluster of “SN-like” interactions - This raises questions like: what exactly do we mean by an “SN-like” event? • These two things are not mutually exclusive—the second is essential to accomplishing the first. • Question : how do DAQ operations change, locally and globally, if an SN trigger is received? 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

  9. Background :Key Numbers • Prototype radiological • Note: Ar 39 rejection requires background: Ar 39 some level of time information - 1 Bq/kg, so 10 7 Hz per 10 kt - Time resolution better than detector 100 ticks (between 20/30 -100 ~2000 hits per drift window from • all Ar 39 in 1x2x6 vs. ~30 from depending on binning) actual neutrino - Individual Ar 39 events low energy and produce isolated • Note: other less-studied hits backgrounds may be higher - # channels needed for rejection energy and tougher to (variable) (K. Warburton) disambiguate. Full disambiguation: 2 to 3 • Raw ADC threshold (2-6, - Don’t yet have hard numbers • threshold dependent) on these. Individual Ar 39 • 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

  10. Burst over time • Early time structure of SN neutrino flux sensitive to mass hierarchy. Good news for physics, bad news for triggering 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

  11. Timescale problems I • Neutronization burst spike is clean, and low-latency, but far from guaranteed! • SNB-like event density over a longer time period could be characteristic. BUT longer latency (in normal hierarchy, increase in events may not be recognizable for as long as 0.1 seconds) . • Do we try for a single robust model independent criteria, or just multiple burst triggers based on different scenarios? 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

  12. Timescale problems II: TPC vs PD • On a completely different note, we have a second timescale problem in the mix • TPC and PD operate on very different timescales • PD efficiency s.t. we likely need to trigger most SN events off TPC • Question: How do we ensure we get max # events with PD information and hence good t0s? 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

  13. Questions in Summary • What defines a single-event SNB trigger? - How local is local, in space and time? I.e. how many channels and how large a time bucket do we need to define a single-event SN trigger without other (e.g. radiological) backgrounds swamping us? - We’ve made some progress on this with Ar 39 but still fear the unknown unknowns. - How do we reconcile the timescales of the different systems (TPC vs. PD)? • What defines a burst-level trigger? - How big a chunk of the burst do we need to accumulate data from before the burst- level trigger is robust? - How do we reduce our model dependence in the burst-level trigger definition? - What do we tolerate in terms of fake rate internally vs. in terms of alert rate? • What precisely does DAQ do in response to an SNB trigger? (see part II) • What is the maximal amount of compression we can tolerate before losing 5 MeV threshold and/or degrading energy resolution at low energies? (relevant to external triggering) 10/9/2017 Amanda Weinstein DUNE DAQ

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend